Monkey Rule - Outside agency?
#1
Posted 27 May 2007 - 10:47 PM
We had a little ruling problem: A monkey chases after a tee shot rolling on the fairway into the rough, picks it up and we gave chase to it, yelling and wishing we had a ruger to shoot that little bugger...he scampers away and leaves the ball on the fringe of the green...
1) I think the ball should be replaced on the rough where we roughly think it will land if that stupid monkey hadnt intervened
2) Another flight mate suggested that we dont know for sure where the ball would end up hence it can be placed back in the fairway at the estimated distance of the tee shot..it could bounce off a tree and land back on the fairway....
3) Another guy suggested we head back to the tee and tee it up again (not possible since the other flight was already waiting at the tee)
4) The owner of the tee shot obviously suggested we should play as it lies and the monkey was considered an outside agency, so like how Tiger gets his break when his tee shot hits the spectator and bounce back on the fairway, he should get a break as well. His argument was the ball hasnt stopped and was still rolling when the monkey picked it up, so essentially, he drove 350 yards.
How do we rule this?
#2
Posted 28 May 2007 - 01:20 AM
reminds me of the golf ball stealing fox on that course out in Colorado or somewhere...there was a news video of it posted here a while back with actual footage of the fox stealing balls.
fwiw, i'd be all for the "outside agency" rule to play it as it lies as long as it was my ball or i didn't have a ton of $$ riding on that hole.
where do you live that you have monkeys on your courses? i'm guessing southeast asia maybe???
#3 Gallery_mjtoal_*
Posted 28 May 2007 - 01:36 AM
If it was moving fast enough that it is not really possible to accurately determine the likely finishing position of the ball, and hence where to drop, you need to replay the shot with no penalty. If the ball was just trickling to a stop, it should be possible to fairly estimate the position.
If the rules require you to replay, the fact that another group is on the tee is irrelevant. You either need to let that group through or crave their indulgence to replay.
#5
Posted 28 May 2007 - 12:51 PM
I'd go with mjtoal's suggestion. Yes it was moving, but it was rolling to a stop and we could estimate where it would have landed. But of course due to the crazyness of the situation, we allowed him to play as it lies and he could only get par anyways =)
#8
Posted 28 May 2007 - 02:20 PM
Sometimes the rules work for you, sometimes against you. In your case, not only is it a hell of a story, it is also a 350 yard drive for your partner.
#9
Posted 28 May 2007 - 03:10 PM
HeadonaStick, on May 28 2007, 12:20 PM, said:
Sometimes the rules work for you, sometimes against you. In your case, not only is it a hell of a story, it is also a 350 yard drive for your partner.
Are you sure about that? <--- not sarcasm.
The monkey actually picked up the ball, right? It didn't stop or deflect it.
(I think this is my favorite rules discussion ever.)
Quote
If a ball in motion is accidentally deflected or stopped by any outside agency, it is a rub of the green, there is no penalty and the ball must be played as it lies except:
(a) If a ball in motion after a stroke other than on the putting green comes to rest in or on any moving or animate outside agency, the player must, through the green or in a hazard, drop the ball, or on the putting green place the ball, as near as possible to the spot where the outside agency was when the ball came to rest in or on it, and
(b) If a ball in motion after a stroke on the putting green is deflected or stopped by, or comes to rest in or on, any moving or animate outside agency except a worm or an insect, the stroke is canceled. The ball must be replaced and the stroke replayed. If the ball is not immediately recoverable, another ball may be substituted.
(Player’s ball deflected or stopped by another ball �" see Rule 19-5.)
Note: If the referee or the Committee determines that a player’s ball has been purposely deflected or stopped by an outside agency, Rule 1-4 applies to the player. If the outside agency is a fellow-competitor or his caddie, Rule 1-2 applies to the fellow-competitor.
Quote

Q. A ball played from off the green was about a foot from the hole and still in motion when it was moved by a dog to a spot about 10 feet from the hole. The ball was either deflected by the dog or the dog picked it up, ran with it and dropped it. What is the ruling?
A. If the ball was deflected, it would be played as it lay, without penalty, from the spot to which it was moved by the dog - Rule 19-1.
If the dog picked up the ball, the player should have placed the ball, without penalty, as near as possible to the spot where the original ball was when the dog picked it up - Rule 19-1a.
I know this decision is "on the green", but I would think it would apply, wouldn't it? (Except the player would drop instead of place.)
#10
Posted 28 May 2007 - 03:29 PM
Charlie_Foxtrot, on May 28 2007, 04:10 PM, said:
HeadonaStick, on May 28 2007, 12:20 PM, said:
Sometimes the rules work for you, sometimes against you. In your case, not only is it a hell of a story, it is also a 350 yard drive for your partner.
Are you sure about that? <--- not sarcasm.
The monkey actually picked up the ball, right? It didn't stop or deflect it.
(I think this is my favorite rules discussion ever.)
Quote

Q. A ball played from off the green was about a foot from the hole and still in motion when it was moved by a dog to a spot about 10 feet from the hole. The ball was either deflected by the dog or the dog picked it up, ran with it and dropped it. What is the ruling?
A. If the ball was deflected, it would be played as it lay, without penalty, from the spot to which it was moved by the dog — Rule 19-1.
If the dog picked up the ball, the player should have placed the ball, without penalty, as near as possible to the spot where the original ball was when the dog picked it up — Rule 19-1a.
I know this decision is "on the green", but I would think it would apply, wouldn't it?
Well, I don't pretend to be a rules expert, but "deflect' has a number of definitions, and picking up an object in motion can be considered a deflection.
However, the ruling you quoted is interesting. Rule 19-1a states that if the ball "comes to rest in or on any moving or animate outside agency, the player must, through the green or in a hazard, drop the ball, or on the putting green place the ball, as near as possible to the spot where the outside agency was when the ball came to rest in or on it." I didn't interpret that as quite the same as being picked up while in motion.
#12
Posted 28 May 2007 - 06:52 PM
HeadonaStick, on May 28 2007, 01:29 PM, said:
However, the ruling you quoted is interesting. Rule 19-1a states that if the ball "comes to rest in or on any moving or animate outside agency, the player must, through the green or in a hazard, drop the ball, or on the putting green place the ball, as near as possible to the spot where the outside agency was when the ball came to rest in or on it." I didn't interpret that as quite the same as being picked up while in motion.
Trust me, you are more of an expert than me. I have to look up everything, every single time.
I wouldn't have thought Rule 19-1 applied either except for the rules decision 19-1/6 about the dog.
#13
Posted 29 May 2007 - 04:39 AM





Sign In
Register
Help

Quote



