Connect with us

Shaft & Grip Reviews

Review: Best Grips



Pros: Best Grips offers classy, hand-crafted leather grips in several designs. They’re unbelievably tacky and durable, and the variety of grip textures will please even the pickiest of players.

Cons: The stitches on the bottom of the grip could be problematic for players who prefer a smoother feel. Price range ($16-to-$20 each) could also be a deal breaker.

Bottom Line: Best Grips has captured the lost art of hand-stitched leather grips in a classy way. With a variety of colors and textures from which to choose, it will be hard for golfers not to find one that they like.


Best Grips is headquartered in Conroe, Texas, and has boldly chosen the name Best Grips, stating “our grips will single-handedly beat any other grip in a head-to-head test.”

“We are proud of our grips,” said Best Grip President Albert Sewill. “Each one is hand crafted and can take hours to complete. We aim to have the highest craftsmanship offered in a grip.”

All of Best Grips’ club grips are made of leather and feature “Pro Taper,” which means that they are slightly larger at their bottom, the part of the grip that’s closer to the clubhead. The company decided on the design after its research and testing on the PGA Tour revealed that many tour players have their grips built to have less taper in the bottom hand.

Best Grip also hand stitches each and every grip, creating a seam on the bottom of the grip that acts like a rib, or a subtle reminder of where the hands should be positioned.


Sewill’s father is a chemist, and with his assistance they created a grip that can withstand the toughest conditions. Their technology is called “ProTac,” a moisture-activated synthetic additive that is absorbed into the leather and remains there for the life of the grip.

“Grips that are painted, non-genuine Leather, or rubber will not absorb ProTac,” according to Best Grips’ website. “They rely on substances chalked onto the top of the grip. As the grip wears away and time dissolves the grip, the tackiness withers away.”

Best Grips is not limited to just club grips, however, as they offer an array of putter grips, head covers and accessories made with the same high-level craftsmanship. Their exotic leathers and wide variety of styles create endless possibilities.

Best Grips’ stock club grips include: the Classic and Classic Oversized (smooth and firm), the Gridiron and LTD Gridiron (made from the same material as professional footballs), the MicroPerf (includes microperforations to increase surface area and tack) and the Harcourt (made from the same material as professional basketballs and slightly softer than the Gridiron).

The Review

The most impressive part of Best Grips, by far, is their unbelievable tackiness. Like all golfers, I’m skeptical of companies claiming superior technology, but ProTac is exactly that.

From left to right: Best Grips’ MicroPerf, Gridiron and Classic club grips. 

For this review, I received samples of the Gridiron, Classic and MicroPerf, which all had extremely high levels of tackiness. I hit about 500 balls with each of the grips, and not only did they stay tacky, but they still look brand new.

Any grip can be tacky when it’s new and dry, however, which is why I put the Best Grips to the ultimate test. I dunked each of them in a bucket of water, and then proceeded to hit balls with them. They experience was amazing, and similar to dunking a rain glove in a bucket of water and then swinging away. Conventional wisdom says the performance of the grip should have been compromised, but the water didn’t affect the Best Grips at all. If anything, they felt a little tackier!

I felt that all the Best Grips were a little firmer than rubber grips I’ve used. I’m not sure if it’s because the leather is actually thicker, or if it’s just the fact that my brain equates leather with more thickness. Either way, I enjoyed the firmer feel and the shock-absorbing qualities. Golfers picky about “feeling” every mishit might not like the dulled vibrations, but they will likely be in the minority.

My favorite Best Grip was by far the Classic, which gave me the most feedback and felt the tackiest to me. I really enjoyed the smooth, traditional leather texture. Some golfers might like the Gridiron grip, which feels exactly like an authentic NFL Football, but it was sensory overload for me. The MicroPerf is a nice middle ground, with just enough texture to improve grip but not enough to affect my feel of the club head.

My personal thoughts aside, I had zero performance issues with Best Grips. As long as a they’re installed correctly, with their seams on straight, most golfers should be more than impressed with their performance. Selecting the right grip is a bit trickier, however, and golfers might want to order single grips in different styles before they commit to a 13-club set.

Looks and Feel

Simply put, Best Grips look as good as they feel. The leather is high quality and beautifully hand crafted, and each grip evokes the nostalgia of hickory shafts and persimmon club heads. They just ooze class.


The stitching on the bottom of Best Grips provides a subtle reminder that will be loved by those players seeking a ribbed-style grip. If they’re also looking for a tacky grip, something that’s not often found in a ribbed-style grip, these could be paydirt.

Best Grips’ custom options also allows golfers to choose from one of 50 colors, 14 different stitch colors and 100 exotic skins. We’re talking alligator, ostrich, lizard… crazy stuff like that. Golfers can also add embossed logos, custom initials or engraved designs for a one-of-a-kind custom look.

The Takeaway

Even with their price tag of $16-to-$18 each, golfers will be hard pressed to find a nicer leather grip than Best Grips. If you’re looking to bring a touch of class to your clubs and get great performance as well, Best Grips might just be your next grip.

For more information, visit Best Grips’ website.

Your Reaction?
  • 31
  • LEGIT6
  • WOW8
  • LOL4
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK13

We share your golf passion. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX, Facebook and Instagram.



  1. stephen johann

    Nov 9, 2017 at 9:24 am

    I would not recommend these grips. I bought 16 grips last summer (2016) and 1/2 of the grips fell apart after less than one year of use. The leather is excellent and performs exactly they way promotes. It is the rubber sleeve that is the problem. On 4 of my grips the top of the rubber grip (the cap) wore out after less than a year of use and the threading came apart. on three other grips the leather seem came apart at the bottom of the grip (by the shaft). Bottom line, the owner sold me on these grips as lifetime and they lasted less than a year– at $18 dollars a grip v. $7 for a good premium grip this is unacceptable. The warranty is for 30 days (ridiculous) and when I called to discuss they would not even consider returning my $300+ purchase. Very dissatisfied, I plan to report this poor quality product to the Better Business Bureau and complain about the even poorer customer service response to this problem.

  2. Arthur

    May 12, 2014 at 12:16 am

    I’ve tried both Best Grip and The Gripmaster grips and I must say that I preferred The Gripmaster. The taper in The Gripmaster’s grips was much more conventional , found the Best Grips too fat in the bottom hand. Also the Gripmaster’s felt tackier, and the performance in the hot humid conditions was unbelievable.

  3. Roland O'Neill

    May 10, 2014 at 6:29 am

    I’m a huge Gripmaster fan. But these are all leather too & so must be considered – would love to try them & compare. I wonder if/how they cracked the issue of getting the leather to remain firmly attached to the sleeve – I understand Gripmaster patented their sleeve. And do these come in kangaroo, goat, sheep et al leathers too?

  4. blink3665

    May 6, 2014 at 1:21 am

    Are you able to install these with air? If you can, are they easy to exhange from set to set? I’m a bit of a club ho and would like to be able to switch them from set to set,

  5. Brian

    May 4, 2014 at 11:33 am

    IMHO, they can’t hold a candle the those made by The GripMaster.

    • christian

      May 5, 2014 at 7:36 pm

      So, I guess you have tried these grips then? So, what was it that made Gripmaster so much better, please inform us.

    • RP Jacobs II

      May 9, 2014 at 1:52 pm

      Good Day Brian-

      Similar to Christian’s question, which BestGrip(s) grips have you tried and where did they fall short of Gripmaster?

      When did you buy them from Zach, and how did you evaluate them, as in how many rounds did you put on em?

      Have a great season Brian 🙂

      Fairways & Greens,

  6. RP Jacobs II

    May 2, 2014 at 12:19 pm

    Excellent review!!

    However, with all due respect, THE most impressive part of Best Grips has nothing to do with the grips, which are second to none.

    The most impressive part of Best Grips is the owner, Zach Sewell, who is one of the most sincere, conscientious and kindest individuals that you will encounter in this or any industry. Simply put, He IS Best Grips!

    Nuff said-

    Have a great season Gents/Gals 🙂

    Fairways & Greens My Friends,

  7. Jeff

    May 2, 2014 at 11:15 am

    I’ve had mine on for 2 years now and they’re still super tacky. Given most rubber grips are dead after 4-8 months and cost $7-$10 these are a steal at their price, and mine are actually their factory seconds which were $9 per grip.

    • Scott

      May 7, 2014 at 4:15 pm

      Jeff, you are so right. I got 3 years out of mine and they were still fairly tacky, just getting worn.

  8. Curtis

    May 2, 2014 at 11:14 am

    I’ve always wondered about these. If the counter balanced putter doesn’t work I’ll have to try one of these!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Here’s why Jordan Spieth switched into a new Fujikura Ventus TR Blue shaft at Pebble Beach



When Fujikura’s new Ventus TR Blue shaft launched in January 2022, we learned all about the updated construction and potential performance benefits compared to the original Ventus Blue. It was unclear at the time, however, exactly who would make the switch into the new TR design on the PGA Tour.

Well, we’re starting to get some answers.

Jordan Spieth, who’s been relatively slow to change into new products throughout his career, is among a handful of names making the change. Spieth conducted recent testing with a Ventus Blue TR 7 X shaft in his Titleist TS2 15-degree fairway wood, and he put it in play this week at the 2022 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am.

Titleist Tour representative J.J. Van Wezenbeeck, who works closely with Spieth on his equipment, said that Spieth came to the Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) on Friday before the 2022 Pebble Beach Pro-Am for a check-up on his equipment. Since Spieth was previously playing Ventus Blue shafts in his Titleist metalwoods, he was intrigued by the new TR version.

As it turned out, Spieth found the new shaft to help with his transition and directional control.

“Coming from Ventus Blue, anytime they update a shaft you’re just intrigued on that, and he liked how [the Ventus TR Blue] loaded compared to the original Ventus Blue for him,” Van Wezenbeeck told GolfWRX on Tuesday. “He felt like when he mishit it, there was a little more control. So that was a good option for him…we did a little bit of internal work on the head to make sure there’s enough spin, because want to make sure his 3 wood doesn’t have too low of spin. He liked how the TR reacted on mishits where the spin didn’t drop, and it had more consistent spin from swing to swing.”

Due to a new Spread Tow fabric in the butt-end section, which is essentially a checkerboard pattern of woven material, the torque on the TR version is 10 percent stiffer in the mid-to-grip end of the shaft. As a result, Fujikura says the TR shaft is designed to improve stability and consistency compared to the original Ventus Blue.

Based on Spieth’s results with the TR shaft during testing, it seems Fujikura’s case holds water.

Spieth is using a Ventus Blue TR 7 X version in his fairway wood.

Pat McCoy, Director of Tour Operations at Fujikura, spoke with GolfWRX about the new shaft, and what players are seeing in their testing out on Tour.

“Compared to the original Ventus Blue, the TR has a stiffer mid-section and lower torque,” McCoy said. “Basically what the shaft does is it eliminates some of the dynamic loft. It eliminates some of the rotation. Obviously, the Ventus Blue was a very stable shaft and one of the best launching shafts we’ve ever had. And we just made it better.

“As far as ball speed and launch and spin, I’m not going to say it’s faster, but we have seen players who have achieved faster speeds with it. It provides more consistency and the ability to turn swing speed into ball speed better. And that’s it. It’s a little stiffer than the original Blue, and it’s a little bit weaker than the [Ventus Black]. It’s a ‘tweener. It gives you something in the middle, and depending upon loft and impact location, you get a better fit.”

The fairway wood shaft wasn’t the only potential change that Spieth will make in 2022, though.

In addition to putting the new Titleist Vokey SM9 wedges in the bag, Spieth is also considering adding another option to the top end of his bag.

Typically, Spieth changes between a hybrid and long irons, depending on course conditions. During the recent session at TPI, though, Spieth took a liking to Titleist’s U-505 wide-bodied driving iron. Ahead of the 2022 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am, Spieth took a U-505 2-iron (Graphite Design AD-DI 105X shaft) out onto the course for testing.

“He’s experimenting with a U-505 this week (ahead of the event at Pebble Beach),” Van Wezenbeeck told GolfWRX. “He’s always gone between a hybrid and either a 2 iron, or a hybrid and 3 iron, and we brought out a 505 as kind of a third option on a week where he isn’t sure whether he should play an iron or a hybrid. The 505 being a wide body iron is kind of a blend between the two. And he was really intrigued with how high it launched on a standard shot, and he could flight it more off the tee, where as with a hybrid he can’t do.

“So on weeks he feels like there’s a lot of irons off the tee, he likes to play the iron. On weeks where there are a lot of shots into par 5s, he likes the hybrid. On weeks where there’s a little of both…he felt the 505 might be an option, so he was taking it on the golf course [on Tuesday] to see how it would react.”

While it’s unclear exactly when Spieth will break out the new U-505, it seems like it’ll certainly be in the rotation going forward. The Ventus TR Blue shaft, on the other hand, has already earned a starting spot in the bag this week.

These changes may seem minor to some, but it shows Spieth’s willingness to find small equipment tweaks to improve his game. For amateur golfers, use this as a lesson when gearing up for the new season. Go through your bag, test some of the new shaft and head options, and see where you can make improvements. Now is the perfect time to take inventory and get prepared.


Your Reaction?
  • 65
  • LEGIT11
  • WOW3
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK6

Continue Reading

Shaft & Grip Reviews

MRC Shaft Shootout: Tensei CK Pro White, Kuro Kage XT and Diamana BF-Series



The Tensei CK Pro White is the latest release from Mitsubishi Rayon Composites (MRC), a low-launch, low-spin shaft with a multi-material design that the company says improves the performance and feel of the shaft. Whereas most golf shafts use between 3-6 different materials in their construction, the Tensei CK Pro White is made from 11 different materials, giving MRC engineers greater precision in the shaft’s design.

Like MRC’s Tensei CK Pro Blue shafts, which produce a slightly higher-launching, higher-spinning ball flight, the CK Pro White uses MRC’s Carbon Fiber DuPont Kevlar Weave in the handle section of the shaft. The company says it increases the strength and stability of that part of the shaft, leading to better feedback.


On the other end of the shaft, the tip section, MRC uses a boron-reinforced fiber. All low-launch, low-spin shafts have stiff-tip designs, but the addition of boron puts the Tensei CK Pro White in a class of its own when it comes to lowering launch angle and spin rate. The boron fiber also reduces torque, which can offer better energy transfer, more accuracy and better feedback — especially for skilled, high-swing-speed golfers.

Connecting and reinforcing those areas of the shafts is MRC’s low-resin content (LRC) prepreg. Prepreg is carbon fiber that’s been reinforced or “pre-impregnated” with resin, a glue that holds the material together when it’s formed into sheets and rolled into the form of a shaft. MRC says that its LRC has 15 percent more carbon fiber and 13 percent less resin than traditional prepregs, which allows MRC to make the Tensei CK Pro White stronger without adding extra weight to the shaft. MRC also uses high-modulus, 40-ton prepreg in the Tensei CK Pro White’s design, which like LRC is thinner, stronger and lighter than traditional prepregs.

The addition of boron helps MRC make the tip of Tensei CK Pro White shaft stiffer and lower in torque.

The addition of boron helps MRC make the tip of Tensei CK Pro White shaft stiffer and lower in torque.

In the EI chart below, you can see how the Tensei CK Pro White’s bend profile compares to the CK Pro Blue. The main differences are its slightly stiffer tip and mid sections, as well as its slightly softer butt section. That gives the CK Pro White a higher “kick point” than the CK Pro Blue. Generally, the higher the kick point of a shaft, the lower its launch conditions. That’s why the Tensei CK Pro White is a lower-launching, lower-spinning shaft than the Tensei CK Pro Blue.

Tensei_Ck_Pro_White_comparisonThe Shootout 

Just how much lower launching and lower spinning is the Tensei CK Pro White than MRC’s latest premium driver shafts? I put it to the test against the company’s Kuro Kage XT and Diamana BF-Series, which like the CK Pro White are PGA Tour-quality shafts that sell for about $400 each. All three shafts tested were built to my spec: 70TX, tipped 1 inch at a finished length of 45.5 inches.

I tested the three shafts on Trackman 4 at the Launch Pad at Carl’s Golfland in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. After warming up, I hit 10 drives with each shaft, and whittled my shots down to the most similar five to help illustrate the differences. Premium balls were used for the test, and results were normalized.

MRCShafts2016_ArrowAs expected, the Tensei CK Pro White was the lowest-launching, lowest-spinning shaft in the test. That’s impressive in its own right, but what will really excite golfers when they try a Tensei CK Pro White is the shaft’s feel. It’s noticeably smoother than the MRC White Board shafts I’ve played in the past. You could likely duplicate the launch conditions of the Tensei CK Pro White with similar products from other premium shaft makers, but I’m not sure its smoothness can be replicated in the category. It’s something special, and I expect a lot of serious golfers with above average club head speeds will be willing to pay a premium for it.

MRC’s Kuro Kage XT uses a stouter iteration of the company’s famed “Blue Board” bend profile, and in that regard it’s quite similar to the Diamana BF-Series. That’s what makes the shafts a little higher launching and higher spinning than the Tensei CK Pro White. The Kuro Kage XT has a much different feel than both, however, due to its use of an elastic wire made of Titanium and Nickel that MRC calls “TiNi” wire.


Related: Learn more about the Kuro Kage XT

In the Kuro Kage XT, the TiNi wire is added to the bottom 13 inches of the shaft, where it adds stability, but it also serves another purpose. Its elasticity allows the bottom end of the shaft to better load and unload during the downswing to help improve energy transfer. That’s what gives the Kuro Kage XT its more active feel, at least compared to the boron-infused tip section of the Tensei CK Pro White, which by design offer no elasticity.

The Diamana BF-Series also uses boron in its tip section, and its combined with a new, aerospace-grade fiber called MR-70 to create what MRC says is a first-of-its-kind hybrid prepreg. MR-70, which is manufactured by parent company Mitsubishi Chemical, is 20 percent stronger and has 10 percent more modulus than similar fibers, MRC saysThe handle section of the BF-Series is reinforced with MRC’s Pitch Fiber, which functions to boost energy transfer like the CK Pro White’s Carbon Fiber DuPont Kevlar Weave.


Related: Learn more about the Diamana BF-Series shafts

In terms of launch conditions, the best fit for me was the Diamana BF-Series. It launched the ball a little higher than the Tensei CK Pro White, and added a little spin to help keep my drives in the air. It was also easier to swing than the Tensei CK Pro White, helping me more easily hit a draw while offering an even smoother feel due to its less rigid tip and mid sections.

To recap, if you need to lower your launch conditions, the Tensei CK Pro White is one of the most intriguing new MRC options to help you do so. Need a higher ball flight? Try the Diamana BF-Series. And if you want a radically different feel, give the Kuro Kage XT a try.

Have a question? Let me know in the comments section below and I’ll do my best to answer as many as I can. 

Weights and Flexes

  • Tensei CK Pro White: 60 (R, S, TX), 70 (S, TX), 80 (TX)
  • Kuro Kage XT: 50 (R, S, X, TX), 60 (R, S, X, TX), 70 (S, X, TX), 80 (S, X, TX)
  • Diamana BF-Series: 50 (R, S, X), 60 (R, S, X, TX), 70 (S, X, TX), 80 (S, X, TX)

Related: GolfWRX Members review the Tensei CK Pro White

Your Reaction?
  • 132
  • LEGIT15
  • WOW3
  • LOL5
  • IDHT5
  • FLOP3
  • OB4
  • SHANK8

Continue Reading


Review: KBS Tour FLT Shafts



Pros: FLT shafts use a flighted design, which helps golfers launch their long irons higher and with more spin. The FLT short-iron shafts provide a more penetrating trajectory for more control.

Cons: FLT shaft flexes correspond with weight, so golfers may not be able to match their desired shaft weight with their desired flex.

Who They’re For: Golfers who need more spin or more launch from their long irons to optimize their trajectory. Everyone from beginners to PGA Tour players can use the shafts effectively, but they’ll be most popular with golfers with moderate-to-slow swing speeds, or any golfer who generates low-spin launch conditions.


Selecting the proper iron shafts is one of the most important equipment decisions golfers make. It’s an issue of quantity. Most golfers carry about 7-8 irons in their bag, so if they choose the wrong iron shaft, they’ve made the game harder than it needs to be with half or more of their clubs.

The good news is that there’s a wider selection of quality iron shafts than there has ever been, with recent growth in models that are designed to help golfers hit their iron shots higher and farther, while still maintaining PGA Tour-quality consistency and feel.

KBS is one of the leading steel shaft manufacturers, and already offered a wide variety of models prior to its newest shaft launch. Company representatives felt KBS was lacking a product for a particular segment of golfers, however, so it developed its new FLT shafts.


FLT shafts ($31.95 each) have a flighted design, which helps certain golfers optimize the performance of each iron their bag. The long irons shafts have progressively softer tip sections, which helps golfers increase their launch angle and spin rates with those clubs. For the right golfer, the design will help them hit their iron shots farther, and stop shots on the green more quickly. In the short irons, where height and spin are easier for golfers to generate, the FLT shafts are stiffer, which creates the flatter trajectory most golfers prefer with their scoring clubs. The crossover point between the higher-launching long irons and lower-launching short irons is the 7 iron.

Like all KBS shafts, FLT models have a constant weight, which means that long iron shafts and short iron shafts will be roughly the same weight through the set. Shaft weight is dependent on flex, however, as softer-flex models are lighter than stiffer-flex models. So if you’re looking for a really heavy, regular-flex shaft or a really light, extra-stiff-flex shaft, these aren’t for you.

FLT Specs


Keep in mind that KBS shafts do not have reinforced tip sections like many other iron shafts, which gives them a slightly higher balance point and can decrease swing weight by 1-2 points. I personally like the feel of KBS shafts and their slightly higher balance point, but some golfers won’t.

The Test

For this review, I tested the new FLT shafts head to head against KBS Tour shafts of the same flex and weight (130X) in 4 irons, 6 irons and pitching wedges. Each of the shafts were installed in Callaway’s Apex Pro ’16 irons, and were built to my specifications (standard grips, standard length, 1-degree strong lofts, 1-degree flat lie angles).


I performed my testing at the Launch Pad at Carl’s Golfland in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., where I hit the 4 irons, 6 irons and pitching wedges on Trackman IV with premium golf balls. I hit 3-6 solid shots with each iron, and then removed the outliers from the final data in an attempt to compare only the most similar strikes. Results were normalized.

As you can see from the data, there was a significant difference in the flight of the 4 irons with the two different shafts, but less of a difference with the 6 irons and pitching wedges.


As expected, the FLT shafts caused 4 iron shots to launch higher (0.8 degrees) and with more spin (729 rpm) than the KBS Tour shafts. I’m not a low-spin player, which is one of the target audiences for this shaft, so the added launch and spin of the FLT shafts caused my 4 iron shots to fly shorter. Golfers who launch their irons too low or with too little spin, however, will likely see a distance increase when using the FLT shafts.

As I moved closer to the short end of the set, the two shafts started to perform more similarly. Theoretically, the 6 iron shots with the FLT shafts should have launched slightly higher and spun more than 6 iron shots with the KBS Tour shafts, but I actually saw a slightly lower launch angle (0.5 degrees) with the FLT. The spin was higher, though, by 211 rpm. With the pitching wedges, the results were again quite similar. The FLT launched 0.9 degrees higher, but actually spun 271 rpm less than the KBS Tour shafts.



Stepping back from the numbers, I was impressed with how similar the feel was between the KBS Tour and FLT shafts. Yes, I could feel that the FLT shafts were more active in the tip with the 4 irons, but they felt nearly the same in the 6 irons. By the time I got to the pitching wedges, the two shafts were indistinguishable. The KBS Tour is considered one of the better-feeling iron shafts currently available, so KBS’ ability to replicate that feel in the FLT will be a plus for the majority of interested golfers.

Looking more broadly, trends in shaft design tends to go hand-in-hand with trends in club head design, and the FLT shafts are no exception. Equipment manufacturers continue to strengthen the lofts of their distance irons; they have to in order balance the launch equation, as their faster ball speeds create a higher launch angle and more spin.

While the improvements to iron design have allowed golfers to hit their mid and short irons farther, many golfers continue to struggle to hit their long irons high enough or consistently enough for them to be effective. And based on my testing results, it’s clear that the FLT shafts can make long irons more playable for certain golfers, and maybe even keep long irons in a golfer’s bag that might otherwise be kicked out for higher-flying hybrids or fairway woods.

As always, I recommend that golfers get properly fit for iron shafts, which means visiting a reputable club fitter in your area. So if you’re in the market for new irons or iron shafts, you can get started by going through KBS’ Online Fit System, which upon completion lists KBS-certified dealers in your area.

Your Reaction?
  • 100
  • LEGIT12
  • WOW6
  • LOL6
  • IDHT3
  • FLOP3
  • OB4
  • SHANK20

Continue Reading