Connect with us


Callaway Big Bertha Alpha 816 DBD Driver: What you need to know



Callaway’s Big Bertha Alpha 816 Double Black Diamond Driver ($499.99) is available in lofts of 9 and 10.5 degrees for right-handed and left-handed golfers. Stock length is 45.5 inches. Stock swing weight is D4. It’s in stores Sept. 18, 2015.

Stock Shafts: Aldila Rogue I/O 60 (60-gram range), Mitsubishi Rayon Diamana D+ 70 (70-gram range)

What you need to know



Two “Distance Chambers” create four possible CG locations.

  • The Big Bertha Alpha 816 Double Black Diamond, or DBD, has two “Distance Chambers” in the center of the sole — one closer to the heel, one closer to the toe — that allow golfers to vary the position of the driver’s Gravity Core for more draw bias (heel position) or more fade bias (toe position). Because of the Gravity Core’s design (read on), this creates four distinct CG positions: high toe, low toe, high heel, low heel.


  • The Gravity Core, a stick-shaped object made of carbon fiber and tungsten, has a heavy end and a light end. In the past, Callaway advised golfers who needed a higher-spinning ball flight to position the Gravity Core heavy-side up in the club head, while golfers who required a lower-spinning ball flight were told to position the Gravity Core heavy-side down. This is still true with the new design, but…


  • The spin rate difference between the Gravity-Core-up and Gravity-Core-down positions with the Big Bertha Alpha 816 Double Black Diamond driver has been reduced from about 300 rpm in previous versions to 200 rpm because of the Gravity Core’s shorter design.
  • Callaway advises that golfers position the Gravity Core in the heavy-side-up orientation if they tend to contact their drives high on the club face, and in the heavy-side-down orientation if they tend to contact their drives in the middle or the bottom of the club face. Doing so moves the center of gravity (CG) more in line with impact area, which enhances ball speed. Callaway testing showed that 40 percent of golfers create more ball speed with the Gravity Core in the up position.

The DBD is all business at address with a matte black crown, no alignment aids and a slightly opened face angle.



The rear weight adds forgiveness, but it’s not meant to be adjusted by consumers.

  • The dual Gravity Core ports were made possible by the elimination of Callaway’s previous adjustable weight ports, which were used on the Big Bertha Alpha (2014) and Big Bertha Alpha 815 (2015) drivers to give golfers the ability to fine tune draw and fade bias. Their removal created the discretionary weight possible for the new design.
  • Like the Great Big Bertha driver, the Big Bertha Alpha 816 DBD has a Forged Composite Crown, a structure that helps move weight lower in the club head. It also uses the same Advanced OptiFit Hosel, which gives golfers a 3-degree range of loft adjustability. So a 9-degree driver can be adjusted to lofts of 8 degrees, 10 degrees and 11 degrees. Each loft can also paired with an individual lie angle of either standard (S) or draw (D), which makes the lie angle more upright.
  • The total weight of the Big Bertha Alpha DBD is 327 grams with Aldila’s Rogue I/O 60 shaft, which uses Aldila’s R.I.P. (Reverse Interlaminar Placement) Technology to give the shaft less torque, increased tip stability and a tighter feel.

More Photos


Your Reaction?
  • 156
  • LEGIT18
  • WOW31
  • LOL13
  • IDHT7
  • FLOP11
  • OB6
  • SHANK77



  1. Kanu

    Jan 29, 2017 at 5:56 am

    Dear Sir,
    I have one Callaway big bertha alpha 816 DBD and 9′
    Kindly teach me, how adjust the lopt from 9′ to 10′ -11′
    Possible advise with picture for reference.
    Thanhs & Regards,

  2. Colton

    Sep 18, 2015 at 8:32 pm

    Just picked up a 816 DBD in a X- FLEX to replace my X-Hot driver. The increase in distance was easy to see with lower spin and I was getting a tighter dispersion. Love it, I tested the great big bertha and it was nice, but nothing like the 816 DBD. I would play my X-Hot over the Great Big Bertha personally. Easy switch.

  3. Erik

    Aug 29, 2015 at 2:29 am

    All you guys are right but only for the average golfer. Ya if your an average golfer you can’t really tell between this club and a 10 year older model. But when your a good golfer and hit consistently you can tell a huge different. Like it’s now known that about a 3% up swing on the ball give the best result and the golfers who are really good know that and can do it to get the most of of there drives. And sense that’s known now companies are making it so these new drivers can maximize that. Especially for a drivers like this and the other “pro” drivers companies put out.
    You guys are dissing companies like taylormade and callaway for trying new things and saying that it doesn’t work. Well look how much father tour players are hitting the ball now compared to 5 years ago. It’s a huge increase! So the best advice I can give is to invest in a certified instructor who has the correct equipment to get you hitting the ball exactly how it needs to be hit and then you take advantage of the equipment coming out.
    Also you guys really need to be fitted for the driver sense there all crazy adjustable now. You can loose a lot of yards and miss a lot of fairways if you have it tuned wrong or the wrong shaft and shaft length.

    I have hit this driver and I was able to play a couple rounds with it before the release date and it is something special I absolutly loved it. I’m just a broke college student and $500 is crazy money to me. Clubs are becoming way over priced. But the day it becomes $400 this driver will be mine.

    And KK it’s 200 rpms for both.

  4. Joe

    Aug 7, 2015 at 10:16 am

    Zach says that Callaway is telling him Sept 18th release dat. My Callaway rep was in store yesterday and said firmly and without pause that the lineup will be in stores by the end of August. He also repeated that eh new Apex line will make an appearance just after Halloween.

    • Joe

      Aug 7, 2015 at 10:36 pm

      not doubting zach, just curious what the actual scoop is.

    • Steve

      Aug 8, 2015 at 8:15 am

      Why release the driver that time of year? When the golfing season is ending, football starting. Buy the driver and store it for 6 months?

  5. KK

    Aug 5, 2015 at 10:50 pm

    Is it 200 rpms per gravity core or 200 rpms for both? I love the look of the new DBD and the wide, tall face. Not a fan of composite drivers, though.

  6. Corey

    Aug 5, 2015 at 4:17 pm

    Hit this today and it is a very nice upgrade from the 815. More forgiveness with the deeper face and moving the gravity core makes a nice difference. Should be a popular choice for fitters.

    Corey Fields, PGA
    Custom Fitter

  7. Marketing Mirage

    Aug 4, 2015 at 11:05 pm

    All this is is a race of who can market the most BS for people to buy into. I agree this continues to be out of hand. Next thing they’ll resort to is nano tech paint jobs and whatever else they hope sticks to the walls when they throw it on deep. Try a better shaft and swing, until then.

  8. Tom

    Aug 4, 2015 at 8:53 pm

    Time to stop the bs……yea yea yea its whatever

  9. Mo

    Aug 4, 2015 at 8:02 pm

    Yes. Another fantastic driver i can get for about $100 in a year

  10. Leon

    Aug 4, 2015 at 9:51 am

    All I need to know is that if I wait three months, the price will reduce $50; if wait 6 months, $100 off; one year, it gives a $150 discount. And probably one or two new models will come out and say: 400 RPM less spin with 40% more forgiveness. Even my kid will do a good math to add the spin reductions and forgiveness improvements claimed in the past a few year to find out: now everyone is having a negative spin rate driver with double /triple amount of forgiveness.

  11. Dpavs

    Aug 4, 2015 at 9:46 am

    Does anyone else feel all this stuff has just gone too far? The entire illusion of small tweaks equaling significant game improvement just doesn’t hold much water. The bottom line is that if you swing poorly you get a poor result, if you swing well you get a good result. The return of small differences from all this tech is diminishing at best. If you doubt this grab a driver from about 10 years ago and try it against your current gamer. You will probably be surprised that the results are not as different as you might think they would be. It’s time for club manufacturer’s to stop the madness!

    • Christosterone

      Aug 4, 2015 at 10:37 am

      I view golf equipment like cars….is there really a difference between a 65 and 66 mustang? Not really….but premium options like fuel injection eventually trickled down making a 2016 mustang substantially better than a 1966…
      While yes, each year (or decade for that matter) may not see discernible improvements there is no arguing that the technologies which last are richly importing the overall driving experience….pun intended
      That’s all this is….trickle down technology that in the long run will make golf equipment incredibly more efficient and effective although year to year the improvements are almost imperceptible..

      • Steve

        Aug 4, 2015 at 5:39 pm

        So buy a new driver every twenty years or so.
        BTW I think a 60’s mustang would be a much better driving experience and much more desired car.

        • Christosterone

          Aug 5, 2015 at 9:58 am

          Sounds about right….personally, I would take a 60s E type jaguar over anything save maybe a 63 split window vette…
          But to your point, yes and no…
          Adjustability and 430-460cc head sizes are the fuel injections of today IMHO…
          Loft, lie and face angle adjustments on drivers were reserved to pros and those who had access to club fitters prior to the str8 fit era….
          We will eventually see adjustability in every club in our bag once the tech allows it…putters are beginning the conversion as we speak…
          Club makers will continue to throw ideas at the wall seeing what sticks…ideas like square heads and mini drivers will come and go….but ideas that work will, like disc brakes, change our golfing lives for the better…

          • Steve

            Aug 6, 2015 at 9:10 am

            The problem with your theory is that a 40 year old car and a brand new car will take you from point A to point B. Both will go at above speed limit speeds. Golf drivers have speed limits. Take a 975d and any new driver to a golf course. And you will be surprised both will take you from point a to point b. I think it is more like computers or cell phones. They having these selling points that 99% of people will never use or need

            • Christosterone

              Aug 6, 2015 at 8:27 pm

              Computers are absolutely a perfect analogy…
              I was simply trying to convey the fact that, like computers and cars, most year to year “advancements” are not discernible…but decade advances are more perceptible and tangible…
              As said, I think your PC analogy is spot on!

              • Steve

                Aug 7, 2015 at 10:04 am

                Agree, if the hype were true we should all be 100yds longer then 10 years ago.

                • James T

                  May 2, 2018 at 11:07 pm

                  I am.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


7 takeaways from an AWESOME equipment talk with Padraig Harrington



Fans of golf equipment have long known that Padraig Harrington is one of us. Throughout his career, Harrington has been willing to test new products, make changes from week to week, and play with a bag of mixed equipment brands.

What equipment fans may not know, however, is just how brilliant of an equipment mind Harrington truly has.

Ahead of the 2023 Valero Texas Open, I caught up with Harrington to pick his brain about what clubs are currently in his bag, and why. The conversation turned into Harrington discussing topics such as the broader equipment landscape, brand deals in 2023, his driver testing process, why he still uses a TaylorMade ZTP wedge from 2008, square grooves vs. V-grooves, and using a knockoff set of Ping Eye 1 irons as a junior.

Padraig Harrington’s 2023 WITB

Below are my 7 major takeaways from the extensive gear talk with Harrington.

1) Padraig’s stance on equipment contracts, and why he prefers Wilson

Harrington is a longtime Wilson staffer, and although he supports the brand and uses their equipment, he doesn’t use a full bag of Wilson clubs. He finds Wilson’s understanding of a player’s need for flexibility to be beneficial to the player, and it’s attracting more and more professional players to the company (such as Kevin Kisner and Trey Mullinax).

“Wilson wants me to play whatever I’m comfortable with. It’s very important. They’re not a manufacturer that says, ‘We want you to play 14 clubs.’ There’s always a club you don’t like. That’s just the way it is. So Wilson is like, ‘We want you playing well and playing the best clubs for you.’

“I am very comfortable with their irons. I’m very comfortable with their wedges, as you can see. They have an old hybrid 4 iron that I love. They have a new hybrid 4-iron that is too powerful. I put it in the bag last week and I had to take it out. The thing is, I use a 4-iron and a 5-wood. My 4-iron has to go somewhat relative to my 5-iron, and then I have to bridge that gap between 4-iron and 5-wood, so it has to do both. The new 4-iron was going 230 yards. My 4-iron goes about 215-235, maybe 240 on a warm day. And my 5-wood is like a warm-day 265 in the air, but I have no problem hitting it 235, so I can cross it over. But this 4-iron, the new version, it just went. I couldn’t hit the 215 shot with it; it’s just too powerful. That’s why I have the old 4-iron in the bag, but it does the job to bridge the gap…

“As players get more money, they’re less dependent on manufacturers. They need the service of a manufacturer – because, like I need to be on that truck and get things checked. But you’re seeing more players see Wilson as an attractive option because you don’t have to use 14 clubs. If you’re not happy this week with the putter; you know, Wilson has the putters, they have everything, but if you want to chase something else for a moment…remember, there’s two things you’re chasing. If you’re a free agent, it’s not good to be changing a lot. That is a distraction. But it’s nice to have the option that if somebody…like I feel Titleist has come out with a great driver. And I’m able to work my way straight into Titleist and say, ‘Hey, gimmie a go with that. Oh, this is a great driver, I’m going to use this.’ Wilson is aware of that. They want their players to be happy and playing well. Like it’s still 10 clubs, but it’s just not 14 and the ball.

“The irons are great, there’s no doubt about that. They’ve won the most majors. They make a gambit of irons. If you want to use a blade, they have the blade. If you want to use my iron, which is just a good tour composite, it has a bit of a cavity-back, you can do that. If you want to use the D irons that have rockets going off there, you can have them. Like the 4 iron, the one they gave me, it was a rocket! And guys are happy to carry driving irons like that, but mine has to match in with the 5-iron. It was just too high and too fast.

“So yeah, I think you’re going to see manufacturers go more of that way. Our players want to be independent, but the problem is that full independence is not great. You don’t want a situation where you’re turning up – as you see kids who make it into their first tournament, and the manufacturers start giving them stuff, and they’re changing. You don’t want to be the guy changing too much.”

2) The dangers of a 64-degree wedge

Although Harrington himself uses a Wilson Staff High Toe 64-degree wedge, he seldom practices with it. Here’s why he warns against it:

“The big key with a 64 wedge is DO NOT use it. No, seriously, do not use it. It’s a terrible wedge for your technique. That club is in the bag and it gets used on the golf course, and it gets used when it’s needed, but you don’t practice with it, because it’s awful. So much loft will get you leading too much, and you’re going to deloft it. Hit one or two shots with it, then put it away. You’re better off practicing with a pitching wedge and adding loft to be a good chipper instead of practicing with a lob wedge and taking loft off. A 64-degree wedge is accentuating that problem. It’s a dangerous club. It does a great job at times, but it certainly can do harm.

“It’s not bad having it in the bag for a certain shot, but it’s a terrible club to practice with. I literally hit one or two full shots with it, a couple chips with it, and that’s it. I know if I spend too long with it, I’ll start de-lofting.”

3) The interchangeable faces on TaylorMade’s ZTP wedges from 2008 were Padraig’s idea?!

I couldn’t believe it myself, but Harrington says that the idea for TaylorMade to offer interchangeable face technology on its ZTP wedges in 2008 was originally his idea…

“The TaylorMade is obviously attracting a lot of attention, but that was my idea! Myself and a consultant for Wilson, I got him to build changeable faces and he sold that to TaylorMade…that’s fully my idea. He sold that then to TaylorMade, and TaylorMade produced them, which I was happy about. But TaylorMade couldn’t sell them. You can’t get people to clean the grooves, so they weren’t going to buy a new face. Why have 400 faces at home? So I went out and bought these faces to make sure I had them for life. And I was home chipping a while ago, and I have a nice 58. I like the grind on that wedge, and the fact I can just replace the face and have a fresh face every three weeks, it’s just easy, so that’s why that’s in there.”

4) Driver testing isn’t all about speed

“The driver companies know I’m a free agent when it comes to drivers, so every time a new driver comes out, they’ll come to me and say, ‘Hey, would you have a look at this?’

“I will test everything, yeah, but it has to beat what I have in the bag. And Wilson’s new driver is the same. They brought out a new driver and it’s great, but I love the driver I’m using. So I say, ‘Look, guys, not only do you have to be as good as the incumbent, you have to be better, because I already know this and I’m familiar with it.’

“Wilson has built a very, very good driver. There’s know doubt about it. But I love the driver I’m using. And none of these manufacturers can build me a driver that’s better.

“Ball speed gets a driver into the conversation, and then you bring it to the golf course. So the driver has to be going as good as my current driver, and then I bring it to the course and see if I can hit the thing straight. I have gone down the road [of prioritizing speed]…I used a driver in 2014, and it never worked weekends. But it was fast. I used it for about six weeks I’d say – six tournaments – and I missed six straight cuts. It never worked the weekend. It was really fast on the range, but it just wasn’t good on the course.”


View this post on Instagram


A post shared by GolfWRX (@golfwrx)

5) Playing with knockoff irons as a junior

“I played as a junior for Ireland, under 18’s, and I owned half a set of golf clubs, and they were imitation Ping Eye 1’s. I borrowed the other half set off my brother. We had a half set each. I had the evens, he had the odds. In that tournament, there was a guy playing with Ping Berylliums with graphite shafts. They cost 1,900 pounds. Mine cost 100 pounds, and they were knockoffs. So I played, for my country, with a set of knockoffs. Before I used those knockoff clubs, I used a mixed bag of clubs. As in, I picked up whatever club they had. The 6-iron might go farther than the 5-iron. The 5-iron might go with a fade and the 7-iron might go with a hook, but I knew what my clubs did. Each club had a purpose.”

6) Using square grooves and V-grooves simultaneously

Square grooves – or “box grooves” – were outlawed by the USGA in 2010 because they were said to help golfers spin the ball too much. V grooves are said to provide less of an advantage because they restrict the sharp edges of the grooves, thus reducing the amount of friction imparted on the golf ball. Prior to the rule change, however, Harrington actually used both V grooves and box grooves, and he’d adjust his setup depending on the golf course.

“What’s interesting is, when the box grooves were around – very few people know this – I carried two sets of clubs at all times. I carried a V groove and a box groove.

“Yeah, see, the box grooves were unbelievable out of the rough, spin wise, but if the rough got to a certain level, the ball would come out so low and with spin that it wouldn’t go very far. Your 7-iron coming out of this rough would only go like 140 yards and it wouldn’t get over any trees because it would come out so low. What I was doing was, if I got to a golf course with this sort of a rough, I’d put in a box groove 7-iron and a V-groove 8-iron. If I got in the rough and I had 170 yards, I’d hit an 8 iron and get a flyer, because the 7 iron wouldn’t get there depending on the lie. And I couldn’t get it over things. So if there were trees, you needed the V groove to get over the trees. A box groove wouldn’t get up in the air.

“No one else was doing it. I played with the box groove for a couple years before I realized that in certain rough, you need the V groove to get there. Hale Irwin played a U.S. Open seemingly with no grooves. Off the fairway it’s meant to make no difference. I would disagree, but that’s what the officials would say. But out of the rough you needed the flyers to get to the green. The V grooves were doing that for me. You get your flyer to get of the rough to get the ball there, but then if it was the first cut of rough, or light rough, or Bermuda rough, or chip shots, it would come out so low and spinny that you’d have no problem.

“I can’t believe that people didn’t realize that I was doing this two-groove thing all the time. I swear to you, you could stand here, you would not launch a 7-iron over that fence there if it was box grooves out of light rough, and V groove would launch over it. The launch characteristics were massively different.”

7) Blame the person, not the putter

Interestingly, Harrington, for all his tinkering, has only used a handful of putters. It turns out, there’s a good reason for that — although he’d like his current model to be a few millimeters taller.

“I used a 2-ball when it came out. Then I used a 2-ball blade, which I won my majors with. I always had a hook in my putts, so not long after I won my majors, I went to face-balanced putter because it helps reduce the left-to-right spin. I started putting really badly in 2013 and 2014 – I had some issues. And then come 2016-2017, I just said, look, I putted well with this putter. If I use this putter, I can’t go back and say it’s the putter’s problem. It’s gotta be me. So I went back to the face-balanced 2-ball blade because I’ve had good times with it. I may have only used 5 or 6 putters in my career.

“I’m really happy that I’ve got a putter that I know I’ve putted well with, and I don’t blame the putter. I can’t say that anymore. I don’t blame my tools, I blame myself if I miss a putt. So it comes down to…I know the putter works, then it’s me. Me, me, me.

“You know, I’ve toyed with using other shafts in the putter, and I will look at other putters, but things are askew to me when I look down. So I can’t have a putter with a line on it. It doesn’t look square to the face. I’ve never putted with a putter that has a line on it for that reason. I line up by feel. I know that putter works, I know it suits me, so that’s why I go with that…

“I prefer a deeper putter (a taller face). The one issue I have is I hit the ball too high on the face, but they won’t remodel the whole system to make me a deeper putter. I’ve tried some optical illusions to try and get it where I hit the ball more in the center, but I hit it high. It seems to be going in the hole so I’m not going to worry about it too much. But in an ideal world, if someone came along and said they could make the putter 3-4 millimeters higher, I’d be happy with that.”

See more photos of Padraig Harrington’s 2023 WITB here

Your Reaction?
  • 15
  • LEGIT3
  • WOW0
  • LOL2
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP1
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading


TaylorMade survey on ball rollback finds everyday golfers massively against introduction of Model Local Rule



In response to the USGA and R&A’s recent announcement that they plan on rolling back the golf ball for the professional game, TaylorMade Golf issued a survey asking everyday golfers to voice their opinion regarding the topic of golf ball bifurcation. Today, they are sharing the results.

Almost 45,000 golfers across more than 100 countries spanning a variety of ages, abilities and participation levels took the time to complete the survey and have their voice heard, with some of the major findings shown below:

  • To the best of your knowledge, do you agree with the proposed golf ball rule?
    • 81% No
    • 19% Yes
  • Do you think average hitting distances in professional golf need to be reduced?
    • 77% No
    • 23% Yes
  • Are you for or against bifurcation in the game of golf (i.e., different rule(s) for professional golfers versus amateurs)?
    • 81% Against
    • 19% For
  • How important is it for you to play with the same equipment professional golfers use?
    • 48% Extremely important
    • 35% Moderately important
    • 17% Not important
  • If the proposed golf ball rule were to go into effect, would it have an impact on your interest in professional golf?
    • 45% Less interested
    • 49% No impact
    • 6% More Interested

The results also show that 57 percent of golfers aged 18-34 years old would be less interested in the pro game should the rule come into effect, while five percent said they would be more interested.

“The goal of our survey was to give golfers the opportunity to voice their opinion on this proposed ruling as we absorb the MLR and its potential effects on the everyday golfer. We are grateful that nearly 45,000 golfers across the world felt the need for their voice to be heard. The overwhelming amount of responses show the passion, knowledge and care for the game our audience possesses. Each response and data point is being reviewed as we will utilize this feedback in our preparation to provide a response to the USGA and R&A.” – David Abeles, TaylorMade Golf President & CEO

You can check out the survey results in full here.

Your Reaction?
  • 8
  • LEGIT2
  • WOW2
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP2
  • OB1
  • SHANK4

Continue Reading


Spotted: Odyssey Tri-Hot 5K Three “anti-right” prototype putter



Odyssey Tri-Hot 5K putters have really taken off on tour, and we have seen a handful of models in tour player’s bags. The latest version we spotted out on tour is a very unique design.

Odyssey makes this putter head with a standard flow neck that offers plenty of toe hang for golfers who prefer or need that weighting. This prototype has a long slant neck installed more near the center of the putter head that lets the toe sit slightly up in the air when held horizontally. This is pretty different since most putters sit with the toe hanging down towards the ground or are face balanced (face sits parallel to the ground). A full shaft offset looks to be achieved with the slant neck and the look at address is definitely different.

We spoke to Callaway PGA Tour manager Joe Toulon about the putter and he had the following to say

“On course [we had a player who] had a little push bias that didn’t necessarily show up in practice but it is something that he felt on course. So we wanted to build something that was a little easier to release and maybe not necessarily open the toe as much in the back stroke and not have to work as hard to release it in the through stroke. That was kind of designed to give a little offset and when you rested it on your finger it would rest toe up a little bit. We thought for that player it would help him square the putter face at impact rather than leave it open a little bit.

“It was more of a concept we had and will continue to work on it. When we had it on the truck and we were hitting some putts with it we noticed that you had to work really hard to push this putter. We wanted to make an anti-right putter. Just a fun little concept that we have an idea and work with our tour department to test things out.

“It isn’t something that ended up in a player’s bag but we learned some things in that process and will keep in mind for future builds and projects.”

The finish also looks to be a little different than the standard Tri-Hot 5K putter’s black and silver motif. The face and neck are finished in silver and the rear done in more of a blueish-gray tone. The White Hot insert looks to be standard and the sole still contains two interchangeable weights.

The shaft looks to be painted in the same metallic red as their standard Stroke Lab shaft, but we don’t see a steel tip section. Not sure if this putter has a full graphite shaft or painted steel.

Toe sitting slightly up

Check out more photos of the Odyssey Tri-Hot 5K Three Putter.

More “Spotted” pieces

Your Reaction?
  • 12
  • LEGIT5
  • WOW7
  • LOL1
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK4

Continue Reading