Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

New coach, new swing, new era of success for Phil Mickelson?



It has been two years and seven months since Phil Mickelson’s last victory. That was the 2013 British Open, and since that day at Muirfield, much like one of his spinning wedge shots, Mickelson’s game has gone in reverse. At 45 years of age, he is at the point in his career where the next five years will be crucial in the development of his legacy. He is already held in the highest esteem by fans and peers alike, and one or two more majors and a handful more PGA Tour victories would elevate him to the absolute elite echelons of the game.

As the sun beamed down on a magnificent Pebble Beach this weekend, Mickelson seemed primed to pick up the first of those wins under the tutelage of new swing coach Andrew Getson. He entered the final round holding a two-shot lead with the 43rd PGA Tour win of his career in his grasp. It was Phil’s 50th start since his last victory. It would be the acid test for his new swing, but unfortunately, it wasn’t to be. A missed 5-foot putt on the last hole prevented Phil from joining Vaughn Taylor in a playoff.

During the early stages of Phil’s changes, when playing under pressure, it will be so easy for him to subconsciously revert to his old swing. This was evident on numerous wayward iron shots on the back nine on Sunday. In times of difficulty, it becomes human nature to default back to something more familiar to make us feel comfortable. This level of comfort needs to be reached in order for the swing transition to be completed fully. I liken it to any kind of relationship. It takes a while to build trust. Once this is built, it becomes natural for that trust to become unconditional. The more times Phil is toward the top of leaderboards, the more comfortable he will be with his changes. A win will go a long way to accelerating the level of confidence he has in his new swing.

It is his relentless pursuit of the U.S. Open title that has influenced his switch of coach. In November 2015, he ended his eight-year relationship with Butch Harmon, and as successful as it was, eight years can be a long time in any relationship. The danger of losing the chemistry and stagnating is a very real prospect, especially in professional sport. It is why we see what I call the “revolving door culture” at sports clubs. Head coaches are regularly hired and fired to ensure fresh ideas are brought to the table in an attempt to remain successful. Also, after going so long without a win, golfers can begin to lose trust in their game, which could be a reason for his switch to Getson, an Australian swing guru.

In professional golf, it is essential for players to compensate for the wear and tear on their bodies as they reach their twilight years. Ageing professionals such as Mickelson not only have to find new ways to compete, but must also gain some sort of competitive edge in order to continue their winning ways. As a former professional golfer who competed on mini tours across the South Eastern United States, I can identify with how a change of coach can induce an internal belief that can lead to better things.

Like a honeymoon period with a new putter, a new coach can have the same psychological effect. One of the main reasons PGA Tour players in the past have opted for Getson as their coach is the fact he has played professional golf himself. PGA Tour winner Kevin Streelman says he often goes to Getson for advice.

“What I love about him is that he’s played professionally, so he gets the playing side of it,’’ Streelman said.

This can be just as crucial as the technical aspects of the swing. Mickelson confirmed to Golf Channel’s Tim Rosaforte that he had been in discussion with Getson since November. He said the talks were primarily focused on his posture. A more upright, athletic posture will enable Phil to get the club in a better position at the top of the swing and in turn create a more compact movement when returning the club to the ball — something all tour pros strive for. In doing this, his swing will become tighter and closer to his body, with less moving parts.

The key for Phil is to achieve all of this while retaining his ability to get the ball in the hole using his most natural of short-game actions. There is a sense this year that he knows he needs to increase the accuracy of his drives and keep the ball in play more often, which is essential at any U.S. Open venue.

There will be two key issues Mickelson and Getson need to focus on to achieve the overall goal — to get the club on plane more and to keep the club in front of him on his downswing. The idea is to prevent the club from getting stuck behind the body, causing the hands to be much more active than necessary, resulting in more inconsistent, errant shots. Speaking to Golf Channel’s Steve Sands last month, Mickelson said, “I feel like I am steeper on the backswing and flatter on the downswing.” This allows his body and hands to turn through in unison. He then went on to describe how his more compact motion makes his ball-striking more consistent, saying, “I don’t have to use any hand action to square the face.”

Zero wins and only four top 10s in the past two seasons are statistics that highlight his need for a change, and prompted the fresh approach in the coaching department. After watching Phil in the early stages of his swing changes, the thing that is most impressive is his new found tempo. With his new plane of swing, he can generate just as much power as he had before but in a more graceful movement — with his body and shoulder turn, rather than lashing at the golf ball with his hands. The more he can repeat this motion both on the range and in tournament play, the more he will trust the outcome, and the less likely he will be to subconsciously revert to his old habits.

Although Phil’s swing betrayed him down the stretch at Pebble Beach, there are many positives he can take from the week. Not only did his swing look much tighter and his ball flight seem far more controlled, but his putting looked very solid too. His speed control on Pebble’s notoriously tricky greens was perfect all week, and he holed an uncanny amount of mid-range putts. He had 21 putts on Saturday, something he didn’t manage in the whole of 2015. If he can keep this level of performance around the greens, and combine it with more consistency off the tee, Phil will always shoot low numbers.

In four starts this year, Mickelson has a second, a T3 and a T11. These results should give him the belief that the changes he is in the process of making are conducive with winning golf tournaments. It is vital that Phil remains patient and keeps working on his new swing and performing drills on the range until it is engrained in his muscle memory. Once this is achieved, we can assume the transition is complete, and expect the victories to begin to flow. One thing’s for sure, when Phil is involved, it will always be one heck of a ride!

Your Reaction?
  • 405
  • LEGIT28
  • WOW167
  • LOL1
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB1
  • SHANK7

Antony Martin is a 31-year-old freelance sports writer, specializing in golf. He was born in England and realized his dream of playing professional golf in 2003, when he moved to Orlando, Fla. He competed on various mini tours, winning three times. He now lives in England, just outside of London, and is still a keen golfer, maintaining a handicap of +1. He spends his time writing and reporting on golf events, while he is also a regular contributor to a soccer website.



  1. Robert Hamilton-Bruce

    Feb 19, 2016 at 3:34 pm

    It was a shame Phil didn’t get the job done on Sunday, but I agree I think 2016 could be his year

  2. chip

    Feb 16, 2016 at 12:17 pm

    ooffa..LOL LOL LOL

    21 putts on saturday, and you think he needs a new putting coach, that actually made me laugh out loud…CHUMP!!

    Great article, and well written. I have been a huge fan of Phil since I was a kid, he is as much of a gentleman as he is a great golfer. Best of luck for 2016 Phil!!!

  3. ooffa

    Feb 16, 2016 at 11:53 am

    He needs a new putting coach and a new gastroenterology doctor. You know, to help with his choking.

    • Jaz

      Feb 16, 2016 at 12:24 pm

      Ooffa, that actually made me LOL LOL LOL
      21 putts on Saturday and you think he needs a new putting coach..what a CHUMP!!
      Great article, and well written. I have been a huge fan of Phil’s since I was a kid, and he is as much of a gentleman as he is a great golfer. Best of luck for 2016 Phil!!!

  4. Jaz

    Feb 16, 2016 at 3:30 am

    I recognize the subtle changes / and would love to see Phil complete the grand slam!! Great work buddy

  5. Alan D'Arcy

    Feb 16, 2016 at 2:56 am

    Amazing article, thoroughly enjoyed reading it… you clearly know your stuff !!!! thanks Antony from England !! 🙂

  6. Fahgdat

    Feb 15, 2016 at 10:40 pm

    I hope he wins the US Open this year

  7. Dave

    Feb 15, 2016 at 10:36 pm

    I think his Saturday round was especially telling. 9 gir, shoots 66, if I’m not mistaken. Uncanny short game, missed one putt inside 10 feet for tourney, again if I’m not mistaken. That usually doesn’t translate to closing Sunday as pressure builds…my 2 cents…

  8. gvogel

    Feb 15, 2016 at 9:49 pm

    New coach, new swing, new era of success? Nope.
    Funny, the swing I saw on Sunday looked just like the one I’ve seen before – way past parallel, and prone to problems.

    I liked Phil the best when he went with the mini driver. It kept him closer to the fairway, and allowed his superlative short game to win for him. Phil winning with a super refined golf swing ( like Justin Rose?) – ain’t going to happen.

    • MetalWood

      Feb 15, 2016 at 9:56 pm

      I agree! At the top of his swing, he’s all over the place. Wonder why his coach doesn’t shorten his swing?

      • Fahgdat

        Feb 15, 2016 at 10:33 pm

        Because that’s his natural position that he’s had for 30 years. Why change it if it helps him turn.

    • Josh

      Feb 16, 2016 at 6:12 am

      That is what the article is saying, that Sunday saw him reverting to his old swing under pressure and gave him problems. I doubt he will ever have a super-refined swing, but he is clearly striving to make his action more consistent, keep the ball in play more and give himself a chance to score with his short game.

  9. Scooter McGavin

    Feb 15, 2016 at 9:32 pm

    I’m confused. He’s got over 50 wins and 5 majors, yet he still needs a few more in order to be part of the “elite echelons”? Don’t get me wrong, I actually can’t stand Phil, but isn’t he already at that level?

    • Oliver Simpson

      Feb 16, 2016 at 6:43 am

      I get what the author is saying- Phil has only won 5 majors, which is obviously a magnificent achievement but doesn’t even put him in the top ten all time for major winners. He is already an elite player, goes without saying, but I think that US open would put him to an even higher level!

      Also he’s only won 42 PGA tour events, not over 50, as the article states!

      Good luck Phil, we’re rooting for you!

      • MarkB A

        Feb 16, 2016 at 11:50 pm

        Phil is also 45 years old with a very serious form of arthritis. I am amazed he is still playing. The medicine probably helps but only so much. Golfers need to be 100% healthy to play at that level and Phil is still playing at that level. Hats off to Vaughn Taylor for grinding and hanging in there all those years. I would love to see Phil win another Masters this year and the US Open plus maybe another Open too.

  10. Bobby Z

    Feb 15, 2016 at 6:12 pm

    GO PHIL!! enjoyable read !

  11. Oliver Simpson

    Feb 15, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    Being a huge Lefty fan it’s great to see Phil back to his best. A close shave this week and a shame he couldn’t convert, I’m sure it won’t be long though!

    A great read and superb analysis of Phil’s swing, especially coming from someone who knows what they’re talking about! Look forward to reading the next one!

  12. Necky

    Feb 15, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Wow what a read – you know your stuff! More commentary like this please!

  13. Kenny

    Feb 15, 2016 at 4:33 pm

    Nice write-up man keep them coming!

  14. Robert Hamilton-Bruce

    Feb 15, 2016 at 3:40 pm

    I really enjoyed reading this article, very informative and easy to read. Great stuff. Go Phil!

  15. Georgia Arkell

    Feb 15, 2016 at 3:10 pm

    Fantastic article. Thrilling read. Can’t wait to read more of your work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Club Junkie

Club Junkie: Odyssey Ten putter review and hitting the new Callaway Apex Pro irons



Reviewing the new Odyssey Ten putters, and I like the overall look compared to last year’s model. The shape is a little more squared off and simple, less distracting. Callaway’s new Apex Pro irons offer a lot of distance and forgiveness in a small package, but do they feel as good as other players irons?



Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: Understanding CG



One of the most misunderstood concepts involved in golf club design is that of “CG,” or “center of gravity,” also “center of mass.” While this particular measurement of any golf club head can certainly offer insight into its probable performance, it is not the “be all, end all” with regard to any club’s specific launch or forgiveness attributes.

What “CG” specifically refers to is the exact center location of a club’s distribution of mass, which will generally coincide with that club’s “sweet spot”—but that’s not always true. There are lots of ways to manipulate or manage any club’s exact CG location, and therein lies a “Pandora’s Box” of misunderstanding.

Let’s start back in the very old days, when irons were single pieces of forged steel and woods were made of persimmon. Since there was no science inside the club, CG was essentially a result of how the clubhead is formed—its essential shape.

A typical persimmon driver head, for example, was sized to deliver its ideal weight without any additional weights added. The solid block of persimmon, with some kind of face insert and an aluminum soleplate was all you had to work with. So, the CG was located pretty close to the center of the clubhead from all three axes – vertical, front-go-back and heel-to-toe. If you remember, persimmon fairway woods were smaller and had a brass sole plate to add mass lower in the head and often a lead weight under the sole plate to move the CG even lower to help produce higher ball flights on shots hit from the turf, rather than off a tee.

Traditional forged irons up to the 1960s-70s typically had a CG very close to the hosel, a result of the mass of the hosel itself and the typical design that put “muscle” behind the impact area, and very little mass out toward the toe. An examination of worn faces on those old irons would reveal the wear very much toward the heel. I distinctly remember fighting the shanks back in those days, and that ugly shot usually felt very close to a perfectly struck one, rather than feeling as awful as it looked.

As metal woods and cavity-back irons became the norm, designers were able to move the CG ever lower in order to produce higher ball flight, and more toward the center of the face to put the CG further from the hosel. As technology has continued to be refined, the use of tungsten inserts has further allowed designers to position the CG exactly where they want it – typically lower in the club and more toward the center or even the toe of the golf club.

And therein lies a problem with pushing this insert technology too far.

There is no question that in addition to making contact somewhere close to the CG of the clubhead, ball performance is also a product of how much mass is directly behind the impact point. Let me offer this example of how important that can be.

Let’s assume two identically shaped cavity-back 7-irons – same size, face thickness, overall weight and a design that places the CG in the exact same spot in the scoring pattern. The only difference between the two is that one is a single piece forged or cast steel head, with the other being cast of aluminum, with heavy tungsten inserts in the hosel and toe areas to achieve the same overall weight and CG location.
Which do you think would deliver the more solid feel of impact and better transfer of energy to the ball?

Now, we could take that even further by cutting out the entire center of both clubheads and increase the mass or the weight of tungsten in the hosel and toe to bring each back up to weight. The CG location would not change, but there would be absolutely no mass at all where the ball impact location would be. That would not work at all, would it?

I’ve learned long ago that it’s not just about the location of the CG that makes a golf club perform, but also the amount of mass that is placed directly behind the spot on the face where impact with the ball is made.

Here’s a fun, “non-golf” way to embrace this concept.

Suppose we had a two-pound sledgehammer and another 2 lb piece of steel hammered into a large circular sheet 1/16” thick. And then suppose someone hit you on the head with the exact CG of each one – which do you think would hurt the most?

Your Reaction?
  • 16
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW1
  • LOL3
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK7

Continue Reading

Golf's Perfect Imperfections

Golf’s Perfect Imperfections: The science behind Dustin Johnson forgetting his bad shots



We’ve all been there, it’s the right of passage for the golfers. You are standing over a shot not feeling comfortable, you hit a bad shot and then proceed to obliterate yourself with names think, “how could you?” And then worse, you can’t let it go for the next three holes and ruin your chances at a decent round of golf. Now, you have wasted your day and you come home grumpy and you take it out on your loved ones and turn one bad day into three…Let’s stop the insanity now and let science show us the way!


Your Reaction?
  • 2
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading