Connect with us

Published

on

In this week’s Tech Tuesday, we look at how technology influenced Lexi Thompson’s loss at the ANA Inspiration, Rory McIlroy’s last-minute equipment changes for The Masters and Mizuno introducing new blade irons.

Your Reaction?
  • 23
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK25

Peter Finch delivers straight-talking, easy-to-follow, honest, professional and data driven advice to all of his viewers from beginner to tour pro. This tried-and-tested method of coaching has helped many golfers achieve their personal goals and beyond.

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Paul

    Apr 16, 2017 at 1:30 am

    I want to first take this subject in a slightly different direction. First, let us get over the myth that you can actually replace a ball exactly in the place were you marked it. A player can probably eyeball it to get within a couple of millimeters, but it is not going to be in the same place if for no reason than the player changes the resting location by picking up the ball in the first place. Second, this is complicated by the use of round markers. I have my doubts that the makers of the rules would have considered Lexi’s “misplacement” of the ball a rules infraction. The movement was around the 180 degrees facing towards the hole placement. So a golfer has to establish a line with no fewer than three points – the ball, the marker, and the hole through what may be a sloping green – to somewhat accurately replace the ball from a standing position that will not in itself be terribly accurate. Those round objects lie! Without a marker with a definitive line and arrow to establish the “true direction” and point where the ball should be replaced, I guarantee this happens all of the time and has happened among the best players of the ages on occasion by accident. Third, unless we are allowed to review camera coverage of every player in the field equally, this is going to clearly impact the leaders and the marquee players disproportionately because there will be more opportunities for people with nothing better to do to “officiate” inadvertent “letter of rules” infractions which have no actual bearing on the outcome of play and probably go well beyond what the actual makers of the rules intended.

  2. RG

    Apr 9, 2017 at 11:02 am

    Just got done watching the Sports Reporters on ESPN lambaste this ruling, and the bodies that support it. “when is golf going to understand the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of he law?’ said one of the commentators. They went on to make fun of signing a scorecard when everybody already knows what a golfer has shot.
    The days of the rise of E sports is upon us. continuing to to be ridiculous in ones approach and ones belief in archaic rule structures is only hurting the game. If you continue to handout $100,000 dollar fines for jay walking you are only driving new players from the game. Think about what you are saying and expressing when you issue rulings in this manner and in this extreme.

  3. Sandy Bunker

    Apr 8, 2017 at 4:56 am

    Cheating speaks volumes about a Professional Golfer………….

  4. Dave R

    Apr 7, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    Yes well it’s called cheating sorry but that’s the fact.

  5. mike

    Apr 6, 2017 at 9:12 am

    I don’t get it. Yes it’s not nice to find out about the penalty the next day. But it would not have been an issue if Lexi had replaced the ball correctly. The European tour has banned a player for this in the past. She may not have intended to do it, but she did do it. The rule of golf are there to protect the field.
    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/jan/18/elliot-saltman-three-month-golf-ban

  6. Blingy

    Apr 6, 2017 at 1:24 am

    Spectators and others not involved in the event as a player or official should not have their comments taken into consideration for deciding the outcome of an event. Once the player, the marker and the officials have accepted a card that sould be the end of the scoring. The on course and internet commentators can discuss whatever they like but it should have no bearing on the result.

    • S Hitter

      Apr 6, 2017 at 3:42 am

      As an honourable, professional golfer, even if the scorecard would be accepted on the spot, if you saw the video after the fact, and it is irrefutable video evidence that will live on forever in our web for all time, you would die just thinking that you cheated, even if not intentionally, that you did not pay attention to the letter of the rules, that you did make a total blunder for all the world to see for ever and ever, you would never live it down and would probably concede the trophy to the 2nd placed player to save face. If you are an honourable, self-respecting player, that is. Such is golf, as it should be, if you respect the game and yourself, and the rules, and officials, and your comrades and fellow competitors and families and friends and the media. Of course, you would put the spot on the 2nd placed player, and she would have a hard time accepting it, so there will have to have been a caucus as to how the situation would be handled, such is the game of golf.

  7. Pingback: Masters Wednesday Link Roll – DJ’s tumble, Jack on Lexi and everything Augusta | GolfJay

  8. D

    Apr 5, 2017 at 10:19 pm

    Deflategate! The golf ball moved because it was deflated!

  9. Chuck

    Apr 5, 2017 at 4:35 pm

    About the supposed “delay.” You don’t know who made the report, how it was discovered and exactly how it was reported.

    Here are some totally reasonable hypotheticals that would explain.

    Scenario One: A guy who is a local or state rules official is watching the tournament and sees the infraction. He is convinced there is a need to report it, but has no idea who to call or write. He calls his state golf association, and asks who knows somebody at the LPGA. It’s Saturday afternoon. They promise to relay a message. Unaware of any urgency, somebody gets back to somebody, messages get relayed and finally on Sunday an email address is relayed to the person who needs it.

    Scenario Two: A guy who is not any sort of Rules official sees what he thinks is suspicious on television. Has no idea what to do. Has dinner on Saturday night at his club, with the club pro and the tournament committee chairman, and mentions the violation. They talk it over; sounds interesting. Nobody has a recording of the event. They agree to talk to the lady assistant pro the next day; she DVR’s all of the LPGA events for swing ideas and teaching. They look at her recording. And then they call the LPGA, and try to get the right email address.

    Et cetera, et cetera. See how the possibilities are endless? Nothing but earnest intentions. Presume bad intentions if you want; I don’t really care. But just remember that they don’t have a crawl-graphic at the bottom of the screen on every golf telecast, giving people the Tour hotline number and email address, in case you see a Rules violation. People have to work at it. Even when an ultimate Rules insider like David Eger saw a violation on a Masters telecast, he had to pull strings, to get a telephone message to Fred Ridley. Tiger was so lucky that they did that.

    As a thought experiment, just consider what you’d do to try to report a rules violation. You can get a phone number for the LPGA offices in Daytona Beach; but I haven’t tried calling them on a Saturday evening, or a Sunday morning. I’ll bet you can’t reach anybody personally. None of their tournament officials offer any contact info on their website.

    I don’t presume to answer all of the “delay” questions. But I don’t think that anybody — at least not based on the info we have — can claim that there is anything wrong or unreasonable about any “delay” in this case.

    It’s unfortunate; but as the first commenter rightly noted, very simply. She breached the Rule.

  10. Bert

    Apr 5, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    No, she violated the Rules of Golf.

    • setter02

      Apr 6, 2017 at 7:22 am

      They pretty well all do with lift, clean and cheat. Laughable to see how far the ball gets moved at times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 6
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW1
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 10
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW0
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 32
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

Trending