Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Is the Open Championship really the truest test?

Published

on

What a tournament that was. Last weekend, golf fans were treated to the best of what professional golf has to offer. There was a guy named Beef in all his bearded glory, Phil the Thrill going for another major and Stenson closing it out with a tie for lowest final round in major history. The final two rounds saw two of the best players in the world go toe to toe with shot making, skill and sportsmanship.

I feel confident saying the Open is the most entertaining golf tournament of the year, with only the Masters offering much of a challenge. The U.S. Open is great, but you can only watch players hacking it out of six inches of rough for so long — and let’s not even get started on the rulings. The PGA Championship is fine, but with it coming two weeks after the Open this year, it seems a little anticlimactic.

And who doesn’t love watching players negotiate howling winds, freezing rain and weather more suited for November than summer. It’s television and entertainment at its best.

There is a larger question to ask about the Open, though; does it really do the best job of identifying the top-performing golfers in the field? Because we heard over and over this week how the Open was the “truest test” in major championship golf. Nick Faldo led off Sunday’s coverage on Golf Channel saying it was. The Open even calls the winner the Champion Golfer of the Year.

But we heard another subject from the players discussed more often before, during and after the tournament even started.

The dreaded draw.

If you weren’t on the right side of the draw at Royal Troon this year, you weren’t in contention. The top 10 heading into Saturday all played on Thursday afternoon and Friday morning. For those counting at home, there was a seven-shot difference between Kevin Na’s two-round total of 139 in 11th place and Mickelson’s 132 at the top. Who is to say Na’s two-day total wasn’t as good as the leaders? Yet he was nearly out of it, 7 strokes back. Stuck on the wrong side of the draw, Jason Day talked about “luck” and Justin Rose called it “frustrating.”

Rory McIlroy, after already making some incendiary comments early in the week, took the high road saying“I’m not going to let being on the wrong side ruin my mood or ruin my week.”

The next day he did this.

Now none of this is to say Mickelson or Stenson shouldn’t have been in the final pairing on Sunday. It’s hard to argue when two golfers close out the Sunday of a major a combined 14-under par. But it doesn’t mean others couldn’t have been in contention on Saturday if they had the opposite side of the draw. So let’s stamp down the high praise and boasting of how well the Open does finding the true champion and golfer of the year.

You can call it the most fun major to watch, you can call it the most entertaining found of golf you’ve ever seen, you can even call it the best final round in major history… just don’t call it the truest test in golf. Because if a tournament is so reliant on when you tee off, how true a test is it really?

Your Reaction?
  • 33
  • LEGIT10
  • WOW4
  • LOL2
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP2
  • OB8
  • SHANK83

Seth is an avid golfer playing year round in Florida.

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Jim

    Jul 24, 2016 at 5:11 am

    Playing against the brunt of the nature is definitely a better test than going against USGA’s sadistic 6-inch rough made on purpose to make life difficult for no absolute reason.

  2. TGS

    Jul 21, 2016 at 2:06 am

    Calloway makes equipment that just goes straight and keeps you in play. I find that to be the case with their woods this year. Very straight

  3. Nev

    Jul 20, 2016 at 8:48 pm

    I find it hard to fathom comments about the luck of the draw, when Thursday was a perfect day, yet none of the best golfers in the world failed to take advantage of it. Maybe it is more that some players find it hard to play links courses. I would rather watch golf played on this style of course, rather than watch players trying to hack their way out of 6 inch rough.

  4. Scott

    Jul 20, 2016 at 4:44 pm

    Seth, you whine worse that Sergio Garcia. Correct me if I am wrong, but 1/2 of the field played in identical conditions, yet the best anyone else could muster is 11 strokes behind 2nd place?

    i guess the reason is that the golf gods wanted Phil and Henrik to be in one of the best mach play duels in recent history. The golf gods hated everyone else.

  5. matto

    Jul 20, 2016 at 5:31 am

    Phil was absolutely soaked to the bone on Friday. Didn’t look easy to me. A lot of this “bad side of the draw” talk seems to be because the OGWR top 4 didn’t fair well.

  6. Rich

    Jul 20, 2016 at 4:54 am

    Sorry Seth, you’re an idiot. You can’t conclude that The Open is not the truest test of golf if you are not going to define what the truest test is. How can you argue that something does or doesn’t fit the brief, if there is no brief. I’m not saying it is or isn’t, I’m just saying your article gives nothing except your opinion.

    Seems like Golfwrx are just getting articles from more and more sources that are either cheap or rubbish just to fill their quota of new articles. Is golf really that uninteresting these days that we are subjected to rubbish articles like this? God I hope not.

  7. Uno

    Jul 20, 2016 at 3:00 am

    Truest test would be to put these Pros on some Muni track with crappy greens, un-raked bunkers and fairways that don’t run out at all

  8. Jack

    Jul 20, 2016 at 2:45 am

    Yup let’s just have the next Open played on a golf simulator so nobody needs to ever play from another player’s divot, and wind conditions can all be simulated to be exactly the same and fair for everyone. That’ll be a true test of skill. /sarcasm

  9. Pete

    Jul 20, 2016 at 1:03 am

    so 14 shot difference between winner and 3rd bc luck of draw???

    that effect is practically standard in any 4 day stroke play event.

    +1 on the sour grapes, next time cool off for a few days before writing an article!

  10. Rancho

    Jul 20, 2016 at 12:36 am

    Ok, having subjected us to this rubbish OpEd, what is the truest test? Send them all to Topgolf?

  11. RedX

    Jul 19, 2016 at 8:28 pm

    +1 to SV, Philip & Ian’s comments.

    Too much has been made of the disparity in the draw in this Open. Any tee time Thursday was ideal as the course was defenceless all day (bunkers excepted) but highly ranked guys like JDay, Rors & Speith wasted their opportunities to go low. Friday was definitely more lopsided but not easy in the morning either.

    Weather played a significant part in this years US Open through to the cut as it has in other PGA tour events during the year.

    I do think the US players “feel” this a little more generally as they are often not called upon to play in wind and rain as regularly. Lighting is often a factor in the US under these conditions and (sensibly) play is suspended. It is rare in the Open and as such maybe they feel it more keenly when asked to play on and get on with it.

    “Hats off” to Phil as a positive example, shunning the umbrella, donning the wet weather gear and the two gloves in the thick of it Friday and just getting stuck in.

  12. SV

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:48 pm

    It may be more prevalent in The Open, but weather-wise the luck of the draw can/will have an affect at any tournament. It just happened that this time the current “names” got caught, so some think it is a big deal. Life is not fair. Golf is not fair. Deal with it.
    Yes, The Open is the truest test of golf. It examines each player and asks them to answer the problems put before them. The questions change, but those that are able to answer them get a good grade. Henrik got an A+. Phil got an A. Others, those that missed the cut, got Fs.

  13. Philip

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    And what tournament doesn’t have this aspect? Based on your argument not one tournament can really claim to offer the truest test of golf because seldom all of the golfers play in the same conditions – especially Thursday and Friday.

  14. Ian

    Jul 19, 2016 at 2:33 pm

    Grumble grumble grumble. Sounds like the sour grapes of realizing that a non-American Major stole the spotlight. Credit where credits due.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 13
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 35
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending