Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Four key factors for success on the PGA Tour

Published

on

It is a common practice in statistical analysis to seek out commonalities for successful or unsuccessful relationships in order to more accurately forecast future events. For example, if I own a store known for selling lemonade, I may want to find out certain commonalities between the days I tend to sell more lemonade versus the days I sell less lemonade. Those commonalities may be the temperature, tourist events that are in town, holidays and weekends versus weekdays.

Generally, the fewer the commonalities the more likely it will lead to a more accurate forecast. If I know that my store is largely dependent on the weather in order to sell lemonade and the other factors are negligible, then it becomes easier to plan around the weather variable. If I know that the warmer the temperature the more lemonade I can sell, I can then stock up on lemonade and perhaps up the price during the summer versus stocking less lemonade and discounting the lemonade during the winter.

With golf, I find many golfers attempt to break down the game in the same fashion. The old drive for show and putt for dough adage is quite common. There is also the various groups of people that believe that wedge play is everything, or hitting it long is everything, or hitting fairways is everything or even the doing everything well is everything.

What I have found in my research on the PGA Tour is common sense, but not entirely obvious. In essence, in order to be VERY successful on the PGA Tour, a golfer does not have to be great at everything. In fact, they do not even have be great at anything. Instead, if they are at least at the average in four different parts of the game, they are extremely likely to be very successful on Tour. In my 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis, I called these “The Big Four” of golf. I have since altered this slightly to derive an even more accurate depiction of how to be successful on Tour.

Driving Effectiveness 

I utilize a proprietary algorithm that depicts how effective a golfer on Tour was off the tee. This algorithm includes metrics that are part of three different components to driving the ball: power, accuracy and precision.

Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 11.18.28 AM

The precision metrics have the greatest influence on a golfer’s score. This is followed by the power metric and then the accuracy metric. Average Distance to the Edge of the Fairway is based on shots that miss the fairway. Missed Fairway – Other % is any time a tee shot ends up in a hazard or requires a subsequent “rescue shot.”

Morgan Hoffmann, who finished 111th on Tour in 2013, was at “the average” for Driving Effectiveness on Tour. Here are a look at his metrics:

Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 11.18.06 AM

As we can see, Hoffmann hit it very long off the tee (Distance is based on all drives measured with a laser). He wasn’t very accurate, but his precision metrics were pretty good.

“Danger Zone” play

Danger Zone play is shots from 175-to-225 yards. This part of the game has the strongest correlation to success on Tour. All things being equal, I have determined that the difference between the best on Tour from the Danger Zone versus the Tour average is worth roughly 0.4 to 0.45 strokes per round. That may not seem like much, but it could be the difference between 40 to 60 spots on the money list.

Kevin Chappell, who finished 58th on Tour in 2013, was at the average from the Danger Zone, hitting those shots an average of 42 feet to the cup.

Short game shots from 10-to-20 yards

What I have found with my research is that the short game shots that have a mathematical correlation to Adjusted Scoring Average on Tour are from within 20 yards to the edge of the green. Outside of 20 yards, the correlation regresses. I believe that many shots from longer than 20 yards come down to luck and randomness.

What I have also found is shots from 20-to-100 yards are incredibly unimportant to the success on Tour. However, the common fallacy with some stat heads is that they start to label shots from less than 20 yards and putting in with shots from 20-to-100 yards, and thus they start to label putting as unimportant as well. The truth is that putting is very important as well as short game shots from under 20 yards. But when you add shots from 20-to-100 yards into the mix, it inaccurately waters down the importance of the short game and putting.

In 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis, I labeled this component of The Big Four as “total short game.” However, it is clear that when it comes to the short game, shots from 10-to-20 yards are much more important than shots from 1-to-10 yards. Thus, I decided to add only shots from 10-to-20 yards in The Big Four metrics that matter on Tour.

Long-hitting Luke List, who finished 163 on Tour in 2013, was at the Tour average at hitting shots from 10-to-20 yards to 6.7 feet.

Strokes Gained-Putting

The last metric is pretty self-explanatory. Typically, the golfers who perform best in Strokes Gained-Putting are the ones who make a higher percentage of putts from 3-to-15 feet than the others. Putts outside of 15 feet start to come down to randomness and luck.

So, who were the players that finished in the top-half in each of these metrics in 2013?

Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 11.18.59 AM

Seven out of the nine players listed finished in the top-25 on the 2013 money list. Jerry Kelly finished 99th, but that was mostly due to him playing in events with lower purse sizes.  Meanwhile, he ranked No. 47 in Adjusted Scoring Average, the metric that most accurately depicts a player’s performance.

While it certainly does not hurt the cause, success on Tour is not about being great at anything (by Tour standards). Success on Tour is about being better than the average at a few important parts of the game. If a player is at least average or better off the tee, on the green, from 175-to-225 yards and from 10-to-20 yards they have put themselves in position to be wildly successful.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Richie Hunt is a statistician whose clients include PGA Tour players, their caddies and instructors in order to more accurately assess their games. He is also the author of the recently published e-book, 2018 Pro Golf Synopsis; the Moneyball Approach to the Game of Golf. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @Richie3Jack. GolfWRX Writer of the Month: March 2014 Purchase 2017 Pro Golf Synopsis E-book for $10

18 Comments

18 Comments

  1. Pingback: What Rickie Fowler Must Do to Join the ‘Big 3′ in Golf’s Elite Class | Sports News

  2. Pingback: What Rickie Fowler Must Do to Join the ‘Big 3’ in Golf’s Elite Class | My Blog

  3. Pingback: 10 Players Who Will Rise (or Fall) in 2015 | Golf Gear Select

  4. Pingback: 10 Players Who Will Rise (or Fall) in 2015 | GolfClick.net | Blog

  5. tbaxxtbaxx

    Apr 26, 2014 at 12:27 am

    Nice article Rich. My question is, what single statistic has the highest correlation with money won? Ballstriking composite? Putting? Scrambling? GIR?

  6. Brock

    Nov 8, 2013 at 4:01 pm

    Why does the danger zone correspond to a higher delta in shots per round (.4 to .45 as you said) than say, 125-150, or 150-175? It seems like the majority of their approach shots these days are inside 175. So, I wouldn’t think that’s the reason for the importance. Is it because the range of misses are bigger from that distance than they would be from 125-175, leading to magnified scores down the line?

  7. TK

    Oct 25, 2013 at 3:07 am

    Great article Richie, very interesting.
    So in terms of the pga tour by your calculation of stats you believe that short game shots from 10-20 yards are much more important than from 20-100?
    But I guess it is determined on how short or long the course is?

  8. KCCO

    Oct 23, 2013 at 10:39 pm

    Best piece I’ve read in a bit on here, thx for very useful info!

  9. Andrew Cooper

    Oct 22, 2013 at 10:27 am

    Thanks Richie, great stuff. Would you say this big 4 would also apply for club golfers? Does it change as you move through different handicap levels?

    • Richie Hunt

      Oct 24, 2013 at 12:03 pm

      Every part of the game is important to some level. If a golfer can improve their fairway bunker play, over time it will help their score. It’s just not going to be as important as something like putting. For club golfers, the Zone ranges differ because they play shorter courses. You can get a good idea of your Danger Zone by looking at the average distance of the par-3’s. And for amateurs, driving becomes the most important part of the game. That is where the greatest standard deviation exists for amateurs. If they can have a good day driving the ball, it will help their score the most. Other than that, I would stick to the Big Four (driving, putting, short game and long approach shots).

  10. paul

    Oct 21, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    Im glad i am not the only one that thinks that golf numbers are fascinating. All my friends think i am a big golf nerd cause i hit a measured and controlled distance off the tee so i have to hit a pitching wedge for my second shot. of course i beat them so i am an even bigger geek. I thought i was just doing good course management 🙁

    • [email protected]

      Oct 23, 2013 at 8:29 am

      Reminds me of how Greg Norman defined aggressive play. If a strength of your game is that wedge then getting that wedge in your hand as many times as possible is Aggressive! Good for you !

  11. Golfwrx

    Oct 21, 2013 at 8:39 pm

    The successful formula: Know How to Close the Tournament. Numbers don’t mean anything if a PGA Tour player can’t close the deal.

    • Richie Hunt

      Oct 22, 2013 at 9:55 am

      Looking at Tour player performance, it’s very much a roller coaster ride throughout the year. Every player gets hot by their standards and then cools down and then plays decent. Part of the problem for Tour players is that the most they will get hot for is 3 weeks in a row. Rarely do I see a player get hot for 4 weeks in a row. They will get hot for 3 weeks in a row and then cool right down.

      What separates the great Tour players from the rest is that when they are ‘cold’, they can still make cuts. When they are so-so, they are making the top-25. And when they are hot, they are in the top-5.

      The problem for them here is that they can’t rely on great putting. It just doesn’t happen week to week. But if they can consistently be average or better in these four areas from week-to-week, they can start making cuts on their down tournaments, making top-25’s when they play so-so, and finish in the top-5 when they are playing well. And the more times they can get into the top-5, they will increase their chances of getting that victory.

      • Vlad

        Oct 22, 2013 at 11:05 am

        Streakiness, or being hot/cold for X weeks at a time, is something that doesn’t get talked about much. Interesting to hear the pros “…can’t rely on great putting. It just doesn’t happen week to week.”
        Cyclical performance has a good bit of relevance to the amatuer/casual golfers. For me, when one area (like driver) gets hot, another area (like putting) cools down. Is this the same phenomenon with the pros? When they are in a stretch of being on the leaderboard week after week, is it that all facets are clicking? Or is it a case of 2 or 3 out of 4 areas (tee, approach, short game, putting) are exceptionally good?

  12. Finnegans

    Oct 21, 2013 at 8:18 pm

    Great article again!

    Thanx

  13. Richie Hunt

    Oct 21, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    Thanks for the kind words.

  14. A J

    Oct 21, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    The most original, insightful golf writer on the planet?

    That would be Rich Hunt.

    Another absolutely brilliant article. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Instruction

The Wedge Guy: The easiest-to-learn golf basic

Published

on

My golf learning began with this simple fact – if you don’t have a fundamentally sound hold on the golf club, it is practically impossible for your body to execute a fundamentally sound golf swing. I’m still a big believer that the golf swing is much easier to execute if you begin with the proper hold on the club.

As you might imagine, I come into contact with hundreds of golfers of all skill levels. And it is very rare to see a good player with a bad hold on the golf club. There are some exceptions, for sure, but they are very few and very far between, and they typically have beat so many balls with their poor grip that they’ve found a way to work around it.

The reality of biophysics is that the body moves only in certain ways – and the particulars of the way you hold the golf club can totally prevent a sound swing motion that allows the club to release properly through the impact zone. The wonderful thing is that anyone can learn how to put a fundamentally sound hold on the golf club, and you can practice it anywhere your hands are not otherwise engaged, like watching TV or just sitting and relaxing.

Whether you prefer an overlap, interlock or full-finger (not baseball!) grip on the club, the same fundamentals apply.  Here are the major grip faults I see most often, in the order of the frequency:

Mis-aligned hands

By this I mean that the palms of the two hands are not parallel to each other. Too many golfers have a weak left hand and strong right, or vice versa. The easiest way to learn how to hold the club with your palms aligned properly is to grip a plain wooden ruler or yardstick. It forces the hands to align properly and shows you how that feels. If you grip and re-grip a yardstick several times, then grip a club, you’ll see that the learning curve is almost immediate.

The position of the grip in the upper/left hand

I also observe many golfers who have the butt of the grip too far into the heel pad of the upper hand (the left hand for right-handed players). It’s amazing how much easier it is to release the club through the ball if even 1/4-1/2″ of the butt is beyond the left heel pad. Try this yourself to see what I mean.  Swing the club freely with just your left hand and notice the difference in its release from when you hold it at the end of the grip, versus gripping down even a half inch.

To help you really understand how this works, go to the range and hit shots with your five-iron gripped down a full inch to make the club the same length as your seven-iron. You will probably see an amazing shot shape difference, and likely not see as much distance loss as you would expect.

Too much lower (right) hand on the club

It seems like almost all golfers of 8-10 handicap or higher have the club too far into the palm of the lower hand, because that feels “good” if you are trying to control the path of the clubhead to the ball. But the golf swing is not an effort to hit at the ball – it is a swing of the club. The proper hold on the club has the grip underneath the pad at the base of the fingers. This will likely feel “weak” to you — like you cannot control the club like that. EXACTLY. You should not be trying to control the club with your lower/master hand.

Gripping too tightly

Nearly all golfers hold the club too tightly, which tenses up the forearms and prevents a proper release of the club through impact. In order for the club to move back and through properly, you must feel that the club is controlled by the last three fingers of the upper hand, and the middle two fingers of the lower hand. If you engage your thumbs and forefingers in “holding” the club, the result will almost always be a grip that is too tight. Try this for yourself. Hold the club in your upper hand only, and squeeze firmly with just the last three fingers, with the forefinger and thumb off the club entirely. You have good control, but your forearms are not tense. Then begin to squeeze down with your thumb and forefinger and observe the tensing of the entire forearm. This is the way we are made, so the key to preventing tenseness in the arms is to hold the club very lightly with the “pinchers” — the thumbs and forefingers.

So, those are what I believe are the four fundamentals of a good grip. Anyone can learn them in their home or office very quickly. There is no easier way to improve your ball striking consistency and add distance than giving more attention to the way you hold the golf club.

More from the Wedge Guy

Your Reaction?
  • 82
  • LEGIT13
  • WOW4
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP4
  • OB1
  • SHANK8

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Texas Children’s Houston Open betting preview

Published

on

As the Florida swing comes to an end, the PGA Tour makes its way to Houston to play the Texas Children’s Houston Open at Memorial Park Golf Course.

This will be the fourth year that Memorial Park Golf Course will serve as the tournament host. The event did not take place in 2023, but the course hosted the event in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Memorial Park is a par-70 layout measuring 7,432 yards and features Bermudagrass greens. Historically, the main defense for the course has been thick rough along the fairways and tightly mown runoff areas around the greens. Memorial Park has a unique setup that features three Par 5’s and five Par 3’s.

The field will consist of 132 players, with the top 65 and ties making the cut. There are some big names making the trip to Houston, including Scottie Scheffler, Wyndham Clark, Tony Finau, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala.

Past Winners at Memorial Park

  • 2022: Tony Finau (-16)
  • 2021: Jason Kokrak (-10)
  • 2020: Carlos Ortiz (-13)

In this article and going forward, I’ll be using the Rabbit Hole by Betsperts Golf data engine to develop my custom model. If you want to build your own model or check out all of the detailed stats, you can sign up using promo code: MATTVIN for 25% off any subscription package (yearly is best value). 

Key Stats For Memorial Park

Let’s take a look at several metrics for Memorial Park to determine which golfers boast top marks in each category over their last 24 rounds:

Strokes Gained: Approach

Memorial Park is a pretty tough golf course. Golfers are penalized for missing greens and face some difficult up and downs to save par. Approach will be key.

Total Strokes Gained: Approach per round in past 24 rounds:

  1. Tom Hoge (+1.30)
  2. Scottie Scheffler (+1.26)
  3. Keith Mitchell (+0.97) 
  4. Tony Finau (+0.92)
  5. Jake Knapp (+0.84)

Strokes Gained: Off the Tee

Memorial Park is a long golf course with rough that can be penal. Therefore, a combination of distance and accuracy is the best metric.

Total Strokes Gained: Off the Tee per round in past 24 rounds:

  1. Scottie Scheffler (+0.94)
  2. Kevin Dougherty (+0.93)
  3. Cameron Champ (+0.86)
  4. Rafael Campos (+0.84)
  5. Si Woo Kim (+0.70)

Strokes Gained Putting: Bermudagrass + Fast

The Bermudagrass greens played fairly fast the past few years in Houston. Jason Kokrak gained 8.7 strokes putting on his way to victory in 2021 and Tony Finau gained in 7.8 in 2022.

Total Strokes Gained Putting (Bermudagrass) per round past 24 rounds (min. 8 rounds):

  1. Adam Svensson (+1.27)
  2. Harry Hall (+1.01)
  3. Martin Trainer (+0.94)
  4. Taylor Montgomery (+0.88)
  5. S.H. Kim (+0.86)

Strokes Gained: Around the Green

With firm and undulating putting surfaces, holding the green on approach shots may prove to be a challenge. Memorial Park has many tightly mowed runoff areas, so golfers will have challenging up-and-down’s around the greens. Carlos Ortiz gained 5.7 strokes around the green on the way to victory in 2020.

Total Strokes Gained: Around the Green per round in past 24 rounds:

  1. Mackenzie Hughes (+0.76)
  2. S.H. Kim (+0.68)
  3. Scottie Scheffler (+0.64)
  4. Jorge Campillo (+0.62)
  5. Jason Day (+0.60)

Strokes Gained: Long and Difficult

Memorial Park is a long and difficult golf course. This statistic will incorporate players who’ve had success on these types of tracks in the past. 

Total Strokes Gained: Long and Difficult in past 24 rounds:

  1. Scottie Scheffler (+2.45)
  2. Ben Griffin (+1.75)
  3. Will Zalatoris (+1.73)
  4. Ben Taylor (+1.53)
  5. Tony Finau (+1.42)

Course History

Here are the players who have performed the most consistently at Memorial Park. 

Strokes Gained Total at Memorial Park past 12 rounds:

  1. Tyson Alexander (+3.65)
  2. Ben Taylor (+3.40)
  3. Tony Finau (+2.37)
  4. Joel Dahmen (+2.25)
  5. Patton Kizzire (+2.16)

Statistical Model

Below, I’ve reported overall model rankings using a combination of the five key statistical categories previously discussed.

These rankings are comprised of SG: App (24%) SG: OTT (24%); SG: Putting Bermudagrass/Fast (13%); SG: Long and Difficult (13%); SG: ARG (13%) and Course History (13%)

  1. Scottie Scheffler
  2. Wyndham Clark
  3. Tony Finau
  4. Joel Dahmen
  5. Stephan Jaeger 
  6. Aaron Rai
  7. Sahith Theegala
  8. Keith Mitchell 
  9. Jhonnatan Vegas
  10. Jason Day
  11. Kurt Kitayama
  12. Alex Noren
  13. Will Zalatoris
  14. Si Woo Kim
  15. Adam Long

2024 Texas Children’s Houston Open Picks

Will Zalatoris +2000 (Caesars)

Scottie Scheffler will undoubtedly be difficult to beat this week, so I’m starting my card with someone who I believe has the talent to beat him if he doesn’t have his best stuff.

Will Zalatoris missed the cut at the PLAYERS, but still managed to gain strokes on approach while doing so. In an unpredictable event with extreme variance, I don’t believe it would be wise to discount Zalatoris based on that performance. Prior to The PLAYERS, the 27-year-old finished T13, T2 and T4 in his previous three starts.

Zalatoris plays his best golf on long and difficult golf courses. In his past 24 rounds, he ranks 3rd in the category, but the eye test also tells a similar story. He’s contended at major championships and elevated events in the best of fields with tough scoring conditions.  The Texas resident should be a perfect fit at Memorial Park Golf Club.

Alex Noren +4500 (FanDuel)

Alex Noren has been quietly playing some of his best golf of the last half decade this season. The 41-year-old is coming off back-to-back top-20 finishes in Florida including a T9 at The PLAYERS in his most recent start.

In his past 24 rounds, Noren ranks 21st in the field in Strokes Gained: Off the Tee, 30th in Strokes Gained: Around the Green, 25th in Strokes Gained: Total on long and difficult courses and 21st in Strokes Gained: Putting on fast Bermudagrass greens.

In addition to his strong recent play, the Swede also has played well at Memorial Park. In 2022, Noren finished T4 at the event, gaining 2.2 strokes off the tee and 7.0 strokes on approach for the week. In his two starts at the course, he’s gained an average of .6 strokes per round on the field, indicating he is comfortable on these greens.

Noren has been due for a win for what feels like an eternity, but Memorial Park may be the course that suits him well enough for him to finally get his elusive first PGA Tour victory.

Mackenzie Hughes +8000 (FanDuel)

Mackenzie Hughes found himself deep into contention at last week’s Valspar Championship before faltering late and finishing in a tie for 3rd place. While he would have loved to win the event, it’s hard to see the performance as anything other than an overwhelming positive sign for the Canadian.

Hughes has played great golf at Memorial Park in the past. He finished T7 in 2020, T29 in 2021 and T16 in 2022. The course fit seems to be quite strong for Hughes. He’s added distance off the tee in the past year or and ranks 8th in the field for apex height, which will be a key factor when hitting into Memorial Park’s elevated greens with steep run-off areas.

In his past 24 rounds, Hughes is the best player in the field in Strokes Gained: Around the Greens. The ability to scramble at this course will be extremely important. I believe Hughes can build off of his strong finish last week and contend once again to cement himself as a President’s Cup consideration.

Akshay Bhatia +8000 (FanDuel)

Akshay Bhatia played well last week at the Valspar and seemed to be in total control of his golf ball. He finished in a tie for 17th and shot an impressive -3 on a difficult Sunday. After struggling Thursday, Akshay shot 68-70-68 in his next three rounds.

Thus far, Bhatia has played better at easier courses, but his success at Copperhead may be due to his game maturing. The 22-year-old has enormous potential and the raw talent to be one of the best players in the world when he figures it all out.

Bhatia is a high upside play with superstar qualities and may just take the leap forward to the next stage of his career in the coming months.

Cameron Champ +12000 (FanDuel)

Cameron Champ is a player I often target in the outright betting market due to his “boom-or-bust” nature. It’s hard to think of a player in recent history with three PGA Tour wins who’s been as inconsistent as Champ has over the course of his career.

Despite the erratic play, Cam Champ simply knows how to win. He’s won in 2018, 2019 and 2021, so I feel he’s due for a win at some point this season. The former Texas A&M product should be comfortable in Texas and last week he showed us that his game is in a pretty decent spot.

Over his past 24 rounds, Champ ranks 3rd in Strokes Gained: Off the Tee and 30th in Strokes Gained: Total on long and difficult courses. Given his ability to spike at any given time, Memorial Park is a good golf course to target Champ on at triple digit odds.

Robert MacIntyre +12000 (FanDuel)

The challenge this week is finding players who can possibly beat Scottie Scheffler while also not dumping an enormous amount of money into an event that has a player at the top that looks extremely dangerous. Enter McIntyre, who’s another boom-or-bust type player who has the ceiling to compete with anyone when his game is clicking on all cylinders.

In his past 24 rounds, MacIntyre ranks 16th in the field in Strokes Gained: Off the Tee, 17th in Strokes Gained: Around the Green and 10th in Strokes Gained: Total on long and difficult courses.

MacIntyre’s PGA Tour season has gotten off to a slow start, but he finished T6 in Mexico, which is a course where players will hit driver on the majority of their tee shots, which is what we will see at Memorial Park. Texas can also get quite windy, which should suit MacIntyre. Last July, the Scot went toe to toe with Rory McIlroy at the Scottish Open before a narrow defeat. It would take a similar heroic effort to compete with Scheffler this year in Houston.

Ryan Moore +15000 (FanDuel)

Ryan Moore’s iron play has been absolutely unconscious over his past few starts. At The PLAYERS Championship in a loaded field, he gained 6.1 strokes on approach and last week at Copperhead, he gained 9.0 strokes on approach.

It’s been a rough handful of years on Tour for the 41-year-old, but he is still a five-time winner on the PGA Tour who’s young enough for a career resurgence. Moore has chronic deterioration in a costovertebral joint that connects the rib to the spine, but has been getting more consistent of late, which is hopefully a sign that he is getting healthy.

Veterans have been contending in 2024 and I believe taking a flier on a proven Tour play who’s shown signs of life is a wise move at Memorial Park.

 

Your Reaction?
  • 15
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

Ryan: Why the race to get better at golf might be doing more harm than good

Published

on

B.F. Skinner was one of the most important psychologists of the 20th century, developing the foundation of the development of reinforcement, and in doing so, creating the concept of behaviorism. In simple terms, this means that we are conditioned by our habits. In practical terms, it explains the divide between the few and far between elite instructors and college coaches.

To understand the application, let’s quickly review one of B.F. Skinner’s most important experiments; superstitions in the formation of behavior by pigeons. In this experiment, food was dispensed to pigeons at random intervals. Soon, according to Skinner, the pigeons began to associate whatever action they were doing at the time of the food being dispensed. According to Skinner, this conditioned that response and soon, they simply haphazardly repeated the action, failing to distinguish between cause and correlation (and in the meantime, looking really funny!).

Now, this is simply the best way to describe the actions of most every women’s college golf coach and too many instructors in America. They see something work, get positive feedback and then become conditioned to give the feedback, more and more, regardless of if it works (this is also why tips from your buddies never work!).

Go to a college event, particularly a women’s one, and you will see coaches running all over the place. Like the pigeons in the experiment, they have been conditioned into a codependent relationship with their players in which they believe their words and actions, can transform a round of golf. It is simply hilarious while being equally perturbing

In junior golf, it’s everywhere. Junior golf academies make a living selling parents that a hysterical coach and over-coaching are essential ingredients in your child’s success.

Let’s be clear, no one of any intellect has any real interest in golf — because it’s not that interesting. The people left, including most coaches and instructors, carve out a small fiefdom, usually on the corner of the range, where they use the illusion of competency to pray on people. In simple terms, they baffle people with the bullshit of pseudo-science that they can make you better, after just one more lesson.

The reality is that life is an impromptu game. The world of golf, business, and school have a message that the goal is being right. This, of course, is bad advice, being right in your own mind is easy, trying to push your ideas on others is hard. As a result, it is not surprising that the divorce rate among golf professionals and their instructors is 100 percent. The transfer rate among college players continues to soar, and too many courses have a guy peddling nefarious science to good people. In fact, we do at my course!

The question is, what impact does all this have on college-age and younger kids? At this point, we honestly don’t know. However, I am going to go out on a limb and say it isn’t good.

Soren Kierkegaard once quipped “I saw it for what it is, and I laughed.” The actions of most coaches and instructors in America are laughable. The problem is that I am not laughing because they are doing damage to kids, as well as driving good people away from this game.

The fact is that golfers don’t need more tips, secrets, or lessons. They need to be presented with a better understanding of the key elements of golf. With this understanding, they can then start to frame which information makes sense and what doesn’t. This will emancipate them and allow them to take charge of their own development.

Your Reaction?
  • 14
  • LEGIT4
  • WOW1
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB0
  • SHANK11

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending