Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Best Ball-Strikers (Part 2): Lee Trevino and Tom Watson

Published

on

I am very fortunate to belong to Preston Trail, a golf club in Dallas noted for having professional and amateur players. Among them is Lee Trevino, and we actually have a bit of history.

I was working at The Haney Ranch as a club fitter in the early 90’s when I developed the Tight Lies fairway wood. I also did basic club repair and can confidently say the repair part was not going to be a career move. Some guys are handy, neat and efficient. None of those adjectives apply to me.

Hank had a young teacher by the name of Tony Trevino who would help me when my inefficiency got me behind any normal repair schedule. His name was Tony Lee Trevino, Lee’s son. When the Tight Lies was gaining a bit of a reputation at the ranch, unbeknownst to me, Tony shafted one up for his dad.

This led to a phone call one evening.

“Barney, this is Lee Trevino,” to which I responded, “Who the hell is this? It’s late and I’m tired.”  

After he reintroduced himself, it dawned on me that the caller was really Lee Trevino, arguably one of the greatest ball strikers in golf history. He went on to explain that he loved the Tight Lies and was preparing to show it to his sponsor at the time, Spaulding. He gave me his agent’s name and phone number so I’d have him available when negotiations started.

My net worth at the time qualified me for food stamps (literally), so suffice to say I eagerly waited for the call from Spaulding. I’m still waiting, a story Lee told the membership of Preston Trail at an evening function. Shall we say it not one of Spaulding’s great decisions. 

The idea of approaching a professional golfer for a game has always seemed intrusive to me, but years later at the club, Lee said “anytime” and I jumped at the chance. I had played with Tommy Bolt and Moe Norman. Now, the chance to add another one of the greatest ball strikers to the list was a like the kid in the proverbial candy store.

Related: Best Ball-Strikers (Part 1): Tommy Bolt and Moe Norman

95c43/huch/1922/22

Lee Trevino won six major championships. Here he is after winning the 1972 Open Championship, his second Claret Jug.

What was it like? How do you explain golf shots executed at a level barely comprehensible? This wasn’t Lee Trevino from the PGA Tour; this was Lee Trevino who is “no longer competitive,” explaining shots as he prepared to take his backswing.

“This calls for a baby fade … I’m going to draw this one so the ball is rolling towards the pin.”

And with every explanation, a shot as described. His drives were from the fairway, as he said, “only about 260” ( I had hit several yards ago). Every shot into the green ended up pin high, unless he wanted to be short or long for a better putt. The old, washed-up guy could only shoot 65-66 and this while giving me a tutorial on shaping the golf ball.

We’ve had several conversations about the finer points of golf shots and equipment; it’s like listening to Elon Musk talk about one of his projects. I pay really, really close attention because he’s always on the verge of going over my head.

And by the way, he plays from tees where he can still hit the irons into the greens he used to hit. He thinks 99 percent of us are tripping over our respective egos by playing back tees, trying to fit hybrids between traps. To that I say, amen!

Tom Watson

Watson

Tom Watson won eight major championships. Here he is after winning the 1983 Open Championship, his fifth and final Claret Jug.

Last alphabetically, but a man I’m proud to call a friend. Tom was on the Adams staff for many years and during that time when I was CEO we had very little contact unless it was a discussion about a particular club design.

When we first signed him, I said that unless he had a specific request we really wouldn’t be seeing much of each other. My analogy was a doctor: If I had a friend who was a doc, I wouldn’t be dropping in on an operation to see how he was doing.

That’s how I viewed playing the PGA Tour. It was his office (or in his case, his operating room) and using the staff relationship to “drop in” would be intrusive. We each had jobs to do and in a sense were close, but not physically. As a result I cannot recall many actual times on the course with Tom, but three memories come to mind.

When I first talked to him about being on staff, the plan was for me to meet him in Kansas City with our new irons for him to try — basically to see if he liked our stuff. He had already used and liked the woods.  

I flew from Dallas and met him on the range at Wolf Creek. Neither Tom nor I are much for small talk. He explained to me that he was going to hit some shots with his regular irons and the same with ours. He proceeded to open a shag bag, and using 3-to-4 different clubs he hit about 25 of the most beautiful iron shots you could imagine.

I was ready to go back to Dallas on the spot. He then took our irons and repeated the process, looked to me said, ” I could play with these,” whereupon it was over. I went back to Dallas, his agent called and we established him as our spokesman — a relationship that exists to this day. My total range exposure time was maybe 45 min.

Every year, Tom would invite his sponsors to play with him at The Greenbrier, and the first two years I went before handing it off to other employees. We were teams and he joined us for three-hole stretches. What do I remember? Leaning!

Every time he hit a shot, it was straight at the flag and I had to lean to see it land. Subsequently, we have evolved into an annual fishing trip, something we both enjoy and he doesn’t have to suffer my golf. I am not including anything on his thoughts on the golf swing. He has out an instructional package and I know he devoted a serious amount of time and effort for it to be complete.

Last year, Tom came to Dallas and I was very proud to be included in his game with George Bush (43) and a dinner afterward.

I was telling my brother about the event, and he reminded me that when I came home from college I used to hire out to muck stalls at local dairy farms. His comment: “Boy have you come a long way.” I have, and the memories and the great people are one thing the game of golf has in abundance.

If it’s a bit hokey; I don’t care. It’s the core of golf and why I fight to stop the loss of players.

Your Reaction?
  • 221
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW15
  • LOL6
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP17
  • OB5
  • SHANK11

Barney Adams is the founder of Adams Golf and the inventor of the iconic "Tight Lies" fairway wood. He served as Chairman of the Board for Adams until 2012, when the company was purchased by TaylorMade-Adidas. Adams is one of golf's most distinguished entrepreneurs, receiving honors such as Manufacturing Entrepreneur of the Year by Ernst & Young in 1999 and the 2010 Ernie Sabayrac Award for lifetime contribution to the golf industry by the PGA of America. His journey in the golf industry started as as a club fitter, however, and has the epoxy filled shirts as a testimony to his days as an assembler. Have an equipment question? Adams holds seven patents on club design and has conducted research on every club in the bag. He welcomes your equipment questions through email at [email protected] Adams is now retired from the golf equipment industry, but his passion for the game endures through his writing. He is the author of "The WOW Factor," a book published in 2008 that offers an insider's view of the golf industry and business advice to entrepreneurs, and he continues to contribute articles to outlets like GolfWRX that offer his solutions to grow the game of golf.

16 Comments

16 Comments

  1. Ken

    Mar 17, 2015 at 10:00 pm

    Please continue these great contributions to GOLF WRX! Thanks so much.

    A V Tech 4 player

  2. RG

    Mar 16, 2015 at 12:17 am

    Your the best and your designs revolutionized the game. Other’s may not see it but the biggest innovator’s in golf history are Karsten Solheim and Barney Adams.PERIOD:)

  3. Brian Conley

    Mar 14, 2015 at 11:18 am

    I no longer buy Titleist or Ping retail because they are so restrictive on retailers. I buy mostly Taylormade because they’re big, with Adidas. I will now start buying Adams because from this article, I’m sure I like Mr. Adams.

    • Twice

      Mar 15, 2015 at 1:49 am

      Adams is a part of TM now, actually. So you’re doing the right thing twice.

  4. Alex

    Mar 13, 2015 at 2:32 pm

    In 1998 I was lucky enough to be right across from Tom Watson while he was hitting balls at the practice tee. I’ve never seen anyone hitting it purer in my life. I’ve been playing for over 30 years and I’ve seen my pile of professional golfers play. But ol’ Tom Watson was like a robot, always same swing, same rythm, same ball flight. Really awe-inspiring.

  5. Roosterredneck

    Mar 12, 2015 at 9:14 pm

    Keep going I too enjoy reading such material. A person that started out with little to nothing and Bam. Explain something, how did you start or get your club cast , molded / made. Give some tidbits on this please.

  6. Scott

    Mar 12, 2015 at 3:22 pm

    Thanks Barney for another great article.
    What did you mean at the end when you said “It’s the core of golf and why I fight to stop the loss of players.”

    • barney adams

      Mar 12, 2015 at 7:43 pm

      Per the NGF there is a category called Avid Golfers, they play the most and pick up 71% of ALL golf related expenses. 10.2m Avids in 2000, 9.1m in 2005, and 6.4 m at the end of 2013. It is my opinion that the guardians of the game should be extensively interviewing the 4m dropouts to learn why and react with programs to ameliorate the most repeated reasons. My singular voice carries no weight on the issue.

      • RG

        Mar 16, 2015 at 12:14 am

        And we’re not replacing the Avid’s that we lose to old age/ poor health. I’ll keep saying it Barney, the new generation is in love with video gamesa. Thes game and the graphics are really incredible. You can link up and play online with people from all over the world and for $50 you can play for weeks. And the learning curve and long waits are nothing like golf.

        • Barney Adams

          Mar 16, 2015 at 1:28 pm

          And golf is HARD which is why some of us love (sometimes hate) it.

  7. Wonderful

    Mar 12, 2015 at 10:36 am

    You da man, Mr Adams! What a wonderful story!

  8. The dude

    Mar 12, 2015 at 9:44 am

    Pretty cool!….any photos of what Lees or Toms irons looked like after they were worn?…I’m sure they were “dime size worn spotted”. I know that is ball “hitting” as oppose to “striking” Thanks for sharing

  9. JHM

    Mar 11, 2015 at 9:00 pm

    thanks for the great stories!!

  10. killerbgolfer

    Mar 11, 2015 at 8:21 pm

    Mr Adams I love these articles. Thank you for taking the time to share these experiences with us.

  11. John

    Mar 11, 2015 at 5:15 pm

    Best of the best here, writer and subject. Kudos!

  12. Terry Harris

    Mar 11, 2015 at 2:14 pm

    Another great article by a wonderful and knowledgeable writer.
    Please keep them coming! And, his book is a great read also.
    And . . . his idea of moving forward (up a tee box) has saved my love of golf!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 26
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

Golf's Perfect Imperfections

Golf’s Perfect Imperfections: Amazing Session with Performance Coach Savannah Meyer-Clement

Published

on

In this week’s episode, we spent some time with performance coach Savannah Meyer-Clement who provides many useful insights that you’ll be able to implement on the golf course.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 RBC Heritage betting preview: Patrick Cantlay ready to get back inside winner’s circle

Published

on

Just a two-hour drive from Augusta National, the PGA TOUR heads to Harbour Town Golf Links in Hilton Head Island, S.C. Hilton Head Island is a golfer’s paradise and Harbour Town is one of the most beautiful and scenic courses on the PGA TOUR.

Harbour Town Golf Links is a par-71 that measures 7,121 yards and features Bermuda grass greens. A Pete Dye design, the course is heavily tree lined and features small greens and many dog legs, protecting it from “bomb-and-gauge” type golfers.

The field is loaded this week with 69 golfers with no cut. Last year was quite possibly the best field in RBC Heritage history and the event this week is yet another designated event, meaning there is a $20 million prize pool.

Most of the big names on the PGA Tour will be in attendance this week with the exceptions of Hideki Matsuyama and Viktor Hovland. Additionally, Webb Simpson, Shane Lowry, Gary Woodland and Kevin Kisner have been granted sponsors exemptions. 

Past Winners at Harbour Town

  • 2023: Matt Fitzpatrick (-17)
  • 2022: Jordan Spieth (-13)
  • 2021: Stewart Cink (-19)
  • 2020: Webb Simpson (-22)
  • 2019: CT Pan (-12)
  • 2018: Sotoshi Kodaira (-12)
  • 2017: Wesley Bryan (-13)
  • 2016: Branden Grace (-9)
  • 2015: Jim Furyk (-18)

In this article and going forward, I’ll be using the Rabbit Hole by Betsperts Golf data engine to develop my custom model. If you want to build your own model or check out all of the detailed stats, you can sign up using promo code: MATTVIN for 25% off any subscription package (yearly is best value).

Key Stats For Harbour Town

Let’s take a look at key metrics for Harbour Town Golf Links to determine which golfers boast top marks in each category over their past 24 rounds.

Strokes Gained: Approach

Strokes Gained: Approach is exceedingly important this week. The greens at Harbour Town are about half the size of PGA TOUR average and feature the second-smallest greens on the tour. Typical of a Pete Dye design, golfers will pay the price for missed greens.

Total SG: Approach Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Scottie Scheffler (+1.27)
  2. Tom Hoge (+1.27)
  3. Corey Conners (+1.16)
  4. Austin Eckroat (+0.95)
  5. Cameron Young (+0.93)

Good Drive %

The fairways at Harbour Town are tree lined and feature many dog legs. Bombers tend to struggle at the course because it forces layups and doesn’t allow long drivers to overpower it. Accuracy is far more important than power.

Good Drive % Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Brice Garnett (88.8%)
  2. Shane Lowry (+87.2%)
  3. Akshay Bhatia (+86.0%)
  4. Si Woo Kim (+85.8%)
  5. Sepp Straka (+85.1%)

Strokes Gained: Total at Pete Dye Designs

Pete Dye specialists tend to play very well at Harbour Town. Si Woo Kim, Matt Kuchar, Jim Furyk and Webb Simpson are all Pete Dye specialists who have had great success here. It is likely we see some more specialists near the top of the leaderboard this week.

SG: TOT Pete Dye per round over past 36 rounds:

  1. Xander Schauffele (+2.27)
  2. Scottie Scheffler (+2.24)
  3. Ludvig Aberg (+2.11)
  4. Brian Harman (+1.89)
  5. Sungjae Im (+1.58)

4. Strokes Gained: Short Game (Bermuda)

Strokes Gained: Short Game factors in both around the green and putting. With many green-side bunkers and tricky green complexes, both statistics will be important. Past winners — such as Jim Furyk, Wes Bryan and Webb Simpson — highlight how crucial the short game skill set is around Harbour Town.

SG: SG Over Past 24 Rounds

  1. Jordan Spieth (+1.11)
  2. Taylor Moore (+1.02)
  3. Wyndham Clark (+0.98)
  4. Mackenzie Hughes (+0.86)
  5. Andrew Putnam (+0.83)

5. Greens in Regulation %

The recipe for success at Harbour Town Golf Links is hitting fairways and greens. Missing either will prove to be consequential — golfers must be in total control of the ball to win.

Greens in Regulation % over past 24 rounds:

  1. Brice Garnett (+75.0%)
  2. Scottie Scheffler (+69.9%)
  3. Corey Conners (+69.0%)
  4. Shane Lowry (+68.3%)
  5. Patrick Rodgers (+67.6%)

6. Course History

Harbour Town is a course where players who have strong past results at the course always tend to pop up. 

Course History over past 24 rounds:

  1. Patrick Cantlay (+2.34)
  2. Cam Davis (+2.05)
  3. J.T. Poston (+1.69)
  4. Justin Rose (+1.68)
  5. Tommy Fleetwood (+1.59)

The RBC Heritage Model Rankings

Below, I’ve compiled overall model rankings using a combination of the five key statistical categories previously discussed — SG: Approach (24%), Good Drives (20%), SG: SG (14%), SG: Pete Dye (14%), GIR (14%), and Course History (14%)

  1. Shane Lowry
  2. Russell Henley
  3. Scottie Scheffler
  4. Xander Schauffele
  5. Corey Conners 
  6. Wyndham Clark
  7. Christiaan Bezuidenhout
  8. Matt Fitzpatrick
  9. Cameron Young
  10. Ludvig Aberg 

2024 RBC Heritage Picks

Patrick Cantlay +2000 (FanDuel)

With the exception of Scottie Scheffler, the PGA Tour has yet to have any of their star players show peak form during the 2024 season. Last week, Patrick Cantlay, who I believe is a top-5 players on the PGA Tour, took one step closer to regaining the form that’s helped him win eight events on Tour since 2017.

Cantlay limped into the Masters in poor form, but figured it out at Augusta National, finishing in a tie for 20th and ranking 17th for the week in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking. The former FedEx Cup champion will now head to one of his favorite golf courses in Harbour Town, where he’s had immaculate results over the years. In his six trips to the course, he’s only finished worse than 7th one time. The other finishes include three third places (2017, 2019, 2023) and one runner-up finish (2022). In his past 36 rounds at Harbour Town, Cantlay ranks 1st in Strokes Gained: Total per round at the course by a wide margin (+2.36).

Cantlay is winless since the 2022 BMW Championship, which is far too long for a player of his caliber. With signs pointing to the 32-year-old returning to form, a “signature event” at Harbour Town is just what he needs to get back on the winning track.

Tommy Fleetwood +3000 (FanDuel)

I truly believe Tommy Fleetwood will figure out a way to win on American soil in 2024. It’s certainly been a bugaboo for him throughout his career, but he is simply too talented to go another season without winning a PGA Tour event.

At last week’s Masters Tournament, Fleetwood made a Sunday charge and ended up finishing T3 in the event, which was his best ever finish at The Masters. For the week, the Englishman ranked 8th in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach, 10th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking and 16th in Strokes Gained: Putting.

Harbour Town is a perfect layout for Fleetwood, and he’s had relative success at this Pete Dye design in the past.  In his four trips to the course, he’s finished inside of the top 25 three times, with his best finish, T10, coming in 2022. The course is pretty short and can’t be overpowered, which gives an advantage to more accurate players such as Fleetwood. Tommy ranks 8th in the field in Good Drive % and should be able to plot his way along this golf course.

The win is coming for Tommy lad. I believe there’s a chance this treasure of a golf course may be the perfect one for him to finally break through on Tour.

Cameron Young +3300 (FanDuel)

Cameron Young had a solid Masters Tournament last week, which is exactly what I’m looking for in players who I anticipate playing well this week at the RBC Heritage. He finished in a tie for 9th, but never felt the pressure of contending in the event. For the week, Young ranked 6th in Strokes Gained: Off the Tee and 6th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking.

Despite being one of the longest players off the tee on the PGA Tour, Young has actually played some really good golf on shorter tracks. He finished T3 at Harbour Town in 2023 and ranks 20th in the field in Good Drive% and 16th in Greens in Regulation in his past 24 rounds. He also has strong finishes at other shorter courses that can take driver out of a players hand such as Copperhead and PGA National.

Young is simply one of the best players on the PGA Tour in 2024, and I strongly believe has what it takes to win a PGA Tour event in the very near future.

Corey Conners +5500 (FanDuel)

Corey Conners has had a disappointing year thus far on the PGA Tour, but absolutely loves Harbour Town.

At last week’s Masters Tournament, the Canadian finished T30 but ranked 20th in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach. In his past 24 rounds, Conners ranks 3rd in the field in Strokes Gained: Approach, 3rd in Greens in Regulation % and 24th in Good Drive %.

In Conners’ last four trips to Harbour Town, his worst finish was T31, last season. He finished T4 in 2021, T12 in 2022 and ranks 8th in Strokes Gained: Total at the course over his past 36 rounds.

Conners hasn’t been contending, but his recent finishes have been encouraging as he has finished in the top-25 in each of his past three starts prior to The Masters, including an impressive T13 at The PLAYERS. His recent improvement in ball striking as well as his suitability for Harbour Town makes Conners a high upside bet this week.

Shane Lowry (+7500) (FanDuel)

When these odds were posted after Lowry was announced in the field, I have to admit I was pretty stunned. Despite not offering much win equity on the PGA Tour over the last handful of years, Shane Lowry is still a top caliber player who has the ability to rise to the top of a signature event.

Lowry struggled to score at The Masters last week, but he actually hit the ball really well. The Irishman ranked 1st for Strokes Gained: Approach on the week and 7th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking. As usual, it was the putter that let him down, as he ranked 60th in the field in Strokes Gained: Putting.

Harbour Town is most definitely one of Lowry’s favorite courses on the PGA Tour. In his six starts there, he’s finished in the top 10 three times, including third twice. Lowry is sensational at Pete Dye designs and ranks 7th in Strokes Gained: Total in his past 36 rounds on Dye tracks. 

Lowry is perfect for Harbour Town. In his past 24 rounds, he ranks 5th in Strokes Gained: Approach, 2nd in Good Drive% and 5th in Green in Regulation %. If he figures it out on the greens, Shane could have his first win in America since 2015.

Lucas Glover +12000 (FanDuel)

This is one of my weekly “bet the number” plays as I strongly believe the odds are just too long for a player of Glover’s caliber. The odds have been too long on Glover for a few weeks now, but this is the first event that I can get behind the veteran being able to actually contend at. 

Glover is quietly playing good golf and returning to the form he had after the understandable regression after his two massive victories at the end of 2023. He finished T20 at The Masters, which was his best ever finish at Augusta National. For the week, Lucas ranked 18th for Strokes Gained: Approach and 20th in Strokes Gained: Ball Striking.

Over his past 24 rounds, Glover ranks 9th in Strokes Gained: Approach and 13th in Good Drive %. Harbour Town is a short course that the 44-year-old will be able to keep up with the top players on Tour off the tee. He’s played the course more than 20 times, with mixed results. His best finishes at Harbour Town include a T7 in 2008, but recently has a finish of T21 in 2020.

Glover has proven he can contend with the stars of the Tour on any given week, and this number is flat out disrespectful.

Your Reaction?
  • 30
  • LEGIT5
  • WOW2
  • LOL1
  • IDHT1
  • FLOP2
  • OB0
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending