Opinion & Analysis
The real top 10: PGA Tour Power Rankings
By Nick DeConti
GolfWRX Contributor
PGA Tour player performance is something that fans and media alike are always measuring and sharing their opinions about. When these matters are discussed between friends, enemies, co-workers, spouses, in-laws – there is always some disagreement. Some people like to measure the entire season’s performance when evaluating a golfer, and some employ the “What have you done for me lately?” school of thought. I always thought there was something to be said for both sides.
I wanted to find a way that I can measure a Tour player’s performance over the course of a season, but also keep in mind how hot (or cold) a player is to help me predict what they may (or may not) do in the future. The FedEx Cup standings do a good job of tracking a player’s season, but let’s look at it this way: if you only played in two PGA Tour tournaments and won them, you would have 1,000 FedEx Cup points (assuming one of them wasn’t a major). With those numbers at this time of the season, you could play in every other tournament, not make a cut, and be in 15th place in the FedEx cup standings. Win only one tournament and you’re still good for 61st! What I’m telling you is that you can’t judge a golfer by those standings alone.
So I invented a system that takes those FedEx Cup standings, put them through a series of number crunches and put together my own Power Ranking to give you a mix of how good these players actually are, meshing together their season performance and recent performance in an effort to quell the arguments between you and your loved (or not so loved) ones.
1. Jason Dufner
Dufner has been the talk of the TOUR this year, rightly so based on his performance. Although not active this week at The Travelers, he’s been in the top 5 his last two tournaments, and one of three players this season with 2 wins.
2. Webb Simpson
With a win at the U.S Open, we could be witnessing the growth of a superstar in Webb Simpson. Webb made 11 consecutive cuts earlier this season, letting us know that we should get used to seeing Webb on the Sunday leaderboard. Webb finished T29 at the Travelers.
3. Matt Kuchar
Coming off of a T8 at the Travelers Championship this week, Kuchar has not missed a cut all season, and also won The PLAYERS Championship in May. Kuchar has been playing great golf all season and is currently in very good form.
4. Jim Furyk
With Furyk’s worst finish being T13 over his past month of play, there’s no doubt he would be close to the top of this list. Furyk has played phenomenal golf as of late, highlighted by his T4 finish at the U.S. Open.
5. Rickie Fowler
After winning his first career tournament at the Wells Fargo in May, Rickie followed that performance up with back-to-back top-5 finishes in his next two tournaments. It has really been a coming out season for Rickie, and it seems he’s developed into the player people thought he would be coming out of college.
6. Hunter Mahan
Hunter put together another solid week finishing T11 at the Travelers this week, adding another good finish to a consistent season this year in which he has one two tournaments, one of them the WGC Accenture Match Play event where he took down Rory McIlroy in the final match.
7. Tiger Woods
Leaving all the “Is Tiger ‘back’ yet?” talk aside, there’s no way Tiger wouldn’t make this list by also winning two tournaments this year, one of them being earlier this month. His T21 finish at the U.S. Open is less than what we expected based on his earlier performance in the tournament, but if we’re expecting him to win majors this year, he’s a player to be reckoned with.
8. Marc Leishman
Leishman found his way into the top 10 this week by getting his first career win at the Travelers. Leishman has been having a good season this year, and also finished T3 at the HP Byron Nelson. He has certainly been flying under the radar, but we should be paying attention to him.
9. Phil Mickelson
Any time we see Phil’s name entered into a tournament, we expect a good finish. His performance at the U.S. Open was less than stellar, but with a win this season at Pebble Beach, we know that we can never count Phil out, and he’s always a threat to win.
10. Ernie Els
A 9th place finish at the U.S. Open and a slew of top-10 finishes this year, the Big Easy continues to be a threat on TOUR. Although he hasn’t broken through this year with a win, his form has been so good lately that we should be expecting one from him soon.
See the chart below for the full rankings, and click here for more discussion in the forums.
| 1 | Jason Dufner | 15 | 1,849 | 2 | 6 | 2054.444444 | |
| 2 | Webb Simpson | 15 | 1,298 | 1 | 5 | 551 | 1261.944444 |
| 3 | Matt Kuchar | 14 | 1,423 | 1 | 6 | 426 | 922.3148148 |
| 4 | Jim Furyk | 13 | 931 | 0 | 4 | 918 | 896.5185185 |
| 5 | Rickie Fowler | 16 | 1,197 | 1 | 5 | 652 | 886.6666667 |
| 6 | Hunter Mahan | 14 | 1,572 | 2 | 3 | 277 | 815.1111111 |
| 7 | Tiger Woods | 10 | 1,452 | 2 | 3 | 397 | 806.6666667 |
| 8 | Marc Leishman | 15 | 897 | 1 | 2 | 952 | 747.5 |
| 9 | Phil Mickelson | 14 | 1,313 | 1 | 5 | 536 | 680.8148148 |
| 10 | Ernie Els | 13 | 802 | 0 | 4 | 1,047 | 675.7592593 |
| 11 | Justin Rose | 12 | 1,169 | 1 | 5 | 680 | 649.4444444 |
| 12 | Zach Johnson | 16 | 1,420 | 1 | 4 | 429 | 631.1111111 |
| 13 | John Huh | 17 | 982 | 1 | 4 | 867 | 618.2962963 |
| 14 | Michael Thompson | 17 | 628 | 0 | 2 | 1,221 | 593.1111111 |
| 15 | Johnson Wagner | 18 | 1,142 | 1 | 4 | 707 | 571 |
| 16 | John Rollins | 17 | 719 | 0 | 5 | 1,130 | 565.8796296 |
| 17 | Bubba Watson | 12 | 1,617 | 1 | 5 | 232 | 539 |
| 18 | John Senden | 14 | 604 | 0 | 4 | 1,245 | 469.7777778 |
| 19 | Graeme McDowell | 10 | 812 | 0 | 3 | 1,037 | 451.1111111 |
| 20 | Mark Wilson | 17 | 940 | 1 | 2 | 909 | 443.8888889 |
| 21 | Ben Crane | 16 | 747 | 0 | 4 | 1,102 | 442.6666667 |
| 22 | Ken Duke | 19 | 622 | 0 | 5 | 1,227 | 437.7037037 |
| 23 | Keegan Bradley | 17 | 915 | 0 | 3 | 934 | 432.0833333 |
| 24 | Charlie Wi | 16 | 709 | 0 | 2 | 1,140 | 420.1481481 |
| 25 | Brendon de Jonge | 19 | 596 | 0 | 2 | 1,253 | 419.4074074 |
| 26 | Dustin Johnson | 10 | 898 | 1 | 4 | 951 | 415.7407407 |
| 27 | Brian Davis | 17 | 655 | 0 | 4 | 1,194 | 412.4074074 |
| 28 | David Toms | 14 | 524 | 0 | 3 | 1,325 | 407.5555556 |
| 29 | Brandt Snedeker | 12 | 888 | 1 | 3 | 961 | 394.6666667 |
| 30 | D.A. Points | 16 | 662 | 0 | 3 | 1,187 | 392.2962963 |
| 31 | Charles Howell III | 17 | 621 | 0 | 1 | 1,228 | 391 |
| 32 | Cameron Tringale | 17 | 603 | 0 | 4 | 1,246 | 379.6666667 |
| 33 | Carl Pettersson | 16 | 1,258 | 1 | 4 | 591 | 372.7407407 |
| 34 | Bo Van Pelt | 15 | 664 | 0 | 5 | 1,185 | 368.8888889 |
| 35 | Kevin Na | 17 | 779 | 0 | 5 | 1,070 | 367.8611111 |
| 36 | Charley Hoffman | 17 | 579 | 0 | 2 | 1,270 | 364.5555556 |
| 37 | George McNeill | 17 | 573 | 1 | 1 | 1,276 | 360.7777778 |
| 38 | Padraig Harrington | 12 | 538 | 0 | 3 | 1,311 | 358.6666667 |
| 39 | Seung-Yul Noh | 19 | 507 | 0 | 2 | 1,342 | 356.7777778 |
| 40 | Ryan Palmer | 15 | 641 | 0 | 4 | 1,208 | 356.1111111 |
| 41 | Matt Every | 15 | 641 | 0 | 5 | 1,208 | 356.1111111 |
| 42 | Martin Laird | 15 | 847 | 0 | 3 | 1,002 | 352.9166667 |
| 43 | Rory Sabbatini | 17 | 545 | 0 | 2 | 1,304 | 343.1481481 |
| 44 | Rory McIlroy | 9 | 1,372 | 1 | 5 | 477 | 343 |
| 45 | Jonathan Byrd | 14 | 655 | 0 | 5 | 1,194 | 339.6296296 |
| 46 | Steve Stricker | 10 | 911 | 1 | 4 | 938 | 337.4074074 |
| 47 | Kevin Chappell | 18 | 333 | 0 | 1 | 1,516 | 333 |
| 48 | Kevin Stadler | 16 | 561 | 0 | 3 | 1,288 | 332.4444444 |
| 49 | Kyle Stanley | 18 | 992 | 1 | 2 | 857 | 330.6666667 |
| 50 | Sang-Moon Bae | 17 | 510 | 0 | 2 | 1,339 | 321.1111111 |
| 51 | Aaron Baddeley | 16 | 535 | 0 | 2 | 1,314 | 317.037037 |
| 52 | Robert Garrigus | 16 | 709 | 0 | 3 | 1,140 | 315.1111111 |
| 53 | Jeff Overton | 17 | 495 | 0 | 2 | 1,354 | 311.6666667 |
| 54 | Bud Cauley | 17 | 492 | 0 | 2 | 1,357 | 309.7777778 |
| 55 | Lee Westwood | 8 | 690 | 0 | 5 | 1,159 | 306.6666667 |
| 56 | Louis Oosthuizen | 12 | 690 | 0 | 2 | 1,159 | 306.6666667 |
| 57 | Scott Piercy | 17 | 485 | 0 | 1 | 1,364 | 305.3703704 |
| 58 | Jimmy Walker | 17 | 483 | 0 | 3 | 1,366 | 304.1111111 |
| 59 | Luke Donald | 10 | 1,070 | 1 | 4 | 779 | 297.2222222 |
| 60 | Greg Chalmers | 17 | 464 | 0 | 1,385 | 292.1481481 | |
| 61 | Ryan Moore | 15 | 518 | 0 | 3 | 1,331 | 287.7777778 |
| 62 | Harris English | 17 | 455 | 0 | 2 | 1,394 | 286.4814815 |
| 63 | John Merrick | 17 | 454 | 0 | 1 | 1,395 | 285.8518519 |
| 64 | Blake Adams | 20 | 383 | 0 | 1 | 1,466 | 283.7037037 |
| 65 | Greg Owen | 16 | 477 | 0 | 2 | 1,372 | 282.6666667 |
| 66 | Chris Stroud | 16 | 469 | 0 | 2 | 1,380 | 277.9259259 |
| 67 | Sean O’Hair | 14 | 518 | 0 | 1 | 1,331 | 268.5925926 |
| 68 | Pat Perez | 15 | 473 | 0 | 1 | 1,376 | 262.7777778 |
| 69 | Tommy Gainey | 20 | 350 | 0 | 1 | 1,499 | 259.2592593 |
| 70 | Bryce Molder | 15 | 466 | 0 | 1 | 1,383 | 258.8888889 |
| 71 | Nick Watney | 15 | 463 | 0 | 2 | 1,386 | 257.2222222 |
| 72 | Martin Flores | 19 | 365 | 0 | 1 | 1,484 | 256.8518519 |
| 73 | Bill Haas | 15 | 922 | 1 | 2 | 927 | 256.1111111 |
| 74 | Vijay Singh | 16 | 429 | 0 | 1 | 1,420 | 254.2222222 |
| 75 | James Driscoll | 17 | 400 | 0 | 2 | 1,449 | 251.8518519 |
| 76 | Colt Knost | 18 | 370 | 0 | 2 | 1,479 | 246.6666667 |
| 77 | Robert Allenby | 16 | 415 | 0 | 2 | 1,434 | 245.9259259 |
| 78 | Spencer Levin | 19 | 695 | 0 | 3 | 1,154 | 244.537037 |
| 79 | J.B. Holmes | 15 | 440 | 0 | 2 | 1,409 | 244.4444444 |
| 80 | John Mallinger | 16 | 410 | 0 | 1 | 1,439 | 242.962963 |
| 81 | Tom Gillis | 15 | 432 | 0 | 1 | 1,417 | 240 |
| 82 | Ricky Barnes | 17 | 376 | 0 | 1 | 1,473 | 236.7407407 |
| 83 | Jonas Blixt | 14 | 455 | 0 | 3 | 1,394 | 235.9259259 |
| 84 | Brian Harman | 19 | 332 | 0 | 1,517 | 233.6296296 | |
| 85 | Chad Campbell | 17 | 370 | 0 | 1 | 1,479 | 232.962963 |
| 86 | Geoff Ogilvy | 14 | 445 | 0 | 1,404 | 230.7407407 | |
| 87 | J.J. Henry | 19 | 325 | 0 | 2 | 1,524 | 228.7037037 |
| 88 | Jeff Maggert | 17 | 363 | 0 | 1 | 1,486 | 228.5555556 |
| 89 | David Mathis | 20 | 307 | 0 | 1 | 1,542 | 227.4074074 |
| 90 | David Hearn | 17 | 350 | 0 | 1 | 1,499 | 220.3703704 |
| 91 | Brian Gay | 16 | 357 | 0 | 2 | 1,492 | 211.5555556 |
| 92 | Billy Mayfair | 17 | 335 | 0 | 1 | 1,514 | 210.9259259 |
| 93 | Daniel Summerhays | 15 | 379 | 0 | 3 | 1,470 | 210.5555556 |
| 94 | Bob Estes | 14 | 402 | 0 | 1 | 1,447 | 208.4444444 |
| 95 | Tim Herron | 19 | 296 | 0 | 1,553 | 208.2962963 | |
| 96 | K.J. Choi | 13 | 423 | 0 | 1 | 1,426 | 203.6666667 |
| 97 | Will Claxton | 17 | 323 | 0 | 1 | 1,526 | 203.3703704 |
| 98 | Harrison Frazar | 14 | 386 | 0 | 2 | 1,463 | 200.1481481 |
| 99 | Kris Blanks | 20 | 268 | 0 | 1,581 | 198.5185185 | |
| 100 | Ben Curtis | 8 | 886 | 1 | 3 | 963 | 196.8888889 |
| 101 | Andres Romero | 14 | 377 | 0 | 1 | 1,472 | 195.4814815 |
| 102 | Fredrik Jacobson | 12 | 434 | 0 | 1 | 1,415 | 192.8888889 |
| 103 | Kevin Streelman | 17 | 306 | 0 | 2 | 1,543 | 192.6666667 |
| 104 | William McGirt | 18 | 289 | 0 | 1,560 | 192.6666667 | |
| 105 | Roberto Castro | 15 | 330 | 0 | 1,519 | 183.3333333 | |
| 106 | J.J. Killeen | 22 | 222 | 0 | 1,627 | 180.8888889 | |
| 107 | Graham DeLaet | 16 | 305 | 0 | 2 | 1,544 | 180.7407407 |
| 108 | Boo Weekley | 14 | 335 | 0 | 2 | 1,514 | 173.7037037 |
| 109 | Brendan Steele | 16 | 288 | 0 | 2 | 1,561 | 170.6666667 |
| 110 | Kyle Reifers | 17 | 268 | 0 | 1,581 | 168.7407407 | |
| 111 | Dicky Pride | 9 | 503 | 0 | 3 | 1,346 | 167.6666667 |
| 112 | Vaughn Taylor | 16 | 280 | 0 | 1,569 | 165.9259259 | |
| 113 | Chris Kirk | 14 | 318 | 0 | 2 | 1,531 | 164.8888889 |
| 114 | Josh Teater | 18 | 245 | 0 | 1,604 | 163.3333333 | |
| 115 | Henrik Stenson | 11 | 394 | 0 | 1 | 1,455 | 160.5185185 |
| 116 | Trevor Immelman | 14 | 309 | 0 | 1,540 | 160.2222222 | |
| 117 | Chris DiMarco | 19 | 223 | 0 | 1,626 | 156.9259259 | |
| 118 | Rod Pampling | 16 | 261 | 0 | 1 | 1,588 | 154.6666667 |
| 119 | Heath Slocum | 17 | 236 | 0 | 1,613 | 148.5925926 | |
| 120 | Ian Poulter | 9 | 443 | 0 | 2 | 1,406 | 147.6666667 |
| 121 | Bobby Gates | 18 | 220 | 0 | 1 | 1,629 | 146.6666667 |
| 122 | Jerry Kelly | 16 | 242 | 0 | 1,607 | 143.4074074 | |
| 123 | Gary Christian | 17 | 225 | 0 | 1,624 | 141.6666667 | |
| 124 | Camilo Villegas | 15 | 251 | 0 | 1,598 | 139.4444444 | |
| 125 | Erik Compton | 15 | 248 | 0 | 1,601 | 137.7777778 | |
| 126 | Chez Reavie | 17 | 218 | 0 | 1,631 | 137.2592593 | |
| 127 | Gary Woodland | 14 | 258 | 0 | 1,591 | 133.7777778 | |
| 128 | Brandt Jobe | 17 | 211 | 0 | 1 | 1,638 | 132.8518519 |
| 129 | Jhonattan Vegas | 17 | 211 | 0 | 1 | 1,638 | 132.8518519 |
| 130 | Sergio Garcia | 9 | 396 | 0 | 1 | 1,453 | 132 |
| 131 | Nick O’Hern | 16 | 221 | 0 | 1 | 1,628 | 130.962963 |
| 132 | Hunter Haas | 19 | 186 | 0 | 1 | 1,663 | 130.8888889 |
| 133 | Brendon Todd | 18 | 196 | 0 | 1 | 1,653 | 130.6666667 |
| 134 | Stewart Cink | 14 | 248 | 0 | 1,601 | 128.5925926 | |
| 135 | Bill Lunde | 16 | 204 | 0 | 1,645 | 120.8888889 | |
| 136 | Davis Love III | 10 | 323 | 0 | 1 | 1,526 | 119.6296296 |
| 137 | Jason Bohn | 17 | 187 | 0 | 1 | 1,662 | 117.7407407 |
| 138 | Y.E. Yang | 14 | 225 | 0 | 1,624 | 116.6666667 | |
| 139 | Charl Schwartzel | 8 | 380 | 0 | 2 | 1,469 | 112.5925926 |
| 140 | Jason Day | 10 | 295 | 0 | 2 | 1,554 | 109.2592593 |
| 141 | D.J. Trahan | 16 | 184 | 0 | 1 | 1,665 | 109.037037 |
| 142 | Justin Leonard | 17 | 173 | 0 | 1 | 1,676 | 108.9259259 |
| 143 | Sung Kang | 20 | 146 | 0 | 1,703 | 108.1481481 | |
| 144 | Mark Anderson | 14 | 205 | 0 | 1,644 | 106.2962963 | |
| 145 | Adam Scott | 8 | 356 | 0 | 1 | 1,493 | 105.4814815 |
| 146 | Tim Clark | 11 | 256 | 0 | 1 | 1,593 | 104.2962963 |
| 147 | Troy Matteson | 19 | 147 | 0 | 1,702 | 103.4444444 | |
| 148 | Matt Bettencourt | 20 | 139 | 0 | 1 | 1,710 | 102.962963 |
| 149 | Danny Lee | 15 | 181 | 0 | 1,668 | 100.5555556 | |
| 150 | Miguel Angel Carballo | 15 | 179 | 0 | 1,670 | 99.44444444 | |
| 151 | Robert Karlsson | 11 | 239 | 0 | 1,610 | 97.37037037 | |
| 152 | Scott Stallings | 16 | 152 | 0 | 1,697 | 90.07407407 | |
| 153 | Jason Kokrak | 17 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 1,706 | 90.03703704 |
| 154 | Retief Goosen | 8 | 200 | 0 | 1 | 1,649 | 88.88888889 |
| 155 | Chris Couch | 15 | 157 | 0 | 1,692 | 87.22222222 | |
| 156 | Derek Lamely | 16 | 145 | 0 | 1,704 | 85.92592593 | |
| 157 | Stuart Appleby | 14 | 156 | 0 | 1,693 | 80.88888889 | |
| 158 | Nathan Green | 12 | 177 | 0 | 1,672 | 78.66666667 | |
| 159 | Michael Bradley | 15 | 141 | 0 | 1,708 | 78.33333333 | |
| 160 | Kevin Kisner | 14 | 149 | 0 | 1,700 | 77.25925926 | |
| 161 | Arjun Atwal | 16 | 130 | 0 | 1,719 | 77.03703704 | |
| 162 | Stephen Ames | 14 | 142 | 0 | 1,707 | 73.62962963 | |
| 163 | Rocco Mediate | 14 | 136 | 0 | 1,713 | 70.51851852 | |
| 164 | Cameron Beckman | 16 | 116 | 0 | 1,733 | 68.74074074 | |
| 165 | Ted Potter, Jr. | 15 | 119 | 0 | 1,730 | 66.11111111 | |
| 166 | Richard H. Lee | 14 | 127 | 0 | 1,722 | 65.85185185 | |
| 167 | Roland Thatcher | 11 | 156 | 0 | 1 | 1,693 | 63.55555556 |
| 168 | Angel Cabrera | 13 | 131 | 0 | 1,718 | 63.07407407 | |
| 169 | Joe Ogilvie | 17 | 98 | 0 | 1,751 | 61.7037037 | |
| 170 | Matt Jones | 10 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 1,706 | 52.96296296 |
| 171 | Joe Durant | 8 | 178 | 0 | 1 | 1,671 | 52.74074074 |
| 172 | Jarrod Lyle | 7 | 199 | 0 | 1 | 1,650 | 51.59259259 |
| 173 | Billy Hurley III | 17 | 72 | 0 | 1,777 | 45.33333333 | |
| 174 | Briny Baird | 13 | 92 | 0 | 1,757 | 44.2962963 | |
| 175 | Mathew Goggin | 13 | 87 | 0 | 1,762 | 41.88888889 | |
| 176 | Russell Knox | 13 | 84 | 0 | 1,765 | 40.44444444 | |
| 177 | Troy Kelly | 14 | 76 | 0 | 1,773 | 39.40740741 | |
| 178 | Gavin Coles | 13 | 81 | 0 | 1,768 | 39 | |
| 179 | Garth Mulroy | 11 | 95 | 0 | 1,754 | 38.7037037 | |
| 180 | Jamie Lovemark | 14 | 73 | 0 | 1,776 | 37.85185185 | |
| 181 | Scott Brown | 14 | 72 | 0 | 1 | 1,777 | 37.33333333 |
| 182 | Lee Janzen | 8 | 125 | 0 | 1,724 | 37.03703704 | |
| 183 | Tommy Biershenk | 17 | 57 | 0 | 1,792 | 35.88888889 | |
| 184 | Tom Pernice Jr. | 14 | 63 | 0 | 1,786 | 32.66666667 | |
| 185 | Duffy Waldorf | 7 | 123 | 0 | 1,726 | 31.88888889 | |
| 186 | Patrick Sheehan | 11 | 73 | 0 | 1,776 | 29.74074074 | |
| 187 | Shaun Micheel | 8 | 100 | 0 | 1,749 | 29.62962963 | |
| 188 | Alex Cejka | 6 | 118 | 0 | 1,731 | 26.22222222 | |
| 189 | Daniel Chopra | 11 | 64 | 0 | 1,785 | 26.07407407 | |
| 190 | Chris Riley | 7 | 96 | 0 | 1,753 | 24.88888889 | |
| 191 | Charlie Beljan | 12 | 49 | 0 | 1,800 | 21.77777778 | |
| 192 | John Daly | 5 | 114 | 0 | 1,735 | 21.11111111 | |
| 193 | Billy Horschel | 8 | 71 | 0 | 1,778 | 21.03703704 | |
| 194 | Rich Beem | 7 | 81 | 0 | 1,768 | 21 | |
| 195 | Lucas Glover | 11 | 47 | 0 | 1,802 | 19.14814815 | |
| 196 | Steven Bowditch | 9 | 57 | 0 | 1,792 | 19 | |
| 197 | Ryuji Imada | 17 | 30 | 0 | 1,819 | 18.88888889 | |
| 198 | Fred Couples | 4 | 108 | 0 | 1,741 | 16 | |
| 199 | Marc Turnesa | 6 | 64 | 0 | 1,785 | 14.22222222 | |
| 200 | Paul Goydos | 6 | 64 | 0 | 1,785 | 14.22222222 | |
| 201 | Marco Dawson | 12 | 28 | 0 | 1,821 | 12.44444444 | |
| 202 | Garrett Willis | 7 | 47 | 0 | 1,802 | 12.18518519 | |
| 203 | Edward Loar | 13 | 25 | 0 | 1,824 | 12.03703704 | |
| 204 | Steve Marino | 6 | 54 | 0 | 1,795 | 12 | |
| 205 | Tim Petrovic | 9 | 36 | 0 | 1,813 | 12 | |
| 206 | Anthony Kim | 10 | 32 | 0 | 1,817 | 11.85185185 | |
| 207 | Todd Hamilton | 4 | 70 | 0 | 1,779 | 10.37037037 | |
| 208 | Frank Lickliter II | 5 | 56 | 0 | 1,793 | 10.37037037 | |
| 209 | Shane Bertsch | 8 | 33 | 0 | 1,816 | 9.777777778 | |
| 210 | Steve Wheatcroft | 12 | 22 | 0 | 1,827 | 9.777777778 | |
| 211 | Woody Austin | 5 | 50 | 0 | 1,799 | 9.259259259 | |
| 212 | Kenny Perry | 4 | 62 | 0 | 1,787 | 9.185185185 | |
| 213 | Will MacKenzie | 4 | 55 | 0 | 1,794 | 8.148148148 | |
| 214 | Skip Kendall | 4 | 53 | 0 | 1,796 | 7.851851852 | |
| 215 | Kent Jones | 4 | 50 | 0 | 1,799 | 7.407407407 | |
| 216 | Richard S. Johnson | 4 | 47 | 0 | 1,802 | 6.962962963 | |
| 217 | Fred Funk | 4 | 47 | 0 | 1,802 | 6.962962963 | |
| 218 | Paul Stankowski | 5 | 35 | 0 | 1,814 | 6.481481481 | |
| 219 | Michael Allen | 3 | 52 | 0 | 1 | 1,797 | 5.777777778 |
| 220 | David Duval | 12 | 13 | 0 | 1,836 | 5.777777778 | |
| 221 | Robert Damron | 5 | 30 | 0 | 1,819 | 5.555555556 | |
| 222 | Corey Pavin | 2 | 67 | 0 | 1,782 | 4.962962963 | |
| 223 | Scott Verplank | 7 | 17 | 0 | 1,832 | 4.407407407 | |
| 224 | Paul Casey | 5 | 19 | 0 | 1,830 | 3.518518519 | |
| 225 | Hank Kuehne | 8 | 10 | 0 | 1,839 | 2.962962963 | |
| 226 | Craig Barlow | 4 | 18 | 0 | 1,831 | 2.666666667 | |
| 227 | Brett Wetterich | 6 | 11 | 0 | 1,838 | 2.444444444 | |
| 228 | Alexandre Rocha | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1,845 | 1.62962963 | |
| 229 | Robert Gamez | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1,842 | 1.555555556 | |
| 230 | Stephen Gangluff | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1,846 | 1.444444444 | |
| 231 | Brett Quigley | 1 | 37 | 0 | 1,812 | 1.37037037 | |
| 232 | Bart Bryant | 2 | 18 | 0 | 1,831 | 1.333333333 | |
| 233 | Zack Miller | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1,844 | 1.111111111 | |
| 234 | Tom Lehman | 1 | 25 | 0 | 1,824 | 0.925925926 | |
| 235 | Scott Dunlap | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1,847 | 0.740740741 | |
| 236 | Jose Maria Olazabal | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1,845 | 0.592592593 | |
| 237 | Neal Lancaster | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1,847 | 0.37037037 | |
| 238 | Kevin Sutherland | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1,847 | 0.296296296 | |
| 239 | Matt McQuillan | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1,848 | 0.259259259 | |
| 240 | Peter Lonard | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1,847 | 0.222222222 | |
| 241 | Omar Uresti | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1,847 | 0.222222222 | |
| 242 | Jesper Parnevik | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1,848 | 0.111111111 | |
| 243 | Ted Purdy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1,848 | 0.074074074 | |
| 244 | Kirk Triplett | 3 | 0 | 1,849 | 0 | ||
| As of June 25, 2012 |
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: We’re talking about practice! My best tips for taking your game to the course
With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game.
Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills.
While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice.
This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times.
Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy.
One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length. Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine.
It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season.
Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds.
Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time. With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game. Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills. While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice. This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times. Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy. One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length.
Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine. It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season. Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds. Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time.
Equipment
Seoul Sensibilities: Is Korean golf fashion starting to shape the world?
For Korean golfers, we always look forward to the last of the kkot-saem-chu-I for the true start of a new golf season. The term refers to a cold snap, but literally translates as “winter being jealous of the flowers beginning to bloom, thus lashing out one final time before surrendering to spring”.
A rather poetic mouthful packed into a short expression.
Koreans can be like that. Understated, yet oddly expressive at the same time. And nowhere is this more true on the golf course and in our golf bags. In fact, I suspect many Korean golfers look forward to new apparel and accessory drops more than they do actual equipment launches each year.

At this point, Korean golf fashion may exist on its own timeline. (courtesy of @seonbi_golfer)
There is ample evidence to support that suspicion. Korea is the world’s third-largest golf market behind the United States and Japan, yet its appetite for golf apparel exceeds that of both countries combined. Recent estimates suggest that Korea accounts for nearly 40 percent of the global golf apparel market, placing it among the world’s most influential golf fashion markets and punching well above its size.
Simply, we care deeply about how new golf clubs look and feel, but enjoy looking good while swinging them even more.
Golfers in the West may laugh and say that golf is played on a course, not a fashion runway. Perhaps. But what’s the harm in trying to look and feel good, if the added self-confidence can help actual performance? It certainly seems to have worked for Jason Day, who may have unlocked a new stats category: dormant strokes gained. Coincidence?

During the COVID-era, estimates placed the market near $9 billion, an astonishing figure for a single country.
As a proud member of Gen X, I’ve witnessed the highs and lows of golf fashion firsthand. The pleated trousers and wing-tipped shoes of Jack Nicklaus, the stylish plus-fours and knickers of Payne Stewart, the baggy black trousers and fitted mock-necks of Tiger Woods, and the thigh-hugging athletic tailoring of Rory McIlroy. Golf fashion, like the golf swing itself, has rarely stood still.
But nowhere have those trends shifted, evolved, and been scrutinized quite as relentlessly as in Korea. Here, golf fashion moves faster than fairway gossip, and consumers dissect brands with a level of discernment that can be both impressive and mildly terrifying. New brands are studied, judged, embraced, or dismissed with startling efficiency.
The result is a consumer base with one of the sharpest eyes for quality and authenticity anywhere in the world. It is difficult to quantify, but easy to recognize. Clean lines without trying too hard. Luxury mixed with utility. Trend awareness balanced by restraint and purpose.
It’s golf fashion shaped by one of the world’s most style-literate cities, something I like to call Seoul Sensibilities, referring to the taste level forged by a uniquely competitive environment.
And increasingly, global brands have noticed.

Many golf brands in Korea have their own flagship shops dedicated to apparel only
Titleist understood this years ago, when its apparel business in Korea took on a life of its own under new ownership and local direction. What had once been a straightforward extension of an iconic equipment giant became something sharper and more premium. By going all in on the serious Tour-player look (I couldn’t even fit into their XL sizes), Titleist struck the right chord with Korean consumers and helped its fledgling apparel business break into the mainstream. Titleist became a household name even for non-golfers who wore its caps, shirts, and windbreakers in daily life. In many ways, it proved that even heritage golf brands could carry real fashion credibility when viewed through a Korean lens.
Several years later, PXG took a page out of Titleist’s playbook and followed suit. Korean consumers helped transform the brand from one known largely for irons and loud commercials into something broader and more stylish. PXG apparel’s growth in Korea was explosive, where it found an early audience and turned the category into something more than mere logo merchandise. It is still hard to walk anywhere in Seoul without seeing its palindrome logo.
Malbon’s meteoric rise in the United States was genuine, but its ascent into a global golf lifestyle brand owes much to Korea, where it was elevated by a market already fluent in modern golf style. Korea did not simply embrace Malbon. It pressure-tested the concept, refined its appeal, and helped push it into the global spotlight.
As such, new brands may arrive from abroad, but more often than not, their sharpest evolution happens here. If a brand can earn credibility in Seoul, it’s deemed to have passed one of the toughest style audits in the game.
That is why the next meaningful chapter may not come from outside, but from a Korean brand moving in the opposite direction, carrying those Seoul Sensibilities outward as K-pop once did.

Play young Stay dope.
From Seoul, With Intent
Khalhon is a label that feels less like a trend-chasing newcomer and more like the product of a market that has already seen everything. Golfers here have long been surrounded by luxury logos, technical fabrics, and tour uniforms disguised as lifestyle wear and vice-versa. In other words, novelty alone rarely lasts here, and the Koreans seems to understand that instinctively.
Its style language leans into clean silhouettes, relaxed but tailored proportions, muted palettes, and premium materials that speak quietly but confidently. There is a modern city aesthetic running through it all, with strong layering pieces, thoughtful textures, and subtle branding that suggests sophistication rather than demanding attention.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
Most importantly, the garments seem designed to blur the line between golfwear and everyday style. Shirts, trousers, knitwear, and outer layers move comfortably between a game of screen golf, a lunch reservation, an airport gate, or an afternoon coffee in Gangnam with friends.
It raises the question of whether this is golfwear that happens to look good off the course, or everyday clothing that performs beautifully on the fairways.
Personally, I have long appreciated Nike Golf for its clean, athletic modernization of golf attire. It also has the useful side effect of making me look like a more serious golfer than I probably am. But off the course, there are times when being instantly identified as the golf guy in a crowd of non-golfers can feel a touch self-conscious.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
That is part of what drew me to Khalhon, which seemed to blend golf and everyday wear naturally. While some of the outfits may be slightly beyond my personal confidence level, the brand also offers tasteful options for older guys like me who still want to express a little personality without regretting the decision later.
These are not simply flashy outfits worn on the course and then banished to the closet until the next tee time. They work surprisingly well off the course too, and I suspect many of the pieces will still look right a couple of years from now, which would certainly be kinder to my wallet than most golf fashion trends tend to be.
And perhaps that broader lifestyle positioning also helps explain why someone like Sean Wotherspoon would find Khalhon creatively interesting in the first place.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
“Korea is not only one of the most fashion-forward golf markets in the world, but one of the most fashion-forward markets globally. Korea is ahead, and I love to watch and try to catch up.” – Sean Wotherspoon, Creative Director at Khalhon
Seoul and Beyond
If Khalhon’s rise says something about where Korean golf fashion is today, its relationship with Sean Wotherspoon says even more about where it is heading.
For readers less familiar with Sean Wotherspoon, his arrival at Khalhon is not some routine celebrity endorsement or influencer collaboration. In design and streetwear circles, Wotherspoon is regarded as one of the more influential creative voices of his generation, particularly when it comes to blending nostalgia, storytelling, and contemporary culture into products that people can connect with.
He first gained widespread attention through his now-famous Nike sneaker collaborations, where his vintage-inspired designs and instinct for color helped turn him into one of the defining artists of the late-2010s sneaker era. His work gradually expanded beyond footwear into apparel, automotive collaborations, collectibles, and broader lifestyle design.
Modern golf style now extends well beyond the fairways, where performance and functionality are largely expected by default. And while plenty of brands already make technically competent golfwear, Khalhon seems more focused on designing clothes people would genuinely want to wear even after the round ends.
And when guys at Wotherspoon’s level show genuine interest in working with a Korean golf brand as its new Creative Director, fashion circles tend to sit up and pay attention. There’s already a huge buzz among the fashion-conscious here about upcoming collabs with iconic sports stars and brands.

“My creative direction for Khalhon is disruptive, colorful, nostalgic, and modern. My goal is to blend these avenues seamlessly within each collection.” – Sean Wotherspoon
In chatting with Sean, what stood out most to me was how genuinely energized he sounded about the project itself. Despite having already worked across and countless other creative spaces, he described golf as a completely fresh category for him, saying that Khalhon “will be an amazing vehicle for my design work.”
At the same time, his enthusiasm seemed tied just as much to Korea itself. He spoke openly about admiring Korea’s fashion culture while repeatedly insisting he is still a terrible golfer.
There was something oddly refreshing about that humility. Rather than sounding like a celebrity parachuting into golf simply because the category suddenly became fashionable, Sean sounded genuinely curious about what Korea might do with the category next.
And perhaps that is what makes Khalhon feel interesting right now. The brand feels less like a trend-chaser and more like the natural result of a market now confident enough to export its own point of view.
For years, global brands came to Korea to sharpen their image against one of the most discerning audiences anywhere. Now, a Korean label appears ready to send those Seoul Sensibilities outward instead.
Which brings us back to kkot-saem-chu-i.
That final cold snap before spring always arrives with a reminder that seasons are changing, whether we notice it immediately or not. Golf fashion feels a little like that right now as well, as the old boundaries between sport, streetwear, luxury, and everyday style continue to soften.
And somewhere in Seoul, a Korean golf label already seems prepared for whatever season comes next. I just hope they have everything in my size.
-
News3 days agoRussell Henley’s winning WITB: 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoAaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
-
Equipment15 hours agoDetails on Jason Day’s latest prototype Avoda iron setup
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
News6 days agoCharles Schwab Challenge Tour Report: MacIntyre, Åberg and Spaun all switch putters, TaylorMade launches new Spider
-
Equipment1 week agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
-
Popular Photo Galleries1 week agoPhotos from the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
