Connect with us

News

GolfWRX Interview – ORKA Golf

Published

on

The modern golf industry is dominated by massive companies with multi-million, and in some cases multi-billion, dollar turnovers. This environment produces intense competition so it’s always interesting when a new company arrives on the scene. ORKA golf has only been around a short time but in that time it has managed to produce not just one complete line up but two: one for better players and one for game improvement.

We got to ask Stuart Johnson, MD and Senior Designer of ORKA golf a few questions.

Golfwrx: Could you tell us a little about your background in general and in the golf industry?

Stuart: I spent the last 6 years as Marketing Director and Head of Product Design and Development for a European golf brand. We experienced market leading growth in this time and it was a great experience, but I felt I wanted to create a brand under a different vision than mass market, one size fits all approach. Prior to that I have been part of several successful start-up businesses, some in other industries including one start-up for the Virgin group of companies.

Golfwrx: How long has ORKA been around and how did it come about?

Stuart: ORKA was started at the beginning of this year with first product being made available in July. ORKA has been born out of my passion for the game and product, I am afraid I am a product nut! I am not one of those product designers that is too blinkered as to be unable to acknowledge so many of the other outstanding products there are out there. I believe totally in custom fitting, and ORKA is a Custom fit brand, by pure definition this means that in order for people to play their best golf some people will have a great fit with ORKA, others may be better off with another brand, and this could be for any number of reasons, but that is the nature of individuality.

Golfwrx: Do you see yourself as an OEM or a component company?

Stuart: We are probably somewhere in between, almost a hybrid company in that respect. We supply in both forms, but essentially this is so that we can meet people’s individual needs and preference. Right now we are experiencing a number of customers who need to change their driver in order to conform to the regulations in Jan, some will buy a new club but many only need to replace the head as they like the feel of the shaft and it gives them great performance. They don’t need a new shaft so why buy one? Our market position therefore allows us to meet both sets of needs.

Golfwrx: What is your main target market?

Stuart: Players who understand the benefit of custom fitting. This is not defined by their handicap in fact there is an argument that higher handicap players may benefit more. Players who are not defined by the name on their clubs, but by the performance they get, but recognise that the best is not always the most expensive.

Golfwrx: What makes ORKA Golf equipment different?

Stuart: There is a lot of great equipment out there. It is an incredibly competitive market so outstanding product performance needs to be a given, but I believe that we can find several additional points of difference in the whole experience. We are certainly making top level custom fit more affordable, with an ambition to offer an unrivalled level of customer service. Relationship with our end user will be paramount to the success of the brand, so we have a number of methods to assist this via the website. Players can register to be testers, for this we will send them out prototype product for testing. Clearly there is a confidentiality thing in this, but it emphasises the importance we are placing on relationship with our customers. We are also handpicking the clubmakers we are working with, and are not looking to saturate the market. But probably one of our biggest points of difference is that we are also a brand with a social conscience, understanding our wider social responsibilities, with a vision to re-invest into the communities we are dealing with as a business.

Golfwrx: Your websites allow a wide range of customization and cover the full range of options – cast game improvement/players forgings, moveable weights and various shafts. How important is equipment fitting for golfers and why does your company put such emphasis on it in comparison to others?

Stuart: Fitting is imperative to playing the best golf you can, anyone who argues probably has never been custom fitted. We have designed the range to give the maximum flexibility for the clubmakers to be able to match the clubs to you and your swing. It is like buying a suit, you can get a great one off the shelf, but there is a completely different feel to a suit that is measured for you, clubfitting is exactly the same. We totally believe that custom fitting your clubs will result in better more consistent golf, but be aware my clubmakers are also not afraid to advise you to get a lesson rather than buying a new product! They are clubmakers not miracle workers after all! The webfit is there as a tool, it is not the complete picture but whilst we build up the network of clubmakers it is a great resource.

Golfwrx: Your website only allows users to select regular and stiff shafts. What is the reason behind this and is there a way to select other shafts?

