Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Are you a swing junkie?

Published

on

Recreational golfers are unlike any other recreational sportsman. I know of no other sport where the recreational participants are as wrapped up in the technique as golfers. Visit any driving range and you are certain to see the majority of the golfers fiddling with their swing.

My guess is that technique preoccupies the minds of golfers more so than technique does in all other recreational sports combined. Visit a basketball court and watch a player miss a shot. Does that player stop and look at his feet or check the angle of his shoulders? Go to a baseball batting cage… Do you see anyone look behind themselves to check the position of the bat? Go fishing and ask your buddy if he has ever checked his wrist angle in order to improve his casting. Be careful with that one, you may get thrown out of the boat!

Modern golf has produced a recreational participant that is too often more involved in the golf swing than they are in watching the golf shot. Watch how seldom golfers hit their shot and watch it fly, land and come to a stop. More times than not, golfers will be seen checking a position or making a practice swing while their golf shot is still in the air. I refer to this type of golfer as a “swing junkie.”

The origins of the swing junkie can be traced back to a wonderful and historic book, Ben Hogan’s “Five Lessons: The Modern Fundamentals of Golf.” This book and the Hogan myth that grew out of this book have done more to create a modern recreational golfer that thinks more about how to swing the golf club than he does about how to play the game. The swing junkie defends his approach to golf by believing that Hogan himself was a swing junkie.

While Hogan continues to be the hero and go-to swing for most swing junkies, others too have caught the attention of the swing junkie. The 1970s brought into popularity Homer Kelley’s book “The Golfing Machine.” The first authorized instructor of the Golfing Machine was Ben Doyle, and his passion for teaching the system was a perfect match for the swing junkies. Golfing Machine swing junkies were seldom seen without their stack of graphs to check sequence photos. For you youngsters, the graph check sequence photos camera took eight still photographs and could be timed for the length of a golf swing. The Polaroid film used with the graph check allowed instant review of the swing. The result was that swing junkies could now spend more time analyzing their swing than watching the ball fly through the air.

Graph Check Sequence Photos

In the 1980s, Jimmy Ballard caught the imagination of the swing junkies. Commonly known as the “Pioneer of Connection,” Ballard had success with golfers as different as Gary Player and Sandy Lyle. Connection resonated well with the swing junkies. After all, on page 82 of Hogan’s “Five Lessons,” Hogan states that “the elbows remain tightly glued to the sides.” Unfortunately for Ballard, swing junkies have a short attention span and the age of connection was short lived.

David Leadbetter’s student Nick Faldo was the perfect golfer for the swing junkie to copy. Faldo seemed to have an endless number of swing drills. In Faldo, the swing junkies found their hero, a golfer who made more practice swings than he hit balls. While the swing junkie was busy trying to keep up with all of Faldo’s drills, the golf swing theory landscape was changing.

The success and popularity of Leadbetter brought into fashion the swing guru, and with that the swing junkie would now and for ever more enjoy technique and method overload. Leadbetter’s “Distance Through Resistance” would soon share the stage with Hank Haney’s concept of swinging the club on plane.

Jim McLean’s X-Factor had swing junkies twisting their torsos to the max. The No. 1 golf instructor was Butch Harmon Jr., but he was never a favorite of the swing junkie. Too much of his instruction was on how to hit golf shots and the swing junkies focus was always to make a better swing.

Today, entirely new ways of dissecting the golf swing are being developed to spark the imagination of the swing junkies. FlightScope and Trackman systems work with 3D Doppler radar tracking technology. Up to 26 individual data points are collected from every golf swing and shot. Data speak like “if you zero the swing plane with that degree of downward angle you will hit a draw” is now replacing the age old image of Ben Hogan’s downswing plane being a little under the backswing plane.

Will 3D radar data be the next step in the long evolution of swing junkie? Like something out of the movie The Matrix, will swing junkies become so focused on the data stream that they don’t even know what their swing looks like? Or will there be a split among the swing junkies? What will happen to the old guard that depends and protects the “good old way, the tried and true” use of video and pictures in their quest to find the perfect swing. What about the new breed of “techno swing junkie” who is always searching for new data points in order to build their perfect swing?

Whatever the future, swing junkies have their own special passion for the game and their own philosophy as to how to get the most enjoyment out of the game. Truth be known, every golfer who enjoys the game has some degree of swing junkie inside. Just keep in mind that the goal of this game is to get the ball in the hole as fast as possible.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

As a professional golfer, Ron Stelten has experienced tournaments on every major golf tour in the world, and has won both in the U.S. and Europe. An entertainer, he hosts golf outings and clinics where he shares stories of his life on tour, plays great golf and provides all the instruction wanted. Ron's teaching skills focus on making golfers the best players they can be. Still competitive at 58, Ron can occasionally be seen playing tournament golf at the highest levels. He splits his time between the Ron Stelten Golf School at Taos Country Club (New Mexico) from June to October and The Palms Golf Club in La Quinta, Calif., November to May. Contact Ron at www.ronstelten.com

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Jim Benjamin

    May 21, 2014 at 12:02 pm

    A friend of mine learned the Golfing Machine swing from Ben Doyle in the 70’s and is an excellent player. He tried teaching me and I improved to a point. I learned a lot about the Golfing Machine theory and can recognize the swing aspects present or missing in any player. The biggest problem I had was I couldn’t do it well enough. I’m a big thick guy and at 66 can’t turn fast enough to get any resulting swing speed. I was trying some new clubs at a Van’s Golf Shop and the pro asked me to release the club more. I knew what he meant and started more of an arm swing, releasing the club through impact instead of holding on trying to release the club with my body. I started hitting the club much longer. Since then I have referenced books by Jim Flick and have been working on a swing that allows me to swing the arms and let the body react. It works much better for me going from a 15 to a 9 hdcp. Pro swings are not for everybody.

  2. jmichael204

    May 21, 2014 at 10:41 am

    I think in golf we get soo caught up in teaching people the proper swing instead of focusing on pitching, chipping and putting where they will make up most of there strokes.. No matter how good your swing is your going to miss the green at some point or need to get up and down from 50 yards etc.. I used to be someone who was always focused on my Driver and full swings.. This year I have spent half the time on the range and more time around the chipping and putting green and have seen dramatic improvement in my game where if I am hitting the ball like garbage I can still “save my round” with the short game.

  3. 1 Junk

    May 20, 2014 at 9:55 pm

    Gimme gimme gimme more more more! Swing it swing it swing it yeah yeah yeah that’s it that’s it that’s it

  4. tom stickney

    May 20, 2014 at 12:18 pm

    As a teacher whom has taught on both sides of the coin- with and without technology…I can tell you that when video came out it caused us to become too “position” focused and guided us into trying to make robotic swings until we learned that everyone had their “own” swing. Thus some things that looked good on camera didn’t translate into great scores…so finally we were ok with different looking moves as long as they “worked” for the player.

    With the advent of Trackman (I have one and love it!) we are seeing the same thing- most teachers trying to push players into “robotic swings” with low face to path relationships with a tight spin axis for less curvature. Trying to eliminate all the variables. This too will pass in time….

    Therefore in the end I believe that Trackman will help golfers go BACK to swings that work for them- ones that are NOT position or aesthetic based- but FUNCTIONAL for the golfer whom uses them because the Trackman is not video based. It’s not about what you look like it’s about what works best for you!!!!! Personally I could care less about the numbers you produce (to a point) as long as they fit what you want your ball flight to look like in your own mind.

    New technology always elicits the same learning curve until instructors truly learn how to best teach with the new systems…it happened with video, 3D motion analysis, and now Trackman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 7
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending