Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

The 23 Players Who Can Win The Masters

Published

on

Last year, I created a filter to help predict the golfers that were most likely to win the Masters. I got the list down to 23 players. In the end, eight of the top-10 finishers were on that list of 23 players that included the eventual winner Adam Scott and runner-up Angel Cabrera.

Before I discuss my picks of this year’s Masters, I want to go over what I call the “critical holes” for Augusta National. The critical holes in any tournament are the ones where the top finishers typically gain the most strokes versus the field, as well as where the greatest deviation in score exists. Going into last year, the critical holes were Nos. 7, 12, 15, 17 and 18. However, after last year, the data is trending differently and now the critical holes are Nos. 7, 12, 13 and 18. With the Eisenhower Tree and some other trees down after the winter storms this year, I would suspect that No. 17 will be easier and it may be a long time before the 17th is a critical hole at the Masters again. Either way, I would watch out for this new set of critical holes as the tournament goes along.

Moving on to the tournament, I filtered out the past champions who are well past their time being competitive and the amateurs.

  • Matthew Fitzpatrick (amateur)
  • Oliver Goss (amateur)
  • Chang-Woo Lee (amateur)
  • Michael McCoy (amateur)
  • Jordan Niebrugge (amateur)
  • Garrick Porteous (amateur)
  • Fred Couples (past champion)
  • Ben Crenshaw (past champion)
  • Bernhard Langer (past champion)
  • Sandy Lyle (past champion)
  • Mark O’Meara (past champion)
  • Larry Mize (past champion)
  • Jose Maria Olazabal (past champion)
  • Craig Stadler (past champion)
  • Tom Watson (past champion)
  • Mike Weir (past champion)
  • Ian Woosnam (past champion)

I also eliminated any first time invitees, as the only first time invitee to ever win at Augusta was Fuzzy Zoeller in 1979.

  • Jonas Blixt
  • Steven Bowditch
  • Roberto Castro
  • Brendon de Jonge
  • Graham DeLaet
  • Victor Dubuisson
  • Harris English
  • Derek Ernst
  • Matt Every
  • Steven Gallacher
  • Billy Horschel
  • Matt Jones
  • Chris Kirk
  • Joost Luiten
  • Patrick Reed
  • Jordan Spieth
  • Kevin Stadler
  • Jimmy Walker

I will say that this group of 1st time invitees is one of the strongest in recent memory with golfers like Bowditch, DeLaet, English, Ernst, Every, Horschel, Jones, Kirk, Reed, Spieth, Stadler and Walker all appearing to be good fits for Augusta National. So, if there is ever a year where somebody may break the first time invitee curse, this is it.

I also eliminated the players who missed the cut at the Shell Houston Open this week because historically the odds of a player missing the cut the previous week and winning the next week are extremely slim. Those players include:

  • Darren Clarke
  • Peter Hanson
  • Trevor Immelman
  • Dustin Johnson
  • Martin Kaymer
  • Louis Oosthuizen
  • Ian Poulter
  • Scott Stallings
  • Kevin Streelman

I also eliminated John Senden, as he has only made the cut once in three tries Augusta and the odds of winning go way down for golfers that have struggled to make the cut at the course.

I also filtered out the European and Asian players on which I do not have substantial data:

  • Francesco Molinari
  • Thongchai Jaidee
  • Thomas Bjorn
  • Jamie Donaldson
  • Thorbjorn Olesen

Over the past 10 years, Augusta National has heavily favored longer hitters that hit the ball high and well from what I call ‘”The Danger Zone.” The Danger Zone is all approach shots from 175-to-225 yards, and it is biggest key to Augusta National, because without quality Danger Zone play at the Masters the golfer will not be successful.

While Augusta National is known for its greens, the make percentage on putts is fairly high from inside 15 feet; likely due to the excellent putting surfaces. The real difficulty on the greens at Augusta is from longer than 20 feet away. Between the undulations and the super-fast green speed, it becomes a task to not three-putt the long ones at Augusta. The big reason why long hitters do so well at Augusta now is that the course plays like a par 68 for them, and that allows them to get away with putting worse. So, if a player is not long, they had better bring good putting and Danger Zone play with them.

Moving on with the list, I eliminated players who I think are too short to play well at Augusta National. They include:

  • Tim Clark
  • Jim Furyk
  • Zach Johnson
  • David Lynn
  • KJ Choi

While Zach Johnson is a previous champion, he also won in a year where there were record low temperatures. This helped Johnson because the longer hitters could not play the par-5’s like a par-4 and that shifted the advantage toward him and his excellent wedge play. Unless there are either cold or wet conditions, I highly doubt the players I just listed stand much of a chance of winning.

I’ve also taken out the low-ball hitters off my list of potential winners. They include:

  • Sang-Moon Bae
  • Jason Dufner
  • Ken Duke
  • Branden Grace
  • Miguel Jimenez
  • Matteo Manassero
  • Graeme McDowell
  • D.A. Points
  • Boo Weekley
  • Y.E. Yang

That leads me to filtering out the last group of players who have struggled from the Danger Zone this year. They are:

  • Lucas Glover
  • Ernie Els
  • Rickie Fowler
  • Bill Haas
  • Russell Henley
  • John Huh
  • Ryan Moore
  • Webb Simpson
  • Lee Westwood

That leaves me with the 23 players who can win the Masters. They are listed alphabetically.

  1. Keegan Bradley
  2. Angel Cabrera
  3. Stewart Cink
  4. Jason Day
  5. Luke Donald
  6. Gonzalo Fernandez-Castano
  7. Sergio Garcia
  8. Matt Kuchar
  9. Marc Leishman
  10. Hunter Mahan
  11. Hideki Matsuyama
  12. Rory McIlroy
  13. Phil Mickelson
  14. Justin Rose
  15. Charl Schwartzel
  16. Adam Scott
  17. Vijay Singh
  18. Brandt Snedeker
  19. Henrik Stenson
  20. Steve Stricker
  21. Nick Watney
  22. Bubba Watson
  23. Gary Woodland

Of those 23 players, here are my top-10 picks to win The Masters:

  • Rory McIlroy (9/1)*
  • Adam Scott (9/1)
  • Phil Mickelson (11/1)
  • Jason Day (14/1)
  • Matt Kuchar (20/1)
  • Bubba Watson (25/1)
  • Justin Rose (28/1)
  • Brandt Snedeker (33/1)
  • Keegan Bradley (33/1)
  • Marc Leishman (100/1)

*Odds from Bovada accurate as of 4/7/14 at 11 a.m.

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Richie Hunt is a statistician whose clients include PGA Tour players, their caddies and instructors in order to more accurately assess their games. He is also the author of the recently published e-book, 2018 Pro Golf Synopsis; the Moneyball Approach to the Game of Golf. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @Richie3Jack. GolfWRX Writer of the Month: March 2014 Purchase 2017 Pro Golf Synopsis E-book for $10

86 Comments

86 Comments

  1. In Ly Nhua Nap Cau

    Jan 2, 2019 at 10:46 am

    Very informative and interesting article. Well done.

    Love Leishman as a surprise pick.

  2. mua c?n h? safira khang ?i?n

    Aug 25, 2018 at 4:13 am

    Very informative and interesting article. Well done.
    Love Leishman as a surprise pick.

  3. Pingback: Golf Swing Video Quang | Discounts For Golf

  4. quang cao wifi

    Oct 8, 2014 at 4:39 am

    I recently couldn’t depart your website just before recommending that I really liked the normal information any person quang cao wifi offer on your friends? Are going to be just as before constantly to consider innovative content

    • c?n h? sapphire

      Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 pm

      thought this was a great read and the more i read it the more i liked it . this week its so falling to place that rory ,phil and adam scott are the three to watch but if you want a hint of form –bradley ,scott and big phil are the three that you should take a dart and stick the wage packet on one of them

  5. Pingback: cigarettes sale - buy online smokes

  6. Bubba W., Orlando

    Apr 14, 2014 at 6:40 pm

    Great performances by Spieth, Blixt, Kuchar and Langer

    • Bubba W., Orlando

      Apr 14, 2014 at 6:43 pm

      btw, isnt it amazing to see Langer and Couples still doing so well against the young guns?

  7. DavePelz4

    Apr 14, 2014 at 5:35 pm

    Technically, there have been 3 first time winners. Horton Smith won the very first Invitational tournament held at ANGC. Gene Sarazen also was a winner in his first tournament.

  8. cole

    Apr 13, 2014 at 8:33 pm

    Nice Top tens. Picking three of ten seems good to me!

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 14, 2014 at 1:38 pm

      Thanks. The winner was more important to me. The editor, Zak, asked me who I had and I picked Bubba.

      I also stated that I thought this was the best group of 1st time invitees we had since I can remember. I think the 1st time invitee curse is mostly due to the hoopla and hysteria of going to the Masters for the first time. Even if you’ve played the course before, the actual tournament is a different story. I think the other part behind the curse is that there is a lot of pressure of winning the Masters for the first time combined with the likelihood of it being your first major championship victory.

  9. bigbadbullfrog

    Apr 11, 2014 at 11:38 am

    “Keegan Bradley has a major under his belt. I think he has more than the stomach for it. In fact, I think he screams ‘GET IN MY BELLY!’” SMH. He’s saying ‘get in my belly’ to the weekend breakfast special at Waffle House because he certainly isn’t making the cut.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 11, 2014 at 3:47 pm

      And Zach Johnson doesn’t appear to be making the cut either. The main point is that saying Keegan doesn’t have the stomach to win a major…..and he’s already won a major doesn’t make much sense.

  10. Dennis

    Apr 9, 2014 at 10:00 pm

    Very solid list. Sure the winner is in.
    I will follow the frenchie Dubuisson, he was just amazing at the WGC Matchplay Championship.

  11. Kevin McGarrahan

    Apr 9, 2014 at 5:01 pm

    I would not count out Patrick Reed. Although it is his first time at the Masters, it is not his first time playing Augusta National. He attended Augusta State University and played some of his collegiate golf at Augusta. That gives him a large advantage over all the other first timers.

    • Rich

      Apr 11, 2014 at 10:06 pm

      Yes it certainly seemed to help him…………………….

    • brad

      May 1, 2014 at 8:02 am

      Honestly I don’t see him as a fixture. I think he’ll play well every few years, but then remain in that 60-70 bracket in the world ranks. Attitude is everything, and he lacks it. He did play well for a few weeks though.

  12. Denis Larkin

    Apr 9, 2014 at 6:33 am

    thought this was a great read and the more i read it the more i liked it . this week its so falling to place that rory ,phil and adam scott are the three to watch but if you want a hint of form –bradley ,scott and big phil are the three that you should take a dart and stick the wage packet on one of them .

  13. Tony Peace

    Apr 9, 2014 at 5:48 am

    Well,you’ve eliminated my 4 picks of Zach,Ricky,Ernie & Trev Immelmann. Interesting to see how you fare. Good luck.

  14. baljit

    Apr 9, 2014 at 12:52 am

    The guy condemning Rory clearly has not seen him hit balls in person.

    Striking out the first timers based on tournament history sounds logical. but looking at the qualities of the first timers in field, Im not surprised if one of them wins

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 9, 2014 at 10:47 am

      I do think that this is the best 1-time invitee group of golfers we have had in a long time. It wouldn’t shock me if a player won, but it’s historically been difficult to win the first time playing any event on Tour. Particularly the Masters.

      • baljit

        Apr 30, 2014 at 9:45 am

        and two newbies nearly won it…i rest my case

  15. LMB

    Apr 8, 2014 at 10:19 pm

    I get the way you did this list, but you have Vijay Singh on there with a chance to win but not Bernhard Langer? IMHO Bernhard is a much more solid/consistant player and would probably wipe the floor with Vijay if they were competing in matchplay.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 9, 2014 at 10:51 am

      Vijay hits it higher and longer. He is also striking the ball quite well this year, particularly from 175-225 yards.

      • LMB

        Apr 14, 2014 at 11:59 pm

        Langer T-8…..Vijay???? No where to be seen. I rest my case.

  16. Nagar

    Apr 8, 2014 at 8:25 pm

    Good article. I feel Jason Day has a huge chance in winning. He has been near or near a bouts for 3 years now and is due for a major win.

  17. Pingback: Los favoritos para el Masters | colombiaDeportes.co

  18. Rob

    Apr 8, 2014 at 6:13 pm

    No love for Dufner? He may not win, but I’d bet on a top 10 finish for the Dufman.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 9, 2014 at 10:54 am

      2nd lowest trajectory on Tour. Also plays a fade. Love him as a player, but Augusta is a tough fit for him.

  19. PBGS

    Apr 8, 2014 at 12:58 pm

    Luke Donald is considered long enough?

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 9, 2014 at 10:55 am

      Not just based off distance, but club head speed. Luke is generating about 111 to 112 mph of club head speed. Trajectory is so important at ANGC and Luke has enough speed and hits it high. He’s borderline, but since he’s played very well in the past, I gave him the nod.

  20. Pingback: Los favoritos para el Masters | Golf76.com

  21. Mathieu

    Apr 8, 2014 at 12:00 pm

    very interesting, thanks,
    any thoughts on Dubuisson, even if he’s never played Augusta?

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 9, 2014 at 11:03 am

      Good driver of the ball that excels from 125-175 yard shots (ranked #1 on Tour). But poor from the Danger Zone (142nd) mainly because he has struggled to keep those shots in the fairway. He could stand a good chance here because he’s 8th in shots from the fairway and the rough at ANGC is negligible. Has putted terribly this year (174th in Putts Gained)

      • Mathieu

        Apr 11, 2014 at 2:00 am

        I guess he’s learning how to play in the USA. I think stats don’t count for him this year he’s improving every week, espacially on putting (slower greens in europe), we’ll see then. thanks

  22. Javier

    Apr 8, 2014 at 6:10 am

    A very reasonable list, I like it.
    Agree with you; Rory, Mickelson and Scott are the favorites, but I’d love that any of the Spaniards win the tournament, specially Sergio or Jimenez.

  23. Kyle

    Apr 8, 2014 at 4:34 am

    Not sure how the weathers going to be but i seen on the news yesterdays practice rounds were cancelled due to storms, Would you say the wetter weather will play into other players hands vs certain others?

    Anyone any idea about if Jason Days hand is ok? Nick Faldo mentioned he had injured it yesterday

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 8, 2014 at 8:57 am

      Depends on how wet it gets. If it makes for the greens to be softer, then the shorter hitters that strike their long approach shots well (i.e. Zach) have more of a chance. If it is soaked and the ball is not rolling off the tee, then it could start to favor their longer hitters because they can carry it further.

  24. Joel

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:45 pm

    In my humble opinion, I believe at ANGC, the “danger zone” should be differentiated between 175-200 and 200-225. A player could be pretty average from 200-225(Bubba Watson) but solid from 175ish and win. The same goes for Lee Westwood, and even though he’s not as long as Bubba, I think he plays to his strengths and weaknesses when it comes to 200+ approaches. Also, for what it’s worth, Zach Johnson is ahead of both Kuchar and Snedeker in regards to distance in 2014. I like him over both of those guys. That being said, 8 out of 10 on this list is flat out amazing.

    • Joel

      Apr 7, 2014 at 11:48 pm

      Sorry for the duplicate entries there. For some reason my 1st comment didnt show up for several hours. I suppose I’m REALLY pushing for Zach Johnson.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 8, 2014 at 9:01 am

      When I examine courses and what approach shots have the most strokes gained/lost from I actually look at it in 25-yard increments instead of 50-yard increments. Both 175-200 yards and 200-225 yards are where a lot of strokes are lost and gained. Not only on the par-4’s and par-3’s, but on the par-5’s. So if a long hitter like Bubba bombs one on a par-5 and has 215 yards into the hole, it doesn’t do him much good if he can’t execute from 215 yards.

  25. Pingback: Trending the Masters: Searching for the 2014 Winner : Future Of Fantasy

  26. Sky

    Apr 7, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    I think it’s a very solid list. I would call Kuchar a shorter hitter and a low ball hitter though.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 8, 2014 at 9:03 am

      Thanks, Sky. I base short hitting not only on distance, but club head speed. I base low ball hitting based on what the Max Height averages reported from ShotLink. Kuchar is not terribly short nor does he hit it terribly low. I will say like Luke Donald, he’s on the borderline (Donald actually hits it high). But given his success here in the past in good weather conditions and his recent play I put him on the list.

  27. Nick Boyd

    Apr 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm

    Fred Couples seems to be in the mix every year on sunday, thats the one that sticks out to me as a booboo. Interesting process of elimination and good read overall!

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 8, 2014 at 1:21 am

      My issue with Freddie is I don’t think his back would hold up.

      • Nick Boyd

        Apr 8, 2014 at 5:53 pm

        Its Augusta – Freddy lives for Augusta

    • Jack Michaels

      Apr 9, 2014 at 1:31 pm

      I agree. Couples’ history at Augusta is so stella in recent years, plus his form on the Champions Tour has been great. At the 175/1 I got I think that Freddy is a solid each way bet.

  28. leftright

    Apr 7, 2014 at 4:46 pm

    Rich,
    I’ll give you your 10 and take the rest for $100. Please email me if you want the bet and anyone else who wants the bet I’ll take it. You take Rich’s 10 and I’ll take the rest.

    • leftright

      Apr 7, 2014 at 4:50 pm

      I only made this comment to be sort of in your face because it is going to be real wet this year it seems. Brings many others into play. Personally I hop Phil wins…ABT.

    • Jason

      Apr 9, 2014 at 12:40 am

      Ill take the bet of his top 23 Vs Field. 10 vs 80 is a little lopsided.

  29. Joel

    Apr 7, 2014 at 4:37 pm

    Maybe I’m a dork but I love this stuff, and 8 out of 10 is incredible. If I can play devils advocate, it seems to me that there are players where “Danger Zone” avoidance is more important than danger zone play. Westwood and Watson are two that come to mind. Is it possible the sample size is smaller for them because they’re aware of this weakness? Both struggle from 200-225 but neither often leave themselves that far out(on 4’s or 5’s at Augusta.) It seems obvious but I wonder if Bubba had the fewest “danger zone” attempts two years ago. You have Zach Johnson listed as “too short” but he actually leads Snedeker and Kuchar in driving distance in 2014-I think he’s got a legitimate shot. For a longshot, and I know his putting can be sketchy, but I like Woodland. I have no statistics to back it up either:)

  30. Kevin

    Apr 7, 2014 at 3:11 pm

    I really liked this article, a great way to look at this topic.

    My one question is, why didn’t Luke Donald fall into your “too short” category? I don’t feel he’s any longer than the others you mentioned. His average finish in driving distance is in the high 160s or low 170s, so there’s only like 10 guys on the PGA Tour each year who, on average, hit their drives shorter than him.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 5:18 pm

      I measure ‘too short’ not only on distance, but based on club head speed. Donald also hits the ball much higher. He’s really on the borderline, but since he has played well at ANGC in the past, I kept him in the top-23

  31. west

    Apr 7, 2014 at 2:38 pm

    Whaaaaat?!?! Making predictions like this are “speculative” at best. Sports, especially golf, has soooo many factors you couldn’t possibly factor or weigh them all in a way that might contribute to making an accurate prediction. Can’t wait to see how things turn out this week. You’re playing the lotto here, and my only prediction is that someone will win that is not on your top ten list…

    • west

      Apr 7, 2014 at 2:39 pm

      Did the Final Four teach you nothing this year? 😉

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 3:11 pm

      There are many common trends that and statistical probabilities that favor certain types of players on each course on Tour. Your odds of seeing somebody like Tim Clark win here are very slim. Yet, a course like Sawgrass will play much more into his favor and is why he has won there. Last year, 8 of the top-10 finishers were in my final 23. The only players that were not were Jason Day (bad Danger Zone play) and Thorbjorn Olesen (a European player I have no data on).

      • Keith

        Apr 7, 2014 at 3:33 pm

        Day is 16th on the Fed Ex Cup and Won the World Cup and the World Matchplay? How is that in the Danger Zone.

  32. John

    Apr 7, 2014 at 2:20 pm

    Very informative and interesting article. Well done.

    Love Leishman as a surprise pick.

    • Mx

      Apr 7, 2014 at 3:02 pm

      Not really a surprise as he has already played extremely well at augusta. Can’t remember what year it was though. I would never rule out DJ, Poulter and, after last years performance, Thorbjorn Olesen.

      • John

        Apr 7, 2014 at 5:23 pm

        his odds are 100/1 to win. I’d call that a surprise if he did.

  33. Dude McDude

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:56 am

    “They are, in no particular order”

    Except they are in alphabetical order…

  34. Jamie Kennedy

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:43 am

    FYI – Senden has made the cut. He finished T35th last year.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 12:05 pm

      You know what? You’re right. When I was looking at his past history on Wikipedia, I got the columns screwed up. I think he stands a chance since he is a good Danger Zone player (shots from 150+ yards), but his record at ANGC has not been good.

  35. nikkyd

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:21 am

    Rory mcilroy has got to be the most over rated young player on tour. And a whiner at best.

    • T

      Apr 7, 2014 at 11:26 am

      do you have any stats to back that up??? Seeing as this is an article about statistics…not ridiculous intangibles…regardless how is a two time major winner before the age of 24 overrated?

      • Pudo

        Apr 8, 2014 at 1:17 pm

        Word! Rors is Top Notch material! If he was a Yankee he’d be your man all day long.! Wake the f**k up Nikkyd!

    • Jacob

      Apr 7, 2014 at 11:42 am

      2 Majors championships is over-rated? You have very high standards sir.

    • Sean Edwards

      Apr 7, 2014 at 12:02 pm

      Overrated? Two majors, and three wins in 4 weeks? Overrated?? He has more talent in his pinky than half of the tour players. Quit making ignorant statements with no evidence to back it up. Go Rory!!!

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 12:09 pm

      He’s won 2 majors including a blow-out victory at the US Open and won the PGA decisively. He was leading the Masters in decisive fashion until blowing up on the final day. And then he did the interview afterward despite being heartbroken (he had yet to have won a major at that time) and handled the interview as professionally and as maturely as anybody I have ever seen. And he’s only 24 years old. He hasn’t been perfect in his behavior, but he has acted very maturely, kindly and in general I find him to be a terrific representative of the game of golf.

    • Craig Peckham

      Apr 8, 2014 at 1:00 am

      I have said this for a while about Rory McIlroy; he has only won primarily in ‘soft’ conditions. As Tiger once said about Rory, he will win more when he learns the nuances of the game. If it rains before or during the Masters week and the wind stays down, look for Rory to be in contention (Top 5), otherwise I don’t think he will be in the Top 10. He simply doesn’t have the variety of shots, or doesn’t have the confidence yet to use when called for. As for Mr. Richie Hunt, I am surprised that in your statistical analysis you didn’t factor in age. Aren’t most Masters winners over 30 and primarily under 35 (with some exceptions of course). The age factor presumably would mean enough PGA Tour and competitive experience combined with athletic ability.

      • Björn

        Apr 9, 2014 at 2:43 am

        Rory grew up playing Royal County Down. One of the best golf courses in the workd and without a doubt one of the windiest. It also has very firm greens and requires a reportoir of shots that no course in the US requires. I think he has it all.

  36. T

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:20 am

    Love the article and the in depth statistical analysis. I do have a question or two about where you get your stats. Let’s take Ryan Moore for instance. He is currently ranked #2 in GIR from 175-200 yds & #11 in Approaches from the same distance as of the SHO so should he really be eliminated because of the “danger zone” stat? He may not be a solid contender but his current form and history at Augusta make him an intriguing pick just below the favorites.

    • Richie Hunt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 12:03 pm

      Danger Zone is based on proximity to the cup. It is also based on shots from 175-225 yards. What is interesting is that I created a formula that took proximity to the cup and the % of greens *missed*. The lowest combination of the two would be the ‘best.’ I’ve found that from 125-175 yards being the best at these two (prox 2 cup + greens missed %), this was statistically very important. But from 175+ yards, not so much. From 175+ yards it is more about getting the ball closer to the hole.

      I don’t have this off the top of my head, but Moore was ranked in the bottom half in Danger Zone play this year. So I think you’re likely over-valueing GIR % from that distance and not counting in shots from 200-225 yards.

  37. Nick

    Apr 7, 2014 at 11:06 am

    Zach Johnson is too short to play Augusta? Really? He’s as long as he was in 2007… when he won at Augusta.

    • Matt

      Apr 7, 2014 at 11:10 am

      I think Rich explained why he said ZJ was too short and gave a brief explanation to why he believes he was able to compete in 07.

      • leftright

        Apr 7, 2014 at 4:54 pm

        The most important stat is “who has got the head for it.” That pretty much eliminates 5 of the 10 off the bat. You have to fail before you succeed and Snedeker, Leishman, Day, Bradley and Kuchar have to fail first, despite the PGA wins. None of those guys have to stomach for it yet.

        • kent

          Apr 7, 2014 at 8:43 pm

          leftright….while I do agree with you that many of those do not likely have the stomach, Watson disproved that theory with his win a couple years ago. As much fun as he is to watch, I can’t remember a more shaky looking player in contention (not sure if you caught his skulled chip earlier this year). And yet, he hit one great shot from the trees to earn his jacket. I’d certainly put my money on all those you listed over Bubba a couple years ago.

          • leftright

            Apr 8, 2014 at 3:00 pm

            I sort of agree but if Bubba had Tiger or Jack’s “stomach” he would have won 15 majors by now. They talk about Tiger’s talent but Bubba may have the most talent ever. Essentially, and this is from personal experience and speaking with many real good players, 99% of golfers really don’t have the stomach for it. The mind is the most underrated part of golf and most underrated skill. I personally would like to see more psychiatric articles because my mind is beating me to death most of the time and probably many of you. Do the hibijeebees control you or do you control them? Tiger and Jack controlled them best if they even had them.

        • Richie Hunt

          Apr 8, 2014 at 1:23 am

          Keegan Bradley has a major under his belt. I think he has more than the stomach for it. In fact, I think he screams ‘GET IN MY BELLY!’

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s LIV Golf Singapore betting preview: Course specialist ready to thrive once again

Published

on

After another strong showing in Australia, LIV Golf will head to Sentosa Golf Club in Singapore looking to build off of what was undoubtedly their best event to date.

Sentosa Golf Club sits on the southern tip of Singapore and is one of the most beautiful courses in the world. The course is more than just incredible scenically; it was also rated 55th in Golf Digest’s top-100 courses in 2022-2023 and has been consistently regarded as one of the best courses in Asia. Prior to being part of the LIV rotation, the course hosted the Singapore Open every year since 2005.

Sentosa Golf Club is a par 71 measuring 7,406 yards. The course will require precise ball striking and some length off the tee. It’s possible to go low due to the pristine conditions, but there are also plenty of hazards and difficult spots on the course that can bring double bogey into play in a hurry. The Bermudagrass greens are perfectly manicured, and the course has spent millions on the sub-air system to keep the greens rolling fast. I spoke to Asian Tour player, Travis Smyth, who described the greens as “the best [he’s] ever played.”

Davis Love III, who competed in a Singapore Open in 2019, also gushed over the condition of the golf course.

“I love the greens. They are fabulous,” the 21-time PGA Tour winner said.

Love III also spoke about other aspects of the golf course.

“The greens are great; the fairways are perfect. It is a wonderful course, and it’s tricky off the tee.”

“It’s a long golf course, and you get some long iron shots. It takes somebody hitting it great to hit every green even though they are big.”

As Love III said, the course can be difficult off the tee due to the length of the course and the trouble looming around every corner. It will take a terrific ball striking week to win at Sentosa Golf Club.

In his pre-tournament press conference last season, Phil Mickelson echoed many of the same sentiments.

“To play Sentosa effectively, you’re going to have a lot of shots from 160 to 210, a lot of full 6-, 7-, 8-iron shots, and you need to hit those really well and you need to drive the ball well.”

Golfers who excel from tee to green and can dial in their longer irons will have a massive advantage this week.

Stat Leaders at LIV Golf Adelaide:

Fairways Hit

1.) Louis Oosthuizen

2.) Anirban Lahiri

3.) Jon Rahm

4.) Brendan Steele

5.) Cameron Tringale

Greens in Regulation

1.) Brooks Koepka

2.) Brendan Steele

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Cameron Tringale

5.) Anirban Lahiri

Birdies Made

1.) Brendan Steele

2.) Dean Burmester

3.) Thomas Pieters

4.) Patrick Reed

5.) Carlos Ortiz

LIV Golf Individual Standings:

1.) Joaquin Niemann

2.) Jon Rahm

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Louis Oosthuizen

5.) Abraham Ancer

LIV Golf Team Standings:

1.) Crushers

2.) Legion XIII

3.) Torque

4.) Stinger GC

5.) Ripper GC

LIV Golf Singapore Picks

Sergio Garcia +3000 (DraftKings)

Sergio Garcia is no stranger to Sentosa Golf Club. The Spaniard won the Singapore Open in 2018 by five strokes and lost in a playoff at LIV Singapore last year to scorching hot Talor Gooch. Looking at the course setup, it’s no surprise that a player like Sergio has played incredible golf here. He’s long off the tee and is one of the better long iron players in the world when he’s in form. Garcia is also statistically a much better putter on Bermudagrass than he is on other putting surfaces. He’s putt extremely well on Sentosa’s incredibly pure green complexes.

This season, Garcia has two runner-up finishes, both of them being playoff losses. Both El Camaleon and Doral are courses he’s had success at in his career. The Spaniard is a player who plays well at his tracks, and Sentosa is one of them. I believe Sergio will get himself in the mix this week. Hopefully the third time is a charm in Singapore.

Paul Casey +3300 (FanDuel)

Paul Casey is in the midst of one of his best seasons in the five years or so. The results recently have been up and down, but he’s shown that when he’s on a golf course that suits his game, he’s amongst the contenders.

This season, Casey has finishes of T5 (LIV Las Vegas), T2 (LIV Hong Kong), and a 6th at the Singapore Classic on the DP World Tour. At his best, the Englishman is one of the best long iron players in the world, which makes him a strong fit for Sentosa. Despite being in poor form last season, he was able to fire a Sunday 63, which shows he can low here at the course.

It’s been three years since Casey has won a tournament (Omega Dubai Desert Classic in 2021), but he’s been one of the top players on LIV this season and I think he can get it done at some point this season.

Mito Pereira +5000 (Bet365)

Since Mito Pereira’s unfortunate demise at the 2022 PGA Championship, he’s been extremely inconsistent. However, over the past few months, the Chilean has played well on the International Series as well as his most recent LIV start. Mito finished 8th at LIV Adelaide, which was his best LIV finish this season.

Last year, Pereira finished 5th at LIV Singapore, shooting fantastic rounds of 67-66-66. It makes sense why Mito would like Sentosa, as preeminent ball strikers tend to rise to the challenge of the golf course. He’s a great long iron player who is long and straight off the tee.

Mito has some experience playing in Asia and is one of the most talented players on LIV who’s yet to get in the winner’s circle. I have questions about whether or not he can come through once in contention, but if he gets there, I’m happy to roll the dice.

Andy Ogletree +15000 (DraftKings)

Andy Ogletree is a player I expected to have a strong 2024 but struggled early in his first full season on LIV. After failing to crack the top-25 in any LIV event this year, the former U.S. Amateur champion finally figured things out, finished in a tie for 3rd at LIV Adelaide.

Ogletree should be incredible comfortable playing in Singapore. He won the International Series Qatar last year and finished T3 at the International Series Singapore. The 26-year-old was arguably the best player on the Asian Tour in 2023 and has been fantastic in the continent over the past 18 months.

If Ogletree has indeed found form, he looks to be an amazing value at triple-digit odds.

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Ryan: Lessons from the worst golf instructor in America

Published

on

In Tampa, there is a golf course that boasts carts that do not work, a water range, and a group of players none of which have any chance to break 80. The course is overseen by a staff of crusty men who have succeeded at nothing in life but ending up at the worst-run course in America. However, this place is no failure. With several other local courses going out of business — and boasting outstanding greens — the place is booked full.

While I came for the great greens, I stayed to watch our resident instructor; a poor-tempered, method teacher who caters to the hopeless. At first, it was simply hilarious. However, after months of listening and watching, something clicked. I realized I had a front-row seat to the worst golf instructor in America.

Here are some of my key takeaways.

Method Teacher

It is widely accepted that there are three types of golf instructors: system teachers, non-system teachers, and method teachers. Method teachers prescribe the same antidote for each student based on a preamble which teachers can learn in a couple day certification.

Method teaching allows anyone to be certified. This process caters to the lowest caliber instructor, creating the illusion of competency. This empowers these underqualified instructors with the moniker of “certified” to prey on the innocent and uninformed.

The Cult of Stack and Jilt

The Stack and Tilt website proudly boasts, “A golfer swings his hands inward in the backswing as opposed to straight back to 1) create power, similar to a field goal kicker moving his leg in an arc and 2) to promote a swing that is in-to-out, which produces a draw (and eliminates a slice).”

Now, let me tell you something, there is this law of the universe which says “energy can either be created or destroyed,” so either these guys are defying physics or they have no idea what they are taking about. Further, the idea that the first move of the backswing determines impact is conjecture with a splash of utter fantasy.

These are the pontifications of a method — a set of prescriptions applied to everyone with the hope of some success through the placebo effect. It is one thing for a naive student to believe, for a golf instructor to drink and then dispel this Kool-Aid is malpractice.

Fooled by Randomness

In flipping a coin, or even a March Madness bet, there is a 50-50 chance of success. In golf, especially for new players, results are asymmetric. Simply put: Anything can happen. The problem is that when bad instructors work with high handicappers, each and every shot gets its own diagnosis and prescription. Soon the student is overwhelmed.

Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design. In this case, the coach is not trying to make you better, they are trying to make you reliant on them for information. A quasi Stockholm syndrome of codependency.

Practice

One of the most important scientists of the 20th century was Ivan Pavlov. As you might recall, he found that animals, including humans, could be conditioned into biological responses. In golf, the idea of practice has made millions of hackers salivate that they are one lesson or practice session from “the secret.”

Sunk Cost

The idea for the worst golf instructor is to create control and dependency so that clients ignore the sunk cost of not getting better. Instead, they are held hostage by the idea that they are one lesson or tip away from unlocking their potential.

Cliches

Cliches have the effect of terminating thoughts. However, they are the weapon of choice for this instructor. Add some hyperbole and students actually get no information. As a result, these players couldn’t play golf. When they did, they had no real scheme. With no idea what they are doing, they would descend into a spiral of no idea what to do, bad results, lower confidence, and running back to the lesson tee from more cliches.

The fact is that poor instruction is about conditioning players to become reliant members of your cult. To take away autonomy. To use practice as a form of control. To sell more golf lessons not by making people better but through the guise that without the teacher, the student can never reach their full potential. All under the umbrella of being “certified” (in a 2-day course!) and a melee of cliches.

This of course is not just happening at my muni but is a systemic problem around the country and around the world, the consequences of which are giving people a great reason to stop playing golf. But hey, at least it’s selling a lot of golf balls…

Your Reaction?
  • 17
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL4
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP4
  • OB1
  • SHANK23

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending