Equipment
“Speed meets enhanced visibility” in new TaylorMade TP5 Pix golf balls
TaylorMade has announced the release of a brand new ball — the TaylorMade TP5 Pix, which features advanced visual technology (which you can clearly see in the featured image, which is, well, the point).
According to the company, the design for the ball was created while working with partners at Indiana University who found that the human eye processes lighter colors more efficiently when it’s darker and darker colors when it’s lighter, leading to the two-color pattern of the TP5 Pix as opposed to the typical single color design seen in most golf balls.
The TP5 Pix features two colors within one shape enhancing visibility at all times. The larger contrast graphics of the TP5 Pix aims to allow golfers to see how much overall spin and side spin is generated around the green, with the 12 evenly-spaced images providing feedback immediately on the spin being produced on shots around the green.
Speaking on the TP5 Pix, Mike Fox, Category Director, Golf Balls, said
“White, round and sits on the ground is no longer the norm for golf balls. Visual technology has given us the opportunity to not only change the appearance of the golf ball but also allows players to see immediate feedback where spin matters most – on and around the greens.”

The TP5, of course, is equipped with all the features of the standard TP5. To recap, these include, a new Speed Layer System comprised of four increasingly stiff layers, featuring a new material called High Flex Material (HFM). According to TaylorMade, HFM is the fastest material the company has ever used, and the tightly wound spring of the HFM aims to create more rebound energy when compressed for added ball speed and also to increase the force on the driver face for added distance.
The Tri-Fast Core of the TP5 Pix features an extra large low-compression inner core with a progressively stiffer outer core and mantle. Working in conjunction, these three layers seek to create lower drag and increased carry.
Also included in the new TP5 Pix is its Dual-Spin Cover which contains an ultra-soft cast urethane cover and a 30 percent more rigid inner cover. This system aims to provide golfers with maximum greenside control, as the rigid inner cover seeks to force the soft urethane cover into wedge grooves for ultimate spin generation.
Finishing the TP5 Pix is a new SoftTough cast urethane cover which features a cast urethane compound and new paint formulation, in an aim to improve scuff resistance, shear resistance, and overall durability.
TP5 Pix will be available at retail on March 22 at an MSRP of $44.99 per dozen.
Equipment
Best ‘forgiving’ wedges – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, our members have been discussing the most forgiving wedges on the market. WRXer ‘aaronpoling’ lays out his current setup and what he’s currently considering, saying:
“I am looking at getting new wedges, but looking for a forgiving wedge.
I currently play Ping G25 50°, MD4 54° and 58°. I used to play the CBX2 in the 50°, 54° and 58° and liked them a lot; but like any good dad, my son took them.
I am currently looking Callaway’s CB12 and Cleveland’s CBZ. Anyone have thoughts on these? Or recommendations of other wedges that I should check out?”
And our members have been weighing in with their thoughts and recommendations in response, with one brand coming out emphatically on top.
Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- boggyman: “CBZs are amazing wedges!”
- drewbens: “Agreed, the Cleveland CB wedges are great! Already had a CBX Full Face 2 54 and recently added a 50 and 58 (for well under $100 a piece). Was chipping so well last week that my brother-in-law asked if the wedges were legal. Definitely underrated wedges for those of us that are not scratch golfers.”
- BogeyTed: “Get Cleveland CBX/CBZ. Very underrated clubs.”
Entire Thread: “Best ‘forgiving’ wedges – GolfWRXers discuss”
Equipment
From the GolfWRX Classifieds: Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset putter
At GolfWRX, we are a community of like-minded individuals who all experience and express our enjoyment of the game in many ways.
It’s that sense of community that drives day-to-day interactions in the forums on topics that range from best driver to what marker you use to mark your ball. It even allows us to share another thing we all love – buying and selling equipment.
Currently, in our GolfWRX buy/sell/trade (BST) forum, @negncic has a Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset putter up for grabs.

From the listing: “34” Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset. Ping composite shaft Ping PLD Pistol grip. No issues. $345 shipped.”
To check out the full listing in our BST forum, head through the link. If you are curious about the rules to participate in the BST Forum, you can learn more here: GolfWRX BST Rules
Equipment
I built the worst fitting clubs ever – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, our members have been reacting to a WRXer who claims to have built the “worst fitting clubs ever.” ‘dlow206’ recounts his experience with plenty of insightful findings for where he can go better next time in a detailed post, saying:
“Here’s my story of building the worst fitting clubs ever (for me). And my findings of what a better fit is.
I am short in stature, as well as a very short wrist to floor of 30.5″. I went down a rabbit hole of wanting to try irons 1″ shorter of more than standard length. Given the shorter lengths, the swingweights would be super light unless I added back a ton of weight to the heads, but I don’t like adding an extreme amount of weight back to the heads, so I decided to compensate with heavier shafts (115 grams instead of 95). Played with this set for a while and was hitting all irons extremely poorly. Thin, fat, right, right, left. My swing didn’t deteriorate that much because I was hitting my driver well, woods well, etc.
Went back to my older set of irons, playing at standard length, and my iron play improved immediately. Since then, have been doing more testing, while paying more attention to different possible variables. What I have found is I actually prefer lighter total weight with relatively normal or slightly heavier swingweights. Did a recent fitting and found that 85 gram shafts were better for me than 95 grams with standard length and relatively standard swingweights.
Still trying to dial in a final iron shaft choice, so have a few contenders that I will be testing. Will be moving away from my current Steelfiber i95 S parallel to lighter and softer
- MMT 80 parallel R – worked pretty well in a limited number of swings at a fitting
- Fujikura Travil 85 R – the fitter liked the Axiom 95 R for me at Club Champion, but i didn’t love the effort required to swing them. If there was a 85 Axiom, that would probably have been a great fit. So i am going try a Travil 85 R which is japan only
- Steelfiber i80 CW R – i have been playing Steelfibers for a long time, so need to give one Steelfiber shaft a shot
Given I do club building work, I am going to build all of these shafts with the All-Fit universal iron adapters to pair with a Srixon 7 iron head for testing. With these adapters, there isn’t a swingweight issue because the amount of weight from drilling out is about equivalent to the universal adapter components.”
And our members have been sharing their reactions in our forum.
Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- Mikey_HACKilroy: “That length cut costs you a fair amount in swing points. I’d posit the length mattered more than the weight because a 115g shaft isn’t going to actually add enough back after cutting an inch off. Does it mean 115 would ultimately work? Hard to say. Maybe try a 1/2″ cut and add 2g to the head to compensate assuming the 7i is 37″ long. Maybe that will feel better. It translates to the same ~D2 you’re swinging at with the 95g shafts (estimated based on common weight, but you can weigh your parts on your own obviously).”
- Stuart_G: “Your process is good – keep at it and trust it.”
Entire Thread: “I built the worst fitting clubs ever – GolfWRXers discuss”
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoAaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
-
Tour Photo Galleries3 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 PGA Championship
-
Equipment1 week agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
Equipment4 days agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
-
Equipment3 weeks agoGolfWRX Launch Report: 2026 Titleist GTS drivers
-
Equipment2 weeks agoPGA Championship Tour Report: Fitzpatrick, Koepka among big-name putter switches for Aronimink

jamho3
Mar 14, 2019 at 1:04 pm
Those are ugly, Truvis for life!
Gwenneth Paltrow
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:51 pm
Leave me out of this.
JP
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:31 pm
I must be a freak of nature! All this time, I’ve been able to find an all white golf ball! I am amazing!!!
Tiger Noods
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:45 pm
It’s not about *finding* the ball. It’s about being able to establish it as a 3-dimensional object in your vision, instead of a 2-dimensional optical illusion that many run into. This prevents skulling balls, and that’s why TruVis is popular.
But sure, you’re amazing. Good job. You’re so special, you must be American.
yellolab
Mar 15, 2019 at 1:43 pm
“This prevents skulling balls”…..seriously? Prevents?
Noe Mormon
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:47 pm
Amazing! Special!
Great job, princess!
jj7
Mar 14, 2019 at 1:53 am
proud of you man. you’ve finally graduated from the mini-golf course
Mat
Mar 13, 2019 at 7:48 pm
Ugly logo, but scientifically the real deal.
This will be the new norm.
Straight
Mar 13, 2019 at 7:43 pm
No such thing as side spin. Only back spin and spin axis. Please stop referring to side spin. People get confused by this. Won’t be long before you write something about “top spin.”
Vectors
Mar 14, 2019 at 3:58 am
Knowledge of axis systems would tell you either a) you have total spin and spin axis, or b) back spin and side spin. Given the numbers from either coordinate base you can easily calculate the other with a little trigonometry.
Both systems work, you’re just arguing terminology
Alex
Mar 13, 2019 at 6:55 pm
Vintage Taylormade…hitch your wagon to a gimmick. Hopefully Sam’s Club buys them out in time for the launch of the M17 which should be out next fall.
Jeffrey
Mar 14, 2019 at 8:58 am
Joke isn’t funny anymore. They have had a 1 year release cycle just like most other companies for many years now.
Metthew
Mar 13, 2019 at 6:30 pm
I gamed the Truvis to see what was up. I’ll give these a shot
Swirley
Mar 13, 2019 at 5:38 pm
You losers will all be playing these ugly rocks the second DJ or Rickie puts them into play. Losers…
V
Mar 13, 2019 at 5:36 pm
I can definitely tell when my ball is going left or (way) right without it looking like something out of a video game. Should look great in the fall too. Fail.
golfraven
Mar 13, 2019 at 4:04 pm
What is next? Bananas on the balls?
2putttom
Mar 13, 2019 at 3:36 pm
first skinny jeans now …… golf balls that look like something outta Mario Brothers.
ND Hickman
Mar 13, 2019 at 3:13 pm
I’ll stick with my Truvis but hope TM fans like these balls.
grossmsj
Mar 13, 2019 at 3:09 pm
I could see these would be excellent to practice with, when you can focus on the feedback from shots you are working on. I might buy a dozen for that.
No way would I be caught dead playing them.
Tider992010
Mar 13, 2019 at 2:43 pm
It amazes me how each OEM has the same technology and name it something else, truvis vs PIX, jailbreak vs hammerhead, speed channel vs cut through technology, speed foam vs gel. Everyone works from the PGA allowed limit so they all should be pretty good. It just ends up being what looks good to you individually. When is a 4 iron, not a 4 iron……….., when it is a 3 iron with a 4 on it.
I
Mar 13, 2019 at 6:51 pm
Get over the whole iron label thing man.
Back in the day there were no A wedges and no G wedges. They didn’t know how to name a Gap wedge. And go back even longer they didn’t have a Sand wedge.
Shall we take numbers off woods and start calling them by names again?
Wuss
Old Man Shaking Fist At Sky
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:49 pm
Only Balata Balls are real balls.
Get off my lawn.
Summit
Mar 13, 2019 at 2:41 pm
Those might be the ugliest looking design they could have put on the ball. Fail…
And to the person that mentioned “camouflage on a golf ball during the fall”, you are absolutely right! this will be impossible to see when the leaves start falling.
Mako Shark
Mar 13, 2019 at 2:37 pm
Guy Fieri comment had me lmao. looks like a distracting ball to make the game even harder – who can focus on this thing?
dat
Mar 13, 2019 at 1:58 pm
These look like they are meant to get lost in the weeds.
david
Mar 13, 2019 at 1:18 pm
taylormades answer to truvis… eh.
John
Mar 13, 2019 at 12:48 pm
It took a university study to come up withe revelation that we see dark colours clearer in light conditions and light colours more clearly in dark conditions? I’d figured that out for myself, thanks.
Robyeaks
Mar 13, 2019 at 12:42 pm
This comment thread is the highlight of my day. Dilly dilly.
Ryan
Mar 13, 2019 at 12:37 pm
I introduce to you the Callaway Xhot golf ball, by Taylormade.
Jim
Mar 13, 2019 at 12:21 pm
Just looks like TM’s answer to the Callaway Truvis. Not that good looking though.
David
Mar 13, 2019 at 12:12 pm
Finally a ball that looks like Guy Fieri.
Boyo
Mar 13, 2019 at 11:55 am
Never did like those Callaway soccer balls either…
Smith
Mar 13, 2019 at 11:22 am
Chrome5 TP Soft with TruPix Technology
Mvan
Mar 13, 2019 at 11:08 am
This is literally like putting camouflage on a golf ball during the fall here in MI
pns
Mar 13, 2019 at 11:13 am
You only play ice hockey there, no?
JR
Mar 15, 2019 at 8:29 am
My thoughts exactly.