Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: Building your “team” – Part 1

Published

on

Golf is a funny game, especially when it comes to the way most golfers buy equipment and put their sets together. It’s fun to review and explore the constant stream of new technologies offered by the club companies, as we are all constantly searching for that new ‘secret weapon’ that will make the difference in our scoring. Somewhere behind each purchase you make – whether it be a new driver, fairway, hybrid, irons, wedges, putter, balls, etc. – you have hope that this is another piece of the puzzle that will help lower your handicap.

But as you evaluate any new individual bits of technology, it is a great idea to pause and look at the entire arsenal of clubs you carry to assess them as your “team”. Each club in your bag is used one-at-a-time for the shot at hand, but collectively our clubs represent the “players” we’ve assembled to go into battle with the golf course, right?

As we approach the finale of the NCAA football championship game, think of your set make-up like a football team. Great coaches look for chemistry and compatibility, for sure, but they also must make sure they have balance. To have a bunch of big men and no speed doesn’t work. Nor can you have a bunch of defensive specialists and no offensive firepower. Almost every year, the team that wins the Championship has balance. Certainly, there are always areas that are stronger than others, but championship teams typically have no real weaknesses.

I’ve come to believe your “team” in your golf bag should follow the same strategy of balance . . . but in my observation, very few golfers approach it this way.

The most common set make-up I see includes a driver, a couple of fairways, 2-3 hybrids, and irons from 4 or 5 through P. Some golfers still carry a 3-iron, and some extend hybrids all the way to the 5 or 6; that’s a personal thing for your ‘team’. I think it fair to say that nearly all golfers have gained distance with the new club technologies, but in my observation, this too often results in a team that is unbalanced. Let me explain.

Let’s take a “typical” male golfer who hits his 5-iron 165-170 yards and shoots 85. Some of you are longer, some of you shorter, and some of you score better or worse than that, but please follow along with me here. That golfer probably hits a driver somewhere around 235-250, and 9-iron 120-125 or so. Let’s say he carries a 3- and 5-wood, a couple of hybrids, 5-PW and two more wedges. Adding the driver and putter, that gives him 14. With this set make-up, therefore, he has five clubs for all his shots that are 165-170 or longer (not counting the driver), and another 4-5 clubs for all his shots from 120-125 and in (not counting the putter).

If this golfer is a typical 85-shooter, he’s hitting driver 12-14 times and averaging +/- 32 putts; that means he has 12 clubs for the other 40 or so shots. If he’s playing the right tees for his skill level, he shouldn’t have more than 8-10 of those that are outside 5-iron range, so nearly half of his “team” is allocated for what likely amounts to about 25% of these non-drive/non-putt shots.

That same golfer will have as many as 15-20 shots from inside 9-iron range, including short-range approaches and recovery shots. That means he has five clubs for what amounts to as much as 50% of his non-drive/non-putt shots.

Please think about this line of logic, because I’m going to continue this discussion on Tuesday. If you would like to offer your thoughts and suggestions for that follow-up, please add your comments below and I’ll build them in to “Building Your Team – Part 2” next week.

Your Reaction?
  • 54
  • LEGIT15
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK6

Terry Koehler is a fourth generation Texan and a graduate of Texas A&M University. Over his 40-year career in the golf industry, he has created over 100 putter designs, sets of irons and drivers, and in 2014, he put together the team that reintroduced the Ben Hogan brand to the golf equipment industry. Since the early 2000s, Terry has been a prolific writer, sharing his knowledge as “The Wedge Guy”.   But his most compelling work is in the wedge category. Since he first patented his “Koehler Sole” in the early 1990s, he has been challenging “conventional wisdom” reflected in ‘tour design’ wedges. The performance of his wedge designs have stimulated other companies to move slightly more mass toward the top of the blade in their wedges, but none approach the dramatic design of his Edison Forged wedges, which have been robotically proven to significantly raise the bar for wedge performance. Terry serves as Chairman and Director of Innovation for Edison Golf – check it out at www.EdisonWedges.com.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. ChipNRun

    Jan 2, 2020 at 11:10 pm

    My set-up includes…

    Driver
    4W + 7W (going into 9th season with this mix)
    4H
    4i-9i (4i refitted with hybrid shaft)
    Wedges 48* / 54* / 58* (58* replaces 60*)
    Putter

    Two seasons ago I had 46-50-54-58, but found the 46 and 50 duplicated each other on shorter shots. And, three wedges easier to manage (9i also part of wedge matrix)… only a couple of gaps in 3x matrix

    I can hit 4W longer than 3W (extra loft helps) and the 7W is really versatile: blows ball out of rough with distance, easy hit around 200 yds., and good on longish par 3 holes.

    4H more versatile, 4i more accurate (tight line for fairway on evil short Par 4s)… if I add fourth wedge one of these would stay home.

    May need to reshaft my irons as lighter from KBS Tour 90 to Recoil… something (maybe either Recoil 95 or ES780 in F3 flex). With old irons, dumped PX 5.0 in 2014. Need graphite so my my elbows don’t ache after consecutive golf days.

    May also need to reduce my D and FW shafts to below 60 grams; falloff last year especially in FW wood distance.

    I retired in May, but due to transition activities had a pretty lean golf season. Hope to have bag tweaked and ready by March.

    Also getting my right hip tweaked with rehab sessions to increase strength/flexibility to counter arthritis.

  2. freowho

    Jan 1, 2020 at 4:09 am

    I would add that a lot of par 3’s are 140m to 180m and this is often a poor spot for many club golfers with a big gap between a hybrid and their longest iron. You need clubs that you can hit a good three quarter shot with and this would be with a heavier shaft and a non tapered grip you can grip down on.

  3. William Terry

    Dec 31, 2019 at 9:14 pm

    Ive been thinking a ton about my bag this season… I’m a decently hard swinger, driver goes 290+. I am planning on rebuilding my entire set based on the course I play most frequently.

    Here is my current plan:

    Driver for maximized distance on holes I can chase. That’s about eight holes. Well struck drives put me under 150 from my usual tees.

    4 par fours between 150 and 180

    6 holes left… 260+ three wood works on all but one. Two are par fives where driver can put me into trouble and I can still get home with three wood. One is a long par five with no upside to driver. Two are short par fours I can get inside 150 with a three wood. Last one is 350 uphill, so 250 straight is the smart play.

    Low lofted hybrid for that. Club number three. Have an Adams hybrid in this slot… will hopefully replace with something built for me.

    3 clubs for tee shots, add putter… I’m at 4. So let’s move to the other side.

    I hit my pitching wedge 150. I carry a gap, sand and lob wedge. This is where I should be doing most of my work… I replaced my gap wedge this year with a vokey… I’m thinking about going a different route now. I use my wedges a ton and mostly on 1/2 swing shots. I’m not as good at distance control as I need to be to really score. It might make more sense to go with a glide setup for the last three… my mizuno hot metal pro pitching wedge has been good… I built it to get a feel for the mizunos but then hit a cash hiccup.

    So that’s 8 clubs. Covers the majority of my round when things go right. 6 left to cover 100 yards, I can go 225 and then 200, and leave myself 4 clubs 190, 180, 170 & 160… I could bump that to 13 yards and add a fifth wedge.

    With modern lofting, 46 pitching wedge, 50 gap, 54 sand, 58 lob in forgiveness and then a work horse wedge at 60 with an aggressive grind to use for tricky stuff around the greens.

    I don’t know, I’ve been building and rebuilding this set for years… hopefully I’ll have the cash this year… be nice to replace my 22 year old irons!

  4. Tom Watson

    Dec 31, 2019 at 6:16 pm

    I’m a low single digit hdcp but I play with quite a few 10-20hdcps. The club I usually see as a waste in their bags is the 3 wood. Short of some odd match scenario, it pretty much never makes sense for these players to try to reach par 5s in two. They simply bring too many disasters into it with their poor ballstriking.

    I would say most avg male 15 hdcps should go driver (likely a 12deg) then 3/4 hybrid with hybrids down to 5 or 6 depending on swing speed.

    D
    3h
    4h
    5H
    6H
    7i
    8i
    9i
    Pw 44
    48
    52
    56
    60

    That is a full set with no useless clubs in theory. The 3h might actually be useless to be honest.

    I’m not a fan of going to wedges more lofted than a 60. This tightly spaced set of wedges might also be tough to gap on full swings for these mid cappers.

    • Deacon Blues

      Dec 31, 2019 at 9:34 pm

      I agree completely that going for par-5 greens in two with a fairway wood is unwise for hackers like me. Over the years, it’s resulted in far more triples and quads than birdies and eagles. It’s been years since I regularly bagged a fairway wood, and I don’t miss them at all.

      About a year ago I downsized my bag to 11 clubs: driver, 18 and 24 degree hybrids, 6i-PW, 52 and 58 degree wedges, putter. All clubs are reliable and forgiving, yardage gaps are manageable, and decision-making is much easier.

  5. Chelsea’s Dad

    Dec 31, 2019 at 10:30 am

    Good points. I’m a single digit myself (bounces from 5 to 9) that hits ball decent length (driver 250 -260 carry, 7 iron 160-165) and I’ve realized changing the gaps at the top of my bag has helped. Go driver, 3 wood, 18 degree hybrid, 4 iron or 20 degree hybrid depending on course needs, then 5-Pw, 50, to, and 60. I found that by leaving 15 yard gaps from 3 wood-hybrid-4 iron that I can make any shot and just need to determine if I need to miss short or long. Having the extra wedge available gives me many more options on full shots and green side shots. Sometimes I can even remove a hybrid or 4/driving iron and add a 62 wedge if the course will provide opportunities.

    • Joel

      Dec 31, 2019 at 1:39 pm

      I’m similar to you, albeit not quite as good. I typically shoot about 80 on my two courses, par 68 and 70. They aren’t long either so I don’t really need too much just below the driver. Coupled with the fact that hitting the green from over 200y away is somewhat hit and miss, I much prefer having more options at the bottom end. I hit my 7I about 160y, driver 250y total unless it’s really dry.

      So my set-up is usually:

      Driver
      3 or 5 Wood
      4I
      4H or 5I
      6I-UW
      54
      58
      64
      Putter

      Wedges are of far more use than another club at the top, a 64* is a godsend.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending