Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

A Closer Look At Decision 18/4

Published

on

The United States Golf Association and R&A Rules Ltd.– the rule-making bodies of the PGA Tour — announced on Tuesday that players would no longer be penalized when a ball’s movement could only be detected through the use of enhanced technology. In other words, a player will not be penalized if the movement of the ball was not immediately discernible by the naked eye at the time — regardless of video evidence. In a statement issued on Tuesday, the USGA provided:

“New Decision 18/4 will provide that, where enhanced technological evidence shows that a ball has left its position and come to rest in another location, the ball will not be deemed to have moved if that movement was not reasonably discernible to the naked eye at the time. The Decision ensures that a player is not penalized under Rule 18-2 in circumstances where the fact that the ball had changed location could not reasonably have been seen without the use of enhanced technology.”

Decision 18/4 will take effect on Jan. 1, 2014 and significantly reduces the effect of the “call-in rule enforcement” controversy that garnered headlines for much of the summer. One of the highest profile examples occurred during this year’s BMW Championship when a videographer spotted a potential violation involving Tiger Woods and alerted officials. Officials reviewed replays of video and assessed a two-stroke penalty to Woods after his ball was deemed to have moved as he attempted to clear loose impediments around it.

The USGA and the R&A previously adopted rules to minimize a golfer’s risk of being blindsided by disqualification after he had turned in a scorecard due to a video replay showing a violation. In April 2011, the USGA and R&A adopted Decision 33-7/4.5, which authorized committees to waive the disqualification penalty for a breach of Rule 6-6d in narrow circumstances in which the player could not reasonably have been aware of a breach of the rules that later was identified solely through video evidence.

What Does This Mean?

Until the official rollout of Decision 18/4 in January, golf is the only sport where a viewer is able to challenge a ruling. This begs the old “tree in the forest with no one around” question — rather, if a golfer commits a rules violation and nobody notices, including the golfer and the rule enforcers, is it still a rules violation? Decision 18/4 makes it clear that the answer is now an unequivocal “no.”

Ultimately, Decision 18/4 is good for the game of golf. The game of golf is founded on the inherent cornerstone of self-policing and reporting when it comes to rules enforcement. The majority of the time, players will gladly call an infraction on themselves if they realize they have violated the rules. The ruling in Decision 18/4 ensures that the spirit of the game stays intact and players are not penalized for mistakes made in good faith; mistakes that could not have personally observed but for video review. Decision 18/4 also ensures that a golfer will not be blindsided by incurring a two-stroke penalty for an after-the-fact violation ruling through video review after signing his scorecard.

Furthermore, Decision 18/4 ensures fair and equal enforcement of the Rules of Golf throughout the entire playing field. While all of the players are governed by the same rules, the cameras are not on every golfer all of the time. Thus, the players with cameras surrounding them will be under a higher level of scrutiny and review simply for being themselves. Decision 18/4 signals a return to a more uniform review and enforcement process.

What is the Next Step?

The Rules of Golf are quite complicated and even the best good-faith effort by a golfer to police himself may still result in a violation of the rules. If the USGA truly wants the enforcement of the Rules of Golf to be uniform for the entire playing field, it will need to seriously examine adding more rules officials to events. For example, there needs to be a rules official with every group during major tournaments and playoff events. Not only would this provide players with a neutral outside observer that can provide rules positions and bring any violations immediately to the forefront, but would likely minimize the time needed for a ruling to be made.

Perhaps it would even be prudent for the PGA to put a rules official in the video truck to work in concert with the rules officials. This official could monitor the videos and call out any infractions he sees to the officials on the course.

Decision 18/4 is a step in the right direction to ensure that the Rules of Golf are enforced in a uniform manner. However, the onus is now on the PGA to find new ways ensure better rules enforcement over the entire field.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. ken

    Dec 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    I agree with the change.
    The issue is not the rule in and of itself. Rather the enforcement of the rule using outside influences. Yes, the enhanced video can detect the moved ball. Not the point. The fact is not every player in a tournament field is followed by tv cameras. Some players, save for when they walk past a camera, do not get any tv time.
    Until every single player is monitored by some kind of video throughout the entirety of an event, this usage of enhanced video should not have been used in the first place.
    Also. In my opinion the various associations governing the game should STOP taking phone calls and electronic messages from viewers.

  2. Rob

    Nov 27, 2013 at 6:52 am

    Good rule, needs to be expanded to negate all decisions based on advanced technology and viewer call ins. Nick commented “touring pros don’t feel they need to play by the rules”, “TW saw the ball move”, TW decided to cheat”. These are all Nick’s opinions. The last thing golf needs is people like Nick participating in rules decisions.

  3. Patrick

    Nov 26, 2013 at 4:00 pm

    This is a good decision by the rules committee. Gallery and spectators should not be able to enforce penalty. How is a ball moving a millimeter going to affect the next shot anyway…It’s not. Good riddance.

  4. jc

    Nov 25, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    that wasn’t a millimeter…it was very plain it moved since the logo moved from west-east to north-south. Not that that would ever bother Tiger. He NEVER sees anything he did as wrong

  5. Rich

    Nov 24, 2013 at 5:15 am

    The rule wouldnt have been changed if it hadn’t happened to one TW this year.

  6. RG

    Nov 22, 2013 at 11:58 pm

    Its about time they realized that it is unfair to penalize a player for something that is outside the players ability to detect. Now golfs ruling bodies need to realize that technology could be used to help instead of just hurt a player. Intent plays a part in every governing system on the planet, but not golf. Lets use tech to see if a guy meant to infringe or accidentally did so. Stop with all the hoopla over millimeters and grazing sand on the backswing and lets play golf. Golf is the only game in the world where its greatest championship can be taken away from a champion if that champion does not do good arithmetic. Its silly stupid and it needs to stop.

  7. Hunterdog

    Nov 21, 2013 at 7:20 pm

    The decision only applies when the movement of the ball could not reasonably be detected without enhanced video; in other words no penalty if player could not know that ball moved. No big deal.

  8. kloyd0306

    Nov 21, 2013 at 7:11 pm

    Viewers being able to “call in” a possible infraction needs to cease. Such an availability penalizes higher profile players disproportionately. Such rulings and decisions need to be confined to the players and the officials – no one else.

    • Nick

      Nov 24, 2013 at 4:10 pm

      Yes I agree that it is unfair that they are subjected to more scrutiny since they are on TV more. They also have more sponsors and more money because they are better and more popular players. So I feel that the exposure is point is moot. The real issue is why touring PROS don’t feel they need to play by the rules. If the ball moves because of you, there is no grey area. TW was looking right at the ball and tried to move the stick to help his lie. The ball moved he saw it and decided to CHEAT the game. Maybe if he didn’t hit his ball into the crap he would not need to cry to the commish.

  9. Bout time

    Nov 21, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    Take that Chamblee!!!

    • ken

      Dec 3, 2013 at 11:47 pm

      Just a minute…Tour players don’t feel they should have to play by the rules?
      From where did you get this information?
      Nick, unless you can provide proof of that accusation being true, I suggest you delete your post and refrain form making such baseless charges.

  10. Dan

    Nov 21, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    I like the new rule. Currently, higher profile players are at a disadvantage for incidents similar to the Tiger “wobble” at the BMW. Those guys are going to have many more cameras rolling on them. The “call in” rule should only have been implemented if every shot of every player was captured with the same level of detail.

  11. yo!2

    Nov 21, 2013 at 2:05 pm

    what about the stick that was moved out of the way to get a clear shot that caused the ball to move a millimeter?

  12. yo!

    Nov 21, 2013 at 1:03 pm

    It’s a good rule. A ball moving a millimeter isn’t going to make a difference.

    • Jack

      Nov 21, 2013 at 10:41 pm

      Yeah, there needs to be a material difference clause in there. You moved your ball a millimeter? It’s ok no violation since it doesn’t make a difference, and you didn’t intend to do it. You move the ball 5 inches back? Yeah you’re DQed. Tamping a spike mark? Ouch.

      • ken

        Dec 3, 2013 at 11:50 pm

        A player does not suffer disqualification for moving his ball or causing it to move at address. He is disqualified only if he does not penalize himself the appropriate number of strokes per the rule AND signs his scorecard without making the correction.

  13. David Sefton

    Nov 21, 2013 at 12:52 pm

    TV companies will not stop showing enhanced coverage of these incidents. So, persistent offenders with ‘poor naked eye vision’ will soon be highlighted.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s LIV Golf Singapore betting preview: Course specialist ready to thrive once again

Published

on

After another strong showing in Australia, LIV Golf will head to Sentosa Golf Club in Singapore looking to build off of what was undoubtedly their best event to date.

Sentosa Golf Club sits on the southern tip of Singapore and is one of the most beautiful courses in the world. The course is more than just incredible scenically; it was also rated 55th in Golf Digest’s top-100 courses in 2022-2023 and has been consistently regarded as one of the best courses in Asia. Prior to being part of the LIV rotation, the course hosted the Singapore Open every year since 2005.

Sentosa Golf Club is a par 71 measuring 7,406 yards. The course will require precise ball striking and some length off the tee. It’s possible to go low due to the pristine conditions, but there are also plenty of hazards and difficult spots on the course that can bring double bogey into play in a hurry. The Bermudagrass greens are perfectly manicured, and the course has spent millions on the sub-air system to keep the greens rolling fast. I spoke to Asian Tour player, Travis Smyth, who described the greens as “the best [he’s] ever played.”

Davis Love III, who competed in a Singapore Open in 2019, also gushed over the condition of the golf course.

“I love the greens. They are fabulous,” the 21-time PGA Tour winner said.

Love III also spoke about other aspects of the golf course.

“The greens are great; the fairways are perfect. It is a wonderful course, and it’s tricky off the tee.”

“It’s a long golf course, and you get some long iron shots. It takes somebody hitting it great to hit every green even though they are big.”

As Love III said, the course can be difficult off the tee due to the length of the course and the trouble looming around every corner. It will take a terrific ball striking week to win at Sentosa Golf Club.

In his pre-tournament press conference last season, Phil Mickelson echoed many of the same sentiments.

“To play Sentosa effectively, you’re going to have a lot of shots from 160 to 210, a lot of full 6-, 7-, 8-iron shots, and you need to hit those really well and you need to drive the ball well.”

Golfers who excel from tee to green and can dial in their longer irons will have a massive advantage this week.

Stat Leaders at LIV Golf Adelaide:

Fairways Hit

1.) Louis Oosthuizen

2.) Anirban Lahiri

3.) Jon Rahm

4.) Brendan Steele

5.) Cameron Tringale

Greens in Regulation

1.) Brooks Koepka

2.) Brendan Steele

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Cameron Tringale

5.) Anirban Lahiri

Birdies Made

1.) Brendan Steele

2.) Dean Burmester

3.) Thomas Pieters

4.) Patrick Reed

5.) Carlos Ortiz

LIV Golf Individual Standings:

1.) Joaquin Niemann

2.) Jon Rahm

3.) Dean Burmester

4.) Louis Oosthuizen

5.) Abraham Ancer

LIV Golf Team Standings:

1.) Crushers

2.) Legion XIII

3.) Torque

4.) Stinger GC

5.) Ripper GC

LIV Golf Singapore Picks

Sergio Garcia +3000 (DraftKings)

Sergio Garcia is no stranger to Sentosa Golf Club. The Spaniard won the Singapore Open in 2018 by five strokes and lost in a playoff at LIV Singapore last year to scorching hot Talor Gooch. Looking at the course setup, it’s no surprise that a player like Sergio has played incredible golf here. He’s long off the tee and is one of the better long iron players in the world when he’s in form. Garcia is also statistically a much better putter on Bermudagrass than he is on other putting surfaces. He’s putt extremely well on Sentosa’s incredibly pure green complexes.

This season, Garcia has two runner-up finishes, both of them being playoff losses. Both El Camaleon and Doral are courses he’s had success at in his career. The Spaniard is a player who plays well at his tracks, and Sentosa is one of them. I believe Sergio will get himself in the mix this week. Hopefully the third time is a charm in Singapore.

Paul Casey +3300 (FanDuel)

Paul Casey is in the midst of one of his best seasons in the five years or so. The results recently have been up and down, but he’s shown that when he’s on a golf course that suits his game, he’s amongst the contenders.

This season, Casey has finishes of T5 (LIV Las Vegas), T2 (LIV Hong Kong), and a 6th at the Singapore Classic on the DP World Tour. At his best, the Englishman is one of the best long iron players in the world, which makes him a strong fit for Sentosa. Despite being in poor form last season, he was able to fire a Sunday 63, which shows he can low here at the course.

It’s been three years since Casey has won a tournament (Omega Dubai Desert Classic in 2021), but he’s been one of the top players on LIV this season and I think he can get it done at some point this season.

Mito Pereira +5000 (Bet365)

Since Mito Pereira’s unfortunate demise at the 2022 PGA Championship, he’s been extremely inconsistent. However, over the past few months, the Chilean has played well on the International Series as well as his most recent LIV start. Mito finished 8th at LIV Adelaide, which was his best LIV finish this season.

Last year, Pereira finished 5th at LIV Singapore, shooting fantastic rounds of 67-66-66. It makes sense why Mito would like Sentosa, as preeminent ball strikers tend to rise to the challenge of the golf course. He’s a great long iron player who is long and straight off the tee.

Mito has some experience playing in Asia and is one of the most talented players on LIV who’s yet to get in the winner’s circle. I have questions about whether or not he can come through once in contention, but if he gets there, I’m happy to roll the dice.

Andy Ogletree +15000 (DraftKings)

Andy Ogletree is a player I expected to have a strong 2024 but struggled early in his first full season on LIV. After failing to crack the top-25 in any LIV event this year, the former U.S. Amateur champion finally figured things out, finished in a tie for 3rd at LIV Adelaide.

Ogletree should be incredible comfortable playing in Singapore. He won the International Series Qatar last year and finished T3 at the International Series Singapore. The 26-year-old was arguably the best player on the Asian Tour in 2023 and has been fantastic in the continent over the past 18 months.

If Ogletree has indeed found form, he looks to be an amazing value at triple-digit odds.

Your Reaction?
  • 3
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Ryan: Lessons from the worst golf instructor in America

Published

on

In Tampa, there is a golf course that boasts carts that do not work, a water range, and a group of players none of which have any chance to break 80. The course is overseen by a staff of crusty men who have succeeded at nothing in life but ending up at the worst-run course in America. However, this place is no failure. With several other local courses going out of business — and boasting outstanding greens — the place is booked full.

While I came for the great greens, I stayed to watch our resident instructor; a poor-tempered, method teacher who caters to the hopeless. At first, it was simply hilarious. However, after months of listening and watching, something clicked. I realized I had a front-row seat to the worst golf instructor in America.

Here are some of my key takeaways.

Method Teacher

It is widely accepted that there are three types of golf instructors: system teachers, non-system teachers, and method teachers. Method teachers prescribe the same antidote for each student based on a preamble which teachers can learn in a couple day certification.

Method teaching allows anyone to be certified. This process caters to the lowest caliber instructor, creating the illusion of competency. This empowers these underqualified instructors with the moniker of “certified” to prey on the innocent and uninformed.

The Cult of Stack and Jilt

The Stack and Tilt website proudly boasts, “A golfer swings his hands inward in the backswing as opposed to straight back to 1) create power, similar to a field goal kicker moving his leg in an arc and 2) to promote a swing that is in-to-out, which produces a draw (and eliminates a slice).”

Now, let me tell you something, there is this law of the universe which says “energy can either be created or destroyed,” so either these guys are defying physics or they have no idea what they are taking about. Further, the idea that the first move of the backswing determines impact is conjecture with a splash of utter fantasy.

These are the pontifications of a method — a set of prescriptions applied to everyone with the hope of some success through the placebo effect. It is one thing for a naive student to believe, for a golf instructor to drink and then dispel this Kool-Aid is malpractice.

Fooled by Randomness

In flipping a coin, or even a March Madness bet, there is a 50-50 chance of success. In golf, especially for new players, results are asymmetric. Simply put: Anything can happen. The problem is that when bad instructors work with high handicappers, each and every shot gets its own diagnosis and prescription. Soon the student is overwhelmed.

Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design. In this case, the coach is not trying to make you better, they are trying to make you reliant on them for information. A quasi Stockholm syndrome of codependency.

Practice

One of the most important scientists of the 20th century was Ivan Pavlov. As you might recall, he found that animals, including humans, could be conditioned into biological responses. In golf, the idea of practice has made millions of hackers salivate that they are one lesson or practice session from “the secret.”

Sunk Cost

The idea for the worst golf instructor is to create control and dependency so that clients ignore the sunk cost of not getting better. Instead, they are held hostage by the idea that they are one lesson or tip away from unlocking their potential.

Cliches

Cliches have the effect of terminating thoughts. However, they are the weapon of choice for this instructor. Add some hyperbole and students actually get no information. As a result, these players couldn’t play golf. When they did, they had no real scheme. With no idea what they are doing, they would descend into a spiral of no idea what to do, bad results, lower confidence, and running back to the lesson tee from more cliches.

The fact is that poor instruction is about conditioning players to become reliant members of your cult. To take away autonomy. To use practice as a form of control. To sell more golf lessons not by making people better but through the guise that without the teacher, the student can never reach their full potential. All under the umbrella of being “certified” (in a 2-day course!) and a melee of cliches.

This of course is not just happening at my muni but is a systemic problem around the country and around the world, the consequences of which are giving people a great reason to stop playing golf. But hey, at least it’s selling a lot of golf balls…

Your Reaction?
  • 17
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL4
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK17

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending