Connect with us

Equipment

Cleveland Gives New TFi 2135 Satin Putters A Face Lift

Published

on

Cleveland has launched its new TFi 2135 Satin putters that combine model-specific face milling with its familiar raised sightline to help golfers achieve better speed and alignment.

The original TFi 2135 putters used a raised sightline that was 21.35 millimeters off the ground, which is also the height of the equator of a golf ball. According to Cleveland, the technology helps golfers better align their putters, see their line more easily, and address the ball in the center of the putter more consistently. Here’s a video to explain how it works.

That “2135” technology is back again, but with a whole new look. Compared to the original TFi 2135 putters, the most noticeable difference is a new satin finish that has a greater contrast with the sightline. The milling on the face is where these putters have really changed, however, and why they’re built for better speed control.

MilledFace

As you can see in the image above, the milling lines are condensed near the center of the putter faces and spread out progressively as they move toward the toe and the heel. That’s to help the ball come off a bit faster when it’s struck off-center. Since fewer milling marks will create less friction, the ball will bounce off the face faster where the milling marks are more spread out.

But that’s not all.

Each separate head model — since they have a different moment of inertia (MOI, a measure of forgiveness) and a different center of gravity (CG) — has specially designed face milling. More specifically, the higher MOI models (re: mallets) have a more gradual variation of mill marks, while the lower MOI models (re: blades) have a more rapid variation. For golfers, this simply means more forgiveness on off-center strikes with each of the putters, hopefully leading to better consistency, speed control, and fewer three putts.

c99bbe6e18e8c807fc540416751f4b84

For the familiar soft feel of the TFi 2135 putters, Cleveland uses a TPU (thermoplastic urethane) insert to dampen vibrations at impact. This combines with three-times deeper milling on the face to create a softer feel then the original TFi 2135 putters and previous iterations of Cleveland putters.

Cleveland’s new TFi 2135 putters will be in stores September 15 in six different head models. The mallet and blade putters will sell for $149.99, and the counter-balanced putters (8.0 and Elevado CB) will sell for $179.99. The putters come stock with either a Lamkin TFi 2135 blue grip or a Cleveland Oversized grip. Cleveland Oversized Counterbalanced grips are also available for a $10 upcharge.

Discussion: See what GolfWRX members are saying about the 2135 Satin putters

TFi 2135 Satin 1.0

  • Head Type: Blade
  • Hosel Type: Plumber’s Neck
  • Length: 33, 34 and 35 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 345 grams
  • Grip Weight: 85 grams
  • Dexterity: RH/LH

TFi 2135 Satin 8.0

  • Head Type: CB Blade
  • Hosel Type: Single Bend Heel
  • Length: 35 and 38 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 405 grams
  • Grip Weight: 148 grams
  • Dexterity: RH Only

TFi 2135 Satin Elevado 

  • Head Type: Mallet
  • Hosel Type: Single Bend Heel
  • Length: 33, 34 and 35 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 370 grams
  • Grip Weight: 85 grams
  • Dexterity: RH Only

TFi 2135 Satin Rho

  • Head Type: Mallet
  • Hosel Type: Single Bend Heel
  • Length: 33, 34 and 35 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 370 grams
  • Grip Weight: 85 grams
  • Dexterity: RH Only

TFi 2135 Satin Cero

  • Head Type: Mallet
  • Hosel Type: Single Bend Heel
  • Length: 33, 34 and 35 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 370 grams
  • Grip Weight: 85 grams
  • Dexterity: RH Only

TFi 2135 Satin Elevado CB

  • Head Type: CB Mallet
  • Hosel Type: Single Bend Heel
  • Length: 35 and 38 inches
  • Lie Angle: 70 degrees
  • Loft: 3 degrees
  • Head Weight: 405 grams
  • Grip Weight: 148 grams
  • Dexterity: RH Only

Discussion: See what GolfWRX members are saying about the 2135 Satin putters

Your Reaction?
  • 117
  • LEGIT9
  • WOW2
  • LOL5
  • IDHT4
  • FLOP0
  • OB1
  • SHANK16

We share your golf passion. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX, Facebook and Instagram.

19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. Mat

    Aug 31, 2017 at 6:09 am

    Ping is going to sue over this one…

  2. Chris C.

    Aug 29, 2017 at 5:28 pm

    In a world increasingly populated with $400.00 putters, I think that it is great that this line of putters will be selling for less than half that amount. I look forward to testing the Rho. I only wish that it had come with either a plumbers neck or flow neck. Alas! there are some limitations when one is charging less than half the other guys.

  3. Cleveland

    Aug 29, 2017 at 2:52 am

    BEST PUTTERS EVA.

  4. DB

    Aug 28, 2017 at 3:41 pm

    These are great putters for the money, and these look even better than the original.

    • ooffaa

      Aug 28, 2017 at 5:35 pm

      Oh ya…. “the looks”…. that’s what really matters …. are you a child?

      • DB

        Aug 28, 2017 at 7:42 pm

        You seem like a stable person.

        • GG

          Aug 28, 2017 at 9:10 pm

          And you obviously work for Cleveland. Keep on lying.

          • DB

            Aug 29, 2017 at 12:29 am

            Wrong.

            I’m a guy who rolled one at a GG and liked it. But yes, I’ve noticed that anyone here who likes these putters has been accused of working for Cleveland. That’s nice.

            • alan b

              Aug 30, 2017 at 2:03 am

              Your original comment was about the price and the looks as reasons to buy it. Now you claiming you “rolled one” and you liked it. Sounds like a “doobie” putter… lol

  5. Jiminy

    Aug 28, 2017 at 2:04 pm

    same old, same old stuff… at high prices.

  6. Boss

    Aug 28, 2017 at 11:02 am

    They look sexy

    • ooffaa

      Aug 28, 2017 at 5:36 pm

      you are gender confused

      • Oppai

        Aug 30, 2017 at 1:52 am

        You would know, from experience, of course

        • alan b

          Aug 30, 2017 at 2:04 am

          Anybody who calls golf clubs ‘sexy’ is confused and needs help but not for golf.

  7. birdy

    Aug 28, 2017 at 9:54 am

    Not even close….these putters are far and away the best putters for the money. ignore price and these compete with every high dollar putter. great feel, looks, and performance. now just wish more retail stores carry them.

    • ooffaa

      Aug 28, 2017 at 5:37 pm

      thank you Cleveland Golf

      • tom

        Sep 2, 2017 at 12:16 am

        Ridiculous comments like this are why I rarely come to this site anymore.

        • Realist

          Oct 20, 2017 at 1:04 pm

          Keyboard warriors are destroying the very fibers of this country. Forum quality is diminishing as a result.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Equipment

What GolfWRXers are saying about iron covers

Published

on

@thegolfinggreen

In our forums, our members have been discussing iron covers with WRXer ‘anythingfinite’ championing the use of iron covers when walking. As a walker, ‘anythingfinite’ says

“I hated the sound of clubs clanking together with every step. So I used neoprene iron covers and endured the ridicule for years. They never, ever slowed my play as I average 18 holes in a little over 2.5hrs playing by myself. It was never about protecting resale value, just about the noise.”

And our members have been discussing iron covers and whether they currently use them or would be tempted to use them in the future.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • jvincent: “Clanking irons in the bag is like the sound of metal spikes on a path. It’s old school golf.”
  • Z1ggy16: “Toss your club cleaning towel in the clubs to help stop them from clanking *as much*. You can also use your one hand to kind of hold some of them in place as you walk.”
  • Windlaker_1: “I use the neoprene covers. Not for resale value, as I normally keep them so long they aren’t worth diddley-poo at that point. Use them to maintain a nice-looking set of irons.”
  • MtlJeff: “I don’t really notice it that much when I walk, to be honest. Maybe its how I arrange my clubs….If the clanging is bothering me, you can just move the clubs slightly, and it usually mitigates it. But if you’re like, breakdancing down the fairway, tough to stop it.”
  • puttingmatt: “It’s your choice. I use iron covers, lets me not forget a club around the green, as the cover in pocket is a quick reminder that something is a miss. Also, it’s a good way to protect your clubs, and at these prices, makes you wonder why not since woods and putters are sold with covers that are intended to be used. One other note, it may keep others from assessing what’s in the bag, and keep a thief wondering if the bag is worth the effort. Hate the feeling about club theft, but clubs are targets.”

Entire Thread: “Confessions of an iron cover user”

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Is 8 degrees between pitching wedge and sand wedge too much? – GolfWRXers have their say

Published

on

In our forums, our members have been discussing gapping degrees and whether 8-degrees between your PW and SW is too much. WRXer ‘jonsnow’ seldom hits his GW and is considering dropping the club from the bag and wants to know, if he does so, will the current 8-degree gap between his wedges be too much. Our members have their say.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • ZA206: “For years I played a 47 PW and a 56 SW. I had a big hole in my scoring irons range (115-105 yards) that I tried to avoid at all costs. It cost me many strokes over the years. I felt like that gap was way too big and eventually settled on 46, 51, 55 (I also play a 60 LW) as my preferred setup. No gaps and I can hit every yardage without any issue. I’m a much better wedge player now than I ever was back then, but that’s not due to having more wedges, that’s more about technique.”
  • RainShadow: “In theory, yes. In actual real world action, depends on how many types of shots you can hit with the PW.”
  • MtlJeff: “I’ve played with 52 to 60 gaps. It depends on what type of shots you want to hit. I never chip with sand wedge and would rather hit a 3/4 shot with a 52 than a full with a 56. So it all depends on your game.”
  • bazinky: “A lot depends on how often you have shots in that yardage range. For example, I replaced my 50 and 54 with a single 52 wedge because I hardly ever had a yardage that required my 50 (I would sometimes go weeks without ever hitting it). That said, my biggest gap is 6 degrees. I think it’s doable as long as you have the discipline to be smart when you have a bad yardage. It can be tough to just aim for the fat of the green when you have a wedge in your hand.”
  • Pingistheanser: “I don’t think so. I’m more of a believer that you should pick lofts based upon the distances that you need to hit from. If those lofts allow you to hit distances that you need to hit, then they’re fine for you. I’m not a believer that you should have 4-degree gaps between your wedges because what good is a club that you never hit because you never find yourself in that distance range? For a time last year, I carried a 46-degree AW and a 56 degree as my only wedges, and they worked just fine. I’d sometimes have to make some adjustments if I found myself 90 yards off of the green because it would be too far for the 56, so I would just narrow my stance, grip down a bit and only swing the AW at about 75%.”

Entire Thread: “Is 8 degrees between PW and SW too much?”

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Are modern irons with stronger lofts easier/harder to hit than older irons? – GolfWRXers have their say

Published

on

In our forums, our members have been discussing modern irons with stronger lofts and whether they are easier or harder to play than older irons. WRXer ‘harpu728’ kicks off the thread saying:

“Being that higher-lofted irons within the same set are easier to hit (i.e. an 8 iron is easier to hit than a 6 iron), I’m trying to draw comparisons to modern irons with stronger lofts, and if these lofts make them harder to hit in theory.

My 10-year-old’s 7 iron is 33 degrees and carries about 150. When comparing this to some of the newer sets out there where 7-irons are slightly longer (club length) and have lofts of 30 degrees, would this mean that ‘on paper’ the modern 7-iron is ‘harder’ to hit than my 10-year old’s 7 iron? Or should I be comparing my 7-iron to the modern 8-iron, which would likely carry as far as my current 7-iron?”

And our members have been weighing in with their thoughts in our forum.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • CAT GOLFER: “Good question, the way I understand it, disregard the number on the bottom of the club. A stronger(lower) loft in newer irons will produce a higher ball flight than the weaker(higher) loft in older clubs. At least that is the marketing pitch. The intent is to make it easier to launch the ball higher and in the process easier to hit. Also, keep in mind modern clubs also have more forgiveness built into them. Stronger lofted, higher launching, easier to hit if you buy the whole pitch.”
  • Sean2: “I don’t pay attention to the number on the club, so much as the loft. With the stronger lofts, I have no long irons in my bag as I simply can’t hit them…maybe being 65 has something to do with it as well, lol. At one time I carried 4-iron on down, now it’s 7-iron on down. But no way I can hit a 18º-19º 4-iron, let alone a 21º 5. I have the same number of irons…they just have a different number/letter on them than they did before.”
  • Warrick: “Important to pair the right shaft with these new iron setups, more so than ever.”
  • puttingmatt: “Look at it like this, instead of missing the green with a standard lofted 7 iron, now you can miss the green with the strong lofted 8 iron. I do not think the modern lofted irons translate into better scores or better misses for golfers. The loft alone is not going to turn a 5hc into a scratch player.”
  • lil’mike: “I guess you could say it something like this. Nowadays when you use a 5 iron, you get the height of a 6 iron but the distance of a 4 iron! Lol. I do think that it can make it hard to hold greens with the irons producing lower spin or at least too low of spin like some reviewers have mentioned in some cases. The bad thing about the stronger lofts is that they are getting to the point of needing two-gap wedges now before you reach the loft spacing that a sand wedge loft of 56 degrees has. For example, the new Mavrik irons have two gap wedges. So it is a 4 iron at 18 degrees, a PW is 41, so AW is 46 and GW is 51. I think that is getting ridiculous as they are turning the stock set makeup from 3-PW to 6-double gap wedge! lol”

Entire Thread: “Are modern irons with stronger lofts easier/harder to hit than older irons?”

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending