Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Match play can work for the Tour with a little tinkering

Published

on

As golf fans, we are seldom exposed to the extremely electrifying format of match play golf. When such weeks arise on what has recently become a very full calendar of golf, it definitely sparks some more attention from the viewers, as we know we will get to witness a form of competition that is much different from our weekly dose of stroke play.

While the fans seem to love when the PGA Tour switches its scoreboard from “even” to “all square,” it appears that the actual Tour, or the gentlemen and ladies who represent it, might not feel as strongly as we do. It’s been just over a week since one of the most exciting renditions of the WGC-Accenture Match Play, where 23-year old Frenchman Victor Dubuisson had his “hello world” moment. After watching Dubuisson hit two of the most miraculous recovery shots that match play has ever seen, to the average viewer it seemed as though such a Sunday performance from Dubuisson and eventual champion Jason Day reinforced that this tournament is as alive and well as ever.

However, if last week at the Ritz Carlton Resort at Dove Mountain appeared to be really great for golf, and more specifically the match play event, then why did PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem announce that the location and sponsor for next year’s championship is unknown?

Well, there isn’t too much to look into at this point as the details on the subject are far from concrete. However, from a sponsorship standpoint it’s pretty tough to wrap your head around the fact that half of the tournament’s field is on a plane home before the second round even begins. Even more so, from a TV perspective, it has to be difficult to get huge viewership when there are only four golfers to watch on Championship Sunday, especially when none of the names include Tiger, Rory or Phil.

When addressing the media on the subject on Championship Sunday in the desert last weekend, Finchem went on to say that “the idea that players can come and play a day and be gone has always been something that we kind of looked at and wondered whether another format would be (better).”

While Finchem went on to say that he wouldn’t assume they are going to change anything at this point, there have been conversations circulating about format change for the season’s first World Golf Championship, in an effort to keep the games top stars around for as long as possible. In his article on GolfChannel.com, Senior Writer Rex Hoggard made it known that a member of the PGA Tour Advisory Council confirmed the Tour has been looking to alter the format to 36 holes of stroke play, followed by a cut, with either the top-32 or top-16 players moving on to a match play format on the weekend.

So we have established some pretty basic points as to why a title sponsor might not be getting the bang for their buck when you look at the format of the WGC Match Play event. After all, the PGA Tour is a business. And as a business if something isn’t working, well then you better fix it. Out of principle, there are some people who may not agree with having a match play event that is actually half stroke play. But if it means seeing the best players in the world play for one more round, subsequently increasing viewership, revenue, and all that jazz, then sign me up!

Back to my point about the match play format, with regards to a regular Tour event, whereby only four players are left for the final round. If 4-to-6 hours of golf coverage is centered around one match, then shouldn’t that match mean a little more to the players, the viewers, the sponsors, etc., than every other Sunday on Tour? With the exception of the Volvo World Match Play Championship, a European Tour event that doesn’t attract the same star power as the WGC Match Play, we only get to see the best players in the world compete on in match play event one other week of the year — in the Ryder Cup or President’s Cup matches. The extreme sense of pride that comes with representing your country in these events, according to the players, undoubtedly outweighs the paycheck that comes with a victory at a regular Tour stop. But what if the payout for a match play event was substantially more than just your average $1 million-plus Sunday?

Since its inception in 2007, and including all of the changes to the format to the FedEx Cup playoffs, there always seems to be those who criticize how the Tour crowns its $10 million man. But the new format changes proposed by the Tour for the WGC Match Play would probably make the most amount of sense for the season-ending Tour Championship. Why not have the end of the season and The Playoffs, with one of the biggest purses in sports, end in dramatic fashion like the NCAA March Madness tournament? The first three Playoff events would remain the same, being played as stroke play events, while the Tour Championship could operate as a 32-man match play event. While it appears that people are not as interested in seeing a head-to-head match up for a regular event (even though the Match Play is a WGC), I am pretty confident that such a format — with $10 million on the line — would spark a greater interest level from the fans than the current finale to the PGA Tour season.

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Oliver Berg is a golf fanatic whose roots in the game were formed in the rugged and rocky golf links of Southern Ontario, Canada. By putting the pen to paper, or more appropriately, his fingers to the keyboard, Oliver turned his passion for ‘talking golf’ online by starting The High Fade Golf Blog. Oliver works in the digital marketing space in the fashion industry in Toronto and has applied what he’s learned from social media marketing to his own Instagram golf account - @thehighfade. Having grown up in a family of golfers, Oliver was given a special gift at young age from his grandmother -- a pillow that reads “Life’s a game, but Golf is serious” is something that he sleeps beside every night, and he pretty much lives by that!

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Denzgolf

    Mar 5, 2014 at 4:30 pm

    Great idea for Fedex but rather than still run risk of losing top ranked in first round (and actually to keep MP format thought out) why not go down path of World cup soccer, 8 seeded pools of four (ranked by position in playoffs not world ranking) who each play 3 matchplay rounds with top 2 of each pool going through to 16 from where it becomes knockout. 7 rounds required, make it 8 with final as 36 holes. Now that’s either a lot of golf in four days or run it over 2 weeks at a course (32 down to 8 in week 1, 8 to winner Friday to Sunday – or 6 days in a week – it is for $10m. There’s a chance of 2 wins each by 3 of four players in a pool, but you just define beforehand that if that occurs the top two seeded from previous 3 playoff weeks go through. If desired to, reduce this risk by allowing all square finishes at 18 in pool matches for half points.

    • Denzgolf

      Mar 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm

      Obviously no one else really likes matchplay, not much but silence on this one???

  2. Phil C.

    Mar 5, 2014 at 4:04 pm

    I’ve been mulling over the exact same thought for over a year dear author. I LOVE match play, love to play it, love to watch it, love the competitive clarity it brings among the players. And yet golf television starves me of it.

    Some of the most fun you’ve ever had sports with your friends was this virtual boxing ring you would construct with the big greats. Kobe vs Lebron, Lakers vs Celtics, Manning vs Brady. What does the golfer talk about hanging out at the bar? Tiger-bash? A conversation on course conditions which makes you wonder why a grown adult would have passionate arguments about grass texture? There simply is no head to head competition. Why not? Purists argue that golf is a pristine pursuit solely existing between the golfer and the course. I like to believe that is only the first step toward what golf will finally be. They would say that Seve Ballesteros, the great spanish short gamer, would in the heat of competition engage in small slights to push his match play opponents on edge. If a match play opponent would call for a free drop on some questionable obstructions he would then turn prickly. Questioning putting order on the green, questioning his opponents club choices, and any other small things to cloud his opponents head. While off the course he’d be known to be a good guy, his competitive nature turned him so HE WASN’T AFRAID TO BE THE BAD GUY.

    There is no “bad guy” in golf today. The closest thing we have is the disfunctional stockholm relationship we have with Tiger Woods. The golf channel tries to make the public care with a few 30 second bumpers describing the obscure names on the leaderboard, but to be honest the Joe Sunday watching isn’t going to care that Golfer #17 is a fade hitter from west palm florida if it has no interplay with any of the other golfers. And so it is shown on TV. Random golf shots here, random putt there. Golfer #1 hitting an approach, Golfer #32 out of a greenside bunker, Golfer #8 hitting out of the rough. No sense of where you are on the course (other than a small window indicating hole #), no sense of how you got there, and no sense of the gravity or brevity of the shot make shot play golf very difficult to watch. But I’ve got some ideas.

    #1 Format Change
    Tim Finchem must have stolen my bedside notebook because I have very similiar thoughts. Bring stroke play into the first 2 days. Match play into the final days. But here are the finer details. First 2 days the entire field plays 27 holes. Field is then cut to the top 32 players. Next day is stroke play, STROKE MATCHES PLAY TO 6 HOLES. 3 rounds of 6 hole matches are played to reduce the field to final four. Champ Sunday is the am 9 hole match to reduce the the final two, and then an afternoon 18 hole championship match.

    The first two days are loaded more simply to help qualm the argument that match play victim to luck and circumstance. That a match was won or loss because of a favorable course condition that happened at the time, or less skilled opponent. My rebuttal to that is that the players have played 54 holes of golf. If they aren’t in position to have a chance to win at the title, why exactly are they there? And more importantly, why does there need to be TV coverage of them?

    Match play hole count was reduced to 6 holes. To put it simply, MAKE EACH SHOT MATTER. The argument again, is that 6 holes is not enough time for evaluation of skill. But SKILL has already been evaluated with the first 2 days, now it is time to test the players ability to deal with PRESSURE. To deal with the moment that you’re stuck in the bushes on your last hole with your opponent on the green, and your options are exhausted. Take the drop you lose. re-hit your last shot with penalty you lose. You’re simply forced into an arena where the only ticket out is the amazing. And if we do not put players into such duress, we’re never going to see such amazing shots.

    All in all the big thing is to try and get more viewership to the game and help this game survive. Less dads and moms are playing golf and that means less kids will even be aware of the sport. I really do love this game, I just wish it wasn’t so laborious to watch it…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s LIV Golf Singapore betting preview: Course specialist ready to thrive once again

Published

on

After another strong showing in Australia, LIV Golf will head to Sentosa Golf Club in Singapore looking to build off of what was undoubtedly their best event to date.

Sentosa Golf Club sits on the southern tip of Singapore and is one of the most beautiful courses in the world. The course is more than just incredible scenically; it was also rated 55th in Golf Digest’s top-100 courses in 2022-2023 and has been consistently regarded as one of the best courses in Asia. Prior to being part of the LIV rotation, the course hosted the Singapore Open every year since 2005.

Sentosa Golf Club is a par 71 measuring 7,406 yards. The course will require precise ball striking and some length off the tee. It’s possible to go low due to the pristine conditions, but there are also plenty of hazards and difficult spots on the course that can bring double bogey into play in a hurry. The Bermudagrass greens are perfectly manicured, and the course has spent millions on the sub-air system to keep the greens rolling fast. I spoke to Asian Tour player, Travis Smyth, who described the greens as “the best [he’s] ever played.”

Davis Love III, who competed in a Singapore Open in 2019, also gushed over the condition of the golf course.

“I love the greens. They are fabulous,” the 21-time PGA Tour winner said.

Love III also spoke about other aspects of the golf course.

“The greens are great; the fairways are perfect. It is a wonderful course, and it’s tricky off the tee.”

“It’s a long golf course, and you get some long iron shots. It takes somebody hitting it great to hit every green even though they are big.”

As Love III said, the course can be difficult off the tee due to the length of the course and the trouble looming around every corner. It will take a terrific ball striking week to win at Sentosa Golf Club.

In his pre-tournament press conference last season, Phil Mickelson echoed many of the same sentiments.

“To play Sentosa effectively, you’re going to have a lot of shots from 160 to 210, a lot of full 6-, 7-, 8-iron shots, and you need to hit those really well and you need to drive the ball well.”

Golfers who excel from tee to green and can dial in their longer irons will have a massive advantage this week.

Stat Leaders at LIV Golf Adelaide:

Fairways Hit

1.) Louis Oosthuizen

2.) Anirban Lahiri

3.) Jon Rahm

4.) Brendan Steele

5.) Cameron Tringale

Greens in Regulation

1.) Brooks Koepka

2.) Brendan Steele

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Cameron Tringale

5.) Anirban Lahiri

Birdies Made

1.) Brendan Steele

2.) Dean Burmester

3.) Thomas Pieters

4.) Patrick Reed

5.) Carlos Ortiz

LIV Golf Individual Standings:

1.) Joaquin Niemann

2.) Jon Rahm

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Louis Oosthuizen

5.) Abraham Ancer

LIV Golf Team Standings:

1.) Crushers

2.) Legion XIII

3.) Torque

4.) Stinger GC

5.) Ripper GC

LIV Golf Singapore Picks

Sergio Garcia +3000 (DraftKings)

Sergio Garcia is no stranger to Sentosa Golf Club. The Spaniard won the Singapore Open in 2018 by five strokes and lost in a playoff at LIV Singapore last year to scorching hot Talor Gooch. Looking at the course setup, it’s no surprise that a player like Sergio has played incredible golf here. He’s long off the tee and is one of the better long iron players in the world when he’s in form. Garcia is also statistically a much better putter on Bermudagrass than he is on other putting surfaces. He’s putt extremely well on Sentosa’s incredibly pure green complexes.

This season, Garcia has two runner-up finishes, both of them being playoff losses. Both El Camaleon and Doral are courses he’s had success at in his career. The Spaniard is a player who plays well at his tracks, and Sentosa is one of them. I believe Sergio will get himself in the mix this week. Hopefully the third time is a charm in Singapore.

Paul Casey +3300 (FanDuel)

Paul Casey is in the midst of one of his best seasons in the five years or so. The results recently have been up and down, but he’s shown that when he’s on a golf course that suits his game, he’s amongst the contenders.

This season, Casey has finishes of T5 (LIV Las Vegas), T2 (LIV Hong Kong), and a 6th at the Singapore Classic on the DP World Tour. At his best, the Englishman is one of the best long iron players in the world, which makes him a strong fit for Sentosa. Despite being in poor form last season, he was able to fire a Sunday 63, which shows he can low here at the course.

It’s been three years since Casey has won a tournament (Omega Dubai Desert Classic in 2021), but he’s been one of the top players on LIV this season and I think he can get it done at some point this season.

Mito Pereira +5000 (Bet365)

Since Mito Pereira’s unfortunate demise at the 2022 PGA Championship, he’s been extremely inconsistent. However, over the past few months, the Chilean has played well on the International Series as well as his most recent LIV start. Mito finished 8th at LIV Adelaide, which was his best LIV finish this season.

Last year, Pereira finished 5th at LIV Singapore, shooting fantastic rounds of 67-66-66. It makes sense why Mito would like Sentosa, as preeminent ball strikers tend to rise to the challenge of the golf course. He’s a great long iron player who is long and straight off the tee.

Mito has some experience playing in Asia and is one of the most talented players on LIV who’s yet to get in the winner’s circle. I have questions about whether or not he can come through once in contention, but if he gets there, I’m happy to roll the dice.

Andy Ogletree +15000 (DraftKings)

Andy Ogletree is a player I expected to have a strong 2024 but struggled early in his first full season on LIV. After failing to crack the top-25 in any LIV event this year, the former U.S. Amateur champion finally figured things out, finished in a tie for 3rd at LIV Adelaide.

Ogletree should be incredible comfortable playing in Singapore. He won the International Series Qatar last year and finished T3 at the International Series Singapore. The 26-year-old was arguably the best player on the Asian Tour in 2023 and has been fantastic in the continent over the past 18 months.

If Ogletree has indeed found form, he looks to be an amazing value at triple-digit odds.

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Ryan: Lessons from the worst golf instructor in America

Published

on

In Tampa, there is a golf course that boasts carts that do not work, a water range, and a group of players none of which have any chance to break 80. The course is overseen by a staff of crusty men who have succeeded at nothing in life but ending up at the worst-run course in America. However, this place is no failure. With several other local courses going out of business — and boasting outstanding greens — the place is booked full.

While I came for the great greens, I stayed to watch our resident instructor; a poor-tempered, method teacher who caters to the hopeless. At first, it was simply hilarious. However, after months of listening and watching, something clicked. I realized I had a front-row seat to the worst golf instructor in America.

Here are some of my key takeaways.

Method Teacher

It is widely accepted that there are three types of golf instructors: system teachers, non-system teachers, and method teachers. Method teachers prescribe the same antidote for each student based on a preamble which teachers can learn in a couple day certification.

Method teaching allows anyone to be certified. This process caters to the lowest caliber instructor, creating the illusion of competency. This empowers these underqualified instructors with the moniker of “certified” to prey on the innocent and uninformed.

The Cult of Stack and Jilt

The Stack and Tilt website proudly boasts, “A golfer swings his hands inward in the backswing as opposed to straight back to 1) create power, similar to a field goal kicker moving his leg in an arc and 2) to promote a swing that is in-to-out, which produces a draw (and eliminates a slice).”

Now, let me tell you something, there is this law of the universe which says “energy can either be created or destroyed,” so either these guys are defying physics or they have no idea what they are taking about. Further, the idea that the first move of the backswing determines impact is conjecture with a splash of utter fantasy.

These are the pontifications of a method — a set of prescriptions applied to everyone with the hope of some success through the placebo effect. It is one thing for a naive student to believe, for a golf instructor to drink and then dispel this Kool-Aid is malpractice.

Fooled by Randomness

In flipping a coin, or even a March Madness bet, there is a 50-50 chance of success. In golf, especially for new players, results are asymmetric. Simply put: Anything can happen. The problem is that when bad instructors work with high handicappers, each and every shot gets its own diagnosis and prescription. Soon the student is overwhelmed.

Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design. In this case, the coach is not trying to make you better, they are trying to make you reliant on them for information. A quasi Stockholm syndrome of codependency.

Practice

One of the most important scientists of the 20th century was Ivan Pavlov. As you might recall, he found that animals, including humans, could be conditioned into biological responses. In golf, the idea of practice has made millions of hackers salivate that they are one lesson or practice session from “the secret.”

Sunk Cost

The idea for the worst golf instructor is to create control and dependency so that clients ignore the sunk cost of not getting better. Instead, they are held hostage by the idea that they are one lesson or tip away from unlocking their potential.

Cliches

Cliches have the effect of terminating thoughts. However, they are the weapon of choice for this instructor. Add some hyperbole and students actually get no information. As a result, these players couldn’t play golf. When they did, they had no real scheme. With no idea what they are doing, they would descend into a spiral of no idea what to do, bad results, lower confidence, and running back to the lesson tee from more cliches.

The fact is that poor instruction is about conditioning players to become reliant members of your cult. To take away autonomy. To use practice as a form of control. To sell more golf lessons not by making people better but through the guise that without the teacher, the student can never reach their full potential. All under the umbrella of being “certified” (in a 2-day course!) and a melee of cliches.

This of course is not just happening at my muni but is a systemic problem around the country and around the world, the consequences of which are giving people a great reason to stop playing golf. But hey, at least it’s selling a lot of golf balls…

Your Reaction?
  • 17
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL4
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK19

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending