Connect with us

Equipment

Why a blade isn’t “just a blade”

Published

on

Miura MB 101 Baby blade 2020 iron

Saying “a blade is just a blade,” is like equating all coupes to just two-door cars because of their similar design characteristics, when in fact, just like cars, every line and transition along the body is as important as what’s under the hood.

To define a “blade,” it is a club design that features a solid mass behind the hitting area, with a thinner sole and higher center of gravity to create greater workability. Blades are less forgiving than cavity backs and were given their name thanks to their thin look resembling knives.

Blades are easy to recognize even from a distance, although there are irons on the market that resemble blades by appearance but offer a lot of technology and forgiveness.

If we’re going to stick with the car analogy, it’s the equivalent of rolling up to a red light with a “sleeper”—it looks docile but is packed with horsepower.

Most OEMs do not replace blades in their lineups as frequently as other models because of the lack of technological advancement compared to game-improvement clubs. Instead, blade models are generally replaced as player preferences change and are a reflection more of playing conditions than technology.

If we compare older blade irons to modern ones, for example, the easiest difference to spot is the sole profile. Older clubs have flatter, less cambered (radius from the leading edge to the back of the head) soles compared to modern clubs that are much more rounded to help improve turf interaction. These are the other key design elements that make up the profile of an iron.

  • Topline: The topline of a club plays one of the biggest factors on how the club looks from address. The general rule of thumb is thick toplines inspire confidence since there is more “mass” behind the ball, but in some cases—like Rickie Fowler’s new irons, thinner is the winner.

    The topline of Rickie Fowler’s 7-iron

  • Sole: Over time, sole profiles have become more homogeneous compared to other design elements because they have evolved as turf conditions have improved. As mentioned earlier, modern blades with more bounce and camber are much easier to hit in varying conditions.

    1960s Hagen (left) vs. 2020 Mizuno (right)

  • Toe profile: Similar to the topline, the toe profile will drastically change the look of a club. Although each one of slightly different they generally fall into three categories; square, rounded, and teardrop. Square toe irons are less common and the result in a sharper angle where the toe meets the topline. Round is the most modern style that you see on most irons today, and two of the best examples are the Mizuno MP20, and the Titleist 620 Blade. The teardrop profile is more commonly found in JDM (Japanese Domestic Market) clubs but a good representation of this would be the Ping BluePrint.

    Address profile of the Ping Blueprint

    The toe profile also plays a big part in how long the blade length appears from the address position, with the square toe making the club look the shortest.

So next time you are looking at a set of blades, pay close attention to the small details around the head to help you figure out the ideal clubs for you.

You can also find discussions on blades, among many other topics in our GolfWRX General Equipment Forum 

 

Your Reaction?
  • 130
  • LEGIT18
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK14

Ryan Barath is a club-fitter & master club builder with more than 17 years of experience working with golfers of all skill levels, including PGA Tour players. He is the former Build Shop Manager & Social Media Coordinator for Modern Golf. He now works independently from his home shop and is a member of advisory panels to a select number of golf equipment manufacturers. You can find Ryan on Twitter and Instagram where he's always willing to chat golf, and share his passion for club building, course architecture and wedge grinding.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Beak

    Jun 10, 2020 at 12:13 pm

    Thick toplines inspire confidence?

    • s

      Jun 16, 2020 at 11:44 pm

      To some people maybe. I can’t stand looking at it. I sometimes wish Vokey made a full set of irons…

      • Tom54

        Jan 7, 2021 at 5:43 pm

        I have also wondered how a set of Vokey irons would look as well

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Whats in the Bag

Steve Stricker WITB 2024 (April)

Published

on

Driver: Titleist TSR3 (9 degrees, C4 SureFit setting)
Shaft: Fujikura Motore Speeder VC 7.2 X

3-wood: Titleist 915F (13.5 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White 80 TX

Hybrid: Titleist 816 H1 (17 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Motore Speeder VC 9.2 X

Irons: Titleist T200 (3, 4), Titleist T100 (5-9)
Shafts: Project X 6.5

Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM8 (46-10F @55), Titleist Vokey SM10 (54-10S @53), Titleist Vokey SM4 (60 @59)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold X100 w/Sensicore

Putter: Odyssey White Hot No. 2

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Grip Rite

Check out more in-hand photos of Steve Stricker’s clubs here.

Your Reaction?
  • 26
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Whats in the Bag

Alex Fitzpatrick WITB 2024 (April)

Published

on

  • Alex Fitzpatrick what’s in the bag accurate as of the Zurich Classic. 

Driver: Ping G430 LST (10.5 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 6 X

3-wood: TaylorMade Qi10 (15 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Black 7 X

Hybrid: Ping G430 (19 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black HB 10 TX

Irons: Ping iCrossover (2), Titleist T100 (4-PW)
Shafts: Fujikura Ventus Black HB 9 TX (2), Nippon N.S. Pro Modus 3 Tour 120 X (4-9)

Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design SM10 (50-12F, 56-12D, 60-08M)
Shafts: Nippon N.S. Pro Modus 3 Tour 120 X

Putter: Bettinardi SS16 Dass

Grips: Golf Pride MCC

Check out more in-hand photos of Alex Fitzpatrick’s clubs here.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

What’s the perfect mini-driver/shaft combo? – GolfWRXers discuss

Published

on

In our forums, our members have been discussing Mini-Drivers and accompanying shafts. WRXer ‘JamesFisher1990’ is about to purchase a BRNR Mini and is torn on what shaft weight to use, and our members have been sharing their thoughts and set ups in our forum.

Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.

  • PARETO: “New BRNR at 13.5. Took it over to TXG (Club Champ but TXG will always rule) in Calgary for a fit. Took the head down to 12, stuck in a Graphite Design AD at 3 wood length and 60g. Presto- numbers that rivaled my G430Max but with waaaaay tighter dispersion. Win.”
  • driveandputtmachine: “Still playing a MIni 300.  The head was only 208, so I ordered a heavier weight and play it at 3 wood length.  I am playing a Ventus Red 70.   I play 70 grams in my fairways.  I use it mainly to hit draws off the tee.  When I combine me, a driver, and trying to hit a draw it does not work out well most of the time.  So the MIni is for that. As an aside, I have not hit the newest BRNR, but the previous model wasn’t great off the deck.  The 300 Mini is very good off the deck.”
  • JAM01: “Ok, just put the BRNR in the bag along side a QI10 max and a QI10 3 wood. A load of top end redundancy. But, I have several holes at my two home courses where the flight and accuracy of the mini driver helps immensely. Mine is stock Proforce 65 at 13.5, I could see a heavier shaft, but to normal flex, as a nice alternative.”

Entire Thread: “What’s the perfect Mini-Driver/Shaft combo? – GolfWRXers discuss”

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP1
  • OB0
  • SHANK7

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending