Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

How to play long par-4’s and par-5’s effectively

Published

on

This past week, Brian Harman won the John Deere Classic. Harman has been one of my favorite players to follow from a statistical approach because he is one of the most aggressive tee shot players on Tour, meaning his numbers show that he is less likely to lay-up off the tee and continue to hit his driver. Here are the top-10 most aggressive drivers on Tour from the 2013 season:

  1. Ian Poulter
  2. Ben Curtis
  3. Brandt Snedeker
  4. Phil Mickelson
  5. Brian Harman
  6. Graeme McDowell
  7. Tim Clark
  8. Robert Castro
  9. Steve Sticker
  10. Matt Kuchar

The statistical research in the game has repeatedly shown that golfers are better off utilizing an offensive strategy versus a defensive strategy. It will not work every time, but golfers who utilizes an offensive strategy usually putting the odds in their favor. The question then becomes, “When is the point of being too aggressive?”

The general rule of thumb in golf statistics is that the closer the ball is to the hole, the more likely the golfer will hit the next shot closer to the hole. The type of lie a player has, however, plays a large factor in this as well.

The chart below shows the 2013 PGA Tour averages in proximity to the club. It illustrates how getting the ball closer to the hole is generally better, but it clearly helps to get the ball in the short grass as well:

Screen Shot 2014-07-14 at 4.09.27 AM

Something that is often overlooked by golfers is that this is just measuring the Proximity to the Cup. While important, it does not assume that each shot lands on the green. In fact, the ShotLink data will measure any shot that is within 30 yards of the edge of the green. And we know that the farther the distance the ball is away from the cup, the more likely the ball will not be on the green.

I have found the threshold on modern Tour courses is about 50 feet. Once the shot gets to roughly 50 feet from the hole, golfers are more likely to be off the green than be on the green. Obviously, today’s greens can hold plenty of shots that are more than 50 feet away from the hole. But, the majority of the time Tour players are trying to hit their approach shot as close to the hole as they can instead of aiming for the middle of the green. If they start missing by more than 50 feet that is more or less with the intent of trying to get that ball as close as they can to the cup.

So, when we look at that chart of Proximity to the Cup from different distances, we see that 50-foot threshold starts with shots from the rough from 175-to-200 yards. It gets to 63.5 feet on rough shots from 200-to-225 yards. It’s not until 225-to-250 yards that the average shot from the fairway has a proximity to the cup greater than 50-feet. Last year, however PGA Tour players only averaged 0.77 shot attempts from 225-to-250 yards per round, regardless if they were from the fairway or the rough. Not many shots come from 225-to-250 yards on Tour, so therefore it is largely a non-factor in most PGA Tour events.

One of the goals I strongly urge my Tour clients to look to achieve is to get 85 percent or more of their Red Zone shots (shots from 175-225 yards) to come from the fairway/tee box. This way, the golfer can perform much better from the Red Zone without actually having to improve their skill and/or change their technique.

sangmoon

For example, last year Sang-Moon Bae finished 126th on Tour from the Red Zone. His adjusted proximity to the cup from 175-to-225 yards was 43.5 feet. However, he only hit 76.8 percent of those shots from the fairway/tee box.

If his performance from the fairway and the rough from those distances did not change and all he did differently was have 85 percent of those shots coming from the fairway/tee box, his adjusted proximity to the cup would have dropped to 41.8 feet. That would have moved him from 126th from the Red Zone to 87th and would be roughly worth 0.2 to 0.25 strokes per round. While that may not seem like much, that is worth roughly 25 spots on the Money List and likely prevented him from qualifying for the Tour Championship at East Lake.

My Own Folly

When I first started doing statistical research I came across the undeniable fact that the “Go For It Percentage” on Par-5’s has a very strong statistical correlation to Par-5 Scoring Average. Furthermore, I saw that the PGA Tour determined a “Go For It” to be anytime golfers got the ball within 30 yards of the edge of the green. Therefore, golfers with a 300-yard shot who can only hit their 3-wood 250 yards could theoretically achieve a “Go For It” as long as they got the ball within 30 yards of the edge of the green.

This initially led me to believe that golfers should generally try to hit it as long as they can on the par-5’s. I was also led to believe this because my logic was that if they didn’t hit a good tee shot, they still had four more shots to save par.

What I discovered was that this theory was severely flawed. And that is because it wrongly places too much value on the tee shot and not enough value on the second shot. Another thing I didn’t consider is that even Tour players do not like hitting 3-woods out of the rough and for good reason; they are not very good at it.

For instance, if a par-5 requires golfers to hit their first two shots 540 yards in order to “Go For It” and they hit their drive 280 yards off the tee, that will leave them with 260 yards to the “Go For It” range. Given that they only hit their driver 280 yards, hitting their 3-wood off the deck 260 yards is going to be a tall order. And they will need as easy of a shot as possible to hit the 3-wood 260 yards. However, if they only hit it 250 yards, they should still be in pretty good position.

What we often see from Tour players is that if they are in the rough on the par-5’s, they will usually lay up and only hit their lay-up shot about 180-to-210 yards. So, trying to swing for the fences on par-5’s may give golfers 20 more yards if they make good contact. But the odds of finding the rough are greater and that means the possible 20 more yards off the tee is negated by them preferring to lay-up because they are in the rough.

Here is a table of one of my own Tour clients. In 2012, we discussed going for par-5’s in two shots and not being afraid to try and bomb the ball off the tee. He was not going for par-5’s in two shots as much as he should, but he actually felt that was ultra-aggressive in going for them whenever it was feasible. I soon discovered the issue with trying to bomb it off the tee so we then focused on him taking his stock swing with the driver and focusing on making good contact and finding the fairway in 2013.

Screen Shot 2014-07-14 at 4.09.46 AM

The client is actually able to go for more Par-5’s in two shots despite not trying to bomb the ball off the tee. In fact, he has lost a sizeable amount of distance off the tee this year and is going for more Par-5’s in two shots than ever. His distance loss is not due to laying-up off the tee as he rarely lays-up off the tee. Yet, he FEELS that he is no more aggressive than he was in 2012. The difference is that he now finds the fairway and gives himself more feasible opportunities to go for the green in two shots.

This is why I’m not a fan of the “bomb-n-gouge” mentality. Finding the fairway provides a sizeable advantage to the golfer. But I’m also not a fan of defensive golf either, because losing distance can have an adverse effect on your expected scores. The best of both worlds is to be unafraid of hitting your driver off the tee, even if it is into a narrow fairway. However, take your stock swing and focus on making good contact and finding the fairway; even if the hole is long and the fairway is wide.

A rule I stress to all golfers

If you are very likely to have a 5-iron or longer on your next shot, whether it is on a par-4 or a par-5, focus on taking your stock swing, making good contact and finding the fairway. Do not try to hit it as hard as you possibly can in hopes of gaining extra yards off the tee. The ability to hit the following shot long enough and accurately enough has a greater influence on your score on the hole.

This is not meant to be a giant revelation, but golfers can swing too hard for their own good. There appears to be a growing sentiment that a golfer has to swing out of their shoes in order to have an “athletic looking swing,” but I grew up playing golf where the common instruction was to have effortless power, not powerful effort.

The idea should be to improve your stock swing so you can hit it long and straight time after time. The data indicates that trying to hit it as hard as you can with little or no regard to accuracy is just not a better path to shooting lower scores. And like Brian Harman, one can make up for a lack of club head speed by adopting a more aggressive strategy rather than trying to make a more aggressive golf swing.

Your Reaction?
  • 10
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Richie Hunt is a statistician whose clients include PGA Tour players, their caddies and instructors in order to more accurately assess their games. He is also the author of the recently published e-book, 2018 Pro Golf Synopsis; the Moneyball Approach to the Game of Golf. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @Richie3Jack. GolfWRX Writer of the Month: March 2014 Purchase 2017 Pro Golf Synopsis E-book for $10

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Kevin

    Jul 15, 2014 at 2:29 pm

    Bottom line, the better your lie is on your second shot on par 5’s, the more aggressively you can play them.

  2. bradford

    Jul 15, 2014 at 7:56 am

    This just doesn’t apply to beginner or even mid-level (90-105ish) players. Does it factor in the woods on the right they hit with that 3W 40% of the time from the fairway? The bunker that they can’t get out of? The whiff from trying to kill it? I’ll agree with these numbers only on the tour, or low hcp players…for others it’s just simply false.

  3. Sky

    Jul 14, 2014 at 10:36 pm

    How was Phil one of the most likely to hit driver off the tee if he didn’t carry a driver for most of 2013? Did they count the phrankenwood as a driver?

  4. Brian

    Jul 14, 2014 at 9:50 pm

    I think the huge thing to consider when going after it as an amateur is the opportunity cost of going for it. If you go by the logic as I have this season (to try and go for it if you can get within 30 yards”) you have to consider what you are giving up. One do the big things is a free 170ish yards. If I lay up on every par 5 I would only have about a wedge in to maybe a 9 iron, but it would be pretty automatic.

    If I decide to go for it, the logic of getting within 30 yards weighs extremely heavy on the presumption that you actually hit a good shot or more importantly actually make solid contact (as I have found out the hard way). If you duff it, you are now 200+ yards out hitting 3 aka “jail”. If you hit a shot that slices way right or hooks left, you have the possibly of ending up behind a tree or blocked out.

    I think weighing the cost of a duffed wood vs a conservative 150 or 170 yards has to be factored in when deciding to go for it

    • Richie Hunt

      Jul 14, 2014 at 11:54 pm

      A major issue with laying up off the tee is that just because you lay-up, there is no guarantee that you will find the fairway. Conversely, just because you hit driver that does not guarantee you will find the rough. And where the real killer is statistically is when players lay-up and miss the fairway. That puts the golfer well behind the 8-ball.

      I typically run into the same argument when it comes to getting a short approach closer to the hole. The 13th hole at Bay Hill is that way. The numbers say to get the ball within 110 yards, regardless if the ball finds the fairway or the rough.

      Instead, they will come back and say ‘well, all I have to do is lay-up and I will have a 9-iron or PW into the hole.’ But, just because they have a 9-iron or PW doesn’t mean that they will find the green. It’s an easy shot, but getting it inside 110 yards is far easier. And the ods of sticking the <110 yard shot close are much better and his odds of not missing the green is also far better.

      It's really common sense…getting the ball closer to the hole generally means that you're expected score will be better. For Tour players, we start to see the difference at around 20 yards (i.e. 130 yard shot will have a noticeably better expected score than a 150 yard shot). But for amateurs we start to see a difference around 10-12 yards (a 140 yard shot vs. a 150 yard shot).

  5. mhendon

    Jul 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm

    I think its also fair to point out 9 of the top ten guys on the aggressive list would be considered short hitters on the PGA tour.

    • Rich

      Jul 15, 2014 at 9:34 am

      You beat me to this point. 9 of those 10 guys have to hit driver because they are short. Phil is the only truely aggressive player on that list. Don’t know where that leaves the article………..

      • MHendon

        Jul 15, 2014 at 11:39 am

        It’s like an attorney trying to leave out all the facts to make his case stick.

    • OhioGolfDude

      Jul 15, 2014 at 1:02 pm

      I think this is a very fair point. Every player on this list is ranked 70th or below in terms of 2014 driving distance – Mickelson being the only one to crack the Top 100. That being said, because these players are required to hit driver on virtually every hole, I’d like to compare their “go for it” strategy with the fairways hit and GIR stats.

  6. Pingback: How to play long par-4?s and par-5?s effectively | Spacetimeandi.com

  7. webbstar

    Jul 14, 2014 at 5:47 pm

    thank you for a bit of sanity, it seems that all we hear about is distance is more important than accurate no matter what the situation. The fact is the only time i’m as accurate from the the rough as the fairway is from 125 yards and in but even then i’d rather be in the fairway.

  8. nikkyd

    Jul 14, 2014 at 4:38 pm

    Does anyone know if there is an average rough height across the board? Shots out of the rough on the pga tour (4″deep grass) sounds demanding, but most municipalities have shorter rough (from what i have seen anyhow) bomb and gouge is a way of life for some of us regardless of rough or not. Its the woods one must be weary of. Sometimes id rather be in the rough because my homecourse fairways and aprons are like concrete!

    • Jeff Trigger

      Jul 14, 2014 at 7:01 pm

      Yours too? My course is either drive to the hardpan or hit the 3 inch Bermuda rough.

  9. Dan P

    Jul 14, 2014 at 2:06 pm

    Another great article from Richie. Keep them coming!

  10. Jedidiah

    Jul 14, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Mmm you’ve own me over richie

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s LIV Golf Singapore betting preview: Course specialist ready to thrive once again

Published

on

After another strong showing in Australia, LIV Golf will head to Sentosa Golf Club in Singapore looking to build off of what was undoubtedly their best event to date.

Sentosa Golf Club sits on the southern tip of Singapore and is one of the most beautiful courses in the world. The course is more than just incredible scenically; it was also rated 55th in Golf Digest’s top-100 courses in 2022-2023 and has been consistently regarded as one of the best courses in Asia. Prior to being part of the LIV rotation, the course hosted the Singapore Open every year since 2005.

Sentosa Golf Club is a par 71 measuring 7,406 yards. The course will require precise ball striking and some length off the tee. It’s possible to go low due to the pristine conditions, but there are also plenty of hazards and difficult spots on the course that can bring double bogey into play in a hurry. The Bermudagrass greens are perfectly manicured, and the course has spent millions on the sub-air system to keep the greens rolling fast. I spoke to Asian Tour player, Travis Smyth, who described the greens as “the best [he’s] ever played.”

Davis Love III, who competed in a Singapore Open in 2019, also gushed over the condition of the golf course.

“I love the greens. They are fabulous,” the 21-time PGA Tour winner said.

Love III also spoke about other aspects of the golf course.

“The greens are great; the fairways are perfect. It is a wonderful course, and it’s tricky off the tee.”

“It’s a long golf course, and you get some long iron shots. It takes somebody hitting it great to hit every green even though they are big.”

As Love III said, the course can be difficult off the tee due to the length of the course and the trouble looming around every corner. It will take a terrific ball striking week to win at Sentosa Golf Club.

In his pre-tournament press conference last season, Phil Mickelson echoed many of the same sentiments.

“To play Sentosa effectively, you’re going to have a lot of shots from 160 to 210, a lot of full 6-, 7-, 8-iron shots, and you need to hit those really well and you need to drive the ball well.”

Golfers who excel from tee to green and can dial in their longer irons will have a massive advantage this week.

Stat Leaders at LIV Golf Adelaide:

Fairways Hit

1.) Louis Oosthuizen

2.) Anirban Lahiri

3.) Jon Rahm

4.) Brendan Steele

5.) Cameron Tringale

Greens in Regulation

1.) Brooks Koepka

2.) Brendan Steele

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Cameron Tringale

5.) Anirban Lahiri

Birdies Made

1.) Brendan Steele

2.) Dean Burmester

3.) Thomas Pieters

4.) Patrick Reed

5.) Carlos Ortiz

LIV Golf Individual Standings:

1.) Joaquin Niemann

2.) Jon Rahm

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Louis Oosthuizen

5.) Abraham Ancer

LIV Golf Team Standings:

1.) Crushers

2.) Legion XIII

3.) Torque

4.) Stinger GC

5.) Ripper GC

LIV Golf Singapore Picks

Sergio Garcia +3000 (DraftKings)

Sergio Garcia is no stranger to Sentosa Golf Club. The Spaniard won the Singapore Open in 2018 by five strokes and lost in a playoff at LIV Singapore last year to scorching hot Talor Gooch. Looking at the course setup, it’s no surprise that a player like Sergio has played incredible golf here. He’s long off the tee and is one of the better long iron players in the world when he’s in form. Garcia is also statistically a much better putter on Bermudagrass than he is on other putting surfaces. He’s putt extremely well on Sentosa’s incredibly pure green complexes.

This season, Garcia has two runner-up finishes, both of them being playoff losses. Both El Camaleon and Doral are courses he’s had success at in his career. The Spaniard is a player who plays well at his tracks, and Sentosa is one of them. I believe Sergio will get himself in the mix this week. Hopefully the third time is a charm in Singapore.

Paul Casey +3300 (FanDuel)

Paul Casey is in the midst of one of his best seasons in the five years or so. The results recently have been up and down, but he’s shown that when he’s on a golf course that suits his game, he’s amongst the contenders.

This season, Casey has finishes of T5 (LIV Las Vegas), T2 (LIV Hong Kong), and a 6th at the Singapore Classic on the DP World Tour. At his best, the Englishman is one of the best long iron players in the world, which makes him a strong fit for Sentosa. Despite being in poor form last season, he was able to fire a Sunday 63, which shows he can low here at the course.

It’s been three years since Casey has won a tournament (Omega Dubai Desert Classic in 2021), but he’s been one of the top players on LIV this season and I think he can get it done at some point this season.

Mito Pereira +5000 (Bet365)

Since Mito Pereira’s unfortunate demise at the 2022 PGA Championship, he’s been extremely inconsistent. However, over the past few months, the Chilean has played well on the International Series as well as his most recent LIV start. Mito finished 8th at LIV Adelaide, which was his best LIV finish this season.

Last year, Pereira finished 5th at LIV Singapore, shooting fantastic rounds of 67-66-66. It makes sense why Mito would like Sentosa, as preeminent ball strikers tend to rise to the challenge of the golf course. He’s a great long iron player who is long and straight off the tee.

Mito has some experience playing in Asia and is one of the most talented players on LIV who’s yet to get in the winner’s circle. I have questions about whether or not he can come through once in contention, but if he gets there, I’m happy to roll the dice.

Andy Ogletree +15000 (DraftKings)

Andy Ogletree is a player I expected to have a strong 2024 but struggled early in his first full season on LIV. After failing to crack the top-25 in any LIV event this year, the former U.S. Amateur champion finally figured things out, finished in a tie for 3rd at LIV Adelaide.

Ogletree should be incredible comfortable playing in Singapore. He won the International Series Qatar last year and finished T3 at the International Series Singapore. The 26-year-old was arguably the best player on the Asian Tour in 2023 and has been fantastic in the continent over the past 18 months.

If Ogletree has indeed found form, he looks to be an amazing value at triple-digit odds.

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Ryan: Lessons from the worst golf instructor in America

Published

on

In Tampa, there is a golf course that boasts carts that do not work, a water range, and a group of players none of which have any chance to break 80. The course is overseen by a staff of crusty men who have succeeded at nothing in life but ending up at the worst-run course in America. However, this place is no failure. With several other local courses going out of business — and boasting outstanding greens — the place is booked full.

While I came for the great greens, I stayed to watch our resident instructor; a poor-tempered, method teacher who caters to the hopeless. At first, it was simply hilarious. However, after months of listening and watching, something clicked. I realized I had a front-row seat to the worst golf instructor in America.

Here are some of my key takeaways.

Method Teacher

It is widely accepted that there are three types of golf instructors: system teachers, non-system teachers, and method teachers. Method teachers prescribe the same antidote for each student based on a preamble which teachers can learn in a couple day certification.

Method teaching allows anyone to be certified. This process caters to the lowest caliber instructor, creating the illusion of competency. This empowers these underqualified instructors with the moniker of “certified” to prey on the innocent and uninformed.

The Cult of Stack and Jilt

The Stack and Tilt website proudly boasts, “A golfer swings his hands inward in the backswing as opposed to straight back to 1) create power, similar to a field goal kicker moving his leg in an arc and 2) to promote a swing that is in-to-out, which produces a draw (and eliminates a slice).”

Now, let me tell you something, there is this law of the universe which says “energy can either be created or destroyed,” so either these guys are defying physics or they have no idea what they are taking about. Further, the idea that the first move of the backswing determines impact is conjecture with a splash of utter fantasy.

These are the pontifications of a method — a set of prescriptions applied to everyone with the hope of some success through the placebo effect. It is one thing for a naive student to believe, for a golf instructor to drink and then dispel this Kool-Aid is malpractice.

Fooled by Randomness

In flipping a coin, or even a March Madness bet, there is a 50-50 chance of success. In golf, especially for new players, results are asymmetric. Simply put: Anything can happen. The problem is that when bad instructors work with high handicappers, each and every shot gets its own diagnosis and prescription. Soon the student is overwhelmed.

Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design. In this case, the coach is not trying to make you better, they are trying to make you reliant on them for information. A quasi Stockholm syndrome of codependency.

Practice

One of the most important scientists of the 20th century was Ivan Pavlov. As you might recall, he found that animals, including humans, could be conditioned into biological responses. In golf, the idea of practice has made millions of hackers salivate that they are one lesson or practice session from “the secret.”

Sunk Cost

The idea for the worst golf instructor is to create control and dependency so that clients ignore the sunk cost of not getting better. Instead, they are held hostage by the idea that they are one lesson or tip away from unlocking their potential.

Cliches

Cliches have the effect of terminating thoughts. However, they are the weapon of choice for this instructor. Add some hyperbole and students actually get no information. As a result, these players couldn’t play golf. When they did, they had no real scheme. With no idea what they are doing, they would descend into a spiral of no idea what to do, bad results, lower confidence, and running back to the lesson tee from more cliches.

The fact is that poor instruction is about conditioning players to become reliant members of your cult. To take away autonomy. To use practice as a form of control. To sell more golf lessons not by making people better but through the guise that without the teacher, the student can never reach their full potential. All under the umbrella of being “certified” (in a 2-day course!) and a melee of cliches.

This of course is not just happening at my muni but is a systemic problem around the country and around the world, the consequences of which are giving people a great reason to stop playing golf. But hey, at least it’s selling a lot of golf balls…

Your Reaction?
  • 15
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL3
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK13

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending