Connect with us

News

GolfWRX Interview Fujikura Golf

Published

on

GolfWRX is proud to present an interview with Fujikura Golf’s Chad Embry, National Accounts Manager and Alex Dee, Engineering Manager.

Click here to listen to the audio.

GolfWRX: Okay we’re here today with Chad Embry and Alex Dee from Fujikura Golf. Guys, how are you doing today?

Both: Excellent, thanks.

GolfWRX: Great. Can you give us a little background about your history in golf and with Fujikura?

Chad Embry: I started in the golf business fifteen years ago. I started as a first assistant at a country club out here in Southern California. I worked there for several years but have always been a salesman at heart. So I got involved with some of the other shaft companies and one of the other OEM’s and a couple of the head companies. I kind of bounced around until I found a home here at Fujikura and that was about eight years ago. I started basically the aftermarket program, we had about twenty accounts and basically did a lot of OEM work at that time. Now we’ve expanded this to over 800 Charter Dealers. I am the National Sales Rep for Fujikura aftermarket and handle all those dealers along with some of the OEM’s. That’s how I personally got started and where I stand today.

GolfWRX: Excellent, Alex, how about yourself?

Alex Dee: I have a mechanical engineering background from the University of California here in San Diego. I took a course in composites back then as an undergraduate. It was a graduate level course and it got me into the nuances of what composite material can do in terms of customizing a structure. When I finished my undergrad, I got into a shaft design and manufacturing company in San Diego and got my feet we there for a year and a half before I decided to go to grad school. I went to grad school at the University of Delaware which had one of the oldest schools for composite materials and I got my masters degree there. After finishing that up, I got brought back to San Diego to work with Fujikura and that was ten years ago today and it’s been a fun ride.

GolfWRX: Congratulations I didn’t know we caught you on your ten year anniversary.

Alex Dee: Time goes by fast, I’ll tell you.

Chad Embry: We got him a Timex. Now as far as Fujikura, I’d like to give you a little background about Fujikura. Fujikura is obviously a Japanese based company started well over a hundred years ago as a rubber company. Fujikura got into the automotive side of rubber, making car parts. They have done, and correct me if I’m wrong, fiber optics, life rafts, print blankets, there are I believe currently eleven different companies dealing with different products throughout the globe dealing with Fujikura. So Fujikura has been around for a long time. We personally started making shafts in 1973 in Japan only. We came across into the U.S. in 1994 and started making shafts in Vista, California which is where we make them today. We primarily came out as kind of a support vehicle for the OEM’s. We helped co-develop the Bubble shaft for TaylorMade and we did a lot of work with Callaway when we first came out to the U.S. Again, we started basically as a support team for those OEM’s and procuring more OEM business. It morphed itself, we actually started the aftermarket side of Fujikura in 2000 and again started a new concept with a shaft that was a little bit higher end at the time. Most shaft companies were selling installs for $40 a piece. We took these materials that cost three times as much to make as standard graphite, only three places in the world could make it with our Triax, and we introduced more high-end, high-performance graphite on the market and you see where that has taken us today.

GolfWRX: Now I wanted to know if you guys could give us a little info about how you design graphite shafts?

Alex Dee: It really starts with two engineering teams, one in Japan and one in the U.S. Japan we are fortunate enough to work with because they have a lot of unique access to advanced technology and different technologies. For the U.S. we have access to the U.S. market and the professional golfers here. The two meld really well together to make the best products for the PGA Tour and the everyday user. We really understand how the shaft behaves, how it works in the golf club, and how it works for a variety of players. So when we design, it really starts with two R&D teams working together and it goes down to looking at some unique materials and how those materials can benefit how we make a golf shaft and how it can best perform. Then from there we’ll characterize some of those unique materials. For example we use a Triax material we use in our Speeder, that Triax material is also in our Rombax which includes a different type of material, we call it a Box Weave – it’s a very tightly woven material and a very low tow fiber, a very expensive and high grade material. What we do is we try to look at those materials and see how they will perform best in a golf shaft, how they will deliver the best performance and the best feel. I could go on because there’s so much about the design of a golf shaft. To answer a question as you posed, it’s very open. There are so many different levels to how we design – I could talk about the materials, I could talk about the engineering groups. It goes beyond that in terms of how we model the golf shafts. We use computers to simulate that. We characterize the materials. We can design the shaft in a simulation on the computer and know its stiffness profile, know its twisting profile and that doesn’t mean an overall twist for example a shaft we say is 3.5 degrees – we may market it that way so it’s easier for the consumer to see that number – but from our point of view we see a distribution of twisting from the tip to the butt end. We’ll design a part for a twisting distribution and we’ll design a part for a stiffness distribution. Commonly right now you’ll hear a lot about EI. We’re looking at that EI Profile. We’re looking at the mass distribution of that part and where that balance point is. All those things will tie into how that part will behave for a specific type of swing.

GolfWRX: I know material technology is one of the things people think about when they think about Fujikura. We want you guys to go more into detail about that in just a little bit. But before that, can you tell us a little bit about how graphite shafts are constructed?

Alex Dee: I sure can. Graphite Shafts are constructed by hand. At least in what we consider in high-performance and high quality they are hand constructed. There are cheaper shafts that can be filament wound. Those are basically done with a tool and more automated equipment that will put the fiber down in the orientations they want. There are some limitations to that in terms of the quality of how the filaments are laid down and how the resin impregnates it. So those are have been delegated more to low cost products. They’ve seen market popularity in OEM and very low cost products. In what we do, everything is by hand so we’ll take pre-preg which is our composite material. It is generally provided by aerospace companies who supply it to major manufacturers of aircraft in the U.S. and abroad. We take these materials and we cut them, and we cut them usually using CNC type of equipment so it is computer controlled so we get the right geometry for those pieces. Those are hand rolled onto a steel tool. That steel tool is also designed specifically for that part so we get the right performance out of it. So we’re basically rolling on, by hand, layers of carbon fiber and resin to build up the golf shaft and putting it through a cure process that hardens the epoxy, then extracting the tool out of it so it is basically a hardened shell. From then on it might go through some grinding and cosmetic decorations as well. There is a lot of quality control involved as well to make sure we’re hitting the right specifications.

GolfWRX: I know anytime somebody thinks of the name Fujikura the name Triax comes to mind as well. Can you tell us what Triax material is and how it benefits graphite shaft performance?

Alex Dee: I sure can, Triax is something exclusive to Fujikura. We have really enjoyed a relationship with a partner in Japan that makes that material for us. What Triax is, is a woven material. Woven materials are much like your shirt or a blanket where you see criss-crosses that tie the material together. What Triax is, what makes it unique and by the word tri, it is a three-axis system so the fibers are woven in three directions rather than just two. There are some unique playing properties to that. First of all in that one layer of material, we could load the shaft in different directions and that loading would be absorbed by different fibers in different orientations. You’ve got to see that in that space – that as you pull on it in different directions there is always a fiber that is always able to take some of that loading. There is also a certain feel you get when you have that kind of material wrapped around a shaft. I liken it to a cage wrapped around the part and it really gives it a solid feel and one thing it does is keep the shaft from ovalizing during the bending. So we get a lot of energy transfer, people say that shaft feels fast because it reacts quickly and hence the name speeder.

Chad Embry: What the Triax does as well is prevent toe droop which steadies the head through the impact area which obviously center contact is the key in maximizing distance and control. So the Triax helps prevent that toe droop, keeps the head steady through impact and results in longer, straighter shots.

Alex Dee: That’s a good point. We talked about the material taking loads in different directions. When you have that off-center impact, the head has a tendency to cause off-center dispersion on the ball. So that shaft keeps it stable and we’ve seen the dispersion on off-center hits using Triax material is very minimal.

GolfWRX: Excellent, I know Triax is just the tip of the ice berg for you guys and you have used other materials such as titanium and Kevlar to improve graphite shaft performance. What do those materials do for you in improving graphite shaft performance?

Alex Dee: Off the top of my head I can’t imagine that we’ve used titanium yet. I do think though that titanium has some benefits and we may be experimenting with that but I can’t really tell you at this point if we are. But there is opportunity for titanium metal. It has a high stiffness and a relatively low weight. But there are penalties for that, the weight is still about two and a half times heavier than carbon fiber. So there are some penalties for using it but there are other attractive means for titanium we may try in the future. As far as Kevlar we have used that and we’ve taken Kevlar and woven it in a Triax form and what Kevlar does for us is it’s a different feel – it’s a softer feel. We use it more for its feel characteristics. It is a ballistics material, it can take high impacts but what I think we’re using it more for is a different feel.

GolfWRX: Now what sort of effect does Tour use and Tour player feed back have for you guys at Fujikura?

Chad Embry: I’ll take that one. We use the Tour almost as a testing ground in conjunction with our Fit-On! Academy here, and obviously better players throughout the country. So there is no doubt we use Tour players as a testing ground for all of our products we introduce. In fact, I would say up to 90% of our products are first launched on Tour with our Tour Reps, Pat McCoy, John Hovis, and our new Tour Rep Mike Sposa a former PGA Tour player. We get a lot of good feedback and sometimes conversely negative feedback from PGA Tour players. We’ll take that back in our house and readjust our designs, or readjust material placement and come up with products that are first Tour proven. We’ll take those designs and either soften them up a little bit, introduce them to the aftermarket or change those a little bit to what suits the aftermarket. So we work very closely with the PGA Tour and they do help us design some of our best shafts.

Alex Dee: There are times where we will take product from Tour straight to the public as well. The X and sometimes some of the XX products could be available to the consumer.

GolfWRX: Now is there one shaft on Tour that dominates Tour use for you guys?

Chad Embry: The beautiful thing about our company is we have a multitude of products that are Tour proven. We’re not a one hit wonder shaft company with a product that gets hot for a couple of years and then phases out. We have in any given week, up to twenty-five different products in play on the PGA Tour. Now some of those are used more extensively than others, but even in the case of the Rombax which is the hottest shaft on the PGA Tour with the inclusion of the TaylorMade Rombax shaft and our aftermarket Rombax shafts. We have several different products out there that are doing well for us. So even with the Rombax shaft being popular, there still is no one product, no one gram weight, no one Z, or X, or W that does well. It’s a wide range of weight categories and a wide range of branded products that are doing well for us. So to answer your question simply, it is a lot of products that do very well out there and not one in particular that steals the show out there.

GolfWRX: Definitely, as you mentioned, one product that has been gaining a lot of momentum out there has been the RE*AX shaft. Can you tell us why that has been so popular on the Tour?

