Connect with us

Equipment

The latest patents from Nike, Titleist and TaylorMade

Published

on

Many of the patents major OEMs apply for with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office take several months to a year to get published, or made public. In other words, companies begin working on a technology and apply for a patent (if it’s something unique enough that the parties in question believe they alone should profit from for the term of a patent) well before we, the general public, are able to hear about it.

Still, it’s interesting to examine the technologies that some of the highest-paid equipment wonks in the world are working on, even if these specific models never make it market, as we did at the beginning of February.

Now, let’s take a look at some recent filings from the major OEMs you know and love.

Nike Iron

Nike Ib

Nike I

It seems at The Oven they’re working with a protoype design that looks like the above. Certainly, the design appears to trend more towards the “game improvement” iron type than a players club.

The prototype seems to be a composite of several materials fused together, as is commonplace among recent distance-improving clubs.

The filing doesn’t give away much in terms of the details of the materials used in the club, obviously, but it does provide a look at the design and how the component parts fit together.

See the full patent filing here.

Titleist Iron

Tit.

Tit. 3

Titleist is developing a co-forged iron, according to a recent patent filing, which is technologically very interesting.

As the filing states:

[the] invention creates…an iron type golf club head from a pre-form billet that already contains two or more materials before the actual forging process resulting in a multi-material golf club head that doesn’t require any post manufacturing operations such as machining, welding, swaging, gluing, and the like.

Thus, the great players iron manufacturer is attempting to produced a multi-component club with superior feel, as the elements will be joined during the forging process, rather than after.

The club is due to have “a body portion having a striking surface made out of a first material, and at least one weight adjustment portion made out of a second material encased within the body portion; wherein the at least one weight adjustment portion is encased monolithically within the body portion of the golf club head without any secondary attachment operations.”

See the full patent filing here.

Titleist Wedge

Tit2 1

Tit2 2

From an “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” standpoint, It’s interesting to see Titleist working on a new wedge design. However, the company has continuously worked to improve their wedges, and appears interested in introducing some CG tweaks into their wedge offerings as they continue to pursue the holy grail of increased spin.

The Fairhaven, Mass company tips its hand with this passage from the filing:

In addition to the increased backspin benefits that can be achieved by maximizing the CG location of a wedge type golf club, maximizing the CG location will also allow for increased performance characteristics such as increased ball speed and increased launch angle that correlates into increased trajectory, increased accuracy, and increased control. Increased ball speed will yield increased shot distance. If an increased spin is desired while keeping shot distance constant, the wedge loft will have to be increased, a characteristic which will mitigate the ballspeed increase while adding even more backspin to the ball, yielding even more overall stopping power or accuracy.

See the full patent filing here.

TaylorMade Driver

Screen shot 2014-03-18 at 6.46.50 PM Screen shot 2014-03-18 at 6.47.02 PM

In a great surprise to nobody, TaylorMade is continuing to work on driver technology.

The patent in question relates to a club design intended to maximize aerodynamic performance through club construction. The specific ways the company is seeking to accomplish this can be guessed at by looking at the drawings submitted with the patent filing.

Given this and a few of the designs from January, it appears a move away from the “traditional” driver shape may be again on the horizon, with concerns about aerodynamics, rather than MOI dominating this time around.

See the full patent filing here.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

GolfWRX Editor-in-Chief

27 Comments

27 Comments

  1. dcorun

    Mar 29, 2014 at 2:25 pm

    The only thing that continues to bother me is the lack of interest in other clubs. It seems that Cally, and TM are the only ones out there. Lord knows they have the money to spend on promotion but, golfers are missing out on a lot of really good drivers and irons because of this constant back and forth between the two. I play Cleveland equipment and always have. They make excellent clubs but, never get any credit for them. Just check out the GD Hot List, one FW and one set of irons are listed. I guess there wasn’t enough pages them and TM, Cally, Ping and Titleist. I do wish they would promote more because a lot of golfers are missing out on some great clubs. Sorry for the rant, everyone have a great golf season especially after this past winter.

  2. sam

    Mar 22, 2014 at 5:14 am

    The Titleist wedges look like a knock off of the Scor wedge, with weight higher to increase spin rates etc – it reads like they copied and pasted the idea from a Scor brochure! Still they never really have any original ideas of their own anyway, its always a redesign of a successful technology.

    • Sams Dumb

      Mar 23, 2014 at 9:39 am

      Ohhh burn. Go shoot 95 with your taylormade speedslot!

      • bradford

        Sep 24, 2014 at 10:22 am

        Oh burn–you’ve never broken 100, “Sams dumb”-ever.

  3. Boomgolf28

    Mar 21, 2014 at 8:20 pm

    It looks to me like Titleist is taking a page out of Adams book too. That iron design looks a bit like the CMB, same multi-materiel forging concept. Of all of the new stuff above that’s the one I want to hit most haha.

  4. Brian

    Mar 20, 2014 at 11:18 am

    Great information, as usual. I am very excited to see what Titleist has in store with those irons. Looks like a MB design with some multi-material forgiveness built in – a more “playerish” AP2, if you will. If so, sign me up!

  5. Jonathan

    Mar 19, 2014 at 9:40 pm

    The inventors listed on the TayloMade driver are both listed as residing in Texas, one specifically in Plano. That’s all the proof needed that TM has resorted to having to go to Adams for help. The only other possibility is that all design projects get filed under TM, and then once approved, the product actually gets assigned to Adams to take it to market.

    • Jonathan

      Mar 19, 2014 at 10:18 pm

      Actually the more I think about it, this has to be an Adams product. There’s no way that a TM driver is going to get patent approval and be registered without Benoit Vincent’s name on it as at least a contributing inventor. My guess is that TM is forcing Adams to get back to the “speed design” business while TM continues to take the wheel on low-forward CG design. A good way to prevent brand cannibalism in the marketplace between the two.

      • Elmo

        Mar 20, 2014 at 3:00 am

        I agree. I thought that as soon as I saw the head shape. It looks like it has that aerodynamic channel on the side that you always see on adams.

        • dMac

          Mar 20, 2014 at 10:45 pm

          Funnily enough this morning I was looking at an Adams 9064LS. When I looked at the TM offering I went hmmm then I wondered what the view would be like from underneath.
          One thing the 9064 had was a spacer in the hosel that let you adjust shaft length by about 0.5 inch- I wonder how long (no pun intended)…

    • leftright

      Mar 27, 2014 at 11:15 am

      This is why the only products in my bag other than my putter are Adams. They are and have been on the forefront for awhile. I have tried Vokey’s, ATV’s, etc. but the Pugielli’s continue to be the best wedges for me. The new XTD driver is the longest I have tested. The SLDR was similar because it rolled out more but I prefer longer carry.

  6. AC Green

    Mar 19, 2014 at 9:02 pm

    Could the Titleist wedge be an indicator of the first work done by James Harrington aka James Patrick? Also does the shape of the Taylormade driver in the front facing drawing remind anyone of the Adams Launch Lab?

  7. BigBoy.

    Mar 19, 2014 at 8:07 pm

    what a load of rubbish.
    technology has done nothing for the golf swing and never will.
    todays golfer is a bigger hack than golfers of past.
    the so called new clubs are no different than clubs built in the 70’s, if anything they do not help the golfer whatsoever.
    a turd is a turd is a turd…they polish it and shout from the rooftops “look what we have invented”…and the sucker public bows down and believes the golfing evangelists.
    what a shame golfers today have no real desire to improve their swings but will upgrade clubs yearly believing the spin the golfing companies tell them.

    • John

      Mar 20, 2014 at 11:27 am

      I guess you still play persimmon clubs and hogan apex irons with pro 90 golf balls right?

      technology does not make huge leaps every year no doubt but if you try to argue that over periods of time it doesn’t make a difference you are crazy

    • paul

      Mar 21, 2014 at 9:01 am

      Typical pessimist comment about tech doesn’t matter, followed by tech doesn’t help, no one cares anymore about their swing (hacks usually don’t, they play for fun).
      Cue the typical reply about persimmons and apex irons (I have some apex irons).
      So tired of these comments.

  8. Chuck

    Mar 19, 2014 at 5:54 pm

    This is such a great regular feature. And very well-written.

  9. Jim

    Mar 19, 2014 at 5:21 pm

    Looks like the SLDR ALPHA is coming with the guarantee of 400 yard drives 17 degree launch and a mind numbing 1 rpm of backspin for all and 2 yards of dispersion

    • jgpl001

      Mar 21, 2014 at 2:35 am

      When is this being release? Next week?

      This is the one I have been waiting for – can’t wait

  10. pk20152

    Mar 19, 2014 at 4:59 pm

    I’m surprise TM hasn’t overloaded the US Patent office with their latest and greatest design. As a matter of fact I bet they’re the running joke at the Patent office “look what I got guys! hot off the press.. another rare patent submissions from TM”… no thanks. I am Titlist loyal.

  11. MHendon

    Mar 19, 2014 at 3:12 pm

    Hmmmm so Taylormade is going with a design strangely similar to something Adams has already had on the market.

    • kibbs

      Mar 19, 2014 at 5:51 pm

      Well, since tney do own Adams Golf now, I wouldn’t see why they would do so seeing how Adams was the most advanced driver in speed (aerodynamically speaking). Coupling those two technologies of speed and adjust-ability is the next logical step. I can’t wait to see what they come out with.

      • bradford

        Sep 24, 2014 at 10:26 am

        Agreed, almost all of the long drive guys are playing Speedlines because of the head speed they can get. This and the slot technology were the two main reasons I thought they bought Adams in the first place. I’d REALLY like to see them incorporate some of the iron tech as well.

  12. Danny

    Mar 19, 2014 at 2:34 pm

    SLDRier in white, guaranteed 17 yards longer or your money back! Why play a Titleist and drive it 250 yards when you can play a Taylormade and drive it 325 with the same swing!

    Taylormade should start doing infomercials

    • AntiDanny

      Mar 21, 2014 at 12:36 am

      Here’s Danny again spewing hate to TM, further perpetuating that “haters gonna hate” only because the company leading the market is.. well.. leading the market. Sourpuss.

    • leftright

      Mar 27, 2014 at 11:18 am

      The Adams XTD and SLDR were the longest drivers for me, LH, 103 average swing speed by a bit (stock shafts) and I tested them all. I do think Adams probably is the brains behind TM now.

    • leftright

      Mar 27, 2014 at 11:21 am

      I hate to say it but the SLDR is heads and tails better than the 913. Titleist is going to have to hire away Justin Honea from Adams to rejuvenate their driver line. Titleist, straight but short.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Whats in the Bag

Wesley Bryan WITB 2024 (May)

Published

on

  • Wesley Bryan what’s in the bag accurate as of the CJ Cup Byron Nelson.

Driver: Callaway Paradym Ai Smoke Triple Diamond Max (9 degrees @10)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Diamana GT 50 TX

3-wood: TaylorMade Stealth Plus (15 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Diamana GT 60 X

Hybrid: TaylorMade Stealth 2 Plus Rescue (19.5 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus HB Blue 8 X

Irons: Titleist T200 (4), Takomo 101U (4), Takomo 101T (5), Takomo 301 CB (6-9)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100

Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (46-10F, 52-08F, 56-14F), Titleist Vokey Design WedgeWorks Proto (58-A)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400

Putter: L.A.B. Golf DF3

Grips: SuperStroke, Golf Pride Tour Velvet

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

More photos of Wesley Bryan’s WITB in the forums.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Why Wesley Bryan is playing two 4-irons this week

Published

on

Editor’s note: This is an excerpt from a piece our Andrew Tursky originally wrote for PGATour.com’s Equipment Report. Head over there for the full article. 

…Flash forward to THE CJ CUP Byron Nelson 2024 at TPC Craig Ranch in Texas, and Bryan is still playing with a mixed Takomo set, except he’s added a new 101 U 4-iron, plus a Titleist T200 4-iron, and he’s dropping his 5-iron.

That bears repeating: Bryan is switching to an iron setup that consists of two 4-irons and no 5-iron.

On paper, that looks wrong, but when you look at yardage gapping instead of the number on the sole of the iron, things start to make more sense.

As Bryan explained to GolfWRX.com on Tuesday in Texas, his Takomo 301 CB 6-iron goes about 195-200 yards. Then, his new hollow-bodied Takomo 101U Driving Iron, which he recently started testing “a couple weeks ago” and bent about 2 degrees weak, goes about 220 yards, and the Titleist T200 4-iron goes about 235 yards.

Speaking on his new Takomo 101U Driving Iron, which sells for $119, Bryan had this to say:

“It’s super forgiving and launches high, and it has a bit longer of a profile to where it looks really good,” said Bryan. “If people are willing to play something that doesn’t have an expensive price tag on their club…[I started testing it] in the last couple weeks and it’s in the bag.

“I just made it like 2 degrees weaker. Basically that gap from 205 to 225 I was in a little bit of a dead space, so I’m going to try and fill that gap better.”

Check out Wesley Bryan’s full WITB here.

Read the rest of the article at PGATour.com. 

Your Reaction?
  • 7
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Most forgiving players irons? – GolfWRXers discuss

Published

on

In our forums, our members have been discussing players irons. WRXer ‘NorthTXGolf’ is on the hunt for some new irons but is putting a priority on forgiveness, and has reached out to fellow members who have been sharing their thoughts and advice on the subject in our forum.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • Sam217: “i230 has got to be one of the most forgiving players irons available. Cobra King Tour another. Don’t sleep on the New Level 480 DB coming out soon.”
  • RangeBaller: “ZX5/ZX7 and i230 should definitely be in your testing pool.”
  • YAMS49: “Another I210 homie here… Very highly recommended if you want/need spin and a consistent yardage.”
  • golf-RN: “I second the Cobra King Tour irons. I am not the greatest ballstriker by any stretch of the imagination and I find the King Tours very forgiving. Toe strikes might lose 5 or 6 yards with no directional loss. You definitely feel the miss though lol but mishits from the center aren’t punished too hard regarding distance.”

Entire Thread: “Most forgiving Players irons? – GolfWRXers discuss”

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending