Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Swanson: How I fixed Steph Curry’s basketball shot with Trackman

Published

on

Warning: Swanson, the author of this story, does not exist… except in his writing. His character is completely imagined, but that doesn’t mean his opinions aren’t real. 

I know all of you probably think of me as just a golf-equipment savant, but that’s putting me in a box. I have other skills in life — like knowledge of the golf swing and the dynamics of golf-ball flight. And thanks to that knowledge, Steph Curry is the dominant basketball player he is today.

Here’s what happened.

Last summer, during the NBA off-season, Steph and I had just finished up 18 holes at my private course in Aruba. He’s actually a really good golfer despite the media calling him a 1-handicap. But anyway, we’re shooting jumpers in my indoor basketball gym after our round when I noticed something off in his release — the basketball was launching much too low and with too much spin. Although he was making every single shot, no matter where he shot it from, the ball kept gently grazing the front of the rim.

As you know, in golf, the optimal launch-spin ratio is 17 degrees and 1700 rpm. To my amazement, or should I say shock, launch and spin were something Steph didn’t even think about when shooting a basketball. Poppycock!

Since 17-1700 works so well in golf, I figured it’d work in basketball, too. So I walked over and grabbed a Trackman from my gym bag (that’s a lesson to my fellow golfers, never go anywhere without your Trackman). I set it up on a table behind him as he took some deep threes to grab some data.

Sure enough, Trackman showed he was launching it at 12 and 2900. From my knowledge of golf, I know that means the ball was ballooning and causing him to hit the front rim. We then made major adjustments to his form, stance, posture and mentality, and even threw some lead tape in his wrist band to balance out his center of gravity. Finally, we optimized his ball flight. He didn’t touch the rim for the rest of our practice session, and he even called me “coach” before he took my jet back to the states. I’ll never forget that.

And while I’m not a huge fan of unjustifiably taking credit for other people’s success, or of completely making up stories, I might just be the reason that Steph Curry broke the all-time NBA record for three-point shots made during a season this year with 402. And I’m the reason Steph Curry won his second MVP in a row, as well. Did you think it was a coincidence Steph was making half-court shots all year? No, it’s not a coincidence. It’s science. The 17-1700 ratio never fails.

The problem with Steph’s game up until this year was that he wasn’t thinking about technique enough. He was just seeing the target and shooting at it, accessing his hand-eye coordination and natural abilities. He wasn’t paying attention to minute details like weight pressure in his feet, pronation, supination, stacking or even tilting. And not only was he not concerned about it, but he didn’t even know the optimal launch angle and spin rate of a basketball.

Admittedly, I’m slightly disappointed that he credits his shooting coach, supportive parents, teammates, work ethic and talent for all of his success instead of me. Kind of selfish, don’t you think?

But seriously, I am hoping at some point Steph publicly acknowledges my role in his success, because I really want to name my new Trackman Data Analysis Performance Center for All Sports after him. The business venture is really taking off after I showed Tom Brady the 17 degrees and 1700 rpm formula and completely turned around his football throwing motion.

Steph, if you’re reading this, shoot me a text so we can talk particulars about the launch of “Swanson and Steph’s Performance Center for Enlightening Athletes on the Significance and Relationship of the Numbers 17 and 1700.”

Your Reaction?
  • 55
  • LEGIT4
  • WOW4
  • LOL140
  • IDHT3
  • FLOP6
  • OB7
  • SHANK121

Swanson doesn't exist, except in his writing. He doesn't play for score any more, as he's too busy working on his spin rates. For tournament purposes, he has a 2 handicap on file from high school golf, registered at his home club, which is only reachable by private watercraft.

19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. Mike Honcho

    Aug 3, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    Judge Smails has issued a bench warrant for Swanson to be sent to the electric chair. We hope

  2. Eric

    Jun 16, 2016 at 4:58 pm

    How would he get trackman to read the ball data from a basket ball?

  3. Brilliant

    Jun 12, 2016 at 6:31 pm

    Swanson, good stuff buddy. I laugh with glee at all the anger gonna come through the comment section. Impressive results, but without knowing the stiffness of his wristbands, you know most of us can’t verify your data “apples to apples.” Next time call an expert.

    • K Dizzle

      Jun 13, 2016 at 4:41 am

      You are confusing anger with utter disappointment.

  4. S Wizzle

    Jun 12, 2016 at 4:51 pm

    With a wet lettuce.

  5. mlecuni

    Jun 12, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    This website deserves better editors.

  6. TheCityGame

    Jun 12, 2016 at 11:36 am

    17-17 is the new 20-20.

    Steph’s being selfish. Come on Curry, give your boy Swanson a little dap.

    Swanson, the lord of all things longball.

  7. Raj jp

    Jun 12, 2016 at 11:30 am

    This is funny. Not sure why some of the other commenters are so uptight about it. Nothing ruins a swing like a stick in the a**.

    • One of Your Best

      Jun 12, 2016 at 4:49 pm

      There is a difference between being uptight and not finding it funny. You probably find Everybody Loves Raymond funny as well which would explain a lot.

      • Raymond.

        Jun 12, 2016 at 6:37 pm

        Everybody Loves Raymond. The absolute test for whether humor is appropriately high brow funny vs just total garbage. You people know who you are, if Raymond makes you laugh, you might as well walk into traffic. There’s nothing uptight about disapproving of someone’s sense of humor though.

  8. SB

    Jun 12, 2016 at 8:31 am

    That’s bad.

  9. Goopher

    Jun 12, 2016 at 3:53 am

    this could actually have been funny … but the later part is about as lame as a courtside seat holder in an NBA game trying to high five every player in their vicinity

    please Swanson … stick with your day job and stop dabbling into satire … it doesn’t seem to be for you

  10. Rob

    Jun 12, 2016 at 12:04 am

    Please leave satire to the professionals at the onion.

  11. J

    Jun 11, 2016 at 10:33 pm

    These articles couldn’t be a bigger waste of time. Please divert these resources to something useful

  12. Dan Plan

    Jun 11, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    This sounds so fake

  13. Tyler

    Jun 11, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    Dear Swanson,
    Do you think the 17-1700 rule could be used in my investment strategy somewhere? I mean it’s like a divine ratio that should be applicable to all aspects of my life right?
    -Tyler

  14. S Mizzle

    Jun 11, 2016 at 12:47 pm

    Swanson needs to be put out to pasture.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans betting preview

Published

on

The PGA TOUR heads to New Orleans to play the 2023 Zurich Classic of New Orleans. In a welcome change from the usual stroke play, the Zurich Classic is a team event. On Thursday and Saturday, the teams play best ball, and on Friday and Sunday the teams play alternate shot.

TPC Louisiana is a par 72 that measures 7,425 yards. The course features some short par 4s and plenty of water and bunkers, which makes for a lot of exciting risk/reward scenarios for competitors. Pete Dye designed the course in 2004 specifically for the Zurich Classic, although the event didn’t make its debut until 2007 because of Hurricane Katrina.

Coming off of the Masters and a signature event in consecutive weeks, the field this week is a step down, and understandably so. Many of the world’s top players will be using this time to rest after a busy stretch.

However, there are some interesting teams this season with some stars making surprise appearances in the team event. Some notable teams include Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry, Collin Morikawa and Kurt Kitayama, Will Zalatoris and Sahith Theegala as well as a few Canadian teams, Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin and Taylor Pendrith and Corey Conners.

Past Winners at TPC Louisiana

  • 2023: Riley/Hardy (-30)
  • 2022: Cantlay/Schauffele (-29)
  • 2021: Leishman/Smith (-20)
  • 2019: Palmer/Rahm (-26)
  • 2018: Horschel/Piercy (-22)
  • 2017: Blixt/Smith (-27)

2024 Zurich Classic of New Orleans Picks

Tom Hoge/Maverick McNealy +2500 (DraftKings)

Tom Hoge is coming off of a solid T18 finish at the RBC Heritage and finished T13 at last year’s Zurich Classic alongside Harris English.

This season, Hoge is having one of his best years on Tour in terms of Strokes Gained: Approach. In his last 24 rounds, the only player to top him on the category is Scottie Scheffler. Hoge has been solid on Pete Dye designs, ranking 28th in the field over his past 36 rounds.

McNealy is also having a solid season. He’s finished T6 at the Waste Management Phoenix Open and T9 at the PLAYERS Championship. He recently started working with world renowned swing coach, Butch Harmon, and its seemingly paid dividends in 2024.

Keith Mitchell/Joel Dahmen +4000 (DraftKings)

Keith Mitchell is having a fantastic season, finishing in the top-20 of five of his past seven starts on Tour. Most recently, Mitchell finished T14 at the Valero Texas Open and gained a whopping 6.0 strokes off the tee. He finished 6th at last year’s Zurich Classic.

Joel Dahmen is having a resurgent year and has been dialed in with his irons. He also has a T11 finish at the PLAYERS Championship at TPC Sawgrass which is another Pete Dye track. With Mitchell’s length and Dahmen’s ability to put it close with his short irons, the Mitchell/Dahmen combination will be dangerous this week.

Taylor Moore/Matt NeSmith +6500 (DraftKings)

Taylor Moore has quickly developed into one of the more consistent players on Tour. He’s finished in the top-20 in three of his past four starts, including a very impressive showing at The Masters, finishing T20. He’s also finished T4 at this event in consecutive seasons alongside Matt NeSmith.

NeSmith isn’t having a great 2024, but has seemed to elevate his game in this format. He finished T26 at Pete Dye’s TPC Sawgrass, which gives the 30-year-old something to build off of. NeSmith is also a great putter on Bermudagrass, which could help elevate Moore’s ball striking prowess.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

19th Hole

Vincenzi’s 2024 LIV Adelaide betting preview: Cam Smith ready for big week down under

Published

on

After having four of the top twelve players on the leaderboard at The Masters, LIV Golf is set for their fifth event of the season: LIV Adelaide. 

For both LIV fans and golf fans in Australia, LIV Adelaide is one of the most anticipated events of the year. With 35,000 people expected to attend each day of the tournament, the Grange Golf Club will be crawling with fans who are passionate about the sport of golf. The 12th hole, better known as “the watering hole”, is sure to have the rowdiest of the fans cheering after a long day of drinking some Leishman Lager.  

The Grange Golf Club is a par-72 that measures 6,946 yards. The course features minimal resistance, as golfers went extremely low last season. In 2023, Talor Gooch shot consecutive rounds of 62 on Thursday and Friday, giving himself a gigantic cushion heading into championship Sunday. Things got tight for a while, but in the end, the Oklahoma State product was able to hold off The Crushers’ Anirban Lahiri for a three-shot victory. 

The Four Aces won the team competition with the Range Goats finishing second. 

*All Images Courtesy of LIV Golf*

Past Winners at LIV Adelaide

  • 2023: Talor Gooch (-19)

Stat Leaders Through LIV Miami

Green in Regulation

  1. Richard Bland
  2. Jon Rahm
  3. Paul Casey

Fairways Hit

  1. Abraham Ancer
  2. Graeme McDowell
  3. Henrik Stenson

Driving Distance

  1. Bryson DeChambeau
  2. Joaquin Niemann
  3. Dean Burmester

Putting

  1. Cameron Smith
  2. Louis Oosthuizen
  3. Matt Jones

2024 LIV Adelaide Picks

Cameron Smith +1400 (DraftKings)

When I pulled up the odds for LIV Adelaide, I was more than a little surprised to see multiple golfers listed ahead of Cameron Smith on the betting board. A few starts ago, Cam finished runner-up at LIV Hong Kong, which is a golf course that absolutely suits his eye. Augusta National in another course that Smith could roll out of bed and finish in the top-ten at, and he did so two weeks ago at The Masters, finishing T6.

At Augusta, he gained strokes on the field on approach, off the tee (slightly), and of course, around the green and putting. Smith able to get in the mix at a major championship despite coming into the week feeling under the weather tells me that his game is once again rounding into form.

The Grange Golf Club is another course that undoubtedly suits the Australian. Smith is obviously incredibly comfortable playing in front of the Aussie faithful and has won three Australian PGA Championship’s. The course is very short and will allow Smith to play conservative off the tee, mitigating his most glaring weakness. With birdies available all over the golf course, there’s a chance the event turns into a putting contest, and there’s no one on the planet I’d rather have in one of those than Cam Smith.

Louis Oosthuizen +2200 (DraftKings)

Louis Oosthuizen has simply been one of the best players on LIV in the 2024 seas0n. The South African has finished in the top-10 on the LIV leaderboard in three of his five starts, with his best coming in Jeddah, where he finished T2. Perhaps more impressively, Oosthuizen finished T7 at LIV Miami, which took place at Doral’s “Blue Monster”, an absolutely massive golf course. Given that Louis is on the shorter side in terms of distance off the tee, his ability to play well in Miami shows how dialed he is with the irons this season.

In addition to the LIV finishes, Oosthuizen won back-to-back starts on the DP World Tour in December at the Alfred Dunhill Championship and the Mauritus Open. He also finished runner-up at the end of February in the International Series Oman. The 41-year-old has been one of the most consistent performers of 2024, regardless of tour.

For the season, Louis ranks 4th on LIV in birdies made, T9 in fairways hit and first in putting. He ranks 32nd in driving distance, but that won’t be an issue at this short course. Last season, he finished T11 at the event, but was in decent position going into the final round but fell back after shooting 70 while the rest of the field went low. This season, Oosthuizen comes into the event in peak form, and the course should be a perfect fit for his smooth swing and hot putter this week.

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: What really makes a wedge work? Part 1

Published

on

Of all the clubs in our bags, wedges are almost always the simplest in construction and, therefore, the easiest to analyze what might make one work differently from another if you know what to look for.

Wedges are a lot less mysterious than drivers, of course, as the major brands are working with a lot of “pixie dust” inside these modern marvels. That’s carrying over more to irons now, with so many new models featuring internal multi-material technologies, and almost all of them having a “badge” or insert in the back to allow more complex graphics while hiding the actual distribution of mass.

But when it comes to wedges, most on the market today are still single pieces of molded steel, either cast or forged into that shape. So, if you look closely at where the mass is distributed, it’s pretty clear how that wedge is going to perform.

To start, because of their wider soles, the majority of the mass of almost any wedge is along the bottom third of the clubhead. So, the best wedge shots are always those hit between the 2nd and 5th grooves so that more mass is directly behind that impact. Elite tour professionals practice incessantly to learn to do that consistently, wearing out a spot about the size of a penny right there. If impact moves higher than that, the face is dramatically thinner, so smash factor is compromised significantly, which reduces the overall distance the ball will fly.

Every one of us, tour players included, knows that maddening shot that we feel a bit high on the face and it doesn’t go anywhere, it’s not your fault.

If your wedges show a wear pattern the size of a silver dollar, and centered above the 3rd or 4th groove, you are not getting anywhere near the same performance from shot to shot. Robot testing proves impact even two to three grooves higher in the face can cause distance loss of up to 35 to 55 feet with modern ‘tour design’ wedges.

In addition, as impact moves above the center of mass, the golf club principle of gear effect causes the ball to fly higher with less spin. Think of modern drivers for a minute. The “holy grail” of driving is high launch and low spin, and the driver engineers are pulling out all stops to get the mass as low in the clubhead as possible to optimize this combination.

Where is all the mass in your wedges? Low. So, disregarding the higher lofts, wedges “want” to launch the ball high with low spin – exactly the opposite of what good wedge play requires penetrating ball flight with high spin.

While almost all major brand wedges have begun putting a tiny bit more thickness in the top portion of the clubhead, conventional and modern ‘tour design’ wedges perform pretty much like they always have. Elite players learn to hit those crisp, spinny penetrating wedge shots by spending lots of practice time learning to consistently make contact low in the face.

So, what about grooves and face texture?

Grooves on any club can only do so much, and no one has any material advantage here. The USGA tightly defines what we manufacturers can do with grooves and face texture, and modern manufacturing techniques allow all of us to push those limits ever closer. And we all do. End of story.

Then there’s the topic of bounce and grinds, the most complex and confusing part of the wedge formula. Many top brands offer a complex array of sole configurations, all of them admittedly specialized to a particular kind of lie or turf conditions, and/or a particular divot pattern.

But if you don’t play the same turf all the time, and make the same size divot on every swing, how would you ever figure this out?

The only way is to take any wedge you are considering and play it a few rounds, hitting all the shots you face and observing the results. There’s simply no other way.

So, hopefully this will inspire a lively conversation in our comments section, and I’ll chime in to answer any questions you might have.

And next week, I’ll dive into the rest of the wedge formula. Yes, shafts, grips and specifications are essential, too.

Your Reaction?
  • 33
  • LEGIT7
  • WOW1
  • LOL1
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP3
  • OB1
  • SHANK3

Continue Reading

WITB

Facebook

Trending