Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Ranking the Best Teams in College Golf

Published

on

With the spring season well underway in college golf, teams will be jockeying for position leading up to the NCAA Regionals in May with hopes of qualifying for the Finals at Rich Harvest Farms in Sugar Grove, Illinois.

Winning the NCAA Championships is the ultimate goal for every school, but golf is a fickle game; it’s not necessarily the best team that comes away with the trophy. Take last year’s result, for example. Oregon won the men’s title, while Washington pulled out the victory on the women’s side.

These two teams came into the week ranked 21st and 13th, respectively. The championships were held in Eugene, Oregon, and both may have benefitted from some Pacific Northwest familiarity. Still, the top-ranked teams at both tournaments fared extremely well. For the men, Texas finished runner-up despite playing without an injured Beau Hossler in the final match. Meanwhile, the UCLA women advanced to the semifinal match before falling by a narrow 3-2 margin to the surging Huskies.

In order to determine the best team in college golf each year, it’s essential to look at the full body of work throughout the season. To fulfill this purpose, the Golfweek/Sagarin Ranking system provides an excellent measure. The index employs an algorithm that takes into account multiple factors — the team’s won-lost-tied record and its stroke differential — to calculate a power rating. Of course, the ranking is relative and is affected by the ratings and performance of common opponents (i.e. the other teams in the tournament field).

With this in mind, the concept of ranking the best teams in college golf in recent years was born. Through analysis of archived Golfweek/Sagarin Rankings year-end data, it’s possible to compile ranked lists for both men’s and women’s teams. The following are the Top-10 rankings for two time periods: the last five years and the last decade.

Men: 5 Years

NCAA Photos Archive

  1. Texas
  2. Alabama
  3. Stanford
  4. California
  5. Illinois
  6. Oklahoma State
  7. Georgia Tech
  8. Southern California
  9. Georgia
  10. LSU

Teams 11-15: Auburn, Florida State, Washington, UCLA, Arkansas.

Men: 10 Years

  1. Alabama
  2. Oklahoma State
  3. Georgia
  4. Stanford
  5. Southern California
  6. Georgia Tech
  7. Texas
  8. UCLA
  9. Florida
  10. Texas A&M

Teams 11-15: Illinois, Washington, Florida State, California, Auburn.

Notes

NCAA Photos Archive

Recognize these two players?

  • Alabama beat out Oklahoma State by the smallest of margins to claim the top spot (70.2783 vs 70.2788).
  • Stanford was the most consistent team, having finished outside the top-10 only once in the past 10 years. The team’s average ranking was 6.8 over that span.
  • Teams that have come on strong over the past five years: Texas (jumped from 7th to 1st), Illinois (11th to 5th), California (14th to 4th) and LSU (N/A to 10th).
  • The 10-spot jump for California can be attributed in large part to its record-setting 2012-13 season, in which the team piled up 11 wins (it also won the stroke play portion of the NCAA Championships, but fell to Illinois in the Semifinal match).
  • Two teams finished atop the rankings in consecutive seasons: Oklahoma State from 2008-09 through 2010-11 (a three-peat) and Georgia in 2006-07 and 2007-08.
  • The 2013-14 Alabama squad was the only top-ranked team to win the national championship in the past decade.

Women: 5 Years

  1. Southern California
  2. UCLA
  3. Duke
  4. Alabama
  5. Arizona State
  6. Arizona
  7. Stanford
  8. Arkansas
  9. Florida
  10. Washington

Teams 11-15: Oklahoma State, South Carolina, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Virginia.

Women: 10 Years

NCAA Photos Archive

  1. Southern California
  2. UCLA
  3. Duke
  4. Arizona State
  5. Alabama
  6. Arizona
  7. Florida
  8. Stanford
  9. Arkansas
  10. Oklahoma State

Teams 11-15: Purdue, Virginia, Georgia, Auburn, Vanderbilt.

Notes

  • Women’s college golf has shown more constancy in the rankings with the same teams occupying the top-9 positions.
  • Purdue had a strong 5-year stretch from 2006-07 to 2010-11 where the team finished inside the top-10 every year, but recent struggles have left Purdue out of the top-10.
  • Southern California and UCLA have separated themselves from the rest of the pack; neither team finished worse than 7th in the rankings over the past decade.
  • The top-ranked team has gone on to win the national championship four times in the past decade: Duke (2007), Southern California (in 2008 and 2013) and Arizona State (2009).

General Observations

  • Every team comes from a major conference: Pac-12, SEC, ACC, Big 12 and Big 10. The best teams not from a Power-5 conference were the UNLV men (Mountain West) and the Pepperdine women (WCC).
  • The Pac-12 is particularly strong in women’s golf with 6 of the top-10 teams in the nation over the last 5 years.
  • Most teams come from warmer climates with the exception of Illinois and Washington (making Illinois’ recent run of success all the more impressive).
  • On average, the men (12.1 per season) play more tournaments than the women (11.2).
  • The men’s and women’s programs at each school are often not created equal; in some cases the men perform better (eg. Texas, Illinois, Georgia Tech), while in others it’s the women who have more success (eg. Duke, Arizona State, Arizona).
Your Reaction?
  • 51
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW2
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK10

Jeffrey Knox's main interests are junior and college golf, but he also follows the professional tours closely. Jeff graduated from the College of William and Mary in 2014, where he served as the Sports Editor and later as Editor-in-Chief of the campus news magazine. He currently lives in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where he works as an environmental scientist for Providence Engineering.

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Undershooter30

    Mar 14, 2017 at 11:57 am

    Bama looking good. Only school with teams in the top 5 of every list. Very impressive.

  2. Tom

    Mar 14, 2017 at 11:21 am

    Jeffery, we shall revisit this topic mid season.

  3. Barry

    Mar 14, 2017 at 10:12 am

    #1 should be the SDSU Women’s team

    Tied for last: All others

  4. Tom

    Mar 13, 2017 at 11:28 am

    Texas in the spotlight.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 34
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending