Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

5 things we learned on Thursday at the 2018 U.S. Open

Published

on

Jon Jennings, superintendent at Shinnecock Hills golf club, tells the story of the linksy look of the property. In the days of coal-fired train engines, embers would occasionally light the land where the course now rests, prohibiting the sustained growth of anything tall. On Thursday, some of those embers returned in a metaphoric sense. As the winds whipped along Peconic Bay, as firm yet wide fairways ricocheted balls into rough and worse, major-championship hopes were burned to a crisp for some, while fires of contention were lit for others. With that poetic opener, let’s find out what the engine dragged out of round one, with 5 things we learned on Thursday at the US Open

5) The U.S. Open is golf’s version of Survivor 

In the 1970s and 80s, many bemoaned the high rough at fairways’ edge and greens’ side. This year, 2018 brings a different version of this torture, thanks to the antithesis of those traditional venues. Where trees once pinched fairways, eliminating recovery shots to greens, absence of trees allows winds to dance and hex the flight of golfers’ shots. Firm greens demand that shots land short or else! What is else? Closely-mown recovery areas, extensive strands of fescue, and bunkers galore. Offer 3 more rounds of 1-under to any of the golfers at that figure (or any others in the field) and they would sign that contract immediately.

4) If anyone tells you that experience matters…

Take a look at the top 19 golfers (there are 17 tied for 20th, so we won’t go there) and you find just 5 major champions. Each (Rose, Reed, Johnson, Stenson, Dufner) has one major title on his resume. The multiple-major names that were expected to stake a claim on Thursday (Mickelson, Spieth, McIlroy, Woods) could not summon similar results. Mickelson was low among that foursome with 77 on the day. Called by some “the sternest test in golf,” the U.S. Open is never the same from year to year. In fact, it’s never the same on the same course. Shinnecock in 1986 differed greatly in 2004, and 2018 is its own unique experience. If destiny taps you on the shoulder, Brian Gay or anyone else, take advantage!

3) There’s always room for anyone to shine

Whether your name is Dean Burmester or David Bransdon, many frustrating swings can be erased by one glorious execution. Be it the long putt, the dunked bunker shot, or the fairway hole-out, the U.S. Open sends many away with a cherished memory. When you troll the bottom of the leader board, where the weekend is no more than travel time, keep in mind that most experience a spotlight moment.

2) If you have to put your money somewhere …

It won’t be on Ian Poulter, Scott Piercy, or Russell Henley. Although they are tied with Dustin Johnson atop the sheet at minus-one, their odds at victory are slim. IF Poulter were to win, however, Lee Westwood and Colin Montgomerie would grind their teeth to nubbins. Neither won a major title, despite being the best British golfers of their day. Poulter’s individual record has not measured up to that of his Ryder Cup persona. Same goes for Piercy. Imagine the history of golf, with Scott Piercy as a U.S. Open champion, but not Phil Mickelson. The golf gods are truly mad on some days. Instead, put your money on the world number one, Dustin Johnson. He has won this tournament recently, on a course of similar brawn, and he has the demeanor to shrug off the bad and the good, and keep the ship headed toward shore.

1) What can we expect on Friday?

First, more combing through fescue for golf balls. Next, more decisions on whether to clip-and-spin, bump-and-run, or putt the ball from areas around the green. Third, rejection of driver off the tee, replaced by hybrids and irons for position and a chance to make par or birdie. Fourth, one golfer at 1-under will toss up a sub-par second round, and be at or near the top of the board. Joining him will be the first person to shoot 67 or 66 for the tournament. It will feel like 61. Finally, a farewell to a number of pre-tournament favorites, drummed falsely to the top by media hype, shaking their heads, wondering how it went so bad, so quickly.

Your Reaction?
  • 37
  • LEGIT4
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK4

Ronald Montesano writes for GolfWRX.com from western New York. He dabbles in coaching golf and teaching Spanish, in addition to scribbling columns on all aspects of golf, from apparel to architecture, from equipment to travel. Follow Ronald on Twitter at @buffalogolfer.

13 Comments

13 Comments

  1. jeffrey monnich

    Jun 16, 2018 at 5:09 pm

    the most important thing I learned from day one and forgot about from last year was TURN THE VOLUME DOWN ON FOX. and today I’m having a more pleasant viewing experience.

  2. Justin

    Jun 15, 2018 at 8:40 am

    Harvest Hill forever

  3. seabass

    Jun 15, 2018 at 6:40 am

    I love this. Make it hard like it was years ago. No more fairways 100 yards wide, and 1/2 inch rough.

    Make this about penalties for mistakes. Force them to hit fairways not just long bombs with easy rough.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jun 16, 2018 at 6:15 am

      For the most part, it’s a different type of hard, or difficult. Shinny allows for the fast/firm/frenetic, in a way that dark-earth courses do not. Oakmont is an inland exception, perhaps why Mike Davis likes it so much. The rest of the arable-land courses need a different set-up. Going back to “hit in high rough, chop out, save par, repeat” is not the ideal manner.

      Mike Davis has hinted that 3 courses (Shinny, Oaky and Pebble Beach) should host the US Open once every 8 years. If we take an 8-year period, that gives us those three, plus room for 5 more. Since June is way better for an Open than July or August, and since it is a priority to bring the event to as many geographic regions as possible, here is a list of 10 courses that might be interest in hosting a US Open:

      Pinehurst #2
      Trinity Forest
      Erin Hills
      Chambers Bay
      Winged Foot
      Southern Hills

      Places like Olympic and Merion are in a bind, as they don’t have access to the space required to host a modern Open. I’m hoping that Torrey Pines sees its last Open in 2021, as the course is more “tour” than “USGA.” The two most important playings in the next 10 years are 2022 and 2023. The USGA needs another northeastern site, since Bethpage went the way of the PGA stable. The Country Club, outside Boston, fits the bill. The association would love to have LA country club on the rolls every 10-12 years, but the question is whether the membership will be one-and-done or embrace it.

  4. ND Hickman

    Jun 15, 2018 at 3:38 am

    Colin Montgomerie isn’t English, pal.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jun 15, 2018 at 7:49 am

      Ach, ye lads! Ye’ve caught me. No research went into the publication of this piece, as you can tell. It’s my addled brain that connected those two Brits. Thanks for being the astute readers and critics that you are, Craig Goodwin and others. Keep reading, continue commenting, and find my flaws!!
      …RM

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jun 15, 2018 at 7:50 am

      ND,

      Good to know we’re pals

      …RM

  5. Craig Goodwin

    Jun 15, 2018 at 2:34 am

    Monty is scottish not English good research

  6. Man

    Jun 14, 2018 at 10:09 pm

    “…one FROM which he never recovered.”
    Come on USGA…. you can’t even speak English. No wonder it’s a mess.

  7. Reeves

    Jun 14, 2018 at 9:45 pm

    Finally, a farewell to a number of pre-tournament favorites, drummed falsely to the top by media hype, shaking their heads, wondering how it went so bad, so quickly. US OPEN about the only course set up that club and ball companies know even the best players cannot make their equipment magic. If courses were set up week in and week out like this Pros would need handicaps to win.

    • Ronald Montesano

      Jun 15, 2018 at 7:52 am

      You’re on to something, but would we tune in? Once a year is quite all right, and I suspect that the USGA has cards to play, to soften the course in case the wind whips with greater fury. The sun is the greater enemy, in my opinion. We’ll see how it plays out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 11
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending