Connect with us

Instruction

Q&A: Chuck Evans on why The Golfing Machine still matters

Published

on

In today’s Q&A I want to introduce Mr. Chuck Evans, one of the leading, if not the leading authority on The Golfing Machine, written in 1969 by Homer Kelley. As we know (in the business), Homer’s great work is the foundational blueprint for all the modern teaching styles today, and its concepts have been used by world-class teachers from David Leadbetter to Sean Foley.

So I want to help you understand more about Chuck, his philosophies, and his golf academy that you can find at www.chuckevansgolf.com. I hope you enjoy our conversation below.

Tom Stickney: How you were introduced into The Golfing Machine?

Chuck Evans: Years ago, my teaching varied by what was in that month’s golf publication. My players were getting better, but I thought I could help them reach their potential faster. I heard about another young teacher in the area that had some “interesting” views of the golf swing, so I booked a lesson with him. When I showed up for my lesson the young pro introduced himself: Ron Gring. As we progressed through the lesson he used terminology that I had never heard, but he explained as we went along.

After that initial session, he told me about a fascinating book called The Golfing Machine by Homer Kelley. When I got home I made a few calls to local bookstores — we didn’t have Google, Amazon, or any of the things we have today –- and found a place nearby that had a copy. I rushed out to get it and once home became completely enthralled with it! Now, I’m not the smartest guy in the world so in quite a few places I was stuck. I couldn’t figure out what Mr. Kelley was talking about.

After several throws across the room I decided to give Mr. Kelley a call. That was in March of 1983. Mrs. Kelley (Sally), answered the phone and told me that Homer had passed on Valentine’s Day of 1983. I was shocked she would answer the phone when I heard that! We talked for over an hour, and I asked her where the nearest authorized instructor was located. She told me Atlanta, Georgia, and his name was George Kelnhofer. I called George but he was booked 3 months out, but recommended one of the other teachers, Danny Elkins.

I got to Atlanta that weekend and spent time with Danny and then decided I should to seek out the other “top” Golfing Machine Instructors to get their understanding. I went to see Ben Doyle, Tom Tomasello, Alex Sloan and walked away more confused than ever. They ALL had a different interpretation of the book and its writings.

I thought how can this be?

They ALL had gone to the SAME classes with Mr. Kelley yet they all had different “ideas” of how to understand the book. So, I called Sally and arranged to spend time with her and go through all of the audio and writings that Homer had left behind.

TS: Why were you so drawn to the book?

CE: It made sense to me. Here was an outline, a catalog of things that a player could do and how the pieces fit together, or didn’t fit. Every chapter tells its own story. For instance, If I wanted to learn more about power I would simply go to chapter 6. Want more about how the wrists work? Go to chapter 4 and so on.

In the 4th edition there were four ball striking patterns and two putting patterns. I’m fortunate to have all the editions, including a copy signed by Mr. Kelley. After you became authorized and taught, you became the leading authority on teaching the thoughts in the book to the teachers interested in using it.

TS: How did this happen? Who did you go to when you had questions?

CE: Sally and I always stayed in touch. We talked weekly and would chat for hours! After several years, Sally called one day to ask if I would help her get the 7th and final edition out. That was 1994.

Cathy Schmidt and I were in Florida working and we looked at each other said, “What the hell, Sally needs help and Homer needs to get this final edition published!” So, we saddled up and headed to Seattle. Once we got there we found out that Sally had reached out to others as well, but no one else either had the time or inclination to give back.

We spent six months going through all of Homer’s handwritten notes, which I still have the originals, and when we finally got it ready to print, Sally couldn’t raise the money! To produce the minimum number of books the publisher wanted $25,000.

Sally appointed me the Director of Education for The Golfing Machine and even offered me the use of Homers studio, which I declined. I mean, come on, WHO could possibly fill those shoes! Anyway, my task was to hold AI classes, certifications, and “grade” the exams. During this time, Sally started talking about the possibility of one day selling the rights and company. In just a few years, and after many conversations, Danny Elkins and I finally negotiated the buyout.

Originally, I had wanted a group that included Ron Gring, myself, Danny Elkins, Martin Hall and you (Tom Stickney). For various reasons, all but Danny and myself dropped out; they just couldn’t’ make it work. I then brought in the current owner Joe Daniels so that we had an odd number for voting purposes.

When I came across something I wasn’t sure about, I would call Alex and he would provide input. But for the most part, all the answers were in Homers audio tapes and notes.

TS: Over time, how has your ideas of the book changed with the new technology that has come out?

CE: You know, there are some things that don’t quite fit. For example, the “Plane.” Science now tells us that golf isn’t planar at all. That doesn’t stop me from explaining to a player how the club head, club face, and club shaft work. Now I may talk more about the sweet spot “plane.”

There’s a lot of talk nowadays about wrist angles, alpha, beta, gamma, torques and forces. But the player certainly doesn’t need to know about those. It’s OUR job to explain things in a way that the player can understand what is or isn’t going on.

