Equipment
Mizuno debuts new Modern Series with Pro M-13, Pro M-15 + Pro Fli-Hi irons
Mizuno has today introduced its new Pro M-13 and Pro M-15 irons, as well as a new Pro Fli-Hi with a fully upgraded chassis, all part of its new Modern Series.
The Mizuno Pro M-13 and Pro M-15 are engineered for players seeking a bit more speed, forgiveness, and playability, while maintaining the Mizuno Pro (241, 243, 245) shaping and feel.
The Modern Series debuts with two distinct models, each designed for a specific type of ball striker.
- The Pro M-13 features tour-preferred proportions and a faster, more consistent flight profile.
- The Pro M-15 delivers higher launch and additional forgiveness that blends smoothly through the set.
Pro M-13 Irons

Integrated construction:
- 4 & 5-iron: Grain Flow forged HD 4120 Chromoly face, topline, and neck. 431 Stainless Steel back part. Integration of Contoured Ellipse CORAREA technology.
- 6, 7 & 8-iron: Full Body Grain Flow forged HD 4115 Chromoly face, topline and neck. 431 Stainless Steel back part. Micro-slot Technology.
- 9, PW & GW: Pure one-piece Grain Flow Forged HD 1025 Elite Steel. Unparalleled feel and feedback in the scoring irons.

Triple cut sole:
- Leading edge bevel provides a sharp leading edge with a high bounce surface, designed for ease of entering the turf without digging. In addition, the trailing edge bevel reduces turf drag as the head passes through the turf.

Specs

Pro M-15 Irons

Integrated Construction
- 4 to 7-iron: Grain Flow forged HD 4135+ Chromoly face and neck. 431 Stainless Steel back part. Hollow-body design with tungsten weighting
- 8-iron: Grain Flow forged HD 4135+ Chromoly face and neck. 431 Stainless Steel back part. Hollow-body design.
- 9, PW & GW: Grain Flow forged HD 1025E Steel Body. 17-4 Stainless Steel back part. Partial hollow-body design.

Improved turf interaction:
- Through sole shape and added bounce.

Specs

Pro Fli-Hi

The Mizuno Pro Fli-Hi has become a fixture with the majority of Mizuno’s tour players. An easy launching, powerful long iron replacement that is designed to flow seamlessly into either the Mizuno Pro M-13, M-15, or full iron set.

The 2026 edition now features a chassis fully upgraded to 4335+ Nickel Chromoly for elevated ball speeds.

Key Features
- Nickel Chromoly 4335+ Hollow Body Construction: Utilizing a heat-treated ultra high strength Chromoly for elevated average ball speeds, with a more pliable body and bendable hosel.
- Internal Tungsten Weighting: 26 grams of weight low in the head for elevated launch compared to traditional long irons.
- Offset Face Weld: Placing the weld line inside the upper face-gauge allowed a thinner topline. On the bottom edge, the weld line is back from the face, allowing greater flex and ball speeds from low on the face.
- Harmonic Impact Technology: Applied to best match the vibration patterns Mizuno’s tour players identified with a soft muscle-back feel.
- Increased Bounce Angle: Increased by a degree for improved turf interaction.

Specs

Price & Availability
- Mizuno Pro M-13 Irons: $215
- Mizuno Pro M-15 Irons: $215
- Mizuno Pro Fli-Hi: $270
Pre-sale: 1/19
At retail: 2/5
Equipment
Best ‘forgiving’ wedges – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, our members have been discussing the most forgiving wedges on the market. WRXer ‘aaronpoling’ lays out his current setup and what he’s currently considering, saying:
“I am looking at getting new wedges, but looking for a forgiving wedge.
I currently play Ping G25 50°, MD4 54° and 58°. I used to play the CBX2 in the 50°, 54° and 58° and liked them a lot; but like any good dad, my son took them.
I am currently looking Callaway’s CB12 and Cleveland’s CBZ. Anyone have thoughts on these? Or recommendations of other wedges that I should check out?”
And our members have been weighing in with their thoughts and recommendations in response, with one brand coming out emphatically on top.
Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- boggyman: “CBZs are amazing wedges!”
- drewbens: “Agreed, the Cleveland CB wedges are great! Already had a CBX Full Face 2 54 and recently added a 50 and 58 (for well under $100 a piece). Was chipping so well last week that my brother-in-law asked if the wedges were legal. Definitely underrated wedges for those of us that are not scratch golfers.”
- BogeyTed: “Get Cleveland CBX/CBZ. Very underrated clubs.”
Entire Thread: “Best ‘forgiving’ wedges – GolfWRXers discuss”
Equipment
From the GolfWRX Classifieds: Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset putter
At GolfWRX, we are a community of like-minded individuals who all experience and express our enjoyment of the game in many ways.
It’s that sense of community that drives day-to-day interactions in the forums on topics that range from best driver to what marker you use to mark your ball. It even allows us to share another thing we all love – buying and selling equipment.
Currently, in our GolfWRX buy/sell/trade (BST) forum, @negncic has a Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset putter up for grabs.

From the listing: “34” Ping PLD Ally Blue Onset. Ping composite shaft Ping PLD Pistol grip. No issues. $345 shipped.”
To check out the full listing in our BST forum, head through the link. If you are curious about the rules to participate in the BST Forum, you can learn more here: GolfWRX BST Rules
Equipment
I built the worst fitting clubs ever – GolfWRXers discuss
In our forums, our members have been reacting to a WRXer who claims to have built the “worst fitting clubs ever.” ‘dlow206’ recounts his experience with plenty of insightful findings for where he can go better next time in a detailed post, saying:
“Here’s my story of building the worst fitting clubs ever (for me). And my findings of what a better fit is.
I am short in stature, as well as a very short wrist to floor of 30.5″. I went down a rabbit hole of wanting to try irons 1″ shorter of more than standard length. Given the shorter lengths, the swingweights would be super light unless I added back a ton of weight to the heads, but I don’t like adding an extreme amount of weight back to the heads, so I decided to compensate with heavier shafts (115 grams instead of 95). Played with this set for a while and was hitting all irons extremely poorly. Thin, fat, right, right, left. My swing didn’t deteriorate that much because I was hitting my driver well, woods well, etc.
Went back to my older set of irons, playing at standard length, and my iron play improved immediately. Since then, have been doing more testing, while paying more attention to different possible variables. What I have found is I actually prefer lighter total weight with relatively normal or slightly heavier swingweights. Did a recent fitting and found that 85 gram shafts were better for me than 95 grams with standard length and relatively standard swingweights.
Still trying to dial in a final iron shaft choice, so have a few contenders that I will be testing. Will be moving away from my current Steelfiber i95 S parallel to lighter and softer
- MMT 80 parallel R – worked pretty well in a limited number of swings at a fitting
- Fujikura Travil 85 R – the fitter liked the Axiom 95 R for me at Club Champion, but i didn’t love the effort required to swing them. If there was a 85 Axiom, that would probably have been a great fit. So i am going try a Travil 85 R which is japan only
- Steelfiber i80 CW R – i have been playing Steelfibers for a long time, so need to give one Steelfiber shaft a shot
Given I do club building work, I am going to build all of these shafts with the All-Fit universal iron adapters to pair with a Srixon 7 iron head for testing. With these adapters, there isn’t a swingweight issue because the amount of weight from drilling out is about equivalent to the universal adapter components.”
And our members have been sharing their reactions in our forum.
Here are a few posts from the thread, but make sure to check out the entire discussion and have your say at the link below.
- Mikey_HACKilroy: “That length cut costs you a fair amount in swing points. I’d posit the length mattered more than the weight because a 115g shaft isn’t going to actually add enough back after cutting an inch off. Does it mean 115 would ultimately work? Hard to say. Maybe try a 1/2″ cut and add 2g to the head to compensate assuming the 7i is 37″ long. Maybe that will feel better. It translates to the same ~D2 you’re swinging at with the 95g shafts (estimated based on common weight, but you can weigh your parts on your own obviously).”
- Stuart_G: “Your process is good – keep at it and trust it.”
Entire Thread: “I built the worst fitting clubs ever – GolfWRXers discuss”
-
Whats in the Bag3 weeks agoKristoffer Reitan’s winning WITB: 2026 Truist Championship
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoAaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
-
Tour Photo Galleries3 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 PGA Championship
-
Equipment1 week agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
Equipment3 days agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
-
Equipment2 weeks agoGolfWRX Launch Report: 2026 Titleist GTS drivers
-
Equipment2 weeks agoPGA Championship Tour Report: Fitzpatrick, Koepka among big-name putter switches for Aronimink



Peter
Jan 7, 2026 at 8:18 am
I live in Singapore, already got the Fli-Hi 2 iron and it is awesome. looks amazing and easier to hit than I expected.
The Truth Network
Jan 6, 2026 at 8:08 am
If Mizuno was out to create a piece of junk, they succeeded.
mg
Jan 5, 2026 at 4:58 pm
make sure the heads are on tight and the lies are the same
Trevino
Jan 5, 2026 at 12:30 pm
Not Mizuno’s prettiest looking clubs, that’s for sure.