Connect with us

19th Hole

‘Tiger was paying attention…even if the world wasn’t’ – Chamblee hits back at former major champ’s Woods ball claim

Published

on

Last week, a social media discussion erupted after a rather controversial take on Tiger Woods from Graeme McDowell.

McDowell seemed to slightly discredit Woods’ dominance in the summer of 2000. In the tweet, the 2010 U.S. Open champion claimed that Tiger had an unprecedented equipment advantage that summer thanks to Nike’s Tour Accuracy golf ball.

“It wasn’t unprecedented at all. Nick Price enjoyed that same advantage being an early adopter of the solid core ball and it took him to the number one in the world by increasing his distance, and in 1998 Mark O’Meara won two majors with a solid core ball and POY. Tiger was paying attention in 1998, even if the world wasn’t.”

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 151
  • LEGIT16
  • WOW10
  • LOL9
  • IDHT7
  • FLOP5
  • OB1
  • SHANK23

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Pingback: ‘An acknowledgement that you’ve had a successful career’ – Tiger on his Hall of Fame induction – GolfWRX

  2. JackDash

    Mar 4, 2022 at 10:29 pm

    Wish tiger had had to play against the real goat, back in the day

    Woods has benefitted greatly from the days of his competition being millionaire golfers being able to slough off cuz they could

  3. Jimmy

    Mar 3, 2022 at 5:05 pm

    Shut up sycophantic Chamblee! nothing Graham said is controversial, why do you feel the need to prostrate yourself that tiger we all know what Graham meant we don’t need your child like interpretations

  4. Jake

    Mar 3, 2022 at 10:22 am

    I recall Phil saying at one point Woods’s sticks were inferior. Is that right? Also, didn’t Tiger use a shorter, smaller head driver a lot longer than others?

    • Andrew Kevin Chang

      Mar 3, 2022 at 4:08 pm

      That was in 2003, and Tiger was still using a 43.5″ driver with a DG X100, when most pros at the time were already switching to graphite, and his driver was about 300cc when guys were starting to adopt 400cc+ heads as the norm

    • benseattle

      Mar 4, 2022 at 12:05 pm

      I think you answered your own question. I don’t believe that Mickelson was saying that Nike was making junk; rather, he was pointing out that Woods was winning using a smaller head driver equipped with a steel shaft while the rest of the golfing world had moved to larger, springier, more forgiving drivers with graphite engine. Does anybody really think that noted equipment savant Tiger Woods would actually say, “This Nike stuff is crap but they’re paying me so I guess I’ll play it anyway?” Me neither.

  5. Pingback: ‘Next time have the courage to tag me’ – Tour pro responds to journalist amid Bay Hill range controversy – GolfWRX

  6. Pingback: ‘How is this possible?’ – Kevin Na questions Tiger’s PIP win – GolfWRX

  7. Mark Scott

    Mar 3, 2022 at 6:58 am

    “In the bag”—I know it’s a term of art in golf, but the ball Tiger had “in the bag” in 2000 didn’t do anything for him: it was in the bag.

  8. Henry R Fitzgerald

    Mar 2, 2022 at 11:37 pm

    You can always count on Chamblee to bring the kids back to reality, lol…

  9. John

    Mar 2, 2022 at 10:49 am

    EV Extra Spin! Loved that ball

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Why Phil Mickelson decided to drop out of lawsuit against PGA Tour

Published

on

Whatever the whys and wherefores, the disputes and disagreements, the one thing the LIV series has done is get people thinking.

Much water has crossed under the bridge and a recap could go on for many hours, but it remains that something somewhere caused the PGA Tour to look at a revised schedule.

Behind all this were a number of court cases, the first being 16 players fighting their cause against a DP World Tour ban, before 11 PGA Tour players sought temporary injunctions against the tour, seeking allowance into the FedEx Cup.

Since then,  Abraham Ancer, Jason Kokrak, Carlos Ortiz and Pat Perez have dropped out of the suit, the trial scheduled to commence in 2024, and now four more have fallen by the wayside.

Those four are Ian Poulter, Talor Gooch, Hudson Swafford, and more vitally, Phil Mickelson.

The idea of a series challenging the golf status quo was always in the mind of Greg Norman and his backers, and Lefty was certainly the one player that launched the idea into orbit, after a revealing interview with golf writer Alan Shipnuck.

That now leaves just three of the original 11 – Bryson DeChambeau, Matt Jones and Peter Uihlein – who are still being backed by LIV Golf.

The organization released a recent statement, commenting:

“Nothing has changed,’” confirmed LIV. “The merits of the lawsuit—the PGA Tour’s anti-competitive conduct—still stand and will be fully tested in court, and we look forward to it.”

The statement confirmed the reasons why they believe they have a strong case.

“We stand by the players who the PGA Tour has treated so poorly, but we also recognize to be successful we no longer need a wide variety of players to be on the suit. We have our players’ backs and will press our case in court against the PGA’s anti-competitive behavior.”

Losing the bigger names might be a blow to the plaintiff’s case, and Mickelson’s comments were always going to be of interest.

Lefty explained the reasons for his withdrawal to Sports Illustrated:

“I am focused on moving forward and extremely happy being a part of LIV, while also grateful for my time on the (PGA) Tour. I am pleased that the players on Tour are finally being heard, respected and valued and are benefitting from the changes recently implemented.”

He summed up:

“With LIV’s involvement in these issues, the players’ rights will be protected and I no longer feel it is necessary for me to be part of the proceedings.”

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Patrick Reed includes three golf journalists in fresh defamation lawsuit

Published

on

Last month, Patrick Reed filed a defamation lawsuit against Golf Channel’s Brandel Chamblee. The suit has since been withdrawn, but the former Masters champion isn’t done yet.

Reed has just filed a new lawsuit against golf journalists Damon Hack, Shane Bacon and Eamon Lynch. In addition to the writers, the suit includes both PGA Tour and DP World Tour and their commissioners Jay Monahan and Keith Pelley.

The suit alleges that those mentioned are guilty of “conspiracy, defamation, injurious falsehood and tortious interference”.

The lawsuit is a whopping 96-pages long and it lists 42 “causes of action”. The causes of action include “a pattern and practice of defaming Mr. Reed”

“These malicious attacks have created hate, aided and abetted a hostile workplace environment, and have caused substantial financial and emotional damage and harm to Mr. Reed and his family,” Reed’s attorney Larry Klayman said in a statement.

The suit claims that the defendants have cost Reed opportunities at multi-million-dollar sponsorships over the course of his career.

The documents also allege that the defendants have been “intentionally and maliciously destroying” the reputation and sales of Reed and his wife’s company, grindworksUSA, which distributes golf equipment made by the Chinese company.

Reed was set to tee it up at the Alfred Dunhill Links this week, but was forced to withdraw due to back issues resulting from a soft mattress at a French hotel.

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Pro travels half way across world for qualifier and is disqualified after one hole

Published

on

Rules are rules.

In ordinary life, there are principles we must stick by. We may not agree with all but rules, or laws, are there, and it’s helpful to know them.

That’s also true in sports. And golf, in particular, loves a rule.

Over the years, golf has witnessed hundreds of infringements and penalties from the logical to the bizarre, and recent times has seen both.

Five months ago, Alex Cejka was disqualified for the second time for infringing a rule on green-reading, whilst in June, Hideki Matsuyama was dq’d for playing with a non-conforming club.

Over on the DP World Tour earlier this month, we reported on the expulsion of Aaron Cockerill from the Made In Himmerland tournament, after hitting his second ace in seven days, following that with a snowman, and forgetting to sign his card!

Golfers can, of course, use the stranger rules to their advantage.

Surely the most bizarre might be the regulation that allowed Thomas Pieters to gain a mulligan after ‘mis-hitting’ a putt at the Open de France, later to be re-interpreted, although, of course, too late.

‘Know your rules’ would be a simple maxim for all players and caddies, so it’s tough to feel too sorry for Blake Abercrombie, despite him losing circa $5000 because of an unavoidable error.

The mini-tour and Canadian Tour player entered the latest stage of the DP World Q-School at a cost of $2000 entry, plus his cost of flying from the US to Denmark – and ended up going home much earlier than planned.

Ryan French (@acaseofgthegolf1) used his infamous Twitter account to inform us all:

Replies asked whether the punishment fitted the crime, whether the rules consider the pressure these players are under, and why it isn’t simply a two-shot penalty like many other consequences.

To silence all, fellow entrant Nico Paez explained it to us all in his brief response :

We may not agree with all but rules, or laws, are there, and it’s helpful to know them.

More from the 19th Hole

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK0

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending