Connect with us

Equipment

Ping i irons: What you need to know

Published

on

Ping’s i irons ($135 per club with steel, $150 per club with graphite) irons have a satin-brushed finish, and are available in 3-9, PW, UW. Default color code is blue. Stock swing weight is D1-D2.

Ping’s Stock Shafts: CFS Distance Steel (Soft R, R, S, X), CFS Graphite (65 Soft R, 70 Regular, 80 Stiff)
No Upcharge Custom Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold (S300, X100), True Temper Project X (5.0, 6.0), True Temper XP 95 (R, S), Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 105 (S, X)

Related: Our full review of Ping’s i irons

What you need to know

  • Ping’s i irons replace the company’s i25 irons, which were cast from 17-4 stainless steel. The i25 irons made our Gear Trials: Best Players Irons list in both 2014 and 2015, earning best-of-the-pack marks in forgiveness. They were widely considered to be the most-forgiving irons in their class.
  • The i irons are cast from a softer material, 431 stainless steel, and for that reason most golfers will identify the i irons as having “better feel.” A 431 stainless steel construction was also used in Ping’s Glide wedges (click here to read our full review).
  • The most common criticism of Ping’s i25 irons (click here to read our review) was that they didn’t fly as far as other irons in their class, which was a product of their solid-face construction and average lofts (33-degree 7 iron). The i irons have 1-degree stronger standard lofts (32-degree 7 iron) in the 3-8 irons, so they’ll fly slightly farther.
  • Like the i25 irons, the i irons have a “progressive design,” which means that as the iron number decreases (i.e. PW, 9 iron, 8 iron) the clubs have gradually longer blade lengths, wider soles and more offset to help golfers hit the clubs higher and farther. The short irons in the set have relatively short blade lengths, narrow soles and minimal offset, which is said to make the easier-to-hit clubs more precise.
  • The shape of the i irons is slightly different than the i25 irons, with slightly thinner top lines, less offset and wider soles. The added trailing edge relief on the soles of the i irons, however, make the two irons play with the same effective sole width as the i25 irons.

Ping i iron specs

Ping_I_irons_specs

  • According to Ping, the 431 stainless steel frame of the i irons has an inherently higher strength-to-weight ratio, which allowed the company to make them even more forgiving than previous i-series irons that were made of 17-4 stainless steel (i25, i20, i15, etc.).
  • Ping’s Custom Tuning Port (CTP), a crevice behind the face of the iron that is filled with an elastomer weight, has been moved deeper in the cavity and lower behind the face of the iron. Unlike previous Ping irons, the CTP is now fully concealed in the iron head. The CTP’s slight movement downward and deeper in the iron head aligns it more directly behind the impact area for better energy transfer and a better feel.
  • Like previous i-series irons, a tungsten weight is used in the toe area of the 3-7 irons, improving the MOI (moment of inertia), a measure of forgiveness.
  • The stock length of the i irons is 0.25 inches longer in the 3-9 irons than the i25 irons. Longer clubs are generally swung faster by golfers, and the change can lead to more distance. Ping’s i 7 iron has a stock length of 37 inches.

Related

Your Reaction?
  • 360
  • LEGIT71
  • WOW57
  • LOL11
  • IDHT19
  • FLOP17
  • OB9
  • SHANK51

49 Comments

49 Comments

  1. Chris

    Aug 5, 2015 at 5:26 pm

    Why all the hate over a club that most have never had a chance to hit? I have played blades for years, MP 14, MP 33, Tits 695, and Tits 712 MB and have liked all of those mentioned. With that said I had a chance to hit these a couple days ago, got fitted, and am now waiting to put them into the bag. With the extra forgiveness, lower dispersion, and maintained ability to work the ball I would welcome a friendly round with any of the blade snobs posting BS comments above. Just saying, look at the tour and ask yourself why more and more are moving away from blades? Maybe because nobody wants to be penalized a couple strokes for loosing concentration for a nano second or being a little fatigued on the last hole and blowing a round due to sloppy form?

  2. Joe

    Jul 31, 2015 at 9:52 pm

    The Ping clubs aren’t anymore jacked-up than the other manufacturers. You don’t have to play jacked-up clubs, just keep the clubs you currently play. What stronger and stronger clubs eventually get to is that the 3 iron and 4 iron get to be too hard to hit. What happens then, you have to replace them with hybrids, and of course more wedges. So in the long run you have really gained nothing, just helping support the golf industry.
    I don’t replace my irons very often, and certainly not every 1 or 2 new versions. New versions are more hype than reality.
    Do I like the new Pings, I haven’t tried them but I do like Pings. I have no immediate plans to replace my current Ping Karsten’s. If I did it might be with my original Eye 2 BeCu, with 50 degree wedge.

  3. ScottC

    Jul 28, 2015 at 9:55 am

    I was able to hit these irons last week at a local course. I liked them enough to get fitted the next day…outdoor fitting, launch monitor, with a PGA teaching pro. I play to a 6, using Mizuno JPX irons. Yes, they are shovels…too much offset, too big a sole, but good distance when struck well. I am not a long hitter, 240 yard drives, hit 7 iron about 150 carry.

    What I found in the fitting was very interesting….I have been playing with irons that are too short for my swing…about 1/2 ito 3/4 nch too short. With the proper length club I was hitting ball in the middle of the club face….hit the PING 7 iron about 170 carry (on launch monitor) vs. 160 with the JPX. Dispersion was much tighter as well. Same loft on the Mizuno 7 iron vs. the PING 7 iron – 32 degrees.

    In the end, my spec’s were Blue lie angle, 1/2 longer. I hit about 100 balls with this setup after the fitting and was very happy with distance, direction, turf interaction, shaft, etc. I found it to be a very comfortable club for me.

    Give them a try and see if you like them. YMMV.

  4. David

    Jul 25, 2015 at 11:47 pm

    Perhaps a step backward for Ping. The i25 was never meant to be a distance club and its accuracy beats any iron out there. Here is what went wrong for Ping. They wanted the iE1 to go farther so how did they do this? Simple. They made the stock shaft 1/2 inch longer. Yep. It works..but it sacrifices accuracy in the process. 7 extra offline yards. Go for it. I’ll stick with my i25’s.

  5. Bobby Marshall

    Jul 18, 2015 at 12:08 am

    The lofts are perfect. This is the way all manufacturers should do it. So then you go 45, 50, 55, 60.

    The problem is the softer steel. They better not put that 431 crap in the next S-line.

  6. KK

    Jul 17, 2015 at 8:20 am

    People complain about jacked lofts but every single iron comparison will mention distance and which is longest, which is middle of the pack and which is shortest. Your iron company does not want to end up last in that comparison.

  7. rymail00

    Jul 17, 2015 at 1:37 am

    I’m not a club engineer but aren’t must “jacked up lofts” because of perimeter weighting and putting the CG lower? So if you have an older model 47* pw that hits a max height of say for the sake of arguement 100ft and carries 100 yards or a 45* pw that reaches the same peak height of 100 feet but goes 115 yards what’s the problem? Clubs now have more weight lower in the back than clubs from a decade ao. So having newer models hit the baller a lot higher you’ve got to lower the loft but still get close to the same peak height.

    Or maybe I’m just confused on what you guys are talking about. 🙂

    In 95% of the rounds or tourneys I play in the first question asked is what did you shoot? Not what iron I hit into the par3 8th hole. The number on the club plays very little role in the out come of score.

    Who knows maybe I just look at it differently.

  8. Batman

    Jul 16, 2015 at 3:00 pm

    Looks like another solid set from Ping. This are attractive option to an aging/retired mini-tour hack like me.

  9. Evan

    Jul 16, 2015 at 1:22 pm

    I like the look and adjustments made compared to the i25. Not quite as pure looking as the s55… Can’t have everything. Incredible no extra charge with the Modus 105 option! With the Modus 105 become a free option on the S55?

  10. MartyMoose09

    Jul 16, 2015 at 8:54 am

    Since i25 and Karsten irons are now in the classic section, looks as though these are a combo of the i25 and G30 while the Gmax are a combo of the G30 & Karsten irons.

  11. Car Ram Rod

    Jul 16, 2015 at 2:04 am

    I guess I’m in the minority here, but I think they are brilliant. I had a chance to see these in person and they have a great look to them, slightly improved to the already popular i25. Less offset, improved head shape, softer feel…..what am I missing here?!?!? Haha.

    As far as the freaking out over the stronger lofts, I don’t quite get it. Ping has the best engineers in the business, don’t you think they product tested and number crunched quite a few fitting sessions before bringing these to the market?

    Ping doesn’t have short product cycles, they’re stepping up to the plate with a couple new iron models they feel good about and they think will help you ‘play your best.’ I wouldn’t let the spec sheet put a bad taste in your mouth before you have them in your hands. Just my opinion.

  12. Joke

    Jul 16, 2015 at 1:44 am

    Pfffffft! Stock lie is BLUE dot? huh? Wha? Sorry, but what happened to the true fitting system that Ping so believes is the best? What – because the lofts are stronger which made the face a little more open so you had to go a little upright to fool people into thinking they’re not going to slice it. What a joke.

    • Frid

      Jul 19, 2015 at 7:28 pm

      Effective lie angle is a product of length. Standard color code is blue because the length is longer than i25. This has nothing to do with loft of the face or any perceived “open” face at setup (which was made up by you)…..Where’s the joke?
      Ping choose to make people aware of a small (3/4 of a degree) change that could slightly effect their game. Sounds like honesty from a company, when the alternative would be to ignore the difference and hurt people’s games over image. Kudos to ping.

  13. other paul

    Jul 15, 2015 at 11:21 pm

    Can’t stand the look of them. Yuck. Looks like a curvy G30. I prefer the i25s. I hit my 47PW 200 yards anyways ????. So a little less distance wouldn’t hurt. Lol.

    • glenn

      Jul 21, 2015 at 6:07 pm

      This might be the most golfwrx comment ever lol

  14. Jim

    Jul 15, 2015 at 9:54 pm

    Any word on drivers and metalwoods for the i line

  15. Dirk

    Jul 15, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    Not bad, but I’ll stick to my Titleist blades. I need the feel and precision to know that I can hit my signature 255 yard 3 iron baby draw, and these shovels just don’t do it for me.

  16. Stephen

    Jul 15, 2015 at 7:24 pm

    Why would they offer only px 5 and 6? Isn’t the shaft that fits more golfers the stiff 5.5? I have I-20’s and they could deffinantly feel less pinglike. These look great just wish they would have stuck with the old lofts, but understand that distance makes more money. #TM

  17. Oldplayer

    Jul 15, 2015 at 6:56 pm

    3 degrees between the 6 and 7 iron. I don’t get it. This is what happens when you want to make a 3 iron that is still playable at 20 degrees but want a pw at 45. I know they are all doing it but it is still crazy. Would be better off to have one less club and just have 4 degrees virtually all the way.
    Pings philosophy is obviously “if you can’t beat em, join em”.
    Come on Ping. You have always gone your own way and had a point of difference. Why change now?
    You’re saying players wanted to hit their i25’s longer. Tell em to grab an SGI set with pw at 43!
    Stay true to Karsten’s original vision. Durable irons that aren’t afraid to be different and you will prosper like you always have. Join the pack and you will get lost in the crowd.

    • Max

      Jul 15, 2015 at 7:22 pm

      Here, here! To me, these are converging with products like RocketBladz From TMaG, and XR irons from Callaway…which is not a good thing.

    • dr bloor

      Jul 15, 2015 at 9:30 pm

      If you pay enough attention to the game and the equipment to know about stronger lofts, you also know that Ping will be more than happy to accommodate your gap preferences throughout the set. If you want a 46 degree PW and a four degree progression from there, they can do it. Just don’t pay any attention to the numbers stamped on the bottoms of the clubs.

  18. Plinko

    Jul 15, 2015 at 4:57 pm

    “The most common criticism of Ping’s i25 irons (click here to read our review) was that they didn’t fly as far as other irons in their class, which was a product of their solid-face construction and average lofts.”

    Hilarious. What a bunch of wussy players Pling players are

    • Warren Schroer

      Apr 18, 2016 at 10:17 pm

      That’s funny- I bought a really nice set of used i25’s to resell and after I fixed them up, took them out to the range and was impressed with the feel. I was playing AP2’714’s and I was hitting these irons 6-8 yds further easy. I have a hard time understanding the need for more yardage- it’s about distance control and accuracy with irons- if you want more distance- hit one more club! I have looked at the new i’s and if I ever purchased them, i’d cut 1/4″ off he length and use the modus 105 shafts- better height and consistent distances from a “standard” length shaft. Making the shaft longer does you no good if you are way off line or don’t know what the club is going to do yardage wise- it feels good to launch an 8 iron over the green, but the chip back is tough. I’ll stick with the i25’s for now.

  19. Shallowface

    Jul 15, 2015 at 4:45 pm

    Are these chrome plated like the Glide wedges?

  20. TJS

    Jul 15, 2015 at 4:39 pm

    To all you posers complaining about loft increases, and loving blades so much more than cast clubs. We get it already you are all +4 handicaps and the three time defending champ at your club. We know you would go pro but you just can’t get the financial backing to get a start.

    • Shaft

      Jul 16, 2015 at 8:25 am

      Yes, and hit your 47 PW 200 yards.

    • Christosterone

      Jul 16, 2015 at 3:25 pm

      I think what a lot of people don’t like is that the lofts are getting stronger and the shafts are remaining the same. It’s basically hard-stepping entire sets….which is actually worse for the high handicapper.
      If anything, they should be staying more towards a 49 degree PW with a wedge length shaft as opposed to what equates to a 9 iron with a wedge length shaft….the same goes for every club in the bag….a 3 iron with a 4 etched on it and paired with a traditional 4 iron shaft….which is generally WORSE for high handicappers….they would be better able to get the ball up with more a soft stepped setup…
      Just my 2 cents…
      -Christosterone

    • Joe Golfer

      Jul 17, 2015 at 1:57 am

      Amen, TJS. It gets tiring hearing of all the pro level players who complain about every single club that gets shown or reviewed by GolfWRX.
      One guy says he hits his PW 200 yards.
      Another says he loves his Titleist blades because he can control his baby draw and hit that 3 iron 255 yards every time.
      Or the complaints that a club isn’t a blade.
      Just take it for what it is instead of whining about the fact that it doesn’t suit a scratch player’s game.
      Even a lot of pros play clubs similar to these styles. Not everybody plays blades like Rory and Tiger.

  21. Sven Olsen

    Jul 15, 2015 at 4:19 pm

    I never liked Pings – from their very first forestation tools to these new ones – it seems to me that Ping tried to copy an old Hogan trick with these clubs – not realizing, that they shall never succeed.
    Sorry – not for me personally – I prefer blades!

    • JPF

      Oct 30, 2015 at 12:40 pm

      Never succeed? Are you brain dead? Think you may want to check out the current financial states of the major golf equipment manufacturers. Think you’ll find PING has succeeded and thrived by using conservative club cycles of about 18 months rather than release a new club every half hour. They must be doing something right.

  22. Raymond Norris

    Jul 15, 2015 at 4:04 pm

    bought a set of 825’s last fall, have changed the shafts from the stock CTF’s to the Distance CTF’s and they are still crap. Another shaft change or just Ebay these not-nice i25’s for more traditional blades like Titleist. I’ve always played Ping’s, but sorry, I don’t care how many Better Player awards they have won (I’m in that category also), the i25’s are not “Pings”. just My take……..

    • JPF

      Oct 30, 2015 at 12:43 pm

      I’m pretty sure your skill level probably exceeds the quality of PING. i25’s are actually played and have won on the PGA Tour but those hacks are nothing to your superior talent. Could it be that the equipment just doesn’t suit you? Everybody on this blog are so effing critical of ANYTHING that they don’t play and act as if their skill level somehow has exceeded the club manufacturers. While it’s annoying as hell, it sure provides much needed comic relief.

  23. shabby

    Jul 15, 2015 at 2:04 pm

    Nothing special/Shaft choices are lame but better than just one crappy cfs

  24. Ping man

    Jul 15, 2015 at 2:03 pm

    Please keep the s-line 17-4 steel. it’s enough of the softer metal. we want our clubs to last longer.

  25. mo

    Jul 15, 2015 at 12:40 pm

    Wow 45* PW. Nice looking clubs but I’d order 5-U for my game.
    It appears to lean more towards players cb’s but gi in disguise?

  26. Max

    Jul 15, 2015 at 12:04 pm

    Longer lengths and stronger lofts……gross

  27. Gautama

    Jul 15, 2015 at 11:03 am

    Look great, but didn’t the i25s launch just last year? I’d always had the impression Ping was on more like a 2+ year product lifecycle. I wonder if the i25s just weren’t hitting their projected volume…

    • Mat

      Jul 15, 2015 at 6:23 pm

      They launched almost two years ago. Started showing up in late 2013? However, a material change is a pretty darn big change. I’m quite happy with my i25s. It’s going to be very interesting to see how 431 holds up over time.

  28. Tyler

    Jul 15, 2015 at 10:10 am

    Another 45 degree PW? When will the “lofting up” end?

    • Nolanski

      Jul 15, 2015 at 11:01 am

      45 is not the highest I’ve seen. But I don’t classify clubs by the club number or letter. Loft degree is the only important thing which is why I liked how the new Hogan irons bought into that.

    • Scooter McGavin

      Jul 15, 2015 at 11:04 am

      Never

  29. Christosterone

    Jul 15, 2015 at 9:35 am

    Ping makes a great looking club….Like Michael said, I wonder why KBS Tour are not a standard…could be the op forgot to list them as they are offered for Karstens and s series for no up charge…
    Now If Ping ever makes an entire glide set I will buy it instantly.
    That being said, I am not blown away enough by the design of the new i club to dump my z945s.
    -Christosterone

    • David

      Jul 25, 2015 at 11:50 pm

      Ping thinks their own shaft design is superior. Abundant comments in the forums will indicate the opposite. Never get a stock Ping shaft if you want to happy in the long run.

  30. MartyMoose09

    Jul 15, 2015 at 9:34 am

    These look like the G30s to me which is what I play. Also ZZ65 is a great no upcharge shaft.

    • Christosterone

      Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 am

      It remains forever perplexing that Ping ended(for the most part) the AWT shafts.
      I had AWT X-Flex in a set of s56s and i15s.
      They were very stiff for such a light club…I probably couldn’t differentiate between the AWT X and an aerotech steel fiber shaft…they were awesome.
      Ping looks to have stopped development/marketing of the AWT….guess I was in the minority.
      -Christoaterone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Whats in the Bag

Sahith Theegala WITB 2024 (March)

Published

on

  • Sahith Theegala what’s in the bag accurate as of the Arnold Palmer Invitational.

Driver: Ping G430 LST (10.5 degrees @9)
Shaft: Project X HZRDUS Black 60 TX

5-wood: Ping G430 Max (18 degrees @16)
Shaft: Graphite Design Tour AD DI 8 TX

9-wood: Ping G430 Max (24 degrees @22.5)
Shaft: Project X HZRDUS Smoke Green RDX 90 6.5

Irons: Ping i210 (3), Ping Blueprint S (4-W)
Shafts: Graphite Design Tour AD DI Hybrid 85 X (3), Project X 6.5 (4-W)

Wedges: Ping Glide 4.0 (50-10S, 54-12S), Ping Glide 2.0 (58-06TS)
Shafts: Project X 6.5 (50), True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400 (54, 58)

Putter: Ping TR 1966 Anser 2 prototype
Grip: SuperStroke Traxion Flatso 2.0

Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet

Ball: Titleist Pro V1

See the rest of Sahith Theegala’s WITB in the forums.

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Product Reviews

Ping S159 wedge review (new B, H grinds) – Club Junkie Review

Published

on

Ping’s new S159 wedges have been widely discussed in the GolfWRX forums since we spotted them on tour late last year. I was fortunate enough to get two of the newest S159 grinds out on the course to put them through their paces around the green. I will admit that some of Ping’s previous wedge offerings never really suited my eye, but that definitely changed with these S159 wedges.

For a more in-depth discussion and a full review, please check out the Club Junkie podcast on all podcast platforms and YouTube below.

Out of the box, I like the clean and simple look that Ping went with. From address, the wedges have had some of the offset removed and the line from the hosel into the leading edge is straight. A lot of wedges with a little offset have a curve, or “hook,” from the hosel to leading edge that I just don’t love. Ping, however, did away with most of that.

Speaking of the leading edge, Ping has gone a little straighter with it as you see very little curve on the lower lofts (like the 52 degree) and just slightly more radius as you get into the lob wedge. I like the simple look with minimal branding on these wedges and the Hydropearl 2.0 chrome finish looks nice while still reducing glare.

Ping added some new grinds and grind options to the S159 line and if you need a place to start with what wedge fits your game the best, Ping’s WebFit app is a quick way to get some suggestions.

I have been hitting the 56 H grind and 60 B grind. The wedges are cast from 8620 carbon steel and have a nice soft feel to them. When you do miss the center, you will get a little more vibration to your hands as well as a more audible click at impact. My miss with a wedge is typically low heel and definitely noticed a firmer feel and louder sound.

Spin on the S159 was very good, and Ping’s use of smaller grooves on the face produced shots that checked up hard from any distance on the green. Now the smaller grooves are a little hard to clean, so I suggest investing in a nice plastic bristled brush. Playing this early in Metro Detroit does not offer you tight, manicured fairway lies, and the S159 wedges were still allowing me to spin the ball back on fuller shots. Shots out of the rough still spun well and were met with very predictable, although shorter, release. I went a little long on a green and had very little green to work with, so I hit a little chip that just landed beyond the fringe and stopped after about one foot, leaving me well short. I didn’t think the wedge could get enough friction on the ball from that deeper rough, but the S159 proved me wrong.

Ball flight is a little higher than the Vokey SM10 wedges on standard shots for me, but you can still flight the ball down easily for a penetrating shot with a lot of spin. Ping states the S159’s shape is tour-inspired, but they do offer some good forgiveness when you don’t hit it perfectly. As I mentioned earlier I tend to miss low heel with my wedges and the S159 would still give me decent launch and spin, producing a solid shot.

Ping S159 56-10 H Grind

I was a little intimidated by this one, as I haven’t played a sand wedge with this little bounce in a long time. I am a steeper swinger and play in soft conditions, so most of my wedges are in the teens when it comes to bounce. However, Ping does describe the H as “A shot-saving option for players with steeper angles of attack who like to manipulate the handle and play with versatility,” so I didn’t need to be so cautious.

The H grind offers good turf interaction on full shots as the course was soft from a few rainy days, but the wedge got through quickly. Divots were just a touch deeper than some of the higher-bounce wedges I have used, but the H got through and out of the turf pretty quickly.

Around the green, the H grind was versatile and allowed you to open the face while the leading edge stayed close to the turf. I don’t open a 56 up a ton, but it was easy to open it slightly and hit a higher-lofted pitch or chip shot around the green. When you went wide open with the H grind in the bunker, it offered good float and slide through firm sand easily and quickly.

Ping S159 60-8 B Grind

This grind was the one I was most excited to try, but I was a little taken aback when I saw how wide the sole was. Now I am light years away from a tour player who can play flop shots off concrete lies, but I like to open the face a little bit. The B grind is wide and only has a little bit of heel and trailing edge relief. As Ping says, the grind is “For a shallow angle of attack and neutral face delivery. Low-bounce design sits low on the turf on square-face shots.” 

Now the B grind does have a nice bevel from the leading edge to the sole that is subtle but allows the wedge to be “thumped” into the turf without worrying about digging while playing it square. As Ping says, square shots are great and you have a bit of forgivness if you hit just slightly behind the ball as the B will glide effortlessly across the turf. You can still open the face a little in some more lush and softer conditions. Shots hit very high on the face don’t carry a ton and lose some spin compared to some of the high-toe style wedges.

Bunkers with softer and fluffy sand are where the B grind will thrive as well; the wedge just floats like a pontoon boat through it. I am usually a 56-degree wedge player out of the bunker unless I am short-sided, but I could see myself using the B grind more and more, as it is just easy and consistent.

My final thoughts on Ping’s S159 wedges: They are very versatile and playable for a wide range of golfers. If you are looking for ultimate shotmaking or just some consistent wedges that spin well, these can be both. And now that Ping added some grinds and grind options to the lineup, you should be able to find a two, three, or four-wedge setup that complements your wedge game, swing, and course conditions.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Here’s a look at the latest FootJoy x Buscemi collab

Published

on

As the company has done for past editions of The Players Championship, FootJoy is once again collaborating with West Coast designer Jon Buscemi for limited editions of its Premiere Series Field LX and Premiere Series Wilcox shoes.

The shoes feature gold detailing as an homage to The Players trophy and ultra-soft leather, as well as staple Premiere Series innovations: the VersaTrax+ outsole, Ortholite coPlush FitBed.

“This collection embodies a luxurious approach to a franchise that is inspired by decades of heritage silhouettes, supercharged for today’s modern golfer,” said Chris Tobias, Vice President, FJ Footwear. “We’re thrilled to continue this partnership with Jon and bring a collection to golfers who have an appreciation for high sense of style in the game of golf.”

Have a look at both designs below, which are available in limited supply on FootJoy’s website.

FootJoy x Buscemi: Premiere Series Field LX

FootJoy x Buscemi: Premiere Series Wilcox

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending