Connect with us

Product Reviews

GolfWRX member testing: Titleist GT driver testing

Published

on

Our forum faithful are well acquainted with the incredible giveaways and review opportunities in the realm of threads and comments, but we want to ensure front-page readers are involved as well.

Check out what the most-trusted GolfWRXers have to say about the Titleist GT driver (and fairway woods, too!) here.

Titleist GT Drivers

Titleist on its line of GT Drivers

Each driver in the GT line features an all-new Seamless Thermoform Crown comprised of a new Proprietary Matrix Polymer. This unique, ultra-light material allowed Titleist engineers to place discretionary mass in the optimal locations for each model, providing exceptional speed and stability with GT’s Split Mass Construction. GT maintains the classic Titleist driver look at address with a clean transition between the crown and the club’s titanium body, and the acoustic properties of the Proprietary Matrix Polymer preserve a player-preferred sound and feel. Refined aerodynamics increase clubhead speed, and a new Speed Ring and VFT face design contribute to faster ball speed on on- and off-center strikes. The sum of these advancements creates an exceptionally fast driver that offers extremely consistent spin and launch conditions across the face.

The new GT line consists of three models. GT2 is designed for speed and forgiveness across the face with a higher-MOI setup. GT3 is designed for fine-tuned speed and control, maximizing distance and optimizing flight. GT4 is a low-spin, 430cc driver designed to eliminate excessive spin and deliver a fast, penetrating trajectory.

How we choose our testers

GolfWRX staff evaluates each entry against the criteria laid out in the testing thread to determine the best fit for each specific product — For example, if a game-improvement iron is being tested, game-improvement iron-playing golfers will be considered.

Member testers

  • @ChrisATL (10 handicap)
  • @stryper (3 handicap)
  • @AUTIGER07 (1.4 handicap)
  • @bigdriveandy (3.9 handicap)

Titleist graciously scheduled a fitting for each member at their local regional Titleist fitting partner to ensure each tester was fit to their spec.

Member review highlights

@ChrisATL (Titleist GT3)

“To start, I would categorize this as my first “true” fitting – I’ve been fitted for specific clubs in the past, but it was done in a big-box retailer and definitely more of a rushed experience. However, Chris’ fitting process was much more “methodical”, which I appreciated and learned SO MUCH more than past experiences.”

“Trackman data will REALLY shed some light on the progression between heads / shafts / setups, but I’ll close this post with one finding: the Ventus TR Blue was far and away the BEST option for me (and we went through A LOT of options). However, even though shaft didn’t change, my selected GT setup found some incredible gains against my gamer.”

“GT3 nails consistency & forgiveness. While I’ve been fighting a bit of a fade recently, the GT3 still kept the flight window much more consistent across a number of days / tests. Furthermore, when there was an obvious mistrike, it was incredible to see how well the GT3 kept the ball playable. For example, the “range” of shot trajectories (left to right) was ~47 yards, compared to ~98 yards with the Paradym. This alone is an INCREDIBLE improvement in driver performance.

“On top of that, distance-wise, I’m seeing material gains in ball speed / carry distance with the GT3 (~5 mph over Paradym) – its hard to explain but the GT face just feels “hotter”. This combined with the increased forgiveness has shown the GT as the clear winner here. One other comment, I noted this at my fitting session, but one of my favorite features of the GT driver is the framing lines that Titleist put on the face. Since the “GT” is quite small on the crown, I appreciate the lines on the face and being able to properly frame / aim the face against the ball.”

@stryper (Titleist GT3)

“After a brief warmup (didn’t need much, as it was as hot and humid as a  St.Louis summer day should be), we started off with a baseline read on what I’m currently playing. Swing felt great, and despite the nerves, I was able to give him a fairly accurate picture of my game off the tee. Some of my nicer shots…and some of my most common misses. Toe fades and dead left when I squared the face with my out-to-in path.

“Then we tried the GT2 head with several different Project X HZRDUS and Denali shafts. Throughout the process, I paid no attention to either weight or flex, preferring to let Matt work his magic there. (I’m relatively insensitive to swing weight and shaft loading anyway, so I didn’t really care). With the GT2, we did pick up a few yards, but dispersion wasn’t quite getting us where we need to be.

“Then we moved to the GT3. Repeated the process with the same various shafts and saw things come into focus a little more. Still not quite there, but dispersion was tightening up. Then we went to Tensei. Gone was the hard left miss, and the weak heel and toe fades were much more in play. A few more tweaks with Surefit track weights and we were set.

“So overall, on average, we found 8 more yards distance and, more importantly, much tighter left to right dispersion. We couldn’t completely get my spin numbers where we would have liked, but Matt was satisfied that that was more of a swing issue than anything about the driver setup.  All in all I came away very satisfied with, and highly recommend, the Titleist driver fitting experience.”

“Literally pitted the TSR3 head against the GT3 head for a true one on one battle, with all variables removed. I used the shaft I was fitted for, Mitsubishi TENSEI 1K Blue 55 Stiff, changing clubheads only between the two rounds of six recorded shots, starting with the GT3. Once again, an HD Golf simulator was used for this test.

“This time a true winner did emerge. For the key factors of distance, ball speed and smash, the GT3 came out ahead, in spite of a slight edge on club speed going to the TSR3. Also to be noted, the TSR3 did push a couple of shots farther right than the GT3, giving the dispersion win to the GT3. Launch angle and peak height also had a tighter, more consistent window with the GT3”

TSR3

GT3

“While doing a speed training session today, I saw my best driver numbers to date. Can’t say enough about the GT3.”

@AUTIGER07 (Titleist GT3)

“I decided to follow Stryper’s approach of going in totally open-minded and really paying more attention to feel and the results instead of immediately checking the shaft/surefit specs when being handed something new. My fitter Billy was great to work with and I’d definitely recommend him for anyone located in the Northern Illinois or Southern Wisconsin area.”

“I came very, very close to going with the GT4 9* as the feel reminded me of a modern 983E. Sound is a little more “tingy” with the GT4 than the GT3 but the feel was about as good as it gets when hitting one in the screws. The GT3’s extra forgiveness and sound (more of a “thwack”) is why I decided to go in that direction but the GT4 was close to being the one. The surprising part of the order was the shaft spec. I previously played a Ping G410 LST with the Even Flow Black so I’m comfortable with that profile / feel but I honestly expected to end up with the HZRDUS Black or the Tensei 1K Black. However, once we moved to the 8* head moving to a mid-launch shaft brought everything into the right window.”

Initial impressions from AUTIGER07..

  • “The 8* head with a mid-launch shaft has been on my mind since the fitting was completed. The ballflight is pretty much perfect, a very penetrating trajectory that doesn’t fall out of the sky and still hits the ground running. I noticed a carry distance similar to my Cobra but also noticed more runout once it landed.
  • Feel is perfect. The sound has a little more ting on mishits than what I recall but center shots are muted.
  • The Riptide felt great. Extremely smooth but didn’t feel loose at all. I used a G410LST with an Evenflow Black for 2+ years and this feels very similar to that setup. Just more firepower from the head vs the Ping.”

@bigdriveandy (Titleist GT3)

“I met with Kevin Moore, the area rep for Titleist, and the Director of Instruction at Viniterra, Josh, who was also doing fittings for members alongside Kevin.”

“We started the fitting – he handed me my first GT build which was a 9* GT3 with Tensei Black 1k 65 X flex. He had it in A1 setting with the weight in the middle. Immediately hit about 3 duck hooks and he asked me to hand it back to him. He handed me back the same configuration head with a Ventus Velocore Blue 6-x. Immediately showed improvement but balls were still diving low and falling out of the sky. He switched to a 10* head and it really came alive for me. Once I adjusted to the feel and the DRASTIC difference in crown appearance from my beloved G400 Max, I was hitting these soft butter cuts that were just staying in the air forever. After each shot he relayed my ballspeed, spin and carry distance to me. To my amazement, he said I was picking up about 3-4 mph of ballspeed and about 10 yards of carry with the GT.”

First impressions from @bigdriveandy

  • Looks: Stupid good. Texted my golfing buddies and told them this is the best looking driver I have ever had. It is a jarring aesthetic departure from my trusty G400 Max. Gloss black, perfect modern pearish-shape. Deep face, and I mean, you guys have seen the pictures online. It’s just better looking in person.
  • Feel/Sound: Titleist nailed it. Is anyone doing it better in the game today? I hit one that was just awful out of the low heel and it briefly sounded a little more brittle/metallic. Out of the center there is just a euphoric crack and that feeling of a forged iron where you almost feel like you’ve missed the ball it comes off so pure. I don’t have experiences with any prior gen Titleist drivers since 910 but this is loads better than the feel and sound of the G400 Max, which is much louder and harsher. I also have a Stealth 2 which feels good, but more on the dead and wooden side where as the GT3 has a more acoustic experience, a more melodic sound as if someone tuned it carefully like they do with a sportscar engine.
  • Ball flight: Well, I was hitting pushes with my driver today. Don’t know what that is about. However, on the handful that I hit straight enough that it would have found a fairway, the ball flight was a towering cut with low-mid spin that flattens out quickly and just gets downrange fast. I easily put it beyond any place on that range that my G400 Max normally goes. It could have been exacerbated by the breeze at my back, but the impression that I got is that the ~10 mph of BS my fitter said I gained was not a fluke.
  • I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that I do think the edge in forgiveness goes still to my G400. Could be just a function of being really comfortable with the setup of my gamer, and we do all know the legend of the G400 Max’s forgiveness. I will say though that the GT3 seems plenty forgiving for most golfers. I did not try to play with the weight or adapter settings but this is probably something I will get around to doing to see if I can get any incremental gains in this setup. For reference my driver is setup at B1 on the hosel and Toe 2 on the weight track.”

Read the entire thread, become a member, and jump in on the conversation here.

More about GolfWRX member testing

Member testing gives our forum members the opportunity to put the latest golf equipment through the paces. In exchange for getting a product to test (and keep), forum members are expected to provide in-depth product feedback in the forums, along with photos, and engage with the questions of other forum members.

For brands, the GolfWRX member feedback and direct engagement is a vital window into the perceptions of avid golfers.

You can find additional testing opportunities in the GolfWRX forums.

We share your golf passion. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX, Facebook and Instagram.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Equipment

Bettinardi The Antidote SB3 and SB5 putter review – Club Junkie Reviews

Published

on

Bettinardi launched The Antidote putters at the end of 2024 with the SB1 & SB2 models. It was their first jump into zero-torque putters and brought that solid Bettinardi feel to the hottest trend in putters. So at the end of 2025, Bettinardi expanded the line with two more models, the SB3 and SB5 putters, in order to appeal to more golfers. I have gotten to roll both models and think they are great in their own ways.

You can listen to the full review on the Club Junkie podcast, streaming on YouTube or any podcast platform — and be sure to follow on Instagram.

Both Antidote putters have faces milled from 303 stainless steel for a soft, solid feel. The faces feature Bettinardi’s signature F.I.T. Face milling, which removes 55 percent of the face material for a soft, responsive feel. Bettinardi then uses its Diamond Blast to finish the face, reducing glare and creating a durable, great-looking finish. The shafts are installed into the center of gravity of the putter head and feature a small amount of forward shaft lean. This gives each Antidote putter Simply Balanced Zero Torque to keep the face square to the target during the stroke.

The Antidote SB3

When I got the box with both putters, this was the one I was most excited for. Being a long-time fan of “fang” style putters, this one just jumped out to me as the one I need to try. Personally, the silver face and Sapphire Blue as the contrast between the two is another way to make sure the putter is aligned towards the target. This putter frames the ball really well between the fangs, or wings, on the back of the putter and the twin white sight lines that run down them. Getting this SB3 lined up to your target is easy and quick, so you can feel more confident as you are about to get that putt rolling.

The feel of the F.I.T. Face is nice and soft with just enough click to let you know the quality of your contact. While it isn’t something Bettinardi claims, I feel like the F.I.T. Face puts a nice roll on the ball, and you don’t ever encounter hopping or skipping as the ball starts out. My favorite way of explaining the feel of a zero torque putter going through the stroke is the feeling of the face pulling itself through impact. To me, the SB3 has a really stable feel, and it doesn’t want to be manipulated through the stroke. The SB1 might be the most stable feeling, to me, out of all The Antidote putters but the SB3 would be a very close 2nd place. If, and when, you strike the ball out on the toe or in the heel, you will have a feeling of the SB3 not wanting to twist and keeping the ball on line. If you are looking for a zero torque, high-MOI mallet, with great feel and sound, then The Antidote SB3 could be a great option to try.

The Antidote SB5

There are a lot of golfers who would love to try a ZT putter but just don’t love mallet putters. Thankfully, there are some really cool options out there, like The Antidote SB5 putter. To me, this is a really classic-looking putter from address with clean lines and a familiar look that should appeal to the more traditional golfer. Just like the SB3, you get a phenomenal-feeling putter, with both pieces precisely milled from 303 stainless steel. The triple site lines, one on the topline and two on the flange, again work better than I expected with this head shape, and I got comfortable with them fairly quickly.

I typically like ZT putters that feel super stable, but this SB5 seemed to fit my stroke right out of the gate. Players with more arc in their stroke might find the SB5 as something that feels more natural to them, as it will allow you to rotate it just a little more than you can with a traditional blade putter. Even with that, I feel the SB5 was really easy to square up, and I was never searching to find consistency in that. Miss hits with the SB5 were also pretty good. Shots off the heel stayed very straight and had a good, soft feel, while shots struck on the toe felt a little more vibration. Interestingly, when I did miss putts, I noticed that I missed more putts left with the SB3 and more right with the SB5. As I have spent more time with each putter, I have fallen more in love with the SB5, which is a little surprising to me. It has just become a comfortable option to use after a few years of gaming.

Bettinardi continues to excel in its ability to engineer and mill some of the finest putters you can get your hands on. With the SB3 & SB5 additions to the zero torque line, I think they have really widened who can and will play these style putters. If you have tried ZT putters in the past but haven’t found the right one due to the fact that they don’t live up to expectations, then maybe one of these Bettinardi putters can be The Antodote!

Continue Reading

Equipment

SeeMore SBx & SKx zero-torque putter review – Club Junkie Reviews

Published

on

SeeMore has had a long history of making precision putters. The company gained worldwide fame after Payne Stewart won the 1999 U.S. Open with one. SeeMore’s most famous putter is the FGP Blade, which Zach Johnson used to win the Masters and the Open Championship.

SeeMore is also the creator of a unique, simple, and very effective alignment aid in their Rifle Scope Technology. RST is the use of a red oval and two white lines on the heel of the putter. When the putter shaft, or hosel, covers the red dot and you can only see the white lines on either side of the shaft, then you know the putter is lined up square. SeeMore is now adding another technology to its putter lineup, zero torque.

You can listen to the full review on the Club Junkie podcast, streaming on YouTube or any podcast platform — and be sure to follow on Instagram.

The SBx and SKx putters are the latest additions to SeeMore’s lineup. Zero-torque putters are probably the most significant and hottest segment in golf right now. The design is based on installing the shaft into the putter head’s center of gravity so the toe points up when you set the putter on a table to hold it without restriction. That balance keeps the face square to the target throughout the entire stroke, eliminating the need to square the putter face like you have to do with traditional putters. Now, this isn’t going to turn you into a tour pro, but for many golfers, it can help them consistently get the ball started on the intended line.

SeeMore did a great job with the putter’s looks, keeping it simple without straying from what they do best. The platinum color face is milled from stainless steel for a solid feel and feedback to the golfer, while the body is precision-milled from a block of aluminum. I like the contrast of silver and black as that divide gives my eye an additional alignment aid to make sure I am putting the ball at the hole, or target.

The SBx is going to have a boxier, more straight and sharp look from address with straight wings that extend back from the body. Some golfers will like that look for framing the ball in combination with the single white sight line on the flange. If you like a little softer and more rounded look, then the SKx fits the bill with more rounded fangs that taper inward to give a more compact look at address.

SKx also uses a single alignment line on the stainless topline, and if you look closely, there are two milled sight lines on the back flange that aren’t painted. If you want a little more to look down at, then you could probably fill them in with white paint pretty easily.

Both putters use SeeMore’s RST alignment, and I do have to say it is a simple yet effective way to ensure the putter is lined up correctly. Usually, if I am testing out two zero-torque putters at the same time, one of them stands out as easier to line up or get rolling on the right start line, but these two were equally matched. Lining up putts and starting them on the intended line are easy and repeatable.

Sound and feel are very important when it comes to finding the putter, as it is the voice that speaks to you. I was really impressed, and so was another WRX staff member, by how soft both the SBx and SKx putters are. The first putts were right out of the box on the office carpet, and we both looked at each other with big smiles! The horizontal milling lines on the face provide a soft feel at impact, and the sound is excellent and low-pitched. Not clicky at all, but you still get a good sound with it that is easy to recognize where you hit it on the face.

Being zero torque, the putters have a good feeling of the face staying square through the stroke. They both are a good mix of highly stable feeling and have the ability to move with an arching putting stroke, also. While they may not have the strongest feeling of the face pulling the head through impact, they should be more versatile, as many golfers find success with them.

I still feel very confident when putting with these that the ball is going to come out on its intended line. I have found that with some zero-torque putters, I tend to have a ball that misses left of the hole or target, and I didn’t find that the case with either the SBx or SKx models. I was really impressed with how consistently I was rolling the ball at the target, and I think the heavy focus on the RST allowed me to avoid overthinking other putting thoughts and swing freely.

 

Overall the SeeMore SBx and SKx are just solid zero torque putters with a more classic shape to them for players who find zero torque hard to look at. The milling and finish work from SeeMore are fantastic and it shows through the performance.

Continue Reading

Equipment

Sugarloaf Social Club x Makino Tour 3 putter review – Club Junkie Reviews

Published

on

Most of us know Sugarloaf Social Club (SSC) as a clothing and accessory brand that has been leading the way in golf fashion and lifestyle since 2011. Ian Gilley is the founder of the brand and has created some amazing products, primarily in the soft goods category. While clubs have not been the focus of SSC, there have been some limited collabs in the space before working on the Tour 3 putter with Makino.

Makino is a Japanese golf brand founded by Shohei Nomura, an industrial designer based in Tokyo. All Makino’s products are made in small batches where precision and craftsmanship are the most important factors.

To be completely honest, I saw the putter on the Sugarloaf website and wasn’t blown away. When taking the putter out of the box, my mind changed, as the quality of the putter and classic look don’t come through with online pictures.

At first glance, the putter appears a little chunky, with larger shoulders that are very defined near the back cavity area. The bumpers are clean and a good blend of rectangular with softened edges. The topline is definitely on the thicker side, but for some golfers, like myself, it can be used as an additional alignment aid to ensure the face is square to the target.

A single sightline is machined into the flange and filled with white paint, creating a simple and traditional look. A shallow milling pattern is used on the face, featuring the model name and the “S” of Sugarloaf on the heel. The little details like the “Play or Perish” motto on the L-neck are excellent touches that let you know this isn’t a mass-produced putter. 

On the grip wrapping, I was surprised to see there is a sticker that says this is an un-plated putter and could rust…but the putter is made from stainless steel? Now I am not a metallurgist, but a search on the old Google machine told me that SUS303 stainless steel uses materials in the alloy, like sulphur, that make it a little more susceptible to corrosion if you aren’t careful. No rust has shown up yet, but I guess that explains it.

On the green, this putter offers a much softer feel than I and a coworker expected from the face milling. SUS303 and the thick face create a really nice feel and sound! The putter is still responsive, however, and you will get good feedback on putts that you don’t hit on the center of the face.

The putter’s sound is also softer, with not really a click but a more gentle knock as the ball leaves the face, even with a firmer ball like the Pro V1x. Ball speed is consistent and repeatable, and while there is no real high-tech engineering in this head, it performs well enough on mishits. Distance drop off from putts off the toe and heel aren’t massive, and there is still a decent chance you get that ball to the hole.

At the end of the day, this putter is much more than I thought it was going to be. The shaping and quality of the finish are phenomenal, showcasing the skill of Makino and the creativity of Sugarloaf. Traditionalists will love the classic look, while feel players will be impressed by the softness and responsiveness the Sugarloaf Social Club x Makino Tour 3 provides.

See more in-hand photos and read what GolfWRXers are saying in the forums.

Continue Reading

Announcement

Our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use have been updated as of January 29th, 2026. Please review the updated policies here Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. By continuing to use our site after January 29th, 2026, you agree to the changes.

WITB

Facebook

Trending