Connect with us

Equipment

When it comes to golf club design, to copy is to create

Published

on

If you have roamed the forums of GolfWRX and read a post about any non-Ping milled putter, you have most assuredly read the phrase, “Oh, you mean…nice Ping Anser!”

In fact, it’s usually a race to see who posts it first!

Needless to say, it’s a very worn out phrase and warrants a need for GolfWRX forums to incorporate a text recognition protocol to automatically inhibit that combination of words from being posted again. I digress…

Certainly, Karsten deserves praise for his ingenuity and eternal influence on the game of golf and the equipment used to play it. Widely considered the inventor of perimeter weighted golf clubs, Karsten is responsible for such greats as the 1959 Ping A-1, the 1966 Anser, and the first cavity back irons, the Ping 69.

But, was he really the first to develop a perimeter-weighted golf club? No.

Copying is an essential part of creation. It’s also a very natural process; in fact, it’s exactly what us humans are, a multitude of cells that have been copied, split and multiplied. So as we look for inspiration, we look to what’s already been made and seek ways to improve upon it.

Henry Ford said it best

“I invented nothing new. I simply assembled the discoveries of other men behind whom were centuries of work. Had I worked fifty or ten or even five years before, I would have failed. So it is with every new thing. Progress happens when all the factors that make for it are ready, and then it is inevitable. To teach that a comparatively few men are responsible for the greatest forward steps of mankind is the worst sort of nonsense.”

As we look at the historic design of the 1966 Ping Anser, we see an interesting correlation to putters that came before it. The idea of perimeter weighting a putter didn’t start with the Anser, nor did it start with the A1. I believe it successfully started with the John Reuter, Jr. Bullseye design and the John Letters Golden Goose putters. (Ryan Barath of GolfWRX, recently produced a short video on the Bullseye answering the question, “Why was it great?”)

The Bullseye and the Golden Goose putters were separately introduced to the U.S. and British golf markets in the mid-1940s. This unique scenario is commonly referred to as “multiple discovery,” where the same innovation emerges from different places at or near the same time. Since Karsten was based in the U.S., the Bullseye is the most likely influencer.

At the time of the Bullseye’s creation, center-shafted putters were illegal, but Reuter believed he could create a more stable putter by placing the shaft as close to the center as possible and leave a small protruding heel opposite the toe, thus bringing more balance to the putter.

Karsten certainly was aware of the Bullseye design, as was the entire golfing world. In my opinion, Karsten made strong improvements to its design by creating the A-1, a remarkably similar design and even a material look, further exaggerating the principles of perimeter weighting by removing weight from the center of the putter and placing it in the heel, toe, and sole of the putter head. It also could be considered the father to many of the center-shafted SeeMore putters used today. The innovation of the A-1 thus led the way for the historic Ping Anser, another variation of a close-to-center-shafted putter with weight removed from the center and redistributed to the heel and toe.

The fact of the matter is, Karsten did not invent perimeter weighting, but he was the one who exploited its benefits, pushed the technology to the limit, and made it look really cool in the process. The most unique aspects to the Anser design was the flat flange in the middle, allowing alignment aids to be added, and the plumbers neck, which allowed the axis of the shaft to pass close to center without actually doing it, further allowing the face of the putter at address to be visible.

Having the visionary ability to see something and make it better is the trademark of a great inventor. It’s worth noting some of the other major innovations that lead the way for John Reuter, Jr’s and Karsten’s inspiration.

  1. In 1919, W. F. Fitz Maurice patented the idea of attaching weight to a golf club to increase the swing weight, what we would consider today as lead tape.
  2. Then in 1930, E. E. Tucker patented the idea of the first adjustable driver and putter, allowing the use of weighted screws to be added to the toe and heel of a putter, or the back of the driver.
  3. In 1961, D. Rains Et Al, who patented the changeable weight putter, allowing for the adjustment of the putter’s head weight with a removable solid bar that passed through the center.

Not all inspiration needs to come from golf either. Just this year, Mizuno released the T20 wedges and used the inspiration of a much more common item, tire tread. Tire tread allows water to be dispersed in different directions upon contact and improve grip. Mizuno engineers used this idea and made micro-grooves that are placed in a perpendicular format to the main grooves, to direct water away, thereby improving clubface contact in wet conditions and maintaining more spin than a wedge without it.

Many forward-thinking engineers lead the way and prepared the environment for all of the advancements that we use today. While we often point to one individual being responsible for some breakthrough golf technology, it should be remembered that the innovations of today are almost always inspired by the innovations of our predecessors.

Your Reaction?
  • 65
  • LEGIT12
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP4
  • OB2
  • SHANK20

Weston Maughan is a golf equipment designer and collegiate champion golfer who has played the game for over 20 years. He worked in the golf industry for over a decade as a golf professional, PGA Tour caddie, custom fitter, and technical staff representative for a major manufacturer. He was a final contestant on the Golf Channel's Wilson's Driver vs Driver season one, and a guest on the Gear Dive podcast from GolfWRX. He received his undergrad from Brigham Young University in business management and his graduate degree from the Academy of Art University in Digital Communications. Now an amateur golfer with a +1.3 handicap, he resides in Utah and works as a software sales manager at Awardco while raising 5 children with his amazing wife. You can find Weston on Instagram at @westonmaughangolf where he posts about golf equipment, products, tips, and experiences.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. JP

    Oct 2, 2019 at 10:47 am

    Is this written in defense of scotty cameron?

  2. Adam

    Oct 2, 2019 at 10:06 am

    This article seems very unnecessary. Copying is not creating, that is objective, in fact it’s the opposite. The problem is some manufacturers will blatantly copy and not cite inspiration. Having said that I don’t feel club most manufacturers go into it trying to be creative and design the “answer” like Karsten was. At this point it’s tinkering proven designs and using marketing tactics to help them stand out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Whats in the Bag

Kris Kim WITB 2024 (May)

Published

on

Driver: TaylorMade Qi10 (9 degrees @7)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White 60 TX

3-wood: TaylorMade Qi10 Tour (15 degrees @13.5)
Shaft: Mitsubishi Diamana WB 73 TX

Irons: TaylorMade P770 (2, 4), TaylorMade P7MB (5-PW)
Shafts: Mitsubishi Tensei 1K White 80 TX (2), Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 X

Wedges: TaylorMade MG4 (50-09SB, 56-12SB, 60-11TW)
Shafts: Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 WV 125

Putter: TaylorMade Spider Tour

Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Cord

Check out more in-hand photos of Kris Kim’s equipment here.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by GolfWRX (@golfwrx)

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

Equipment

Welcome to the family: TaylorMade launches PUDI and PDHY utility irons

Published

on

TaylorMade is continuing its UDI/DHY series with the successor to the Stealth UDI and DHY utility irons: PUDI and PDHY (which the company styles as P·UDI and P·DHY). TaylorMade is folding the designs in with its P Series of irons.

TaylorMade outlined the process of developing its new utilities this way. The company started with the data on utility iron usage. Not surprisingly, better players — i.e. those who generate more clubhead speed and strike the ball more precisely — were found to gravitate toward the UDI model. DHY usage, however, covered a wider swath than the company might have expected with six-to-18 handicappers found to be bagging the club.

TaylorMade also found that the majority of golfers playing UDI or DHY utilities were playing P Series irons at the top of their iron configurations.

Can you see where this is going?

Matt Bovee, Director of Product Creation, Iron and Wedge at TaylorMade: “As we look to the future, beyond the tech and the design language, we are excited about repositioning our utility irons into the P·Series family. P·UDI is an easy pair for players that currently play P·Series product and P·DHY is an extremely forgiving option for players of all skill levels. It is a natural fit to give these players the performance in this category that they are looking for.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by GolfWRX (@golfwrx)

TaylorMade PUDI

TaylorMade PUDI technology cutaway (via TaylorMade)

Crafted with tour player input, TaylorMade sought to develop a confidence-inspiring utility iron that blends with the rest of the P Series irons. Also of note: Interestingly, the PUDI has a more compact head than the P790.

In comparison to past UDI products, the PUDI has a more traditional iron shape, slimmer toplines, and less offset with a little of the backbar visible at address.

TaylorMade PDHY

TaylorMade PDHY tech cutaway (via TaylorMade).

Larger in profile than the PUDI, the PDHY seeks to position center of gravity (CG) lower in the club for ease of launch. The toe height is larger and the profile is larger at address — roughly five millimeters longer than PUDI — the sole of the club is wider for improved forgiveness.

Club Junkie’s take

Golfers who feel like they are missing something at the top of the bag could find the PUDI or PDHY a great option. The look of the PUDI should fit the most discerning eye with a more compact look, less offset, and a thinner topline. If you want a little more confidence looking down the P-DHY will be slightly larger while still being a good-looking utility iron.

For being small packages both models pack a pretty good punch with fast ball speeds, even off-center. The feel is soft and you get a solid feel of the ball compressing off the face when you strike it well. Your ears are greeted with a nice heavy thud as the ball and club come together. The PDHY will launch a little higher for players who need it while the PUDI offers a more penetrating ball flight. Both utility irons could be the cure for an open spot in the top end of the bag.

PUDI, PDHY, or Rescue?

TaylorMade offers the following notes to assist golfers in filling out their bags:

  • PUDI has mid-CG right behind the center face to create a more penetrating mid-to-low ball flight
  • PDHY has a lower center of gravity to produce an easier-to-launch mid-to-high ball flight.
  • Both PUDI and PDHY are lower-flying than the company’s hybrid/Rescue clubs.
  • PUDI is more forgiving than P790.
  • PDHY is the most forgiving iron in the entire TaylorMade iron family

Pricing, specs, and availability

Price: $249.99

At retail: Now

Stock shafts: UST Mamiya’s Recoil DART (105 X, 90 S and 75 R – only in PDHY)

Stock grip: Golf Pride’s ZGrip (black/grey)

PUDI lofts: 2-17°, 3-20°, 4-22° in both left and right-handed

PDHY lofts: 2-18°, 3-20° and 4-22° in both left and right-handed

Your Reaction?
  • 15
  • LEGIT4
  • WOW3
  • LOL3
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP2
  • OB2
  • SHANK4

Continue Reading

Equipment

Coolest thing for sale in the GolfWRX Classifieds (5/3/24): Scotty Cameron Champions Choice 2.5+ putter

Published

on

At GolfWRX, we are a community of like-minded individuals that all experience and express our enjoyment of the game in many ways.

It’s that sense of community that drives day-to-day interactions in the forums on topics that range from best driver to what marker you use to mark your ball. It even allows us to share another thing we all love – buying and selling equipment.

Currently, in our GolfWRX buy/sell/trade (BST) forum, there is a listing for a Scotty Cameron Champions Choice 2.5+ putter

From the seller: (@wwcl): “Has been gamed as pics show. 33.5 includes original h/c and grip. $575 includes shipping and PP fees.”

To check out the full listing in our BST forum, head through the link: Scotty Cameron Champions Choice 2.5+ putter

This is the most impressive current listing from the GolfWRX BST, and if you are curious about the rules to participate in the BST Forum you can check them out here: GolfWRX BST Rules

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT1
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending