Pros: Tungsten weights placed low and deep in the head encourage a high launch.

Cons: Only one shaft option. Golfers with faster swing speeds could create too much spin with these, and their turf interaction, particularly from the rough, leaves something to be desired.

Who’s it for: Low-spin golfers seeking a favorable distance-to-dollar ratio.

Overview

This year’s Nickent offering includes the F30 Ti fairways and hybrids, which are replete with multi-material compositions that are designed to provide high launch, sturdy forgiveness and booming distance.

An ultra-thin stainless steel crown allows unnecessary weight to be positioned low and back in the clubhead. In addition, the sole is tungsten-cast and the result of these two is a center of gravity (CG), which sits low and deep in the clubhead. The face of the club is a brazed titanium rather than steel. This effectively allows you to get driver-esque distances with fairways and hybrids.

IMG_2573IMG_2576

The F30 Ti fairway comes in lofts of 13, 14.5 and 17 degrees. The 13 and 14.5-degree woods have stock length of 43.5 inches whereas the 17-degree is 43 inches.

IMG_2566

The F30 Ti hybrid is available in No.’s 2-5 with corresponding lofts of 15, 18, 21 and 24 degrees. The stock and only shaft offering is the Grafalloy Boost Graphite, which is available in regular and stiff flex (50-to-60 grams depending on shaft flex). The skinnier profile of the Boost is stated to reduce drag by up to 15 percent and this, in theory, increases swing speed. The Micro-Mesh Tip Technology is engineered to provide additional tip stability so shots stay true and straight. Neither club offers adjustability with loft or face angle and is only available in right-hand.

MSRP for each club is $229, although the fairway woods are listed for $89.99 and the hybrids are listed for $79.99 on Dick’s website.

The Review

You want workability? The F30 Ti can move the ball. Up. Down. Left. Right. Far. The stock shaft was certainly light and whippy, however, I could hit a variety of shots on multiple trajectories. That said, the biggest win for this club is the distance it offers. It’s not longer than competitors, but for the right swing it isn’t much shorter either. In fact, it’s plausible that a non-brand specific customer will look at the list of included technologies and bag it with few, if any, regrets.

The 3 wood as tested (14.5 degrees) produced a carry right at 245-to-250 yards. The trajectory was noticeably higher than other models (see comparison chart below) and mishits were penalized, but distance loss was minimal, if not insignificant. This is significantly shorter than my gamer, but that’s due in large part to the stock shaft and excessive spin/launch I created as a result.

IMG_2574

The Numbers

TaylorMade SLDR 3 Wood (16 degrees) with Fujikura Motore Speeder TS 8.3 TP (stiff)

  • Average Launch Angle: 14 degrees
  • Average Spin Rate: 2700 rpm
  • Average Ball Speed: 152 mph
  • Average Carry Distance: 258 yards
  • Average Total Distance: 271 yards

Cobra Bio Cell+ 3 Wood (15 degrees) w/ Matrix Red Tie 6Q3 (stiff)

  • Average Launch Angle: 13 degrees
  • Average Spin Rate: 3000 rpm
  • Average Ball Speed: 154 mph
  • Average Carry Distance: 261 yards
  • Average Total Distance: 277 yards

Nickent F30 Ti 3 Wood (14.5 degrees) w/ Grafalloy Boost (stiff)

  • Average Launch Angle: 17 degrees
  • Average Spin Rate: 3800 rpm
  • Average Ball Speed: 148 mph
  • Average Carry Distance: 253 yards
  • Average Total Distance: 256 yards

For each club, I hit 15-to-20 balls both off the tee and off the deck. All distances were measured using a Flightscope X2 launch monitor and standard Callaway range balls.

IMG_2565

Both the Nickent fairway wood and hybrid did well off the tee and from clean lies, but struggled in varied conditions. Turf interaction out of the rough was a bit awkward (think 7th grade dance awkward) where every swing seemed an onerous task and given the inconsistent results, this was a bit of a letdown. Like the fairway wood, the 3 hybrid (18 degrees) demonstrated decent distance even though it spun like a top inside a washing machine on spin cycle.

My hunch is the lack of an adjustable hosel is a cost-saving measure and single lofts/shaft offerings reduces the number of SKU’s for big box stores. Given that it’s 2014 and more and more companies are pushing limits of adjustability and shaft offerings, it’s clear this club isn’t designed to compete against the big boys.

IMG_2569

It’s kind of like your mom bought you an authentic jersey, but what you hoped would be embroidered and tackle-twill… is just silk-screened. The aesthetic properties of the F30 leave a lot to be desired and come off as imbalanced and cheap, but the matte black crown and black face look great. This coupled with the classic rounded profile gives the F30 a simple and understated silhouette.

IMG_2578

People like fish, but don’t want it to taste fishy. Generally, golfers like metal woods, but don’t want them to feel too metallic. It isn’t “hail on an aluminum roof” bad, but it’s not significantly better.

The Takeaway

This gets Triple P status. Price Point Product. For the right golfer with average to below average swing speed, there is enough performance to give reason for excitement… and purchase. The use of varied metals and current technologies is impressive in its own right and if the [high-launch + faster swing = longer distance] equation is one you’re after, the F30 Ti is one to try.

Your Reaction?
  • 11
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Previous articleThink you've got to "give it a run" on must-make putts? Think again
Next articleIn club fitting, three swings is all it takes
I didn't grow up playing golf. I wasn't that lucky. But somehow the game found me and I've been smitten ever since. Like many of you, I'm a bit enthusiastic for all things golf and have a spouse which finds this "enthusiasm" borderline ridiculous. I've been told golf requires someone who strives for perfection, but realizes the futility of this approach. You have to love the journey more than the result and relish in frustration and imperfection. As a teacher and coach, I spend my days working with amazing middle school and high school student athletes teaching them to think, dream and hope. And just when they start to feel really good about themselves, I hand them a golf club!

19 COMMENTS

Not seeing your comment? Read our rules and regulations. Click "Report comment" to alert GolfWRX moderators to offensive or inappropriate comments.
  1. I went to DSG today looking for a 200 yard club, picked up the Nickent 20* Stiff F30 based on price and color scheme (HOW SHALLOW), any way, the Nickent had a very good feel when struck on and off center. The launch monitor was showing 195-200 carry and 205-215 with rollout. Is it a good club, YES. Is it long, NO! The same degree of hybrid from Callawy and Adams gave me 230-240 (carry&roll). So even with the Ti face its still shorter. I still bought it b/c like i said, i was looking for a 200 yarder that’s easy to hit and land soft, not a hybrid that’s going to compete with my 5 wood and throw my yardages off.

  2. Sound like this club is for the guy who swings in the 85-95 range. He will get the height and spin to hit a good golf shot instead of hitting low, poor carry 3 woods and hybrids. He will hit the ball further and will spin it much less that the author did who is generating at least 105mph with the 3 wood if not more. Most golfers can’t get enough spin with something like an SLDR and the shaft in the Cobra is low spin also. Spin creates height and carry. The low spin craze has people hitting too many low shots. Guy says I killed it, it went 280 but he carried it 230 and it rolled 50 yards. Fine and dandy if there is no “lake”, bunker, rough or wet fairways. I will admit though, that is why adjustability is nice.

  3. Interesting. I bet if they tested a club that said “Maltby” on it, it would have faired better in their review. To my knowledge, starting with the 6dx series, Nickent clubs are being produced by Maltby for Dicks Sporting Goods. With that in mind I’d bet that the technology in them is sound.

  4. I am confused, can some of you “Elite” golfers enlighten me, this club was bashed because? Its not on tour? Its now $299? There was a thread earlier on why golf is loosing players and how to gain some. Maybe this would be a good start, educating those who bash players who’s clubs are NOT tour issue and cost more than a home mortgage payment that maybe they CANT AFFORD THEM!! grow the h**l up, and yes, I was among those who used played with 6+ year old clubs and used golf balls. .
    Now, a C- minus because if may spin too much for “some” players? hey how about this, judge or rate the clubs on their target player range? or maybe have more than ONE tester? say, a Low-Mid AND HIGH handicapper and see who benefits the most,,,

  5. Like JBH says, I thought Nickent was toast as well. I used to have a couple of their Genex hybrids and arc wedges and they performed quite well for me. Too bad they went sideways. If they kept going with their R&D they could have been a decent niche player in the market instead of where they are now.

  6. I thought Nickent went the way of the dodo… I used to play their ARC blade irons and absolutely loved them, especially because I paid $250.00 for the set brand new as they were being cleared out.

  7. LOL. Looks like the writers at GolfWRX finally found something to give a bad review. Next up, give a bad review to a legitimate brand, not a virtual unknown, unless you shop at Golf Galaxy or Dick’s… What’s next? Are you going to review Macgregor clubs?

LEAVE A REPLY