Stuart: With respect to shaft flexes, yes anything is available and if its not there send me an email and we will come back to you. The reason we only have a limited number of shafts on there at the moment is that we want to encourage people to the clubmakers to be properly fitted, I do not want the internet fitting system to act as a substitute for seeing a clubmaker, it simply is not. It is there for those who cannot or do not want to go to a clubmaker, but my encouragement for everyone is to go and have the experience. We are adding more shaft options all the time, and within reason everything is available but more on a request basis at this stage so that I can truly discuss with people their requirements, and ensure that they are getting as close to what is right for them as possible.

Golfwrx: How do the target markets for the XR and Kii ranges differ?

Stuart: I see XR as much more of an internet range in that it competes at tough price points and offers great product for golfers on more of a budget, but at the same time still offering the option to have custom fit on it, either online or at the clubmakers, where as the Kii is much more suited to the clubmakers skills with its configurable weight system in the woods which allows them to set up numerous launch options suited to the individual. The Kii is superior in terms of its technology and its flexibility and thus more suited to their skills.

Golfwrx: When you would be releasing your equipment to the US and would you ship there from the UK/AUS?

Stuart: The short answer to product in the US is yes, the longer answer involves finding the right method of bringing that to market and whether that is a partnership or we distribute ourselves. In the meantime we are looking at the most effective way of servicing a US client base from the European hub in the UK.

Golfwrx: Where and how are your clubs made, specifically castings and forgings?

Stuart: OK, all clubs are made to specific order, you will not be able to ring up and place an order and have it shipped that day as it will be made bespoke to your fitting requirements, assembled by a qualified club-maker. With respect to the heads themselves, these are made in China, alongside some of the major brands. Historically production has moved around the world from the USA to Taiwan, to China and now to other areas such as Vietnam. This has been as manufacturers attempt to keep production costs low as raw material costs such as Titanium have gone through the roof.

Golfwrx: As a new company what is your view of Golf Magazines Top Equipment Lists? Do you feel as though it is a fair representation of the current generation of equipment or is there an unspoken prejudice against the smaller companies as very few seem to be represented?

Stuart: Tough question! I know many equipment editors, and have the highest respect for their impartiality. Obviously the larger companies represent greater advertising revenues than a brand such as ORKA, but my experience is that advertising with a magazine may enable you to be involved in more tests or features but in no way guarantees you the result. In the past I know I have benefited greatly from the objectivity of the equipment editors, and their willingness to recognise product on its individual merits, even upsetting some big advertisers. I do believe that the cream will rise to the top, and good product will get recognised, from a small manufacturers point of view Tom Wishon’s products are a great example of this. All in all I have no complaints on the system, it is what it is.

Golfwrx: How are you going to make your mark in an industry that is dominated by the big companies like Ping, Callaway, Titleist et al?

Stuart: I recognised long ago that if someone wants to buy a "brand" you can’t fight it. We will make our mark with people who are more passionate about the game than they are about the name on the clubs. We will do this through our network of Custom Fit Centres and by the quality of our product and service. I cannot emphasise enough how great an experience this is, and once you go to a clubmaker you are, in my opinion, very unlikely to ever buy a club off the shelf again. With respect to competing with the big companies, I believe we already do this in terms of design and performance, so then it is just about marketing spend. I think more people are becoming wise to the fact that when they buy a big name brand, a percentage of that purchase is going towards tour players.

Golfwrx: What is likely to be your product release cycle? Does Orka golf have any new models coming out in the near future?

Stuart: At this stage all products will have at least a two year lifecycle, and if I cannot design anything better or there are no new technologies or material improvements then they will last longer. We will not bring out product unless there is a clear improvement. That said designers never stop tinkering with products and there are always little things you would like to change after sign off. Currently we have 2 main ranges in the XR and Kii ranges. There are new products for next year including a range which will only be available through our clubmakers, rather than also available on line such as the XR and Kii, but these are to complete the range rather than removing any of the existing product line up.

Golfwrx: Is Tour presence essential for the success of a golf company?

Stuart: I guess that depends on how you want to grade success. Personally success for ORKA will be judged by seeing people satisfied with the choice so that they come back when they need something new, so for me success is judged more on brand loyalty. We are not trying to be the largest brand in the industry, we simply want to provide excellent kit that is fairly priced and performs beyond the expectation of the end user. My honest belief is that if we can do that then "success" of the brand will follow. I think if we were to focus on "Success" we would probably fail. Tour presence does not guarantee results, it can be like a needle in a haystack. So for me product performance is always more important than tour players. Moreover I believe the golfing public are pretty switched on to tour counts and its relevance.

Golfwrx: Where do you see the golf industry going in the next 5 years with regards to new developments?

Stuart: The search for a new material to replace Titanium will continue, brought about by the increase in air travel pushing the raw material costs through the roof, but we have been looking for some time and as yet there is nothing quite like it. "Traditional" shapes for drivers and woods may well come back again, the benefits of a "Square" driver are excellent if you don’t hit the ball straight but if you do why would you want one? and if you don’t maybe a few lessons is a good option too. The biggest changes may well be with irons and a focus on higher MOI. The biggest impact will come from any rule changes that are made as they try to stop the driver / wedge rounds, as they can’t keep making courses longer, but that will be one for the R&A and the USGA.

Golfwrx: Where do you see ORKA Golf in 5 years?

Stuart: Making great, market leading, technologically advanced golf equipment supplied through our network of outstanding clubmakers – in short our vision for the business will be unchanged, we will just aim to be even better at it in 5 years time!!

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Mossy

    Nov 16, 2007 at 9:08 am

    Great read cheers Golfwrx! Good luck ORKA!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

5 Things we Learned: Friday at the U.S. Women’s Open

Published

on

Dumbo flies again! There is certainly a half-generation of golf fans without the slightest idea of how well In-gee Chun, aka Dumbo, can golf her ball. The Korean was the It Girl from 2015 to 2018. She won three LPGA events, with two being major championships. She returned to Korea to cure her homesickness, but made the occasional foray back to the Americas. In 2022, she captured a fourth LPGA title and, guess what? It was a third, unique major title.

The halfway cut line was set at four over par. Those at plus-five and beyond had their stay in Tinseltown cut short, at least when it comes to working rounds of golf. Among the 87 who fell on the high side of the cut line, Lydia Ko stood out as the biggest name. Others given a two-day furlough were Lilia Vu, Megha Ganne, Chizzy Iwai, and Leona Maguire. Making the cut on the number are Lottie Woad, Celine Boutier, Mao Saigo, and amateur Asterisk Talley. If you follow world football, imagine the feeling of relegation on a weekly basis. That’s the 36-hole cut in professional golf.

We learned five things on Friday at Riviera Country Club, and we’d love to share them with you. Find a comfy place and brighten the screen on your device. It’s time for Five Things We Learned on day two at the US Women’s Open.

Part One: the biggest movers

A golfer’s feel appears or slips away overnight. Although Saturday is known collectively as Moving Day, it doesn’t come with as sudden and final a feeling as Friday. Move the wrong way on Friday and you’re down the road. Improve in the proper direction and you save your week. Both Mao Saigo and Rio Takeda opened with plus-five rounds of 76, then signed for 70 on day two, and made the cut on the number.

Moving the other way were Stephanie Kyriacou (70-78) and Ina Yoon (68-79). Their respective eight- and eleven-shot declines propelled them from title contention to tournament departure. Minjee Lee and Minji Kang (seven shots higher) along with Rose Zhang (five shots) made the cut, but saw their opportunity for victory take a serious body shot.

Part Two: the leaders

Allison Lee and Ruoning Yin took the conservative path to the 36-hole medal. Lee posted four birdies and a bogey for a total of 68 on day two. Yin had two birdies and sixteen pars for her second consecutive card of 69. Their 138 places them one shot clear of the aforementioned Dumbo Chun, who followed an opening 71 with 68. First-round leader Jennifer Kupcho added seven shots to her total, from an opening-day 66 to a follow-up 73, yet remained within the inner circle of leaders at -3, tied with Chun and four others. Four more golfers sit at minus-two, two shots behind the top duo. An even dozen of golfers sits within two shots of the lead.

The day’s biggest move of gravitas came from Nelly Korda. After a disappointing 73 on Thursday, the world number one improved six shots, thanks to a five-birdie round of 67. Korda slid inside the top ten with her recovery, and certainly reclaimed her place as most frightening chaser at Riviera. No one is likely to shoot in the low 60s at Riviera, but Korda just might post a mid-sixties score on Saturday, to seize the lead on Sunday morning.

Part Three: Ams verse Champs

Five current amateur golfers were among the 68 golfers to reach the weekend. Kiara Romero posted the best non-pro score on Friday, a one-under 70, to move from plus-two to plus-one figures. She is joined there by Aphrodite Deng, who reversed those numbers for her two rounds. Maria Jose Marin (143), Farah O’Keefe (145), and Asteriks Talley (146) joined the #WeDidIt brigade to earn a spot for the final two rounds.

Six former US Open champions, led by In-gee Chun(2015), also punched a ticket for round three. Allison Corpuz (2023), Maja Stark (2025), Ariya Jutanugarn (2018), A Lim Kim (2020), and Minjee Lee (2022) preserved their dream of a second US Open trophy for the mantle. Nineteen amateurs failed to earn a post for the final 36-holes, while five former champions joined them on the sidelines. Yuka Saso, twice a winner in this event in the past half-decade, missed the cut by five shots. 24 amateurs against eleven former titleists suggests that it is easier for the young to qualify, but harder for them to find success.

Part Four: the golf course

Scoring went up by .6 shots per player, from round one to round two. Statistically speaking, it became harder to make the cut as the day wore on. Birdies dropped by 50, while pars remained constant. Both bogeys and doubles increased markedly. The first and the sixth holes played under par on the front nine, while the second and ninth were nearly tied for most difficult traces on the road to the turn.

Coming home, holes ten, twelve, fifteen, and eighteen played as an impregnable quadrilateral. Odds are, you gave a shot back on each of them. Despite number seventeen’s accessibility for birdie, no one got out of the back nine alive. If conditions continue toward the extreme, Riviera will extract a pound of flesh from the contenders over the weekend.

Part Five: what to expect

From my vantage point, the tee times to watch are the 4:55 EST and the 5:05 slots. Nelly Korda pegs her ball in the sixth-last pairing with Sora Kamiya. The little-known Kamiya will get an up close and personal look at the crowds that follow the best in the world. Korda will need to ignore Kamiya’s expected struggles and golf her own ball. Ten minutes later, Lauren Coughlin begins play with Casandra Alexander at her side. It’s a similar situation, with the experienced Coughlin alongside an unseasoned partner.

Both Sei Yong Kim and Gaby Lopez have turned in strong performances, and their 5:15 pairing might produce some explosive numbers. From back in the pack, the tasty duo of Brooke Henderson and Jeeno Thitikul at 4:20, might see double digits in birdies. The unexpected at unknown Riviera is likely, so your guess is as good as mine.

 

Continue Reading

News

5 Things we Learned: Thursday at the U.S.. Women’s Open

Published

on

Gone are the days when the U.S. Women’s Open was held at Scenic Hills or Churchill Valley. Fine courses that they are (or were, as Churchill Valley went bankrupt a decade ago) there is something to be said for the venue. Not all Women’s Open playings need to take place on Men’s Open venues, but some should. This week in Los Angeles, the Women’s Open visits Riviera Country Club for the first time. Down the road, we will visit Inverness, Oakmont, Interlachen, Oak Hill, Chicago Golf, and Merion. That is quite the murderer’s row (1927 Yankees reference) of golf clubs.

What can we expect from the 2026 tournament? Greatness and uncertainty. Unlike the PGA Tour, which visits Riviera each February, the LPGA does not, so the women will not have nearly the body of work over the George C. Thomas layout. Maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe they’ll play #10 smarter than the men do. Maybe they’ll figure some things out that their male counterparts can not. For today, we’ll try to find five things to learn, and share them with you.

First, this ain’t your momma’s U.S. Open course

How do we know? Well, so far, only one previous champion currently sits inside the top thirty. That would be Minjee Lee, the 2022 winner at Southern (NC) Pines. Lee made par on her first nine holes, the inward side at Riviera. She dropped birdie putts on the first and ninth holes (ten and eighteen for her day) and tallied another seven pars, for 69. She sits three shots off Jennifer Kupcho’s opening 66. Don’t worry about Kupcho; we’ll get to her. After Lee, defending champion Maja Stark ranks T30 at even par, joined by three other, former winners.

What Minjee did, is the sort of thing that wins U.S. Open titles. She guided her ship safely past swells, and made a move when the waters calmed. The fewer the bogeys, the more likely Minjee figures in the outcome on Sunday evening in Pacific Palisades. Off the tee, Lee was unmatched. She hit 14 of 14 fairways. Her iron play was a bit loose in comparison. She putted for birdie on 12 of 18 holes, which meant that her recovery short game was on point. Lee was ten yards longer on measured driving holes than the field average, and was below the field average (a good thing) in putting.

Second, the amateurs beat a loud drum

Three of the world’s top amateur golfer posted 70, placing them four off the lead, in a tie for 14th place. Canada’s Aphrodite Deng, Spain’s Paula Francisco Llaño, and Colombia’s Maria José Marin, showed the professional world that their game is strong. Both Deng and Francisco Llaño collected five birdies on the day. Should they match that output on day two, and minimize the foozles, they’ll be the topic of conversation on Saturday morning. Marin, the 2026 Augusta National Women’s Amateur champion and an NCAA team semifinalist last week, played a game similar to Minjee Lee: few mistakes and few taken risks.

The last amateur to post the low medal score for 72 holes was Jenny Chuasiriporn in 1998. She lost a playoff to Se Ri Pak, who matched her plus-six effort at Blackwolf Run. The last amateur to win the U.S. Women’s Open was Catherine Lacoste in 1967. The amateurs are stronger than they’ve ever been, but the professionals have not allowed them to close the gap. A victory by one of the college set would be a cannon shot heard round the world. Could it happen? Absolutely. Is it likely? Not at all.

Third, let’s talk Kupcho

Jennifer Kupcho won the inaugural Augusta National Women’s Amateur. She won three times on tour in 2022, including the Chevron, a major title. She won a fourth event in 2025, but has not established the winning credentials projected on her after 2022’s marvelous coming-out.

Kupcho hails from Colorado, and spent four years in the Carolina Piedmont, at Wake Forest Universtiy. Neither of those locales cries out I’ll be at home at Riviera, but here we are, after a seven-birdie performance. Kupcho posted birdie on each of her first three holes, and added four more (against two bogeys) to assume a one-shot advantage over Korea’s Sei Young Kim.

Kupcho drove the ball decently, approached moderately well, but putted lights out on Thursday. Her 26 putts were tied for best in show on day one. There might just be something about the putting surfaces at Riviera that aligns with Kupcho’s vibe. If that is the case, just get the ball on the green, anywhere, and let the flatstick do the lifting.

Fourth, how young is Sei Young?

Sei (pronounced “So”) Young Kim won a dozen times from 2015 to 2020. She took time off from winning until 2025, shen she captured a thirteenth LPGA title. Like Kupcho, Kim has hardware from one major event, the 2020 Women’s PGA Championship. How to explain the five years away from victory? No idea. When Sei Young was in contention during the prime of her career, the outcome was a foregone conclusion.

What to expect over the next three days at Riviera? Anyone’s guess. It might be the 2015-2020 Sei Young, or it could be the 2021-2025 version. Kim began her day with birdies at 10 and 11, then settled into a stretch of pars before her solitary bogey at the 4th (her 13th) hole. Kim regained her composure and reeled in three birdies to close the front nine. Her four-under performance trails Kupcho alone, and there is a real chance that Sei Young will produce a second score in the 60s and take a bit of control of the tournament.

Fifth, we’re giddy for Gaby

Although I cannot place my finger on why, it seems that each year, Gaby Lopez pops up on the U.S. Open leaderboard. She hasn’t figure out how to remain in contention, but here we are, in 2026, and Lopez is once again in the mix. The three-time champion on the LPGA circuit had a stunning first nine holes, turning in minus-five. She reached six deep at her tenth hole, but then gave three shots back coming home. Which Gaby will show up on Friday, and for how long? If back-nine Gaby can somehow channel front-nine Gaby, all outcomes are within reach. If the loose play continues, Lopez’ wiki page will add one more T41 to her majors column.

Continue Reading

Tour Photo Galleries

Photos from the 2026 U.S. Women’s Open

Published

on

GolfWRX Tour Photographer made the trip from the Memorial Tournament across the country to the U.S. Women’s Open at Riviera. Check out links to all the photos below!

General Albums

WITB Albums

Pullout Albums

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending