IN-HAND PHOTOS: 2013 Callaway X Hot Irons & Woods!

• Tweet
• Pin It

(X) Hot off the press!

Here are some sneak peeks at new Callaway X Hot Irons (Pro and Non-Pro) and woods for 2013.

We have complete coverage of the new X Hot line from Callaway.

• Callaway X Hot and X Hot Pro Drivers & Woods
• Callaway X Hot and X Hot Pro Hybrids
• Callaway X Hot and X Hot Pro Irons

What do you think?

CLICK HERE TO SEE WHAT GOLFWRX MEMBERS ARE SAYING ABOUT THE CALLWAY X HOT IRONS & WOODS

Related Posts

• 

  Anchored putter ban goes through
  Anchored putter ban goes through
• 

  Photos from the Crowne Plaza Invitational
  Photos from the Crowne Plaza Invitational
• 

  Sang Moon Bae’s Winning WITB
  Sang Moon Bae’s Winning WITB
• 

  Bradley falters as Bae takes Byron Nelson title
  Bradley falters as Bae takes Byron Nelson title

17 Comments

1. 

   Johnnie

   December 8, 2012 at 2:06 am

   Best looking callaway irons in many years.

   Reply
   • 

     Ra

     December 9, 2012 at 2:38 am

     Really? It looks like a Titty-TM mangled step-child.
     Like an AP2 with the Burner 2.0 mixed together, no?
     LAZY design! Truly, truly lazy. Nothing unique or cool about this one, at all!

     Reply
     • 

       bob

       December 13, 2012 at 2:48 pm

       Oooh, that taylormade butthurt. Here…have some salt.

       Reply
2. 

   tom

   December 9, 2012 at 6:28 pm

   I think the irons looks great.

   Reply
3. 

   Johnny

   December 9, 2012 at 11:51 pm

   MONEY BABY!!!!

   Reply
4. 

   Marcus

   December 10, 2012 at 6:01 pm

   Why cant people build a normal looking golf club, graphics and decals look horrible.
   TM has started a disgusting trend

   Reply
5. 

   deven

   December 11, 2012 at 3:21 pm

   I hit all of the new callaway equipment. Probably the best theyve had in a while

   Reply
6. 

   clubman

   December 12, 2012 at 1:16 pm

   Awesome. These clubs fly at least a club longer than my AP2′s

   Reply
   • 

     g0edw1g01

     December 12, 2012 at 2:22 pm

     Yeah, but how do the lofts compare? Most of these new ‘longer distance’ irons being made today are being delofted – hence the greater distances eg the loft of the new TM Rocketbladez 6iron is akin to the Callaway X-22 5iron but TM claim thieir 6iron is 11 yards longer than the X-22 6iron!!

     Reply
7. 

   pete61

   December 12, 2012 at 2:19 pm

   any specs available yet? lofts/lengths etc..

   Reply
8. 

   RAT

   December 12, 2012 at 3:29 pm

   Same ol’ same. No wonder they are laying off people.

   Reply
   • 

     ron b.

     March 3, 2013 at 10:15 pm

     maybe rory should give them a try.nike should stick to shoes.

     Reply
9. 

   brandon

   December 13, 2012 at 2:33 pm

   We hit the Fairway Wood and it blew everyone away who hit it! Stunning FairwayWood and it is definitely going in my bag when it drops. The Tour FW is so choice.

   Reply
10. 

    7464

    December 18, 2012 at 7:40 am

    Wow! I am surprised by the comments about the looks of the irons…I guess “to each his own” but I think these irons (X Hot Pro) look very nice and classy (I did not say classic) compared to the X Hot 24 and Raxr X graphics…I also see them repalcing the Razr X Tour and that was a very good looking iron at address… and played by quite a few on the Tour’s…I just hope in the “Pro” we can get some decent shaft choices without upcharges…

    Reply
11. 

    Rob

    December 27, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    I think the irons look great. I have never purchased Callaway irons. I never bought the idea of a uniflex shaft for everyone. I feel Callaway has missed the low HC market that doesn’t want forged irons. I want irons that don’t punish me when I miss them. I think these Pro series might work for me. Ofcourse I want to see how they compare with the new rocketbladez.

    Reply
    • 

      10Hdcp

      December 29, 2012 at 9:05 am

      Gotta hit ‘em first. Going to replace my X-14s with either Hot X or Rocketbladez. Can’t wait!!

      Reply
      • 

        ron b.

        March 3, 2013 at 10:17 pm

        save time, x hots.

        Reply