Chad Embry: Well, the RE*AX TP product – and there is a difference there is a RE*AX that comes standard with the TaylorMade equipment and the RE*AX TP which is upgraded in the TP heads. It’s done well for us in the fact – two fold, one it is a fantastic product. It is full length Rombax material. When we started to develop the Rombax material we partnered up with TaylorMade to come up with a product for them in particular, for their aftermarket products, as well as for Tour. So it is a full length Rombax Shaft and it comes in a multitude of weight categories from 55-105 grams. When TaylorMade first introduced this product with their equipment asked in no uncertain polite terms that their players who are sponsored by them play that product. That was a one year cycle, and that was a couple of years ago that it happened. The benefit of that was it worked so well that players continued playing it after there was no mandate to playing that product. So even to this day we have several of those Rombax RE*AX TP shafts out on Tour and it is a fantastic product. So the popularity of it is quite simple, it produces and does quite well for these Tour players and with the Rombax technology and its benefits, it’s a sought out product for the PGA Tour.

Alex Dee: And it’s a validation of Rombax technology for TaylorMade products used extensively on Tour.

GolfWRX: Now I know for the folks on GolfWRX, a few of the shafts like the 660TR and VTLT which were previously Tour only have a big time cult following. So a lot of the members were wondering why these shafts have never been released to the public?

Chad Embry: That’s a fair question. In part, these products are either, mirrored by a product that we did release in terms of its playability and its profiles and / or the percentage of the golfing public that can actually play a shaft such as the VTLT is very small. The VTLT is an extremely tip stiff product, low torque, has a very low ball flight, and a very low spin rate. We had products in our lineup that were a touch more playable for a wider range of golfers in the Vista Tour 60 and 70 which basically could cover the player profile we wanted to cover. To have too many product SKU’s is confusing. Obviously we are limited by space here in our warehouse. So to come out with some of these products doubled up on other products and in other instances there just wasn’t a broad enough player base to warrant bringing these products to market. Also, a lot of times also you’ll have products that get popular only because of the fact that they are very rare and very hard to get. That doesn’t mean that they’re products we currently offer, but it adds a little more allure and attractiveness for a discerning player to have that in his club.

GolfWRX: That’s a very valid explanation. Now can you tell us a little bit about your relationship with OEM’s? Are they typically sending you a head and asking you design something around it, or do they have a list of specifications they want you to meet?

Alex Dee: I would say that depends on the OEM. We have customers that send us specifications they would like us to hit and customers who do provide us with a head and say, “Please make us something that would play best for this.” A lot of times regardless of whether it is a spec driven initiation of a product or just a blank sheet, it still goes down to player testing and some field testing, some additional modification to make sure we’re hitting the audience they want us to hit.

GolfWRX: Now getting into the product line a little bit, can you tell us about the E series and how the lineup progresses from the E100 all the way to the E300?

Chad Embry: The E is the product line in a price point category that covers pretty much every single golfer on the market. It starts with our E100 series which is more of a higher ball flight, higher spin rate shaft. Obviously I don’t want to pin point any particular golfers that fit into these because there are no rules to fitting players. But if it had to be mentioned, the E100 series is more for your mid-handicap, ladies, seniors, slower swing tempo that’s looking to get some air under their shots and a little more spin rate for maximum carry. The E200 which is our brand new product offering which is a club maker exclusive product line is the replacement for the Tour Platform. It is more of a mid ball flight, mid spin shaft that comes in a multitude of weights and fits a wide range of players. At least that was our history with the Tour Platform. We had the Tour Platform on the PGA Tour and we had it in 36 handicappers hands getting good benefits out of it. We added a 50 gram range, changed the design a little bit using new materials and technology, and now we’ve added that to the lineup in 50, 60, and 70. The E300 is the lower ball flight, lower spin rate, better golfer, harder swinger, quicker tempo player. We have that in a 50, 60, 70, and 80 gram weight category. So now our line is clean, you have a shaft you can easily explain to a consumer why it fits his needs and how he will benefit from that shaft. We’ve also come out with hybrid shafts and iron shafts in each of those categories. So we’ll have an E-160 iron and hybrid, an E-270 iron and hybrid, and an E-380 iron and hybrid which mimic the playing characteristics of their wood shafts. So the will 100 be a little bit higher a little easier to swing, 200 being more of that mid ball flight, mid spin rate, and that 300 being a little bit lower spin rate and a little bit lower ball flight.

GolfWRX: Could you tell us a little bit about Rombax technology, the Box weave, and how it exactly works?

Chad Embry: Alex Dee obviously touched on this a little earlier but Triax technology came out and was introduced with the Speeder series of shafts. Again, like Alex mentioned, it deflects force in more directions than standard unidirectional graphite shafts. It has got the tri- three different directional graphite. And so again it can deflect the force, steady the head through impact, creating longer and straighter shots by getting more center contact. Some of our dealers throughout the country like to refer to our Rombax as a Speeder on steroids. We’ve taken it and given greater added stability with the Braided Box weave on the outside of the Triax weave. So even though my engineering partner here would probably disagree, it almost gives you a fourth and fifth directionality to it –

Alex Dee: It does, you take two and add three and you get five.

Chad Embry: There you go. So now we’ve not only taken the stability that made the Speeder series and particularly the Speeder 757 a home run, we’ve added a stabilizing material on the outside to even give it more directionality, basically more deflection of load through the entire swing and made that the Rombax series. So now the Rombax series really is a suped up Speeder and we’ve come out with three different lines of the Rombax series. So we’re starting to get more player coverage in the Rombax. We have a lot of players on the PGA Tour kicking around with that currently and a lot of them actually playing that product as we speak.

Alex Dee: I’d like to add a few things to that although Chad pretty much summed it all up, when you talk about composite materials, they are generally good in only direction and that’s in the direction of the fibers. That’s where your fibers are the strongest, that’s where you’re going to want your load to be. And in the opposite direction, you’re basically putting on plastic and it’s not reinforced in that direction and that’s where you’re going to get some of your weakness. The benefit of using unidirectional composites is that you can decrease the weight. You can put the fibers in the direction of the loading and reduce the overall weight of the structure. You can actually design that structure as you want by putting the fibers in different directions. What happens is during the golf swing, there are a lot more complicated forces going on than just bending and twisting. There are loads in various directions. We introduced the Triax together with that Box weave. We are able to reinforce the shaft in multiple directions without the penalty of weight as you would in steel. So we’re trying to get to that consistency of steel, the feeling that steel has. We’re getting to that without the penalty of weight.

GolfWRX: Now can you tell us how the X, W, and Z lines all vary in bend profile?

Chad Embry: Yeah, absolutely. In simplistic terms, the X series is a softer but section shaft, but still a pretty stable tip section. It’s meant to increase your launch but not your spin rate. So it’s all about a mid-high launch with low spin. The W series is a little bit firmer in the butt section, it’s got a little bit more whip in the mid section. Basically what it does is get you a mid ball flight with mid spin rate. Finally, the new entry we have in 2008 is the Z series which is a firmer profile from tip to but designed for a low, boring trajectory with little spin. More Tour driven than anything but again along the lines of our E series, we’re trying to simplify things with a mid-high, mid, and mid-low shaft with our Rombax line. I’m sure as it progresses here in the Rombax line in the U.S., we’ll come out with more and more options to address specific player needs. But as of now we have every player addressed with that Rombax line.

GolfWRX: Has the ZCOM series been rolled into that, or are they still going to be available?

Chad Embry: The ZCOM series has gone away. The ZCOM series with the exception of the ZCOM SIX, formerly known as the Fit-On-11 SIX, has been taken out of our lineup for 2008. It is a product that did well for us. It’s uniqueness was it had a 4.5” parallel tip section and could be adapted for any hosel size with similar playability. So if you had a Titelist and you wanted to put it all the way through with no tip cut and you had that same shaft into a TaylorMade in years past you would have difficulty duplicating the playability of that driver. With the ZCOM, you could tip that 2” and put it in and have the same playability and feel as you did. We didn’t get an amazing support for that product I terms of what we designed it for in terms of its playability and compatibility in different heads. So each year you come out with different product lines and the Rombax has been an absolute home run for us so we thought instead of expanding or even keeping the ZCOM in, we’ll expand the Rombax line to cover similar profile players the ZCOM actually had and go with that as our ticket moving forward as opposed to dragging on with the ZCOM line. The ZCOM again, was a successful product for us and is still played out on Tour by several different players. But again, it just didn’t fall into the niche and direction we wanted to move with the multidirectional fiber that we think is absolutely phenomenal.

GolfWRX: I’d like to ask a question about the Fujikura SIX. What has made the SIX such a popular shaft for so many years?

Chad Embry: That’s a really good question, sometimes we scratch our heads. The SIX, being light weight but very tip stable is a great distance shaft for better, harder swingers. As you alluded to in that question, it has been an extremely popular shaft on the PGA Tour, LPGA Tour, Nationwide, and Champions. Essentially the Tour players want to get a little higher ball flight but don’t want the increased spin which is typically found in lightweight shafts. The SIX puts, for a lightweight shaft, very little spin on the ball, but gets a nice mid-high ball flight. So obviously you’re looking at maximum carry distance and still getting plenty of roll out. As far as the design characteristics that make that such, again I think it’s just a little more stable tip section and doesn’t allow for a ballooning spin rate to occur with harder, quicker tempos.

GolfWRX: Now getting into the Speeder series, what has made them such a popular shaft for such a long period of time.

Chad Embry: I think we’ve touched on it a few times – that’s obviously the Triax technology. It really was what put Fujikura on the map. It was the first of the multi-directional fibers out there and still to this day the very best and the only proprietary material in the golf industry as far as I know. With that stabilization it’s all about accuracy and getting that accuracy is getting center contact. As a byproduct of center contact you end up with more distance because hitting the sweet spot of the club not only do you have more accuracy but it also translates into more yardage. So the Speeder is obviously Tour proven success and because of that those guys really want to find fairways more than anything. Most of those guys, with the exception of a few of them, hit it plenty far but they just want to be more down the middle so their second shots and their approach shots can be that much closer to the pin.

Alex Dee: Speeder is noted for having that kind of material story that early on. Today you see a lot of people throwing materials out there that might look cool. They might put them on the outside where people can see them. That’s not necessarily that Tour proven or playable as a Speeder. Speeder when it came out, we didn’t really try to promote that three axis material at the time, that material was hidden under the paint. You couldn’t see it. You might see it under the grip area if you took off your grip. It was something we were after in terms of performance rather than the story. The story came from the playability rather than just having to see it.

GolfWRX: I know that’s one product that has stood the test of time better than most others. How do the 586 and 686 Speeders differ from the rest of the line?

Chad Embry: In today’s driver market, companies are getting held back by the USGA with limitations on COR, on head size, you name it. It’s hard to get an advantage over a competitor. So more and more companies are coming to us at Fujikura and asking us for front line shafts, top notch products, first release products and we try to draw a line between how much of the new technology and how much we give them and how much we hold back for the aftermarket and the consumer market. But with Callaway in particular they came to us and they have been great partners with us as well as TaylorMade and some of the other companies. They wanted a front line Speeder product that had not been released to the public. In terms of playability difference, it is hard to point to one or two things. They are actually similar to current offerings we have. The 686 and 652, although there are some slight playability differences and they are different designs, are pretty close in comparison to ball flight, spin rate, weights torques, the whole bit. Whereas the 586 is a little more tip firm than our 569. So described for particular player types the 586 is best for smoother, slower tempos, get a little height under the ball, get a little spin on it. Where the 686 is a little bit more of a players product, a little bit more of a mid ball flight, little bit lower spin rate, little bit heavier, little bit lower torque. But they both perform at an amazing high performance for the Callaway in particular and in aftermarket products.

GolfWRX: Now will we be seeing any new updates to the Speeder line in the future?

Alex Dee: I think you will.

Chad Embry: Obviously we need to walk carefully around this one, but absolutely. The Speeder material is too good and we touched on what made the Speeder so great, and you mentioned standing the test of time and it obviously have. In certain tournaments there are more 757’s in played in drivers than almost every shaft and sometimes gets the biggest count out there. Obviously we’ve never played any player on any Tour out there to play our products. The fact that we have won every single PGA Tournament on shaft counts this year speaks volume of what our engineers have done, what our Tour Reps have done, and you will definitely see a product coming out utilizing the Speeder. It might not be under the name Speeder, but we are definitely going to utilize that material because it is such a proven winner and continues to be to this day.

GolfWRX: The other big announcement you made a little while ago was your Fitting Center. Can you tell us a little about that and how it’s coming along?

Chad Embry: Yeah, in fact we’re really excited about our Fit-On Academy. We have a testing and R&D facility here at Fujikura now on site utilizing the latest in launch monitor technology and the interchangeable shaft technology. So we currently have the ability now to bring in consumers as well as our charter dealers, our club makers across the country into our facility and have them test the latest products. We set this up in conjunction with some of our Tour players to come in. We get data from them, we figure out new shaft models, we try out new materials. We do a lot back there from PGA Tour to OEM usage to consumer usage to fit and get people into the right playing products for them. That includes head, that includes shaft, grip, length the whole bit we can do it all in our Fit-On Academy. In fact, we have the ability now and are going to start marketing our ability to take consumers. So if a GolfWRX member wants to come in and get fit by our Tour Reps they are more than welcome to pay a fee – it is an ala carte menu type process where if they want to come in for a driver fitting they can pay and don’t quote me on this $150. If they want to come in for the driver and irons they can pay another fee, if they want to come in for the complete shebang it’s an entire day fitting which includes on course trial of the product which fits their entire bag and gets them some schwag if you were from Fujikura – bag, headcover, hats, shirts. It’s pretty exciting in terms of all those levels from consumer all the way up to our own testing internally to be able to have this on site and at our disposal at any time.

GolfWRX: Definitely, I’m sure quite a few GolfWRX members will be lining up ready to take advantage of that.

Chad Embry: You know we would love to have any of the guys that want to come down. In fact, GolfWRX has been very good to Fujikura in the past and we’d like to offer an invite to any of the GolfWRX guys that want to come down. Maybe we can even work out a discounted deal if a GolfWRX member wanted to come down to get fit through Pat McCoy our Tour Rep.

GolfWRX: Now with a world of shaft choices out there, it’s kind of tough for amateurs to find the right shaft for their game. How would you suggest people go about finding the perfect Fujikura shaft for them?

Chad Embry: At Fujikura we have over 800 Charter Dealers across the country which range from green grass to big box to custom club makers in their own area. On our website we have a dealer locator list and it’s pretty convenient. You go in, you type in your zip code, and it will list three or four guys in your area who will actually fit you for Fujikura products. You can go to that anytime. Obviously getting fit is essential in today’s marketplace with all the choices and the myriad of equipment out there to that get set up for you in your particular game. So absolutely go to one of our Charter Dealers and inquire about Fujikura.

GolfWRX: Along those same lines, there are so many great shaft companies out there, what sets Fujikura apart from the rest of the pack?

Alex Dee: I can’t say I focus too much on our competitors. I would say we are really after a quality material, quality performance. We are more than just a company that’s looking for what is the trend of the day. You don’t see us doing anything with nano right now. There doesn’t seem to be compelling argument to use nano in terms of our R&D and what we’ve seen here. So I don’t think we’re as gimmicky as others perhaps. We’re not into adding all the fancy colors to make the part play better. We’re really after the core graphite golfer who really wants the good performance and recognizes Fujikura as a good product and recognizes our reputation of high performance.

Chad Embry: There’s a lot of good shaft companies out there. There’s no doubt about it. I’d like to think that when Fujikura started many years ago, we’ve done a lot of right things for this business and increase playability of the golf shaft. I think a lot of companies saw that and saw the success we had early on and tried to mimic what we do. A few of the things which separate us is first and foremost our material – with that Triax and Rombax being proprietary you might see a lot of companies, even suggest they have a Speeder technology or a material that is similar to or like Triax and Rombax. But the beautiful thing about it is we have the rights to that product and the sole rights to that product. Again, looking at the Tour success of that product, there’s no debating or doubting that it works, it’s proven, and there’s something in that lineup for every golfer out there. Again, that’s to the success of our team here at Fujikura from the top on down. We make shafts for every golfer out there in a price range that can fit their budget. So as far as separation, there are a lot of good products out there. We’d like to think that because of the teamwork we have here and the materials we have at our disposal that we make a better golf shaft than other companies for particular players.

Alex Dee: We’re always looking to innovate. Our job is never done.

GolfWRX: Guys, we really appreciate your time. It means a lot you were willing to take the time to answer all of our questions and give us so much great information about your new products and all the great stuff you guys have been doing.

Alex Dee: We appreciate your time and we appreciate your membership being so supportive of our products. I am a member out there at GolfWRX and if there’s ever a question – I do answer questions from quite a few guys that have been e-mailing me but they’re more welcome to PM me here are Fujikura or e-mail me and we’ll give them all the information they need.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. tak kawashima

    Dec 29, 2011 at 4:21 pm

    can you explain what the term 5×07 means?
    there are other numbers and letters too.

  2. Rod Welsh

    Dec 3, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    Excellent explanation of the Fujikura product line. It reinforces the positive experience I have had with Speeder and Rombax shafts.

  3. Pingback: You Can Golf » Blog Archive » Fujikura Golf Inteview

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

5 Things we Learned Saturday at the U.S. Women’s Open

Published

on

Despite Colin Jost being so over the expression That was not on my bingo card, so much of what happened on Saturday at Riviera was precisely defined by that 2026 catch-phrase. Seasoned professionals faltered while young amateurs soared. Leaders posted par rounds while afterthoughts amassed birdie after day-three birdie. What transpired set up the potential for the best duels in USWO history. In the mixing bowl are the world’s number one, former champions, former contenders, and a host of the game’s top names.

Over the first three days, Riviera has played more like a golden-age gem than it ever has in modern times. Players are using greenside slopes and fairway cambres to propel the ball into proper position. Green speeds are manageable, yet daunting from the absolute worst place (read: above) in relation to the hole location. Nothing is unfair (fingers crossed for the same in two weeks on Long Island) and everything is earned.

Could it be Nelly, or Charley, or Sei Young or In-gee? How about Gaby or Jennifer, Nasa or Ruoning? All have contended before in the U.S. Women’s Open, but only In-gee Chun has raised the Semple trophy in triumph. A Hollywood sound stage is set for a dramatic finish, but prior to the conclusion, let’s revisit the five things that we learned on Saturday at the U.S. Women’s Open.

Saturday Thing One: Nelly Korda is tied at the top

If it were anyone else, after consecutive rounds of 67, the dam would break. That’s not the case with Korda. If anything, we expect that she might go lower on Sunday, to the tune of 65, and walk off with her first U.S. Women’s Open title.

We know that ruling bodies and host clubs adore name champions. They salute all victors, but the success of a current top golfer, a media darling, or a proven veteran serves to legitimate and venerate the event and the venue. The USGA and Riviera would be thrilled to have Nelly Korda as a champion.

What will propel the three-time major titleist to a fourth grand slam victory? Another 67, for starters. Reaching double-digits under par would place the Floridian in a marvelous space. It would require Sei Young to keep pace, and would demand that all the trailers post 66 or better.

Saturday Thing Two: How about those amateurs?

1  2  3  5  6  10  13  16  17  18

Those are the holes that Maria Jose Marin (68), Aphrodite Deng (68), and Asterisk Talley (66) birdied on Saturday. That’s a minus-ten ringer score for the trio. As we sleep one more sleep before the final round, consider that Marin and Deng are four strokes back of the leaders, while Talley is five shots behind. To have three amateur golfers within striking distance of the top ladder rung is heady stuff. Can Talley possibly follow up her minus-five with another one on Sunday? Even that might not be enough. How about Marin and Deng. Can they drop a mid-60s scorecard on the professionals, and throw a scare into them? Our intuition suggests no on both counts, but the potential for a top-five amateur finish is certainly in the cards.

Saturday Thing Three: the Korean Kontingent

Sei Young Kim and In-gee Chun would win any partner event this week, given their current form. Kim will tee off with Nelly Korda in the last game, and she will have a front-row seat to Chun’s performance, as In-gee will play in the game just ahead. Of the two, Sei Young appeared to have less control over her shots, as a substantial number of spproach shots turned inordinately left.. Time and again, her short game bailed her out of the bogeytown prison, although she did miss a fair number of short putts. Dumbo (aka Chun) seemed more in control from tee to green, but will need to channel her early-2020s self to insert herself into the narrative.

Saturday Thing Four: Kupcho’s Komeback

It’s not like she went very far away, but Jennifer Kupcho’s 69 on day three had to be gratifying. The Colorado native and Wake Forest alumna was in fine Friday position to make a statement and expand her lead. She had posted 66 on Thursday, but fell off form on day two with 73. There were 67s and 68s at Riviera  that day, but Kupcho’s birdie production fell from seven to two, as her bogey line increased from two to four. She reduced the bogey output on Saturday, and redoubled birdies to four. She finds herself precisely one shot off the lead, in a tie with In-gee Chun, her Sunday walkabout mate.

What will Kupcho need on day four, to provide an opportunity for victory? Fairways and greens always help, but that electric, day-one start of birdies on holes one, two, and three will be massive. Stay on the proper side of the green-center bunker on six, and survive the dautning holes. Kupcho has made bogey on 13 and 15 twice in three days. Should she come to the final stretch in a place of power or hope, those two holes will test her worth and mettle. Kupcho has also played the closing triumvirate of holes in par or better, each of the three days. That sort of clutch-time performance will stand her well on day four.

Saturday Thing Five: How will it all transpire?

No one expects that both of the top two will struggle on Sunday. One of them will shoot 68, to reach nine-under par. That means that the trailers will have to light up the western sky with fireworks, to keep pace. There is a golfer with nine, top-ten finishes in major championships, who has never won a major. That golfer is Nasa Hataoka, and she is poised to break through and make a victory out of her tenth, top ten finish at a major. Hataoka finished T2 and T4 in this event in, respectively, 2021 and 2023. A missed cut in 2025 was a shock to the system, but the Japanese golfer will bounce back in style and claim the title.

Continue Reading

News

5 Things we Learned: Friday at the U.S. Women’s Open

Published

on

Dumbo flies again! There is certainly a half-generation of golf fans without the slightest idea of how well In-gee Chun, aka Dumbo, can golf her ball. The Korean was the It Girl from 2015 to 2018. She won three LPGA events, with two being major championships. She returned to Korea to cure her homesickness, but made the occasional foray back to the Americas. In 2022, she captured a fourth LPGA title and, guess what? It was a third, unique major title.

The halfway cut line was set at four over par. Those at plus-five and beyond had their stay in Tinseltown cut short, at least when it comes to working rounds of golf. Among the 87 who fell on the high side of the cut line, Lydia Ko stood out as the biggest name. Others given a two-day furlough were Lilia Vu, Megha Ganne, Chizzy Iwai, and Leona Maguire. Making the cut on the number are Lottie Woad, Celine Boutier, Mao Saigo, and amateur Asterisk Talley. If you follow world football, imagine the feeling of relegation on a weekly basis. That’s the 36-hole cut in professional golf.

We learned five things on Friday at Riviera Country Club, and we’d love to share them with you. Find a comfy place and brighten the screen on your device. It’s time for Five Things We Learned on day two at the US Women’s Open.

Part One: the biggest movers

A golfer’s feel appears or slips away overnight. Although Saturday is known collectively as Moving Day, it doesn’t come with as sudden and final a feeling as Friday. Move the wrong way on Friday and you’re down the road. Improve in the proper direction and you save your week. Both Mao Saigo and Rio Takeda opened with plus-five rounds of 76, then signed for 70 on day two, and made the cut on the number.

Moving the other way were Stephanie Kyriacou (70-78) and Ina Yoon (68-79). Their respective eight- and eleven-shot declines propelled them from title contention to tournament departure. Minjee Lee and Minji Kang (seven shots higher) along with Rose Zhang (five shots) made the cut, but saw their opportunity for victory take a serious body shot.

Part Two: the leaders

Allison Lee and Ruoning Yin took the conservative path to the 36-hole medal. Lee posted four birdies and a bogey for a total of 68 on day two. Yin had two birdies and sixteen pars for her second consecutive card of 69. Their 138 places them one shot clear of the aforementioned Dumbo Chun, who followed an opening 71 with 68. First-round leader Jennifer Kupcho added seven shots to her total, from an opening-day 66 to a follow-up 73, yet remained within the inner circle of leaders at -3, tied with Chun and four others. Four more golfers sit at minus-two, two shots behind the top duo. An even dozen of golfers sits within two shots of the lead.

The day’s biggest move of gravitas came from Nelly Korda. After a disappointing 73 on Thursday, the world number one improved six shots, thanks to a five-birdie round of 67. Korda slid inside the top ten with her recovery, and certainly reclaimed her place as most frightening chaser at Riviera. No one is likely to shoot in the low 60s at Riviera, but Korda just might post a mid-sixties score on Saturday, to seize the lead on Sunday morning.

Part Three: Ams verse Champs

Five current amateur golfers were among the 68 golfers to reach the weekend. Kiara Romero posted the best non-pro score on Friday, a one-under 70, to move from plus-two to plus-one figures. She is joined there by Aphrodite Deng, who reversed those numbers for her two rounds. Maria Jose Marin (143), Farah O’Keefe (145), and Asteriks Talley (146) joined the #WeDidIt brigade to earn a spot for the final two rounds.

Six former US Open champions, led by In-gee Chun(2015), also punched a ticket for round three. Allison Corpuz (2023), Maja Stark (2025), Ariya Jutanugarn (2018), A Lim Kim (2020), and Minjee Lee (2022) preserved their dream of a second US Open trophy for the mantle. Nineteen amateurs failed to earn a post for the final 36-holes, while five former champions joined them on the sidelines. Yuka Saso, twice a winner in this event in the past half-decade, missed the cut by five shots. 24 amateurs against eleven former titleists suggests that it is easier for the young to qualify, but harder for them to find success.

Part Four: the golf course

Scoring went up by .6 shots per player, from round one to round two. Statistically speaking, it became harder to make the cut as the day wore on. Birdies dropped by 50, while pars remained constant. Both bogeys and doubles increased markedly. The first and the sixth holes played under par on the front nine, while the second and ninth were nearly tied for most difficult traces on the road to the turn.

Coming home, holes ten, twelve, fifteen, and eighteen played as an impregnable quadrilateral. Odds are, you gave a shot back on each of them. Despite number seventeen’s accessibility for birdie, no one got out of the back nine alive. If conditions continue toward the extreme, Riviera will extract a pound of flesh from the contenders over the weekend.

Part Five: what to expect

From my vantage point, the tee times to watch are the 4:55 EST and the 5:05 slots. Nelly Korda pegs her ball in the sixth-last pairing with Sora Kamiya. The little-known Kamiya will get an up close and personal look at the crowds that follow the best in the world. Korda will need to ignore Kamiya’s expected struggles and golf her own ball. Ten minutes later, Lauren Coughlin begins play with Casandra Alexander at her side. It’s a similar situation, with the experienced Coughlin alongside an unseasoned partner.

Both Sei Yong Kim and Gaby Lopez have turned in strong performances, and their 5:15 pairing might produce some explosive numbers. From back in the pack, the tasty duo of Brooke Henderson and Jeeno Thitikul at 4:20, might see double digits in birdies. The unexpected at unknown Riviera is likely, so your guess is as good as mine.

 

Continue Reading

News

5 Things we Learned: Thursday at the U.S.. Women’s Open

Published

on

Gone are the days when the U.S. Women’s Open was held at Scenic Hills or Churchill Valley. Fine courses that they are (or were, as Churchill Valley went bankrupt a decade ago) there is something to be said for the venue. Not all Women’s Open playings need to take place on Men’s Open venues, but some should. This week in Los Angeles, the Women’s Open visits Riviera Country Club for the first time. Down the road, we will visit Inverness, Oakmont, Interlachen, Oak Hill, Chicago Golf, and Merion. That is quite the murderer’s row (1927 Yankees reference) of golf clubs.

What can we expect from the 2026 tournament? Greatness and uncertainty. Unlike the PGA Tour, which visits Riviera each February, the LPGA does not, so the women will not have nearly the body of work over the George C. Thomas layout. Maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe they’ll play #10 smarter than the men do. Maybe they’ll figure some things out that their male counterparts can not. For today, we’ll try to find five things to learn, and share them with you.

First, this ain’t your momma’s U.S. Open course

How do we know? Well, so far, only one previous champion currently sits inside the top thirty. That would be Minjee Lee, the 2022 winner at Southern (NC) Pines. Lee made par on her first nine holes, the inward side at Riviera. She dropped birdie putts on the first and ninth holes (ten and eighteen for her day) and tallied another seven pars, for 69. She sits three shots off Jennifer Kupcho’s opening 66. Don’t worry about Kupcho; we’ll get to her. After Lee, defending champion Maja Stark ranks T30 at even par, joined by three other, former winners.

What Minjee did, is the sort of thing that wins U.S. Open titles. She guided her ship safely past swells, and made a move when the waters calmed. The fewer the bogeys, the more likely Minjee figures in the outcome on Sunday evening in Pacific Palisades. Off the tee, Lee was unmatched. She hit 14 of 14 fairways. Her iron play was a bit loose in comparison. She putted for birdie on 12 of 18 holes, which meant that her recovery short game was on point. Lee was ten yards longer on measured driving holes than the field average, and was below the field average (a good thing) in putting.

Second, the amateurs beat a loud drum

Three of the world’s top amateur golfer posted 70, placing them four off the lead, in a tie for 14th place. Canada’s Aphrodite Deng, Spain’s Paula Francisco Llaño, and Colombia’s Maria José Marin, showed the professional world that their game is strong. Both Deng and Francisco Llaño collected five birdies on the day. Should they match that output on day two, and minimize the foozles, they’ll be the topic of conversation on Saturday morning. Marin, the 2026 Augusta National Women’s Amateur champion and an NCAA team semifinalist last week, played a game similar to Minjee Lee: few mistakes and few taken risks.

The last amateur to post the low medal score for 72 holes was Jenny Chuasiriporn in 1998. She lost a playoff to Se Ri Pak, who matched her plus-six effort at Blackwolf Run. The last amateur to win the U.S. Women’s Open was Catherine Lacoste in 1967. The amateurs are stronger than they’ve ever been, but the professionals have not allowed them to close the gap. A victory by one of the college set would be a cannon shot heard round the world. Could it happen? Absolutely. Is it likely? Not at all.

Third, let’s talk Kupcho

Jennifer Kupcho won the inaugural Augusta National Women’s Amateur. She won three times on tour in 2022, including the Chevron, a major title. She won a fourth event in 2025, but has not established the winning credentials projected on her after 2022’s marvelous coming-out.

Kupcho hails from Colorado, and spent four years in the Carolina Piedmont, at Wake Forest Universtiy. Neither of those locales cries out I’ll be at home at Riviera, but here we are, after a seven-birdie performance. Kupcho posted birdie on each of her first three holes, and added four more (against two bogeys) to assume a one-shot advantage over Korea’s Sei Young Kim.

Kupcho drove the ball decently, approached moderately well, but putted lights out on Thursday. Her 26 putts were tied for best in show on day one. There might just be something about the putting surfaces at Riviera that aligns with Kupcho’s vibe. If that is the case, just get the ball on the green, anywhere, and let the flatstick do the lifting.

Fourth, how young is Sei Young?

Sei (pronounced “So”) Young Kim won a dozen times from 2015 to 2020. She took time off from winning until 2025, shen she captured a thirteenth LPGA title. Like Kupcho, Kim has hardware from one major event, the 2020 Women’s PGA Championship. How to explain the five years away from victory? No idea. When Sei Young was in contention during the prime of her career, the outcome was a foregone conclusion.

What to expect over the next three days at Riviera? Anyone’s guess. It might be the 2015-2020 Sei Young, or it could be the 2021-2025 version. Kim began her day with birdies at 10 and 11, then settled into a stretch of pars before her solitary bogey at the 4th (her 13th) hole. Kim regained her composure and reeled in three birdies to close the front nine. Her four-under performance trails Kupcho alone, and there is a real chance that Sei Young will produce a second score in the 60s and take a bit of control of the tournament.

Fifth, we’re giddy for Gaby

Although I cannot place my finger on why, it seems that each year, Gaby Lopez pops up on the U.S. Open leaderboard. She hasn’t figure out how to remain in contention, but here we are, in 2026, and Lopez is once again in the mix. The three-time champion on the LPGA circuit had a stunning first nine holes, turning in minus-five. She reached six deep at her tenth hole, but then gave three shots back coming home. Which Gaby will show up on Friday, and for how long? If back-nine Gaby can somehow channel front-nine Gaby, all outcomes are within reach. If the loose play continues, Lopez’ wiki page will add one more T41 to her majors column.

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending