Connect with us

Opinion & Analysis

Why golf industry organizations must do more (and what they can do)



When we look at the current state of golf, there are more questions than answers. There is more confusion than clarity. There are more initiatives than you can shake a golf club at, but there have been fewer results than there are believers that Dustin Johnson’s leave of absence was voluntary.

Against a backdrop of declining popularity and participation, we’re presented with confusing and seemingly irreconcilable behavior from our industry organizations, who are themselves experiencing varying fortunes.

And on the subject of fortunes, there are some curious realities in executive compensation and hard questions to be asked. For example, why does Joe Barrow of the First Tee reportedly earn $1 million annually? What has the CEO of the NGCOA (National Golf Course Owners Association) done to merit earning 10 percent of the organization’s net assets in annual compensation, the NGF’s (National Golf Foundation) nearly 10 percent?

In a recent article titled “Golf Industry Associations: A Tale of Two Cities,” Jim Koppenhaver, of golf consulting group Pellucid Corporation, offered an interesting take on all of the above. I reached out to hear more about his take on the current state of industry associations.

Koppenhaver’s contention is simple. The PGA Tour, USGA, and PGA of America are doing well as they have the mother’s milk of lucrative TV deals. The WGF, GCSAA, NGCOA, NGF— lacking those contracts — not so much. And based on the collective net assets of these non-profit organizations, it doesn’t seem like anyone’s change purse is totally devoid of coin to allocate to industry growth.

A word of explanation regarding some of the potentially lesser known acronyms:

The WGF is the World Golf Foundation. Its mission is to “develop and support initiatives that positively impact lives through the game of golf and its traditional values.”

The GCSAA is the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America. The organization “provides education, information and representation to more than 17,000 members in more than 72 countries. GCSAA’s mission is to serve its members, advance their profession and enhance the enjoyment, growth and vitality of the game of golf.”

The NGCOA (National Golf Course Owners Association). It “is the leading authority on the business of golf course ownership and management. The Association represents the industry’s key decision makers with ultimate responsibility for golf courses throughout the world.”

The NGF (National Golf Foundation) “is an objective and independent information resource dedicated to supporting all the people, companies, facilities and associations that earn their living in the golf business. NGF delivers market intelligence, insights and trends to fulfill its mission: To Help Golf Businesses Succeed.”

Koppenhaver’s data on the organizations’ net assets bears this out.

For the “best of times” group, net assets are both substantial and growing.


For the “worst of times group,” much less so (save for the WGF’s strange 2012 cash infusion).


The non-profit USGA recently struck a $56 million TV deal with Fox to add to its coffers. Likewise, the PGA of America cashed in thanks to its deal with CBS, and the PGA Tour, of course, as Koppenhaver writes, “Very intelligently locked in their partners at favorable…and long terms.”

The bottom line: these non-profit organizations are sitting on piles of cash that would make Scrooge McDuck blush.

Likewise, the “worst of times” crew has a bit more money in the bank than might be expected. For example, they had more than $50 million in their collective treasure chests in 2012.

As Koppenhaver writes:

[quote_box_center]“The final question that any reasonable person would ask here is, “What have the various industry Association heads done over the ’10-’13 period that has significantly advanced either the industry as a whole (NGF & WGF) or their specific constituency (NGCOA and WGF)?” Given that we’re not seeing exponential growth in the NA base of any of the orgs (WGF potentially excluded although without a breakdown of that $30M infusion it’s hard to tell) and the industry has declined in participants and rounds and basically held flat in Total Golf Facility Revenue, it doesn’t seem that the members contributing their hard-earned money to those Associations are getting much (any?) bang for their leadership buck?”[/quote_box_center]

Not having a good answer to this question and hoping there was something I was missing, I decided to ask the author of the report, as well as each of the organizations mentioned in it.

The PGA Tour declined to comment. The USGA, PGA of America, WGF, NGCOA and NGF all failed to respond to repeated inquiries.

The GCSAA provided this statement, per J.D. Dockstader, chief business development officer:

[quote_box_center]“There are some good things happening within the golf industry right now, and our revenues have increased consistently over the last four years. The association is continually exploring new models for membership growth, both within the U.S. And internationally, as well as greater industry collaboration, which is key to creating a critical mass of influence and economies of scale. Our relationship with other governing bodies is stronger than ever.”[/quote_box_center]

Koppenhaver, fortunately, was willing to discuss his findings at length.

What’s the problem here?

J.K. In any business that you’re in that’s declining, you need a.) A strategy and b.) money.

At the end of the Golf 20/20 conference, they passed the hat. Obviously they didn’t get a lot of takers … equipment manufacturers and golf course owners have the least cash of anybody. Their strategy has failed miserably. They can’t really set their feet and point themselves in a direction…this year it’s women, the next year it’s minorities…

You’re not going to get a great strategy out of asking 50 different people to do this as a 10th job.

Since Golf 20/20, we’re about 8 million golfers light of where we were; we’re about 60 million rounds lights of where we were. We have no strategy, and we still have no money. Fifteen years after this initiative, we’re actually going backwards at a faster pace than when we started, and everyone is still passing the hat to everyone else without a strategy.

Should the PGA Tour, USGA, and PGA of America be compelled to put forth cash to grow the game?

The big guys shouldn’t be compelled to contribute that money; they should feel a responsibility to.

If you look at the USGA and their pattern of giving, they give out hundreds of tiny grants. It’s more about PR…that’s not investing, that’s a PR campaign.

I tossed out the idea of a 1.5 percent tax [of each organization to fund initiatives].

It’s tens of millions of dollars that would be put into play for coming up with a strategy and actually deploying it. Feed your winners and starve your losers! Put five or six things in the marketplace. One or two of them work. You give them more money, shut down the others. Put four more in the hopper…

Do they care?

Institutions get to a certain size and it’s very hard to knock them off center. You’re not going to knock the USGA off center if they just stick to message and ignore. There’s no incentive for any of those organizations to help stabilize the game.

Something will have to shift in the funding mechanism or around public sentiment as it relates to the USGA and their willingness and ability to actually put real money and brains toward fixing the game rather than saying “our job is to maintain a handicap system, teach people how to grow grass, and to run tournaments.

What’s going on at the NGCOA?

Look at the track record of the NGCOA for the past few years. Can you identify any initiative or progress that they’ve made that has advanced the good of the members or impacted the industry?

I can’t think of many places like that where you give somebody a $100,000 raise. I would love to know what the rationale was for rewarding somebody a third more in base compensation. I had a guy from the NGCOA board rip me a new one. I said, “Bring me the facts.” I haven’t heard back from him.

What explains the relative absence of successful initiatives?

There hasn’t been concerted strategic information gathering conducting. We’ve lost 8 million golfers over the past decade and we still don’t have solid, quantitative reasons why we lost them, can they be reacquired, and what it is we would need to reacquire them.

You have to have some system for reviewing and prioritizing the ideas and what you’re going to put in the marketplace. Hack Golf: they got the ideas but no triage. They opened this website and let it lay in agony. Somebody has to sort through the crap: Here’s 1,000 ideas…of them, 100 have merit. We can only finance 10. The back end of that is you have to have reporting and tracking mechanisms.

We did this Get Golf Ready thing. It’s been in the market for like six years now. They’re not even having structured exit interviews. They have no mechanism for keeping track of [participants]: where they’re playing, how much they’re playing, how much money they’re spending. They’re simply sending them an email survey a year later and saying, “What was your impression of the program?”

I know you’re not high on the First Tee…

You take something like the First Tee—A colossal waste of resources, time, and money. We started out with noble intentions: We wanted more diversity in golf, not just ethnically but among the incomes. They go out and raise a ton of money. They go start building golf courses. They build courses in a time in which the golf industry already had too many courses.

When [Joe] Barrow and the boys put this up as a criteria of success, they’re saying, “We built this in a place where your golf course doesn’t reach…we built it in the inner cities.” But when charitable funding is taken away, it’s not self-sustaining.

From 2000 to 2005, they touted how many courses they were building. In 2005, voices like myself were finally heard saying, “This is stupid.” Now it’s changed to “lives touched.” Now they’ve “touched a million lives.” But what does golf have to do with that? I can touch a million lives through church…through the Boys & Girls Club.

The industry is just littered with this stuff. There needs to be accountability on the back end. We need to be willing to feed our winners and starve our losers.

What will sustained growth take?

Somebody has to fund this thing [programs] with real money for an extended period. We come up with a program, and we fund it for the first year—it’s a PR campaign. But you can’t build good programs banking on runaway success in year one. Good programs take time. There’s a process of refinement and making mistakes. You can’t do that when somebody simply writes you an adequate check for year one alone.

It’s going to take people who aren’t part of the good-old boy network…aren’t allied to everybody and their cousin. But nobody’s going to insert the Save the Golf Industry Czar, who isn’t aligned with all this crap.

What are the root issues here?

We don’t have very good financial accountability. We don’t have very good governance over CEO compensation as it relates to the organization and its productivity. And there’s this other stuff where things just go sideways for eons and nobody ever calls it out and says we either need to kill this conversation or we need to set firm timelines.

Your Reaction?
  • 107
  • LEGIT26
  • WOW15
  • LOL3
  • IDHT3
  • FLOP10
  • OB4
  • SHANK13



  1. Mojo

    May 1, 2015 at 7:17 am

    Excellent article but nothing will change. All the time the public are paying through the nose for equipment that the professionals are getting free, high green fees and a rule book with hundreds of items in it you will see a big decline in people playing golf. At our club we have a junior team and we can’t put out a full team of 7 – not enough junior players, and one junior girl member tells you there is something seriously wrong with the way golf is being run by people with their hands in the kitty. Instead of supplying professionals with everything they need, yes I have seen them coming out of the tour vans loaded down with equipment and shoes, let juniors play for nothing and give them some equipment.

  2. Dave C.

    May 1, 2015 at 6:12 am

    The golf non profits are just like the regular non profits. Just looking for more money for its officers and key employees. I once interviewed for an accounting position for a huge national non profit. The local officer was making over 100K at the time, and was married to a successful attorney. When we discussed the salary of the open position, I was appalled to hear, they were looking for someone for $4-5 per hour. (This was thirty years ago.) The lady replied that they were looking for a community minded individual.

    I left that place with a bad taste. Non profit corporation only means an exemption from federal income taxes, not really any interest in the public well being. Ask the 1 million dollar CEO about it. Like politicians, their job is to keep their jobs.

    My opinion.

  3. Golfgirlrobin

    Apr 30, 2015 at 6:54 pm

    Nobody has convinced me yet that anything needs to be done at all. Golf has always been a niche sport and only those who need to make a buck off of it need sustained growth. The Tiger boom was never going to last, and lots of professional business people failed to grasp that. Courses went up with little thought to sustainability, prices went up simply because they could, and the market was flooded with product. The closing of one of these courses is not a tragedy, TaylorMade having trouble selling one of their 397 new club offerings every year is not a tragedy. That the number of golfers reverts to its historical norm is not the end of the sport.

  4. ComeOnSense

    Apr 30, 2015 at 9:42 am

    Greed is what’s killing our game, Greed destroys everything in society ,and sadly, Greed is now moving faster and more powerful than before. A person or Organization that’s is full of Greed is consider to be “successful” in society.
    We can’t ignore that most of the people that left Golf came in because of Tiger Woods and a booming economy. And What the Golf club manufactures and Golf course builders did during that Boom?.They turn on their Greed switch, $400 for a driver and ,supposedly, upscale golf courses for $100. per rounds. But wait, I know why is that, it’s the #1 excuse for Greed mentality…. ‘Supply and Demand”.
    Demand in High? let’s jack the price up. This is not only in Golf but everything in society. Have you noticed when the demand is low the price it’s not lower,but actually higher? Funny how prices wont go down, Greed wont let it come down.
    Talking about “Jack’ the price up. Take 2 of our golf ambassadors , Jack & Arnie, who build golf courses. Do you see them building courses with green fees in the $30’s? Even now when Golf its hurting? Are they promoting the game of golf now that golf needs them the most? Omg, how there I say that of Jack & Arnie right?,but in my opinion, they are not helping by building these ” you cant afford fee” courses with Clubhouses so big ,that you can’t find the bathrooms even if you do a ‘google search”, Greed won’t let them ,or simple, they need more money…to be…successful…in golf and leave behind a.. Legacy… of HighEnd… HighPrice… GolfCourses…so when they passed away, they can leave Golf in the same place they found it when they first started playing …in the hands of those with Greed .
    Excuse my honesty.
    ” the moment you go to far right or left, you will miss the truth” Me

  5. Mad-Mex

    Apr 30, 2015 at 12:22 am

    Best article so far, by far, unfortunately like many CEO’s they don’t look at the bottom of the ladder, only at the bottom line. As long as the premium courses are full and still getting premium pay, they don’t care about the municipal course on which a break even day is a struggle.
    Golf companies have no incentive to bring down the price when you have people buying $500 dollar shafts and even grips are quickly surpassing the $10 per grip barrier.
    But there is plenty of blame to go around, for example:
    The 36 handicapper playing from the tips while using ill fitting equipment only because he saw Joe Pro using.
    The scratch player analyzing and describing EVERY single shot to his group
    The beer per hole player driving around like a moron
    And of course, the jam as many as I can so I can get a bigger cut Club Pro.

  6. GolferC

    Apr 30, 2015 at 12:21 am

    It is an interesting article and while I agree with most of it, I disagree about the section on “The First Tee”. I think having a program to bring kids into the game is huge, especially in a world where kids are losing out on baseball because it is too slow. Aren’t they the future customers? The First Tee makes the game fun and engaging for kids. It is about impacting lives, not just touching them. “But what does golf have to do with that” Do you play golf? Seriously. As a golfer, there are many valuable lessons it can teach us, especially in the form of adversity and perseverance, something it seems most successful people manage pretty well. Golf is the vehicle for reaching all kids, to reinforce honesty, integrity, sportsmanship, and others that too many adults on the golf course and in life could benefit from using a few of those lessons. Kids just don’t show up to learn to swing a club. What I have seen with The First Tee is it has introduced the game to kids who may not have ever given it a try and have later ended up in the golf industry or has become an avid golfer. Our home course has benefitted from the revenue created from parents giving golf a try because their kids are in the program and so they have been buying green fees, range balls, and lessons on a regular basis. Yes, the organization had a little greedy start, but at least they have recognized the downside and have positively emphasized partnering with local courses/ practice facilities.

  7. Mark

    Apr 29, 2015 at 11:42 pm

    I agree with everything that has been said but nobody ever seems to talks about the poor economic conditions of this country and unemployment, under employment or partime employment that so many have had to accept. Personally speaking, I belonged to a private club and played a lot of golf – and so did everyone else at the club. (by the way, golf took just as long to play then as it does now – it not like they extended an official round of golf to 25 holes). Everyone appeared to be doing well financially and enjoying life and playing golf. Then the firings, layoffs, downsizing, rightsizing, reorganizations or what ever bullshit name they’re calling it now. I had to resign from the club and quit golfing because my new job paid half of my previous one and I don’t have the flexibility or the time anymore. I’m not looking to cry the blues here I’m just saying there are more people like me and there’s nothing the “golf industry” people can do to change that.

  8. Shallowface

    Apr 29, 2015 at 9:45 pm

    One thing that Golf 20/20 suggested that no one has tried is the idea of allowing “twosomes only” during certain times of day or as a means for struggling operators to do something to stand out from the crowd.
    Most of the places and times I play twosomes dominate. But throw a foursome into the middle of the mix and everyone’s day is shot.
    There is no question that the biggest waste of time in this game is having to watch THREE other people play. But the possibility that the PGA of America may be the most resistant to change of any organization in the history of American business means that it is highly unlikely such a simple but effective idea would ever be tried.
    I keep hoping they will prove me wrong.

    • TR1PTIK

      Apr 30, 2015 at 8:24 am

      I’d even be okay with the foursomes so long as the course marshals would do something about the groups of 5 or 6! I still contend that one of the best ways to improve pace of play and save course operators some money is to provide some better education on etiquette – and perhaps the rules. My local muni doesn’t even outfit each cart with the necessary tools to fill in fairway divots – only on SOME of the tee boxes and no one uses it. I’m constantly fixing other people’s ball marks or having a good putt stop short because of one… There just needs to be more accountability at every level I guess. I mean, what would happen if golf courses actually started booting golfers that either disrupted pace of play or failed to take proper care of the course? None of it is that hard, but a lot of us here in America are just lazy and a touch ignorant (or arrogant – take your pick). We as a whole, just don’t seem to care enough to change what we’re doing and fix the problem.

      • Shallowface

        Apr 30, 2015 at 6:20 pm

        TR1PTIK, I hear ya, but I’ve been at this game for over 40 years. There have been attempts at educating people, but people have to want to be educated. I’ve seen it all, including etiquette posters hanging over the urinals. It’s just like fixing slow play on the Tour. All talk, no action.
        All we hear is that the biggest cause of people not playing is how long it takes to play. So much of that time is spent watching other people play, and I have suggested the simplest of fixes. I have heard there are courses in the UK that don’t allow foursomes until after 10 AM. That’s a great place to start.
        Now, if your course is booked solid with foursomes and everyone is happy (and there are still places like that, particularly in Florida), don’t change a thing. But if you are a struggling operator looking for an edge, try a Twosomes Only day one day a week and see what happens. What do you have to lose?

    • Shallowface

      May 5, 2015 at 10:26 am

      Taking this a step further, I’m sure you’re like me in that you get a lot of email special offers from courses trying to get your business. Virtually every one of these I’ve received recently have been “foursome specials.” Why can’t “the management” understand that between kids activities, work obligations and the modern day wife who really doesn’t understand why she has a problem with golf except she knows she’s supposed to because she saw it years ago on “Everybody Loves Raymond,” it has become nearly impossible to get four people to show up in the same place at the same time. Unless you have a list of ten or fifteen names to call, you’ve got a real problem.
      The answers don’t lie in the past. Try a “Twosomes Only” day. If it doesn’t work, you’re out nothing.

  9. Barry S.

    Apr 29, 2015 at 9:20 pm

    I suggest that all the Golf Industry Organizations be consolidated under the umbrella of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

  10. UA Golfer

    Apr 29, 2015 at 6:54 pm

    Money talks…follow the money

  11. Golfer Steve

    Apr 29, 2015 at 6:54 pm

    The industry needs some changes.

  12. GMatt

    Apr 29, 2015 at 6:03 pm

    Excellent article, as some have said “follow the money” that’s a gross understatement given the USGA, PGA Tour and their operations….. I say take away their tax exempt status and let them report true earnings, once they are accountable to someone then maybe transparency will enlighten all

  13. michael

    Apr 29, 2015 at 3:00 pm

    Golf industry is like washington. Upper managements lips move and nothing comes out!

    I quit playing golf. t v commentators and thats all golf commentators are more concerned

    about being politically correct than telling the truth! tim fincham is a looser!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. Lou

    Apr 29, 2015 at 2:47 pm

    This idea speaks a lot like the growing problem of the state of executive compensation that is sorely evident in business, sports, entertainment and politics. Extremely evident when we see the beggars with their collective hands in our pockets yet failing to connect with our desires. Ask around your golfing buddies how they really feel about the US Open being played on British open style courses. Fairly evident that a few Asian countries are creating a growth of the game for their future golf millionaires. A scattering of other countries have similar entries and now the PGA and & USGA are pushing Latin and South America into the fray. In my mind there is sincere doubt that this will help grow the game here in the US. We cannot maintain this past time as a spectator sport while losing the daily fee players and the daily fee players obviously do not like where the game is going.

  15. other paul

    Apr 29, 2015 at 2:24 pm

    One of your better articles Ben. Good job.

    • Marc

      Apr 29, 2015 at 9:49 pm

      I agree. Well done Ben. That was very well done.

  16. Scud

    Apr 29, 2015 at 1:33 pm

    I attended a few “Golf Summit” meetings in the late 80’s and early 90’s and they all had good intentions, but no strategy, no leadership, etc. And nothing has happened.

  17. Greg V

    Apr 29, 2015 at 1:21 pm

    Golf is a great game if you are walking and playing with 10 or less clubs that you can carry easily. But that game started to go out of style in the 1930’s with 14-club sets. It further eroded in the 1960’s and 1970’s with the advent of the electric cart.

    So, if most golf these days is played out of carts on courses that are too long to walk, it is not a beneficial game for exercise; recreation has turned into a social activity.

    Why grow the game? The PGA Tour has grown magnificently as a wealth generator for professionals. The USGA has benefited handsomely from its new TV contract. Who is hurting? Course operators and golf equipment companies.

    I would contend that golf course operators would benefit from a shorter ball, shorter course set-ups and game that is not so dependent upon high tech. Play would be faster, and easier from tee to green (but scores wouldn’t change much). But those very factors might hurt equipment sales. And, I suppose the PGA Tour benefits from pros who hit the ball over 300 yards. So there are major conflicts between the interests of each of these parties.

    Who is supposed to preside over the conflict? The USGA. But I contend that they have been asleep at the switch for decades. That is not hard to fathom – their membership is largely derived of wealth members of private clubs, where golf exists in a tiny bubble that is just fine, thank you very much.

    Until the membership composition is changed at the ruling body, the game is going to slip down the current path. And, I would argue that the current path is not healthy. But, largely, we are all victims of our desire to hit the ball longer and longer through technology, instead of improving our accuracy through practice.

  18. IowaHacker

    Apr 29, 2015 at 12:26 pm

    Great article. I think a lot of the principals not only apply to the golf industry, but to a lot of companies. When your upper management is not held accountable and stays in the same stagnant ways, no progress happens. It doesn’t matter if your in the golf, equipment, clothing, etc industry, constant innovation and progression is what moves industries forward. And don’t get me started on executive salaries…..since when does making 100 times more than your middle management make sense both financially and practicality wise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Opinion & Analysis

The Wedge Guy: Consistent setup is key to success



In follow up to last week’s post, Top 4 reasons golfers don’t improve, I want to dive into what I believe to be the most common problem affecting mid- to high-handicap players. This is a big topic that will help nearly every golfer, regardless of your skill level, so it’s going to take two articles to cover it.

Here’s part 1.

We all tend to play golf in a constant cycle of swing-and-correction, swing-and-correction, but my observation is that most of the time our bad swings are caused by improper, or inconsistent setup.

I’m a firm believer that once you have played golf for a while, you have probably developed the ability to have a reasonably repeating and effective swing path and method. Even though it might not be textbook, it’s yours and has your fingerprints all over it. And the fact that you occasionally strike really good shots proves that your swing has the capability of producing results that are gratifying.

I certainly don’t suggest you shouldn’t work to improve your swing technique – the better the mechanics, the better and more consistent the results you are going to get. But my point is that your swing has produced good shots before, and it can do so more often if you just “fix” one thing – your starting position.

The single issue that troubles golfers of all skill levels, from tour player to 100-shooter, is the ability to be consistent. And I’m a firm believer that many – if not most – bad shots are the result of a bad starting position. Think of it this way: no matter how good your swing might be, if you start each shot with the ball in a different position in relation to your body core’s rotation axis, you simply cannot get the clubhead back on the ball consistently.

The ball is 1.68” in diameter, and the effective striking surface of an iron or fairway wood is only an inch or so across. That puts pretty tight demands on your ability to get the club behind your head and back on the ball with consistency.

Let’s compare golf to a baseball hitter. He’s standing in the box and the pitch can be anywhere in the strike zone. He’s got to have good technique, but is heavily reliant on his eye/hand coordination to get the bat on the ball. Darn difficult task, which is why the very best hitters only average .350 or so, shank off lots of fouls and completely whiff the ball at least 20% of the time! If you translated that to golf, no one would ever break 150!

The single thing that makes this game remotely playable . . . is that we get to start with the ball in the exact spot where we want it – every time.

I have a friend in the custom club business that did some research measuring the setup consistency of hundreds of golfers of all skill levels. What he found is simple, but revealing. His methodology was to have golfers address and hit a series of 6-iron shots, stepping away and taking a fresh setup for each one. He found that good players with low single-digit handicaps showed the ability to put themselves in almost the exact same position in relation to the ball every time. Measuring from the back of their heels to the ball showed an average deviation from shot to shot of less than 1/4 inch.

But he saw that the higher the handicap, the more shot-to-shot error in setup consistency the golfer exhibited – 20-plus handicap golfers exhibited an average shot-to-shot deviation in distance from the ball of up to two inches or even more! That’s the entire width of the clubhead! It’s a wonder they ever hit it at all!

This variance is a major reason why we can get “in the groove” on the practice range, but have difficulty taking it to the course.

So, think about that for a few days, and next week, I will share how you can quickly build a solid and repeating setup, so that you can give yourself the best chances of hitting good shots more often.

If there is any true “secret” to improving your ball-striking, shotmaking, and scoring, this is certainly it.

Your Reaction?
  • 140
  • LEGIT35
  • WOW19
  • LOL3
  • IDHT2
  • FLOP2
  • OB3
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading

Golf's Perfect Imperfections

Golf’s Perfect Imperfections: High octane ball compression and artistic touch around the greens



From the Olympics to taking out the glancing blows in your irons and chipping it close. Wisdom in Golf has your back.

Your Reaction?
  • 0
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB1
  • SHANK1

Continue Reading


The 19th Hole (Ep. 165): One-on-one with Shane Bacon



Host Michael Williams talks with the co-host of the Golf Channel’s Golf Today about the Open Championship and Collin Morikawa’s place in the history books.

Your Reaction?
  • 1
  • LEGIT0
  • WOW0
  • LOL0
  • IDHT0
  • FLOP0
  • OB0
  • SHANK2

Continue Reading