Mr. Kelley wrote that the ball will start practically at a right angle to the club face and square to the leading edge of the club face. FlightScope tells us that this is not what happens and it varies with different clubs. I think that number is up to around 85 percent of the club face, depending on the club being used. A lot of people are more than willing to call out TGM. But from my standpoint there is MORE than enough great information in there to produce tour caliber play, that is, IF someone really knows how to glean the info out of the book!

I know a lot of AI’s and former AI’s that truly do not have the understanding they need to have. Some have come up with their own “hypothesis” telling the world they have discovered something when in fact, it’s just a “rehash” of something out of TGM.

In my own education, I spend more time these days studying biomechanics. I’ve attended classes with Dr. Kwon, Phil Cheetham, Mike Duffey and read a lot of Sasho MacKenzie and Steven Nesbit. If Mr. Kelley were alive today, I know he would embrace the new technology and the study of biomechanics.

TS: Do you feel that the book or parts of the book are maybe outdated?

CE: Yes, but I truly believe that if Mr. Kelley was alive today there would be several more editions. These would be because of new findings using the latest technology. He didn’t have the things we have to day to accurately measure the club and the body.

TS: Why do players never mention their work with TGM principles other than Bryson?

CE: My belief is that they are either afraid of mentioning it, OR they simply don’t know any better. The long-time poster child for TGM was Bobby Clampett.

When he played poorly, it was TGM’s fault. Today, Bobby has his own school, “Impact Zone,” and he uses the principles that he was taught by Ben Doyle.

Players are being told that TGM doesn’t make players better. Like I said earlier, there is enough good stuff in there to produce tour caliber players. But, you need the RIGHT instructor to help wade through all of the negative bs being put out about TGM.

TS: What is the most important thing the book has taught you personally?

CE: That there is certainly a swing for everyone! So many variations and combinations, I think the number is 546 quadrillion. Also, that there are no “fundamentals” that apply to every player. Sure, we all must grip the club, but the style is variable. Just like the posture, aim, alignment, foot flairs — you name it. We all do those things, but we do them in a way that fits us. Mike Bennett and Andy Plummer have a great description for fundamentals and I think they nailed it!

TS: If you could ask Homer one question, what would it be?

CE: Why did you have to leave us so early? Your work wasn’t done! He dedicated almost 30 years to finding the “secret” to golf. Did he find it? We’ll never know, but he might have.

Your Reaction?
  • 107
  • LEGIT13
  • WOW6
  • LOL3
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB2
  • SHANK13

Tom F. Stickney II, is a specialist in Biomechanics for Golf, Physiology, and 3d Motion Analysis. He has a degree in Exercise and Fitness and has been a Director of Instruction for almost 30 years at resorts and clubs such as- The Four Seasons Punta Mita, BIGHORN Golf Club, The Club at Cordillera, The Promontory Club, and the Sandestin Golf and Beach Resort. His past and present instructional awards include the following: Golf Magazine Top 100 Teacher, Golf Digest Top 50 International Instructor, Golf Tips Top 25 Instructor, Best in State (Florida, Colorado, and California,) Top 20 Teachers Under 40, Best Young Teachers and many more. Tom is a Trackman University Master/Partner, a distinction held by less than 25 people in the world. Tom is TPI Certified- Level 1, Golf Level 2, Level 2- Power, and Level 2- Fitness and believes that you cannot reach your maximum potential as a player with out some focus on your physiology. You can reach him at [email protected] and he welcomes any questions you may have.

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Steve Wozeniak

    Apr 30, 2017 at 11:38 am

    I just love how the guy admits the book is outdated and he would change it………HELLO, it means the guy was WRONG !!!!!!
    This garbage has ruined so many swings over the years it’s sad. This is exactly why the average score is STILL 101…….101 people because of poor instruction and actually thinking hitting a golf ball is hard. Oh well it sure keeps me busy fixing swings……
    Steve Wozeniak PGA

  2. 8thehardway

    Apr 30, 2017 at 3:05 am

    Editorially speaking, the book is an $80 joke. Format, grammar, punctuation, layout… you’ll find obstacles and roadblocks to comprehension on every page. Laboring through assembly instructions set in 6 point type, written by someone for whom English was a second language with drawings shrunk beyond recognition is an apt comparison and after7 editions of this crap I doubt anyone involved in publishing version 8 is concerned about clarity, comprehension or, by extension, their intended audience.

  3. Kenneth

    Apr 29, 2017 at 12:34 am

    Chuck, do you still have the designation of GSED – Golf Swing Engineer Doctor?
    If so do you fully understand Chapter 2 of TGM – Statement of Principle – Introduction to Mechanics and where Homer provides the scientific basis for his Star System of G.O.L.F.?
    Homer was not a graduate engineer nor scientist of any kind and I wonder if his science is legitimate. I have the 1982 edition of TGM.

  4. Dan

    Apr 28, 2017 at 8:06 pm

    There have been some very fine golf teachers/instructors and Mr. Kelly was one of them. I have read his book and did get some ideas from it. It isn’t the easiest book to understand as Mr. Evans says. The best instruction book on golf I’ve ever read and understood was written by the best teacher of all IMHO and that was Practical Golf by John Jacobs.

  5. Michael

    Apr 28, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    Ben Hogan’s 5 Fundamentals, Harvey Penick’s Little Red Book, and Doak’s Confidential Guide to GC’s will teach you how to play golf, how to think about golf, and how to read a golf course.

  6. Bob Jones

    Apr 28, 2017 at 10:07 am

    For the 8th edition, please hire a professional writer. Homer Kelley’s syntax and words choices are the reason why this book is such a head-scratcher. Some critical concepts, for example, In-Line, are poorly defined. The book presents many choices, but does a poor job of saying which ones work together and which ones conflict. Etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Instruction

Clement: Laid-off or perfect fade? Across-the-line or perfect draw?

Published

on

Some call the image on the left laid off, but if you are hitting a fade, this could be a perfect backswing for it! Same for across the line for a draw! Stop racking your brain with perceived mistakes and simply match backswing to shot shape!

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Instruction

The Wedge Guy: The easiest-to-learn golf basic

Published

on

My golf learning began with this simple fact – if you don’t have a fundamentally sound hold on the golf club, it is practically impossible for your body to execute a fundamentally sound golf swing. I’m still a big believer that the golf swing is much easier to execute if you begin with the proper hold on the club.

As you might imagine, I come into contact with hundreds of golfers of all skill levels. And it is very rare to see a good player with a bad hold on the golf club. There are some exceptions, for sure, but they are very few and very far between, and they typically have beat so many balls with their poor grip that they’ve found a way to work around it.

The reality of biophysics is that the body moves only in certain ways – and the particulars of the way you hold the golf club can totally prevent a sound swing motion that allows the club to release properly through the impact zone. The wonderful thing is that anyone can learn how to put a fundamentally sound hold on the golf club, and you can practice it anywhere your hands are not otherwise engaged, like watching TV or just sitting and relaxing.

Whether you prefer an overlap, interlock or full-finger (not baseball!) grip on the club, the same fundamentals apply.  Here are the major grip faults I see most often, in the order of the frequency:

Mis-aligned hands

By this I mean that the palms of the two hands are not parallel to each other. Too many golfers have a weak left hand and strong right, or vice versa. The easiest way to learn how to hold the club with your palms aligned properly is to grip a plain wooden ruler or yardstick. It forces the hands to align properly and shows you how that feels. If you grip and re-grip a yardstick several times, then grip a club, you’ll see that the learning curve is almost immediate.

The position of the grip in the upper/left hand

I also observe many golfers who have the butt of the grip too far into the heel pad of the upper hand (the left hand for right-handed players). It’s amazing how much easier it is to release the club through the ball if even 1/4-1/2″ of the butt is beyond the left heel pad. Try this yourself to see what I mean.  Swing the club freely with just your left hand and notice the difference in its release from when you hold it at the end of the grip, versus gripping down even a half inch.

To help you really understand how this works, go to the range and hit shots with your five-iron gripped down a full inch to make the club the same length as your seven-iron. You will probably see an amazing shot shape difference, and likely not see as much distance loss as you would expect.

Too much lower (right) hand on the club

It seems like almost all golfers of 8-10 handicap or higher have the club too far into the palm of the lower hand, because that feels “good” if you are trying to control the path of the clubhead to the ball. But the golf swing is not an effort to hit at the ball – it is a swing of the club. The proper hold on the club has the grip underneath the pad at the base of the fingers. This will likely feel “weak” to you — like you cannot control the club like that. EXACTLY. You should not be trying to control the club with your lower/master hand.

Gripping too tightly

Nearly all golfers hold the club too tightly, which tenses up the forearms and prevents a proper release of the club through impact. In order for the club to move back and through properly, you must feel that the club is controlled by the last three fingers of the upper hand, and the middle two fingers of the lower hand. If you engage your thumbs and forefingers in “holding” the club, the result will almost always be a grip that is too tight. Try this for yourself. Hold the club in your upper hand only, and squeeze firmly with just the last three fingers, with the forefinger and thumb off the club entirely. You have good control, but your forearms are not tense. Then begin to squeeze down with your thumb and forefinger and observe the tensing of the entire forearm. This is the way we are made, so the key to preventing tenseness in the arms is to hold the club very lightly with the “pinchers” — the thumbs and forefingers.

So, those are what I believe are the four fundamentals of a good grip. Anyone can learn them in their home or office very quickly. There is no easier way to improve your ball striking consistency and add distance than giving more attention to the way you hold the golf club.

More from the Wedge Guy

Your Reaction?
  • 88
  • LEGIT13
  • WOW6
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP4
  • OB1
  • SHANK8

Continue Reading

Instruction

Clement: Stop ripping off your swing with this drill!

Published

on

Not the dreaded headcover under the armpit drill! As if your body is defective and can’t function by itself! Have you seen how incredible the human machine is with all the incredible feats of agility all kinds of athletes are accomplishing? You think your body is so defective (the good Lord is laughing his head off at you) that it needs a headcover tucked under the armpit so you can swing like T-Rex?

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW2
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending