Connect with us

Equipment

Blurred Lines: Mizuno launches JPX-900 Tour irons

Published

on

Mizuno, which has set the golden standard for players irons over the years, is blurring the lines between a blade iron and a forged cavity back with its new JPX-900 Tour irons. The new irons pass the eye-test for a blade, but they’re pumped up with performance features usually reserved for Mizuno’s bulkier JPX irons.

A Mizuno JPX-900 Tour 6 iron at address.

A Mizuno JPX-900 Tour 6 iron at address.

Like Mizuno’s MP iron models, which are designed for the most discerning and skilled golfers, the JPX-900 Tour irons are made from Mizuno’s Grain Flow forged 1025E Mild Carbon Steel to give golfers the familiar soft, solid feel for which Mizuno is known.

“We wanted to make the best Grain Flow Forged iron ever,” says David Llewellyn, Mizuno’s Director of R&D.

What’s different about the JPX-900 Tour irons is the more aggressive styling, which is part form, part function. The addition of Mizuno’s angular “Power Frame” to the cavity increases moment of inertia (MOI), which makes the irons more forgiving. Yet according to Llewellyn, the refined cavity-back irons should be an easy transition for its staff players, Chris Wood and Luke Donald, who currently use the company’s MP-5 blade irons.

JPX900_Tour_CloseUp 1

Mizuno’s MP-64 irons, a forged cavity-back that many in the Mizuno community believe to be the best-feeling Mizuno iron in recent memory, was used as the benchmark for the acoustics of the JPX-900 Tour irons. By using the company’s HIT (Harmonic Impact Technology) system, which measures and quantifies sound frequencies, Mizuno was able to mimic the acoustics of the MP-64 irons while improving on their construction.

Specs

MizunoJPX900Tourironspecs

In terms of looks, the JPX-900 Tour irons are smaller than the MP-25 irons released in 2015, with a lower toe height and a “more modern design” than the MP-25 irons, Llewellyn says. Another note of distinction: the soles of the JPX-900 Tour irons which are thinnest ever used on a JPX model, and feature the same sole geometries Mizuno has been giving its MP irons for several generations. This design will create more versatility than ever from a JPX offering, something better players will surely appreciate.

JPX900_Tour_3Clubs+Shafts

The stock shaft for the JPX-900 Tour irons is True Temper’s Dynamic Gold AMT, which uses an ascending weight design to improve performance of each iron. In the X100 flex, for example, the 3-iron shaft weighs roughly 115 grams, while the pitching wedge shafts weighs about 130 grams. The lighter long-iron shafts help golfers hit higher-flying long-iron shots, making it easier to hit and hold greens, while the heavier short iron shafts provide added stability for greater precision.

JPX900_Tour+GolfPride

Mizuno’s JPX-900 Tour irons, available Sept. 16, will sell for $1,199.99 in either steel or graphite. There is no upcharge for custom shafts or grips.

Related

Your Reaction?
  • 729
  • LEGIT97
  • WOW75
  • LOL12
  • IDHT13
  • FLOP6
  • OB7
  • SHANK48

He played on the Hawaii Pacific University Men's Golf team and earned a Masters degree in Communications. He also played college golf at Rutgers University, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism.

49 Comments

49 Comments

  1. Ufourix

    Aug 22, 2016 at 7:34 am

    Will they be offered in Left Handed??

  2. TWShoot67

    Aug 16, 2016 at 3:52 pm

    I use to play Mizuno blades for the longest time 14’s, 29’s and even the 33’s. Didn’t like the 32’s, but these look like they might be that perfect go between blade and cb. If they feel like my old time dizzy blades with a little extra punch Mizuno may have me back. But for now I’m sticking with my King Cobra pro mb/cb’s. Definitely can’t wait to demo. Love the minimal offset, one thing I din’t like about the 29’s in the scoring clubs was the huge amount of offset thus the Tiger combo of 29’s in long irons and 14’s in scoring clubs.

  3. tonks

    Aug 15, 2016 at 7:26 am

    I am using Mizuno TP9s with DG S400 shafts for the last four years (designed in 1986). I bought them from someone who had only used them four times from new (they were still in the original Mizuno box!). I find them well balanced and accurate and they look fantastic. The loft of the 7 iron is 37 degrees. Does anyone have any thoughts as to how they compare with MPs and JPXs should I want to change to a modern club?

  4. Tim

    Aug 12, 2016 at 7:50 pm

    Does anyone else see the Ping s55 when you look at these irons? The toe portion of the cavity is identical as well as the general shape of the cavity. Overall design goal is exactly what the s55 achieved: smaller, players cavity back iron. Good news for all the fans of Ping’s S line who have being asking Ping to forge their clubs.

    • KK

      Aug 13, 2016 at 9:47 pm

      Just the high toe weighting. Everything else is very different, including the unseen tech.

    • Double Mocha Man

      Mar 17, 2017 at 11:04 am

      Does anyone else see the Titleist AP1 and AP2 irons when they look at the back of these clubs?

  5. Dane

    Aug 12, 2016 at 3:56 pm

    To bad Mizuno doesn’t offer the Dynamic Gold Tour Issue shafts in custom. That’s my favorite iron shaft. These irons would be awesome paired with those shafts. Most of the club manufacturers carry that shaft but for some reason Mizuno does not.

    • L

      Aug 12, 2016 at 4:30 pm

      Not this again.
      There is no need for those shafts. Mizuno can build their clubs to precise spec with the standard ones. No need to spend the extra money for labels

      • Dane

        Aug 14, 2016 at 1:51 am

        It’s not just labels. The Tour Issue model has a tighter tolerance and are more consistent compared to the standard shafts. I can feel the difference between the two and others can agree with me. It’s the #1 shaft model on Tour. Titleist, TaylorMade, Callaway and Ping offer that shaft but not Mizuno. That’s unfortunate in my honest opinion.

        Also, Go to TrueTemper.com where they have a video explaining the differences between the two shafts. Your not paying more for a label, your paying more for a better, tighter tolerance and more consistent shaft.

        • Jim

          Aug 14, 2016 at 11:39 pm

          ….and everyone on tour was ALSO SST Pured….every shaft can be found to have a most stable plane to install in the head for optimum feel & performance.

          while it’s been illegal to manufacture a shaft specifically with a ‘spine’ to be inserted in a specific orientation, It’s not illegal to ‘find’ it in a shaft and reinstall it so it lies on a better axis…

          I’m diggin KBS now after being an original Brunswick Rifle defector from DG X100’s

        • Christopher

          Aug 15, 2016 at 11:05 am

          From what I remember originally they’re the same shaft, just cherry-picked. There wouldn’t be any difference in feel or performance between two shafts weighted the same, with the same playing characteristics. The only difference would be the label and the upcharge.

          An expert clubmaker could cherry pick the same exact Dynamic Gold shafts off the rack and there would be no difference, apart from the price. You’re only paying more for True Temper to sort the shafts correctly, which is arguably something they should do in the first place.

        • Scooter McGavin

          Aug 15, 2016 at 4:52 pm

          No, you can’t feel the difference.

          • Eric

            Aug 16, 2016 at 8:55 pm

            Some players won’t feel the difference between the standard shafts versus Tour Issue shafts but good players will. Plus the Tour Issue shafts look better with the Tour Issue shaft band.

            • Christopher

              Aug 17, 2016 at 4:10 pm

              They’re the same shaft, so they’re imagining a difference. The only difference is that each shaft will match your other shafts in your irons to a tighter margin, but you could cherry pick the standard Dynamic Gold shafts to achieve the same result. Imagine if you bought new pool balls for your 9-ball table, one or two balls are slightly heavier or lighter than the others, that would be your Dynamic Gold set, and the Tour Issue’s would all be same weight. They’re the same balls, they just have tighter quality control with the Tour Issues.

  6. MP-4

    Aug 12, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    “…should be an easy transition for its staff players.” Highly doubt LD would move from the MP-5 to a JPX iron. Going to be awhile before anything surpasses the MP-5. Looking forward to the JPX 900 driver though, which I think is the most interesting club of the new JPX line.

  7. bogeypro

    Aug 12, 2016 at 9:34 am

    What is your beef with Mizuno? Did they touch you inappropriately or something? They make great equipment. Don’t get mad at them if you can’t play it…

    • smizzletroll

      Aug 12, 2016 at 11:58 am

      no, they didn’t touch him, thats his beef. professional troll of golf message boards, ridiculously sad…

  8. KK

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:51 pm

    Beautiful but these don’t look very forgiving– basically an MB. Tour is a good name.

  9. Dat

    Aug 11, 2016 at 8:53 pm

    I think they look very different for Mizuno in a good way. Really looks like the engineers spent their time on this one. A true leap in the generation of their products. I don’t care what they call them as long as they perform.

  10. Double Mocha Man

    Aug 11, 2016 at 6:54 pm

    They look like a streamlined version of the Titleist AP-2 irons.

  11. Tom Duckworth

    Aug 11, 2016 at 5:11 pm

    I have never owned a set of Mizuno irons but have always wanted to . Just never got around to it. I have some Wilson FG Tour V2s with some Nippon shafts that I just can’t kick out of the bag. These look really nice I never liked the looks of the 800 series and didn’t think the MPs were right for me. The MP-64s are beautiful and I was thinking about getting a used set for fun and to try them out. Maybe I’ll have to look into these. This is the first series of JPX irons that look good to me funny I always thought MPs were some of the best looking irons out there and JPX the worst . Hope to see some reviews soon. Maybe Mizuno will want some WRX testers.

  12. Brian

    Aug 11, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    You should stick with your Callaways and their 29 degree 7 iron.

  13. Jay

    Aug 11, 2016 at 2:57 pm

    While the “no upcharge” is nice, if you prefer a more stock shaft – DG S300 – kind of have to feel you are getting hosed.

    • DJ

      Aug 11, 2016 at 5:24 pm

      Why would anyone take a chevy when the caddilac is the same price? They are not targeting the cheap end with these irons.

    • Jim

      Aug 14, 2016 at 11:30 pm

      Actually, it was a huge, smart move from Callaway…First year of Apex irons, they knew they were so good – and 1099 – $100 more than other big OEM’s ‘BEST’ they offered whichever shaft you needed for no upcharge. That helped make them a huge successs.
      When Rocketblades died a painful death after only 8 months and Speedblades (the next ‘greatest iron ever made’) came out with the same POS $9.00 shaft as Rocketblades for $899, getting into Apex (a FAR better head) w/KBS C-Tapers or Project X’s for 200 more wasn’t that big a stretch for shoppers.

      it’s a smart move for every OEM. Cripes – even Adams put CTapers in that funky black head a couple years ago, and they came to market for 699. It destroyed that dog Speedblade head…

      DG’s are reliable shafts – the standard we judge from – kinda like an IBM Mainframe – but if for no extra charge, you can
      definitely get a better feeling better performing stick.

      it always goes back to getting fit by an expert – with outdoor ball flight & proper launch monitor… Steel shaft tech has been blowin’ up big time in last 5 years. Take advantage of it!

  14. Bl

    Aug 11, 2016 at 12:51 pm

    Looks cool. Smaller than the MP-25? Even better.

  15. Chuck

    Aug 11, 2016 at 12:10 pm

    1. So no tungsten in the soles or the toes? Do they accomplish most of what is going on with the tungsten inserts in other brands, with just the shape of the perimeter weighting? I’d be fine with that. My gripe with the tungsten-weighted Titleists was that the head was just a shade too compact for my own tastes.

    2. Are these the strongest lofts that Mizuno has ever offered?

    3. I would want a lot more information on the sole grinds. Does Mizuno offer anything custom in that regard? Can you order a blunted leading edge?

    4. So is this the prelude to a new MP model?

    • Brian

      Aug 11, 2016 at 12:55 pm

      1. Mizuno has never used tungsten inserts in their irons and these do not depart from that standard.
      2. These have the same loft specs as the MP-25, MP-15, and MP-5; so no, these aren’t lofted strong.
      3. You would likely have to order custom sole grinds from Mizuno’s Yoro arm and should expect to pay a premium to do so.
      4. No idea

      • tl

        Aug 11, 2016 at 4:30 pm

        And, they are also still 1/4″ shorter than Titleist

        • kloyd0306

          Aug 12, 2016 at 8:57 pm

          Don’t you mean that Titleist are 1/4 inch longer than Mizuno?

          There is no industry standard for length. Who is to say that Titleist’s lengths are the correct length? Besides, stock lengths are only for stock clubs and if you are buying stock clubs from anyone, you may as well drive a car that does not have an adjustable seat, an adjustable steering wheel or adjustable mirrors.

          Mizuno measures length WITHOUT the grip. Titleist measures length WITH the grip. There is still a small difference but not a 1/4 inch when both are finished.

  16. Justin

    Aug 11, 2016 at 11:34 am

    If they are in fact smaller than the MP25s then I’ll be salivating over these. May have to work up a combo set with MP25 4 and 5 irons

  17. Dj

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:59 am

    Look like 716 ap2

    • Scooter McGavin

      Aug 11, 2016 at 1:38 pm

      Yeah, except that they don’t.

    • Brian

      Aug 11, 2016 at 4:08 pm

      They look like the club that the Ap2 aspires to be.

      • Dj

        Aug 11, 2016 at 5:50 pm

        Except ap2 will outsell by 20 times

        • Brian

          Aug 12, 2016 at 8:39 am

          I’m not a Mizuno shareholder, so their sales aren’t a concern of mine.

  18. rpm300

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:52 am

    They look nice, but as usual for Mizuno, they have way too muck offset in the short irons.

  19. Alex

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:23 am

    My gosh, those look incredible. However, am I the only person who thinks those grooves seem like they’re extending too far on the toe?

  20. sumsum

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:21 am

    I hear they will be offering Recoil now with no upcharge, might make this a mean set!

  21. Marty Moose

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:06 am

    Mizuno makes very nice clubs. If I were one of the current Nike staffers, I’d be talking to Mizuno. Even if that means a pay cut. Prob turn out to to be the same $ if they continue to wear Nike clothing.

  22. Nolanski

    Aug 11, 2016 at 10:01 am

    Pretty

  23. LabraeGolfer

    Aug 11, 2016 at 9:56 am

    Best selling irons of 2016-2017…. Well should be anyway at least for better players. They look fantastic and they are Mizuno’s so I know they will perform.

    • Mikec

      Aug 12, 2016 at 9:12 am

      So you are making a predication that these will lead iron sales??

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Equipment

WRX Spotlight: Sense Golf Grips

Published

on

In putting, just as in the rest of golf, you often hear the term “line up square” for best results. With the all-new Sense S1 and R1 grips, you can now take the idea of lining up square to a whole new level.

Speaking to level, Sense isn’t just creating a square grip either—it’s about an entire grip system designed to help you find the exact feel and weight distribution that allows you to create the most consistent putting stroke possible. They achieve this with their patented S.A.W. (Sliding Adjustable Weight) system that is hidden out of sight inside the grip and the shaft of your putter.

The S.A.W. System comes with different adjustable weights that move up and down a carbon fiber rod under your hands to create different feels for the users. The placement positions are endless since there are no specific looking points and with the option to also purchase addition weights, there is bound to one combo that gives you exactly what you want. The stock kit comes with 30 g, 20 g, and 10 g weights that can all be used at once (or not at all) to fine-tune weight placement and overall balance point of the entire putter.

There have been a lot of great weight-shifting ideas brought to putters over the last couple of years, but many of them involve purchasing a whole new putter to take advantage of the technology. With the Sense Grip you just need the kit and you can try it in any putter you want, which for those people that love their current putter means not having to make a wholesale change.

From Sense: “The S1 & R1 grips are designed to have the sides of the grip parallel to the putter face. This design gives the golfer a heightened sense of where the putter face is at all points of the putting stroke.”

The theory of a square grip has been applied in other sports like ping-pong for a long time. The squared-off shape creates better awareness of the angle of the paddle to help a player direct and spin the ball as desired. It works the same with the Sense Grip but at much slower speeds and with the desire to hit it perfectly straight.

Sense Grips and additional weights can be found directly from their website: SENSEGOLFGRIPS.COM and for a tutorial on how to install one, our very own Brian Knudson shows you how below.

 

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Forum Thread of the Day: “Best grip for cold winter weather?”

Published

on

Today’s Forum Thread of the Day comes from eagles1 who created the topic dedicated to the best winter grips. Eagles1 is on the lookout for grips which “remain tacky” during the winter months, and our members share the grips (and gloves) which have consistently worked best for them during the cold.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • RobotDoctor: “I game BestGrips Microperf (Augusta model) throughout the year, warm and cold weather. These leather slip-on grips are outstanding warm or cold. At least they work for me and feel much better than rubber grips.”
  • PreppySlapCut: “Tough to beat the Tour Wrap 2G, here.”
  • gripandrip: “I use the FJ winter gloves and have had no issues with grip… with the Z5, UTX and Tour wrap. Maybe the gloves?”
  • kleinheinz: “Lamkin Sonar is great in cold weather.”

Entire Thread: “Best grip for cold winter weather?”

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Forum Thread of the Day: : “Can a club be a perfect performer but too ugly to play?”

Published

on

Today’s Forum Thread of the Day comes from Patrik1982 and discusses the question of whether a club can be an excellent performer but too ugly to keep in the bag. Our members share their thoughts on the matter, with the majority siding with performance over aesthetics.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • Tim Sherwood: “Taylormade R9 irons. I have bought, sold, regretted selling, bought again, sold and so on 3 times now. I love the cavity badging, feel and performance of those irons, but every time I bring them back, I remember just how comically oversized they are, and I can’t play them. Shame really, they are a great product if they fit your eye.”
  • boggyman: “If it works, who cares what it looks like? My current gamers are from the early ’90s. They’re not new or the latest iron but just flat out work!!”Emerich: “I feel this way about some of those ridiculous new putters – for me, I just don’t want to look down and see that.”
  • BIG STU: “I say it is subjective— And I will be the first to tell you if I do not like the looks at address I more than likely can not and will not hit it. That changed for me about a year or so ago. I had always thought ALL hybrids were ugly. Now I could tolerate the early TM Rescues to some extent, but they were hook machines. I ended up on a bulk trade deal acquiring an older Adams A-12 OS 23* with a Pro Launch Red shaft in it. That thing is fugly, but I figured out with a hosel adjustment and some lead tape in the toe to make it anti hook for me. Like I said that thing is ugly, but I love it, and you would have to pry it from my cold dead fingers. A good friend of mine who is getting up in age but is still an accomplished player and lifetime PGA member told me ” It does not matter what a club looks like if you can hit it and it works for you” I had sorta adopted that line of thought previously being brand agnostic, but after that hybrid experiment I have also adopted his policy too.”
  • slimreaper30: “Tools, man. Tools.”

Entire Thread: “Can a club be a perfect performer but too ugly to play?”

Your Reaction?
  • 2
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Facebook

Trending