Equipment
GolfWRX exclusive: Inside Underground Golf’s members-only golf ball – with Sergio Garcia & Mark Wahlberg
When Sergio Garcia revealed earlier this month that he was making a surprise switch in golf balls, it sent a ripple through the equipment world.
The reveal was a golf ball from the mysterious Underground Golf. A bold new venture co-founded by Hollywood star Mark Wahlberg, Garry Singer (former co-founder of Clear Golf Balls), and retail heavyweight Doug Meijer. Their ambition is simple and audacious: build the best golf ball on the planet and deliver it through an ultra-exclusive $2,800 membership.
The twist? The ball isn’t sold, stocked, or even marketed.
I sat down with Garcia, Singer, and Wahlberg to talk performance, exclusivity, and why they believe this isn’t just another golf ball launch.
Garry Singer
Gianni: What gap in the traditional golf ball market did you feel The Underground was uniquely positioned to solve?
Garry: We’re not trying to fill a gap. We’re trying to build the best golf ball we possibly can and get it into the hands of friends and like-minded golfers who care about the same things we do. That said, there’s a segment of the market that cares deeply about engineering integrity and performance.
Most major manufacturers are optimizing for scale. That means decisions get influenced by cost efficiencies, distribution requirements, and margin structures. That’s not a criticism, it’s just reality. We wanted to build something without those constraints. Small batch, tightest tolerances, freedom to reject anything that doesn’t meet standard. There’s a real market for players who prioritize precision over price and I’ve seen that before with Clear. Sometimes success in this industry isn’t always visible from the outside, but when a product quietly performs at a very high level, the right people notice. And they act.
Gianni: For serious equipment enthusiasts like GolfWRX members, how does someone actually gain access to The Underground’s membership? Invite-only, referrals, or another process?
Garry: Applications open this week. We’ve already received hundreds of inbound requests on our waitlist. People have written in with full golf resumes, competitive histories, personal notes about why the mission resonates. It’s been impressive.
We’ll review things like club affiliation, handicap, playing profile, but more importantly, alignment. We’re looking for players who understand why we’re controlling numbers in the first place. This isn’t artificial scarcity. It’s engineering discipline.
Membership will be capped. That’s non-negotiable. Because if you want to continue manufacturing at the tightest tolerances possible, you can’t chase unlimited volume. The people who get that? Those are the ones we’re building this for.
Gianni: Without revealing anything proprietary, what core performance philosophy guided the ball’s design?
Garry: Consistency first. Everything else follows that. Our philosophy is simple: remove variability wherever possible. Tighten tolerances beyond what’s typical at mass scale. Build something that performs the same way on swing number one and swing number one thousand. When you focus on that level of detail, you don’t have to say much about it. The performance speaks for itself.
Sergio Garcia
Gianni: Which single performance characteristic made you put the ball straight into play?
Sergio: It wasn’t just one thing on paper. It was more the feeling. From the first few swings, there was just something different. The flight was very stable, very penetrating, but still soft when I needed it to be. Around the greens especially, it just reacts the way I see the shot in my head. And then last week having an albatross with it in tournament play…obviously that’s a special moment no matter what you’re playing, but when you’re seeing the lines clearly and the ball is doing exactly what you’re asking, it gives you a lot of confidence. Sometimes you hit a ball and it just listens to you. This one does that. There’s something magic in it.
View this post on Instagram
Gianni: What’s the reaction been from fellow tour pros since the news came out?
Sergio: A lot of curiosity. Guys notice quickly when something new goes in the bag. I’ve had a few come up asking what it feels like, what the numbers look like. I just tell them they should try it. You can’t really explain it until you hit it. Once you do, you understand.
Gianni: What excites you most about being part of The Underground at this stage?
Sergio: I like that it started small. Very intentional. Very precise. It wasn’t built for everyone, it was built to be right. That’s exciting to me. When you’re part of something from this stage, you can feel the care behind it. It’s not noise. It’s not hype. It’s just quality and belief. And I think people are going to feel that when they play it.
Mark Wahlberg
Gianni: What convinced you that The Underground was something you wanted to build?
Mark: Most things in golf are done at massive scale, and that’s fine. But I wanted to build something where we could be obsessive, no compromises. I’m not interested in “good enough.” I’m interested in best possible. That’s how I live. Training, business, family: whatever I’m doing, I want to do it right. And I wanted to see how close we could get to that standard in golf, too. A ball that feels like it was made with discipline.
Gianni: As someone who plays a lot of golf, what performance characteristic of the ball stood out most to you personally?
Mark: Consistency. That’s the thing. It’s precise. You hit it, and it does what it’s supposed to do. Over and over. That’s what serious players want. It has something special where you don’t feel like you’re fighting the ball. You’re seeing the shot and it’s matching your intent. That’s as close to perfect as you can get, where it becomes less about guessing and more about trusting.
Gianni: Long term, is the vision global scale or tightly controlled exclusivity?
Mark: Controlled – always. The second you chase unlimited scale, you start making trade-offs. And we’re not here for trade-offs. Could it be global? Sure. But global doesn’t have to mean mass. Our priority is protecting the standard. Because once you let the standard slide, it’s over. And the whole reason we built this is to do what the big manufacturers can’t (or won’t) do.
View this post on Instagram
You can begin the application process for membership to The Underground right now at underground.golf.
Equipment
Interesting clubs at top of bag – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, users are talking about top of bag setups that are non-traditional or thought-provoking in some way. Original poster @SuperSpurs106 inquired about other members who might use unorthodox set-ups to help with gapping issues or weak spots.
They wrote:
“I currently have a PING G430 driver, TM Qi35 3W and a TM Qi4D 7W. Driver and 7W are fine but can’t get on with my 3W and have always struggling with this club over the years. Thinking of adding a 2H which I know would look odd. Just wondering if anyone else had a weird set up at the top of their bag?”
Our members in the forum have offered up their thoughts and personal experiences with non-traditional top of bag set-ups, and their reasoning for thinking outside of the box to begin with. Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- BowMain42: “Don’t worry about what “looks” odd. If the club does what you need it to do, it’s the right club.”
- scooterhd2: “I cant hit 3 woods either. Thats why I roll with a unicorn XL Hibore 2 wood. 400 cc head at 16 degrees of loft and its just a monster 3 wood off the tee. Off the deck, we are playing the f6 baffler. 5 wood at 41.75 inches and its easy to control.”
- phizzy30: “I had driver, 3 metal, 2/4 hybrid once upon a time as a higher ss player. 4 hybrid is gone and in place is a driving iron nowadays. I don’t think what you’re proposing is weird in anyway, however the yardage gap might be glaringly huge between driver and 2 hybrid. What is it about your 3 metal that has got you all messed up? You could always go 4 metal with shorter shaft and see if that works.”
Entire Thread: “Interesting clubs at top of bag”
If you aren’t a member, join us in the GolfWRX forums today!
Equipment
Members of the Mini Driver Club – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, one user has gone searching for fellow users of a mini driver. In a post, @TightFade asked for other mini driver users to chime in with their weapon of choice, the reason for employing a mini, and what club follows it in the bag.
@TightFade asked:
“What mini are you playing? What spot in the bag did it take over? What’s the next club after it? For me: Elyte mini 13.5. Replacing 3w. Next up club looks like it’ll be 5w.”
Our members in the forum have been sharing their own bag setups featuring the mini driver, and the various reasons they purchased one in the first place. Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- RCGA: “Ping G430 Max 12* ‘Thriver.’ Next club is a 4w and 2i (I play a weird course).”
- JMB3: “R7 at 12.75 with Diamana BB 63s. 3w replacement. Next Club: Elyte Ti 5w at 17*.”
- ColdOkieGolf: “R7 15.5 turned down to 13.5 It replaces the 3w. I found it surprisingly easy to hit off the deck, and it’s very rare that I need or want to hit something beyond 250 from the fairway, so next club is my 7w.”
- ChaosTheory: “I’m sub-90 MPH with driver. But I’m able to hit DOD. I have been wanting something like the R7 15.5, so I just ordered one. I have a spot in the bag so nothing has to go. But I could see it replacing my trusty 4 wood, which I never use for approach shots. Just tee shots and lay ups. If I drop the 4 wood, I will turn my 7 wood down to ~20 degrees and will have good gaps. I recently tried a thriver build: 12 degree driver turned to 14, with a heavier 44 inch shaft and added head weight. I hit it great. Very accurate and not overly high, but the problem was that it sometimes went as far as a typical drive. And that’s not what I needed. So I will probably turn the 15.5 up to 16.5 or even 17.5. It’s all theoretical at this point. ?”
Entire Thread: “Members of the Mini Driver Club…Check In.”
If you aren’t a member, join us in the GolfWRX forums today!
Whats in the Bag
Chris Gotterup WITB 2026 (June)
- Chris Gotterup had >14 clubs in his bag when photographed prior to the Memorial Tournament.
Drivers: TaylorMade Qi4D (8 degrees), Ping G440 LST (9 degrees @8), Ping G440 LST (7.5 degrees)
Shafts: Project X HZRDUS Smoke Grey 6.5 TX 70 g, Project X HZRDUS T1100 Handcrafted 6.5 TX 70 g, Project X HZRDUS Smoke Grey 6.5 TX 70 g


Mini driver: TaylorMade BRNR (13.5 degrees)
Shaft: Project X HZRDUS Black TX 80 g

5-wood: TaylorMade Qi4D (18 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB Wood Shaft 83 TX

7-wood: TaylorMade Qi4D (21 degrees)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Diamana WB Wood Shaft 83 TX

Irons: TaylorMade P770 (3), Bridgestone Tour B 220 MB (4-9)
Shafts: KBS C-Taper 130 X


Wedges: TaylorMade MG5 (46, 52, 56, 60)
Shafts: KBS C-Taper 130 X, True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100

Putter: TaylorMade Spider X Tour
Grip: SuperStroke Zenergy Pistol 2.0

Grips: Golf Pride Z Grip Cord
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B X Mindset
Check out more in-hand photos of Chris Gotterup’s clubs here.
-
News3 days agoRussell Henley’s winning WITB: 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoAaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
-
Equipment19 hours agoDetails on Jason Day’s latest prototype Avoda iron setup
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
News6 days agoCharles Schwab Challenge Tour Report: MacIntyre, Åberg and Spaun all switch putters, TaylorMade launches new Spider
-
Equipment1 week agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
-
Popular Photo Galleries1 week agoPhotos from the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge

Pingback: Henrik Stenson latest pro to put exclusive invitation-only golf ball into play – GolfWRX