Opinion & Analysis
The 20 players who can win the Masters
My annual Masters column shortlisting the players that can win the Masters has been successful since its inception in 2013. Since the field is smaller compared to other majors and it is the only major event that plays the same golf course each year, there are clear set metrics that have strong predictive outcomes for success at Augusta National Golf Club. Thus, the filtering process that narrows the list to 20-24 players lives on.
Last year was the second year in a row where the winner rather easily walked away with the green jacket. But the next four closest competitors (Aberg, Morikawa, Homa, and Fleetwood) were all players that I had filtered out. But, I do feel that the weather conditions may have played a role in those players finishing better than expected.
Over the past 25 years, Augusta National has greatly favored longer hitters. The best way for the shorter hitters to compete in the Masters is to get the right type of weather. It could be record low temperatures with strong winds, like in Zach Johnson’s 2007 victory, or it could be soft conditions from rain that allow shorter hitters to be able to hold those long approach shots, like in Mike Weir’s 2003 win.
The current trend of “critical holes,” where past leaders in the tournament have gained the most strokes against the field, is holes 7, 11, 13, and 17. But with the tee moved well back on 13 for the first time last year, any inclement weather may completely change the importance of that hole and give some advantage back to shorter hitters who are superior wedge players if virtually nobody can reach the green in two shots. Having said that, 11 is still proving to be the most critical hole as top players in the past have been gaining an average of 1.5 strokes per tournament on that hole alone.
As I have done for the past two editions, I’ll filter out the LIV players first. Since LIV Tour does not provide ShotLink or Trackman data, it’s more of a guessing game as to how certain LIV Tour golfers are playing.
Tyrrell Hatton
Dustin Johnson
Phil Mickelson
Joaquin Niemann
Charl Schwartzel
Cameron Smith
Bubba Watson
It feels odd leaving Mickelson and DJ out, but they haven’t played very well, and I don’t think the key parts of their game to succeed at Augusta are on point at this time. Niemann has made 4 out of 5 cuts at Augusta, but hasn’t really scared the top of the leaderboard. Recency bias matters in golf forecasting, and neither Cameron Smith nor Tyrrell Hatton have played all that well lately on the LIV Tour and in other tournaments around the world.
Next, I filtered out the amateurs and all first-time professional attendees. The Masters has only been won three times by a first-time attendee: Fuzzy Zoeller was the last to win in 1979. Prior to Zoeller, though, it was Horton Smith in the inaugural event in 1934, followed by Gene Sarazen in 1935:
Jose Luis Ballester(a)
Evan Beck (a)
Brian Campbell
Rafael Campos
Laurie Canter
Thomas Detry
Nico Echavarria
Max Greyserman
Justin Hastings (a)
Joe Highsmith
Rasmus Højgaard
Noah Kent (a)
Thriston Lawrence
Matt McCarty
Maverick McNealy
Taylor Pendrith
Aaron Rai
Davis Riley
Hiroshi Tai (a)
Davis Thompson
Kevin Yu
Out of all of the first-time attendees, the data likes Nico Echavarria and Kevin Yu to play the best at Augusta National.
I also filtered out old Masters champions I do not believe can get into contention anymore.
Angel Cabrera
Fred Couples
Zach Johnson
Bernhard Langer
Jose Maria Olazabal
Vijay Singh
Mike Weir
As I mentioned earlier, there is a recency bias involved with performance forecasting. Missing the cut in the event in the prior week greatly reduces the likelihood of winning the following week compared to players who miss the cut, take a week off, and then play the following week.
Therefore, I filter out all players who missed the cut at the Valero Texas Open last week.
Ludvig Aberg
Akshay Bhatia
Sam Burns
Matt Fitzpatrick
Max Homa
Tom Kim
Chris Kirk
Hideki Matsuyama
Adam Schenk
I will also filter out the players who have never made the cut at the Masters.
Wyndham Clark
Nick Dunlap
Austin Eckroat
Stephan Jaeger
Michael Kim
A Tradition Unlike Any Other…
Augusta National has traditionally favored longer hitters and even more so in the past 20 years of the event. Of course, there have been exceptions, as in 2007 when the short-hitting Zach Johnson ended up winning the event.
Critics of my filtering system point out Johnson’s victory as a case for short hitters being able to win at Augusta, but they neglect the fact that Johnson’s victory came in historically low temperatures in the 40s with wind gusts reaching 35 mph. That made the par-5s almost unreachable in two shots, and the course stressed wedge play and short game around the green, where Zach had a sizable advantage.
Historically on the PGA Tour, scores start to increase significantly once the wind speeds are going 12 mph or more. The forecast calls for a nice Thursday with winds blowing 9 mph SSW. Friday is the day of uncertainty with a forecast of potential morning rain and winds at 12 mph coming out of the West. Saturday is supposed to be a little cooler with 8 mph NNW winds. And then it is setup for a beautiful sunny Sunday with a high of 73 degrees and winds only blowing at 4 mph out of the Northwest. Mind you that the key par-5’s, 13 and 15 go west, so the wind is likely to be in the golfers’ face to some degree on those holes.
I still don’t see the weather being a big enough factor to help the shorter hitters, so I will filter out the players that don’t have enough distance off the tee.
Lucas Glover
Brian Harman
Russell Henley
Tom Hoge
Denny McCarthy
Collin Morikawa
JT Poston
Justin Rose
Sepp Straka
Nick Taylor
Danny Willett
Morikawa is the most difficult player to leave off this list since Augusta National is such an approach shot player’s course and Morikawa is arguably the best iron player in the world. His lack of distance is the only area of the game that he is missing to be a perfect fit for the course. And he has picked up some distance in the past couple of years, but still just narrowly misses out on the distance filter. It should also be noted that Sepp Straka has been having a strong season with his irons, particularly on his long approach shots.
The next filter will be players who hit the ball too low. This filter has been controversial in the past, but has continually proven to be valid. Last year I had 5 players in this filter with two of them missing the cut and the best finish was a t-22 by Joaquin Niemann. This year we have another 5 players to filter out:
Daniel Berger
Sungjae Im
Robert MacIntyre
Jhonattan Vegas
Will Zalatoris
Every year, I filter out the poor performers on approach shots from 175-225 yards, as Augusta National puts a lot of stress on those shots. Last year, I filtered out nine players, and they had the most success out of any group of players filtered out in previous Masters, with both Max Homa and Tommy Fleetwood finishing T3 — but most of the group still underperformed.
Here are the golfers I’m filtering out due to poor play from 175-225 yards:
Christiaan Bezuidenhout
Cam Davis
Jason Day
Harris English
Tommy Fleetwood
Billy Horschel
Patton Kizzire
Adam Scott
Jordan Spieth
Sahith Theegala
Cameron Young
That leaves the 20 players who can win the Masters…
Byeong Hun An (150/1)
Keegan Bradley (100/1)
Patrick Cantlay (40/1)
Corey Conners (65/1)
Bryson DeChambeau (14/1)
Tony Finau (80/1)
Sergio Garcia (80/1)
Nicolai Højgaard (200/1)
Viktor Hovland (35/1)
Brooks Koepka (25/1)
Min Woo Lee (40/1)
Shane Lowry (40/1)
Rory McIlroy (6.5/1)
Matthieu Pavon (400/1)
Jon Rahm (16/1)
Patrick Reed (80/1)
Xander Schauffele (20/1)
Scottie Scheffler (5/1)
JJ Spaun (175/1)
Justin Thomas (25/1)
My personal top-10 picks
Corey Conners (65/1)
Bryson DeChambeau (14/1)
Viktor Hovland (35/1)`
Min Woo Lee (40/1)
Shane Lowry (40/1)
Rory McIlroy (6.5/1)
Jon Rahm (16/1)
Xander Schauffele (20/1)
Scottie Scheffler (5/1)
Justin Thomas (25/1)
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: We’re talking about practice! My best tips for taking your game to the course
With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game.
Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills.
While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice.
This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times.
Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy.
One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length. Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine.
It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season.
Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds.
Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time. With the beginning of June on the horizon and courses rounding into peak condition for the season, it’s time to hone the finer skills that often get rusty over the winter. More sunlight also means more time to get out on the course and work on your game. Whether it’s the practice green or the driving range, there’s always something to improve—whether you’re enjoying the fresh air or preparing for a weekend game or tournament. You can work on drills or freestyle around the green, and friendly competition is a great way to sharpen your skills. While there are endless ways to get better at golf, I’m going to focus on practicing around the green. Let’s take a look at a few things to keep in mind as we head into the summer months.
Drills
From the driving range to the practice green, it’s important to incorporate drills into your routine. Years ago, I spent a weekend working on my short game with James Sieckmann. He recommended doing drill work for 5–10 minutes, then returning to your main practice. This way, you create a balance between structured drills and real-world scenarios, so you’re not confined to “perfect” situations. For example, hitting the same three-foot putt over and over is good for repetition, but after a while, it becomes less interactive for your brain.
My approach is to use a putting trainer with a narrow gate for the ball to pass through, or simply place tees just outside the width of the ball. I’ll hit a series of four putts through the gate for three sets. Then, from a similar distance, I’ll hit four putts without the training aid and repeat that sequence three times. Next, I’ll hit a number of 15–25 foot putts in a random fashion, then circle back to repeat the short putt drills with and without the training aid.
This breaks up the rhythm of hitting short putts with the training aid. When you hit the same short putts over and over, it’s easy to get into a groove—which is great for the drill, but not reflective of actual course play. While finding a rhythm is fundamental for drills, I like to introduce variation with longer putts to keep things realistic.
Game Mode
Once you’ve established a foundation with drills, it’s time to simulate on-course scenarios. This is where a few practice games come in handy. One that I’ve been enjoying lately involves putting 10- to 15-footers with two balls. If I make the putt, great! If I miss, I pull the missed ball back a putter length.
Suddenly, that little tap-in becomes a nerve-wracking three-footer—at least at first. As you get better at this game, those three- and five-footers become much more comfortable and routine. It may sound cliché, but each shot is just what it is—it’s how we react that makes the difference. I like this game because it blends the pressure of on-course putting with the consequence of leaving yourself a much longer putt than usual.
Another game I like is one I recently learned from Brad Faxon. Place three tees in a line at four different locations around the hole: one at 3 feet, one at 6 feet, and one at 8 feet. The 3- and 6-foot putts count as par, and the 8-footer is for birdie.
This game keeps you focused on scoring and helps you get into a competitive mindset. You can even think about this putting game while you’re on the course. I just started playing it, and last week I couldn’t get better than two under par.
Competition
Competition during practice is when drills and games come to life, and you start to see results. For me, nothing beats a putting contest with a friend or two. In the right setting, these contests can become talking points for the whole season. Match play, a game of 21, or simply seeing who can make the most one-putts (with a small prize on the line) are all great ways to simulate real on-course pressure. Recently, I played in a putting contest where one competitor made back-to-back 30- and 50-foot putts. As they say, expect your opponent to make every putt—and he nearly did. That’s impressive, and it’s something you see on the course, too: you have to stay committed to your game plan, no matter what.
When it comes to practice, it’s important to blend feedback from recent rounds with the fundamentals you want to reinforce. Drills, games, and competition—from the driving range to the putting green—form the backbone of skills you’ll rely on during actual rounds. Finding the right balance is something we’re all working on, one practice session at a time.
Equipment
Seoul Sensibilities: Is Korean golf fashion starting to shape the world?
For Korean golfers, we always look forward to the last of the kkot-saem-chu-I for the true start of a new golf season. The term refers to a cold snap, but literally translates as “winter being jealous of the flowers beginning to bloom, thus lashing out one final time before surrendering to spring”.
A rather poetic mouthful packed into a short expression.
Koreans can be like that. Understated, yet oddly expressive at the same time. And nowhere is this more true on the golf course and in our golf bags. In fact, I suspect many Korean golfers look forward to new apparel and accessory drops more than they do actual equipment launches each year.

At this point, Korean golf fashion may exist on its own timeline. (courtesy of @seonbi_golfer)
There is ample evidence to support that suspicion. Korea is the world’s third-largest golf market behind the United States and Japan, yet its appetite for golf apparel exceeds that of both countries combined. Recent estimates suggest that Korea accounts for nearly 40 percent of the global golf apparel market, placing it among the world’s most influential golf fashion markets and punching well above its size.
Simply, we care deeply about how new golf clubs look and feel, but enjoy looking good while swinging them even more.
Golfers in the West may laugh and say that golf is played on a course, not a fashion runway. Perhaps. But what’s the harm in trying to look and feel good, if the added self-confidence can help actual performance? It certainly seems to have worked for Jason Day, who may have unlocked a new stats category: dormant strokes gained. Coincidence?

During the COVID-era, estimates placed the market near $9 billion, an astonishing figure for a single country.
As a proud member of Gen X, I’ve witnessed the highs and lows of golf fashion firsthand. The pleated trousers and wing-tipped shoes of Jack Nicklaus, the stylish plus-fours and knickers of Payne Stewart, the baggy black trousers and fitted mock-necks of Tiger Woods, and the thigh-hugging athletic tailoring of Rory McIlroy. Golf fashion, like the golf swing itself, has rarely stood still.
But nowhere have those trends shifted, evolved, and been scrutinized quite as relentlessly as in Korea. Here, golf fashion moves faster than fairway gossip, and consumers dissect brands with a level of discernment that can be both impressive and mildly terrifying. New brands are studied, judged, embraced, or dismissed with startling efficiency.
The result is a consumer base with one of the sharpest eyes for quality and authenticity anywhere in the world. It is difficult to quantify, but easy to recognize. Clean lines without trying too hard. Luxury mixed with utility. Trend awareness balanced by restraint and purpose.
It’s golf fashion shaped by one of the world’s most style-literate cities, something I like to call Seoul Sensibilities, referring to the taste level forged by a uniquely competitive environment.
And increasingly, global brands have noticed.

Many golf brands in Korea have their own flagship shops dedicated to apparel only
Titleist understood this years ago, when its apparel business in Korea took on a life of its own under new ownership and local direction. What had once been a straightforward extension of an iconic equipment giant became something sharper and more premium. By going all in on the serious Tour-player look (I couldn’t even fit into their XL sizes), Titleist struck the right chord with Korean consumers and helped its fledgling apparel business break into the mainstream. Titleist became a household name even for non-golfers who wore its caps, shirts, and windbreakers in daily life. In many ways, it proved that even heritage golf brands could carry real fashion credibility when viewed through a Korean lens.
Several years later, PXG took a page out of Titleist’s playbook and followed suit. Korean consumers helped transform the brand from one known largely for irons and loud commercials into something broader and more stylish. PXG apparel’s growth in Korea was explosive, where it found an early audience and turned the category into something more than mere logo merchandise. It is still hard to walk anywhere in Seoul without seeing its palindrome logo.
Malbon’s meteoric rise in the United States was genuine, but its ascent into a global golf lifestyle brand owes much to Korea, where it was elevated by a market already fluent in modern golf style. Korea did not simply embrace Malbon. It pressure-tested the concept, refined its appeal, and helped push it into the global spotlight.
As such, new brands may arrive from abroad, but more often than not, their sharpest evolution happens here. If a brand can earn credibility in Seoul, it’s deemed to have passed one of the toughest style audits in the game.
That is why the next meaningful chapter may not come from outside, but from a Korean brand moving in the opposite direction, carrying those Seoul Sensibilities outward as K-pop once did.

Play young Stay dope.
From Seoul, With Intent
Khalhon is a label that feels less like a trend-chasing newcomer and more like the product of a market that has already seen everything. Golfers here have long been surrounded by luxury logos, technical fabrics, and tour uniforms disguised as lifestyle wear and vice-versa. In other words, novelty alone rarely lasts here, and the Koreans seems to understand that instinctively.
Its style language leans into clean silhouettes, relaxed but tailored proportions, muted palettes, and premium materials that speak quietly but confidently. There is a modern city aesthetic running through it all, with strong layering pieces, thoughtful textures, and subtle branding that suggests sophistication rather than demanding attention.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
Most importantly, the garments seem designed to blur the line between golfwear and everyday style. Shirts, trousers, knitwear, and outer layers move comfortably between a game of screen golf, a lunch reservation, an airport gate, or an afternoon coffee in Gangnam with friends.
It raises the question of whether this is golfwear that happens to look good off the course, or everyday clothing that performs beautifully on the fairways.
Personally, I have long appreciated Nike Golf for its clean, athletic modernization of golf attire. It also has the useful side effect of making me look like a more serious golfer than I probably am. But off the course, there are times when being instantly identified as the golf guy in a crowd of non-golfers can feel a touch self-conscious.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
That is part of what drew me to Khalhon, which seemed to blend golf and everyday wear naturally. While some of the outfits may be slightly beyond my personal confidence level, the brand also offers tasteful options for older guys like me who still want to express a little personality without regretting the decision later.
These are not simply flashy outfits worn on the course and then banished to the closet until the next tee time. They work surprisingly well off the course too, and I suspect many of the pieces will still look right a couple of years from now, which would certainly be kinder to my wallet than most golf fashion trends tend to be.
And perhaps that broader lifestyle positioning also helps explain why someone like Sean Wotherspoon would find Khalhon creatively interesting in the first place.

“Built for the course. Designed beyond it.”
“Korea is not only one of the most fashion-forward golf markets in the world, but one of the most fashion-forward markets globally. Korea is ahead, and I love to watch and try to catch up.” – Sean Wotherspoon, Creative Director at Khalhon
Seoul and Beyond
If Khalhon’s rise says something about where Korean golf fashion is today, its relationship with Sean Wotherspoon says even more about where it is heading.
For readers less familiar with Sean Wotherspoon, his arrival at Khalhon is not some routine celebrity endorsement or influencer collaboration. In design and streetwear circles, Wotherspoon is regarded as one of the more influential creative voices of his generation, particularly when it comes to blending nostalgia, storytelling, and contemporary culture into products that people can connect with.
He first gained widespread attention through his now-famous Nike sneaker collaborations, where his vintage-inspired designs and instinct for color helped turn him into one of the defining artists of the late-2010s sneaker era. His work gradually expanded beyond footwear into apparel, automotive collaborations, collectibles, and broader lifestyle design.
Modern golf style now extends well beyond the fairways, where performance and functionality are largely expected by default. And while plenty of brands already make technically competent golfwear, Khalhon seems more focused on designing clothes people would genuinely want to wear even after the round ends.
And when guys at Wotherspoon’s level show genuine interest in working with a Korean golf brand as its new Creative Director, fashion circles tend to sit up and pay attention. There’s already a huge buzz among the fashion-conscious here about upcoming collabs with iconic sports stars and brands.

“My creative direction for Khalhon is disruptive, colorful, nostalgic, and modern. My goal is to blend these avenues seamlessly within each collection.” – Sean Wotherspoon
In chatting with Sean, what stood out most to me was how genuinely energized he sounded about the project itself. Despite having already worked across and countless other creative spaces, he described golf as a completely fresh category for him, saying that Khalhon “will be an amazing vehicle for my design work.”
At the same time, his enthusiasm seemed tied just as much to Korea itself. He spoke openly about admiring Korea’s fashion culture while repeatedly insisting he is still a terrible golfer.
There was something oddly refreshing about that humility. Rather than sounding like a celebrity parachuting into golf simply because the category suddenly became fashionable, Sean sounded genuinely curious about what Korea might do with the category next.
And perhaps that is what makes Khalhon feel interesting right now. The brand feels less like a trend-chaser and more like the natural result of a market now confident enough to export its own point of view.
For years, global brands came to Korea to sharpen their image against one of the most discerning audiences anywhere. Now, a Korean label appears ready to send those Seoul Sensibilities outward instead.
Which brings us back to kkot-saem-chu-i.
That final cold snap before spring always arrives with a reminder that seasons are changing, whether we notice it immediately or not. Golf fashion feels a little like that right now as well, as the old boundaries between sport, streetwear, luxury, and everyday style continue to soften.
And somewhere in Seoul, a Korean golf label already seems prepared for whatever season comes next. I just hope they have everything in my size.
-
News3 days agoRussell Henley’s winning WITB: 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
-
Whats in the Bag2 weeks agoAaron Rai’s winning WITB: 2026 PGA Championship
-
Tour Photo Galleries2 weeks agoPhotos from the 2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
-
Equipment2 weeks agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
News5 days agoCharles Schwab Challenge Tour Report: MacIntyre, Åberg and Spaun all switch putters, TaylorMade launches new Spider
-
Equipment1 week agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch
-
Popular Photo Galleries1 week agoPhotos from the 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
-
Equipment3 weeks agoPGA Championship Tour Report: Fitzpatrick, Koepka among big-name putter switches for Aronimink

Pingback: The 24 players who can win the Masters – GolfWRX
Filippo
Apr 10, 2025 at 10:04 am
I hope Rory, will win Koepka.
Andrew J
Apr 10, 2025 at 7:03 am
Rory is my favorite especially if he could putt. And Rory could with this which is the solution to rid of slow play on greens. EGOS – Expert Greenreading Operating System offered in Amazon books with large pics & font. Only $27 each which is a smoking deal for a lifetime skill.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DJT2YLL9 Great book for those with an analytical mind.
Masters Bettor
Apr 9, 2025 at 11:55 am
So you filter out all LIV players to start and end up with 20 that can win that include Serio, Rahm, Bryson, Brooks, and Pat Reed? You’re not making any sense with your paragraph of LIV and elimination of those golfers with that as written.
Richard
Apr 9, 2025 at 1:55 pm
Agree ….
livat
Apr 9, 2025 at 4:32 pm
Agree. The LIV analysis and reasoning is poor. Niemann is probably the LIV player with the best chance.
DukeOfChinoHills
Apr 11, 2025 at 12:41 am
His list of 20 players are the statistically probable players who could win.
The second list of personal top-10 picks are his “emotional” picks.
Masters Bettor
Apr 11, 2025 at 1:40 am
Yes but he derives that top 20 list (which is hilarious in it’s own right considering that there’s literally only like 10 guys max here who can win every year and half are the betting favs) while making literally zero sense with how he starts the article off about disqualifying all LIV players yet ending up with a top 20 list that includes a bunch of them.
Ross
Apr 9, 2025 at 11:07 am
I love your analysis. Great job. I think the will come from your top 10.
Felice Mastronzo
Apr 9, 2025 at 8:21 am
Another year another list of excuses about filtered out players that performed well instead.
Golf is not predictable at this level, too much variables.
Final top 10 list is just the list of normal favorites.
DontBMad
Apr 9, 2025 at 11:57 am
He’s been right 11/11 times – predictable enough…
Felice Mastronzo
Apr 10, 2025 at 4:27 am
Picking up 20 from a field of around 70 and predict one of them to be the winner is not so hard.
But the analysis model has many flaws.
Richie Hunt
Apr 11, 2025 at 1:33 pm
It’s 97 players in this year’s field.
Bobbie
Apr 23, 2025 at 11:00 pm
How many players was there is 2024?