Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

TM Stage 2 tour vs Stage 2 non tour drivers ?


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 cxissi

cxissi

    Major Winner

  • Lefty Boomers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 4266
  • Joined: 08/03/2005
  • Location:western Canada
  • Handicap:12
  • Ebay ID:gdb-golf
GolfWRX Likes : 24

Posted 20 April 2013 - 12:45 PM

Been doing a fair bit of Driver testing this spring.  So far I am leaning towards the Stage 2 non tour.
For me It has a slight edge in performance over the R1 and big advantage in sticker price over other drivers.   Being a lefty I am having trouble finding a lh Stage 2 tour is driver to compare head to head.

Anyone had a chance to compare these two head to head ? Is there much difference between them
in performance ?

Thanks gb


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

1

#2 BirdieBob

BirdieBob

    Member of the 1 Iron Club

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,633 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 12966
  • Joined: 03/03/2006
  • Location:The Course
GolfWRX Likes : 345

Posted 20 April 2013 - 12:54 PM

http://www.golfwrx.c...s/#entry6708179
(open the pdf document for details)
According to this the R1 tops the Stage 2 for DISTANCE in four out of six categories of face impact.
The stage 2 only has two out of six tops.
In addition, the R1 has more adjustment for Swingweight, ball flight, and loft/face angle...the stage 2 only has loft.

Edited by BirdieBob, 20 April 2013 - 12:56 PM.


2

#3 cxissi

cxissi

    Major Winner

  • Lefty Boomers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 4266
  • Joined: 08/03/2005
  • Location:western Canada
  • Handicap:12
  • Ebay ID:gdb-golf
GolfWRX Likes : 24

Posted 20 April 2013 - 01:16 PM

View PostBirdieBob, on 20 April 2013 - 12:54 PM, said:

http://www.golfwrx.c...s/#entry6708179
(open the pdf document for details)
According to this the R1 tops the Stage 2 for DISTANCE in four out of six categories of face impact.
The stage 2 only has two out of six tops.
In addition, the R1 has more adjustment for Swingweight, ball flight, and loft/face angle...the stage 2 only has loft.
I hit both of these for my swing I was getting about 5 more yards with the Stage 2 and was hitting it very very
straight. I went in to the testing wanting the R1 because I liked the look of it better but for my swing the Stage 2
is more consistent.
gb

3

#4 shanka

shanka

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89696
  • Joined: 07/26/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 6

Posted 20 April 2013 - 03:26 PM

I have the Stage 2 Tour TP and really having success with it.  Launches pretty high without ballooning and very forgiving across the face.  The dispersion has been pretty good too. I think the heavier Matrix 7Q3 shaft has helped me with my tempo.

4

#5 storm319

storm319

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,190 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 99866
  • Joined: 12/07/2009
  • Location:Minnesota
GolfWRX Likes : 289

Posted 20 April 2013 - 04:23 PM

I found that the difference between the non-tour Stage 2 vs Stage 2 Tour to be nearly non-existent compared to the original RBZ vs RBZ Tour. I personally would get the original RBZ Tour over either Stage 2.


5

#6 borgore23

borgore23

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 128802
  • Joined: 05/16/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 20 April 2013 - 08:38 PM

View Poststorm319, on 20 April 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:

I found that the difference between the non-tour Stage 2 vs Stage 2 Tour to be nearly non-existent compared to the original RBZ vs RBZ Tour. I personally would get the original RBZ Tour over either Stage 2.

Because there is no difference other than being more fade bias in the tour head. But I definitely disagree. The stage 2 has a much better feel and more muted sound. Also the matrix 6Q3 is a great stock shaft in the tour model. Best driver I have ever hit.

6

#7 G-Bone

G-Bone

    Better than most...

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,308 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 50361
  • Joined: 03/01/2008
  • Location:Outskirts of Detroit, Rock City
  • Handicap:8.4
GolfWRX Likes : 402

Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:14 PM

Stage 2 Tour is very similar to R1, minus the adjustability (according to my testing on Trackman). So, if you didn't care for R1, Tour won't excite you either.

Stage 2 (non Tour) beat them both for me, including most of the other "big boys" released this year.
Ping G LS Tec Driver 8.4º (digital) ~ Tour AD DI-6
TaylorMade M2 Fairway 16.5º ~ Tour AD GT-7
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 20º ~ Tour AD GT-75 UT
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 23º ~ Tour AD HY-85
Epon by Endo AF-503 Irons 5–PW ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 51.13 F (Heal & Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 57.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 63.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Scotty Cameron Circle T Del Mar Buttonback Select Tour Prototype (A026140) ~ 34"
Titleist Pro V1x ~ #25

7

#8 borgore23

borgore23

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 128802
  • Joined: 05/16/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:48 PM

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 09:14 PM, said:

Stage 2 Tour is very similar to R1, minus the adjustability (according to my testing on Trackman). So, if you didn't care for R1, Tour won't excite you either.

Stage 2 (non Tour) beat them both for me, including most of the other "big boys" released this year.

Did you test using the same shaft for each head? What is your swing speed? Did you dial in the R1 to get your optimal loft?

Edited by borgore23, 20 April 2013 - 10:49 PM.


8

#9 ZBigStick

ZBigStick

    Practice Perfect Form

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,306 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13111
  • Joined: 03/06/2006
  • Location:MCO
GolfWRX Likes : 515

Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:52 PM

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:

View Poststorm319, on 20 April 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:

I found that the difference between the non-tour Stage 2 vs Stage 2 Tour to be nearly non-existent compared to the original RBZ vs RBZ Tour. I personally would get the original RBZ Tour over either Stage 2.

Because there is no difference other than being more fade bias in the tour head. But I definitely disagree. The stage 2 has a much better feel and more muted sound. Also the matrix 6Q3 is a great stock shaft in the tour model. Best driver I have ever hit.

The 6Q3 is a great shaft, is it the "real deal" in the Tour or only in the TP (7Q3)?
TaylorMade R15 10.5 Diamana B-60
Callaway X2 Hot Pro 15 Kuro Kage 70
Callaway Apex 20h Kuro Kage 80
Srixon Z 745 4-PW Steelfiber 110i cw
Callaway MD2 50S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 54S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 58T Dynamic Gold
Odyssey #7 White Hot Pro
Rife Iconic Phantom Vault 001
TaylorMade Tour Preferred

9

#10 borgore23

borgore23

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 128802
  • Joined: 05/16/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:57 PM

View PostZBigStick, on 20 April 2013 - 10:52 PM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:

View Poststorm319, on 20 April 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:

I found that the difference between the non-tour Stage 2 vs Stage 2 Tour to be nearly non-existent compared to the original RBZ vs RBZ Tour. I personally would get the original RBZ Tour over either Stage 2.

Because there is no difference other than being more fade bias in the tour head. But I definitely disagree. The stage 2 has a much better feel and more muted sound. Also the matrix 6Q3 is a great stock shaft in the tour model. Best driver I have ever hit.

The 6Q3 is a great shaft, is it the "real deal" in the Tour or only in the TP (7Q3)?

Real deal my friend. :) only "made for" shafts are in the non tour stage 2 and normal R1 as far as I know.


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

10

#11 G-Bone

G-Bone

    Better than most...

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,308 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 50361
  • Joined: 03/01/2008
  • Location:Outskirts of Detroit, Rock City
  • Handicap:8.4
GolfWRX Likes : 402

Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:58 PM

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 09:14 PM, said:

Stage 2 Tour is very similar to R1, minus the adjustability (according to my testing on Trackman). So, if you didn't care for R1, Tour won't excite you either.

Stage 2 (non Tour) beat them both for me, including most of the other "big boys" released this year.

Did you test using the same shaft for each head? What is your swing speed? Did you dial in the R1 to get your optimal loft?

Yes, tested both with AD BB. My swing speed is 96-98.
Ping G LS Tec Driver 8.4º (digital) ~ Tour AD DI-6
TaylorMade M2 Fairway 16.5º ~ Tour AD GT-7
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 20º ~ Tour AD GT-75 UT
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 23º ~ Tour AD HY-85
Epon by Endo AF-503 Irons 5–PW ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 51.13 F (Heal & Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 57.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 63.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Scotty Cameron Circle T Del Mar Buttonback Select Tour Prototype (A026140) ~ 34"
Titleist Pro V1x ~ #25

11

#12 borgore23

borgore23

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 128802
  • Joined: 05/16/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 20 April 2013 - 11:02 PM

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 10:58 PM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 09:14 PM, said:

Stage 2 Tour is very similar to R1, minus the adjustability (according to my testing on Trackman). So, if you didn't care for R1, Tour won't excite you either.

Stage 2 (non Tour) beat them both for me, including most of the other "big boys" released this year.

Did you test using the same shaft for each head? What is your swing speed? Did you dial in the R1 to get your optimal loft?

Yes, tested both with AD BB. My swing speed is 96-98.

So the lower launch and spin characteristics of the Stage 2 tour and R1 wouldn't help you at all. Makes sense. I'm guessing you slice the ball as well so the draw bias stage 2 (non tour) would help as well. Glad you found the driver that works best for you!

12

#13 ZBigStick

ZBigStick

    Practice Perfect Form

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,306 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13111
  • Joined: 03/06/2006
  • Location:MCO
GolfWRX Likes : 515

Posted 20 April 2013 - 11:07 PM

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 10:57 PM, said:

View PostZBigStick, on 20 April 2013 - 10:52 PM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:

View Poststorm319, on 20 April 2013 - 04:23 PM, said:

I found that the difference between the non-tour Stage 2 vs Stage 2 Tour to be nearly non-existent compared to the original RBZ vs RBZ Tour. I personally would get the original RBZ Tour over either Stage 2.

Because there is no difference other than being more fade bias in the tour head. But I definitely disagree. The stage 2 has a much better feel and more muted sound. Also the matrix 6Q3 is a great stock shaft in the tour model. Best driver I have ever hit.

The 6Q3 is a great shaft, is it the "real deal" in the Tour or only in the TP (7Q3)?

Real deal my friend. :) only "made for" shafts are in the non tour stage 2 and normal R1 as far as I know.

Thats good news, but why the $100 up charge for a 7Q3??
TaylorMade R15 10.5 Diamana B-60
Callaway X2 Hot Pro 15 Kuro Kage 70
Callaway Apex 20h Kuro Kage 80
Srixon Z 745 4-PW Steelfiber 110i cw
Callaway MD2 50S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 54S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 58T Dynamic Gold
Odyssey #7 White Hot Pro
Rife Iconic Phantom Vault 001
TaylorMade Tour Preferred

13

#14 borgore23

borgore23

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 128802
  • Joined: 05/16/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 56

Posted 20 April 2013 - 11:18 PM

View PostZBigStick, on 20 April 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:


Thats good news, but why the $100 up charge for a 7Q3??

I think the 7Q3 is just the shaft they use to put in retail stores as the stock TP shaft offering. They have many other TP shaft offerings from TaylorMade though. Not sure why the 7Q3 is more expensive than the 6Q3.

14

#15 shanka

shanka

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 89696
  • Joined: 07/26/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 6

Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:13 AM

I do believe the 6Q3 is a made for shaft.  If I'm not mistaken, it is also a .350 tip, not .335.  If the shaft has the TP logo, then I believe it is the real deal.  I was also told this by the sales person at Roger Dunn.


15

#16 G-Bone

G-Bone

    Better than most...

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,308 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 50361
  • Joined: 03/01/2008
  • Location:Outskirts of Detroit, Rock City
  • Handicap:8.4
GolfWRX Likes : 402

Posted 21 April 2013 - 07:27 AM

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 11:02 PM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 10:58 PM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 20 April 2013 - 09:14 PM, said:

Stage 2 Tour is very similar to R1, minus the adjustability (according to my testing on Trackman). So, if you didn't care for R1, Tour won't excite you either.

Stage 2 (non Tour) beat them both for me, including most of the other "big boys" released this year.

Did you test using the same shaft for each head? What is your swing speed? Did you dial in the R1 to get your optimal loft?

Yes, tested both with AD BB. My swing speed is 96-98.

So the lower launch and spin characteristics of the Stage 2 tour and R1 wouldn't help you at all. Makes sense. I'm guessing you slice the ball as well so the draw bias stage 2 (non tour) would help as well. Glad you found the driver that works best for you!

Actually I play a strong draw. Also, from what I've been told by TM, the Stage 2 is more neutral than draw bias.
Ping G LS Tec Driver 8.4º (digital) ~ Tour AD DI-6
TaylorMade M2 Fairway 16.5º ~ Tour AD GT-7
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 20º ~ Tour AD GT-75 UT
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 23º ~ Tour AD HY-85
Epon by Endo AF-503 Irons 5–PW ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 51.13 F (Heal & Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 57.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 63.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Scotty Cameron Circle T Del Mar Buttonback Select Tour Prototype (A026140) ~ 34"
Titleist Pro V1x ~ #25

16

#17 storm319

storm319

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,190 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 99866
  • Joined: 12/07/2009
  • Location:Minnesota
GolfWRX Likes : 289

Posted 21 April 2013 - 08:23 AM

View Postshanka, on 21 April 2013 - 12:13 AM, said:

I do believe the 6Q3 is a made for shaft.  If I'm not mistaken, it is also a .350 tip, not .335.  If the shaft has the TP logo, then I believe it is the real deal.  I was also told this by the sales person at Roger Dunn.

The 6Q3 in the Stage 2 Tour does look to be made for (.350 tip and 59g in Stiff vs .335 and 67.5g for the real 6Q3). TM also has the 6Q3 under custom options with aftermarket graphics and specs that match up to the Matrix site.

Edited by storm319, 21 April 2013 - 08:26 AM.


17

#18 ZBigStick

ZBigStick

    Practice Perfect Form

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,306 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13111
  • Joined: 03/06/2006
  • Location:MCO
GolfWRX Likes : 515

Posted 22 April 2013 - 02:34 AM

View PostG-Bone, on 21 April 2013 - 07:27 AM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 11:02 PM, said:



So the lower launch and spin characteristics of the Stage 2 tour and R1 wouldn't help you at all. Makes sense. I'm guessing you slice the ball as well so the draw bias stage 2 (non tour) would help as well. Glad you found the driver that works best for you!

Actually I play a strong draw. Also, from what I've been told by TM, the Stage 2 is more neutral than draw bias.

So what are the differences between the Stg2 and Stg2 Tour heads?  They look so dang similar.
TaylorMade R15 10.5 Diamana B-60
Callaway X2 Hot Pro 15 Kuro Kage 70
Callaway Apex 20h Kuro Kage 80
Srixon Z 745 4-PW Steelfiber 110i cw
Callaway MD2 50S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 54S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 58T Dynamic Gold
Odyssey #7 White Hot Pro
Rife Iconic Phantom Vault 001
TaylorMade Tour Preferred

18

#19 G-Bone

G-Bone

    Better than most...

  • ClubWRX Charter Members
  • 2,308 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 50361
  • Joined: 03/01/2008
  • Location:Outskirts of Detroit, Rock City
  • Handicap:8.4
GolfWRX Likes : 402

Posted 22 April 2013 - 06:09 AM

View PostZBigStick, on 22 April 2013 - 02:34 AM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 21 April 2013 - 07:27 AM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 11:02 PM, said:



So the lower launch and spin characteristics of the Stage 2 tour and R1 wouldn't help you at all. Makes sense. I'm guessing you slice the ball as well so the draw bias stage 2 (non tour) would help as well. Glad you found the driver that works best for you!

Actually I play a strong draw. Also, from what I've been told by TM, the Stage 2 is more neutral than draw bias.

So what are the differences between the Stg2 and Stg2 Tour heads?  They look so dang similar.

You are correct there, my friend... Their exterior specs are identical (excluding graphics of course).

The differences between the two heads lie within. The S2 Tours CG is slightly more forward and and lower, when compared to standard S2. Thereby allowing S2 Tour to have marginally less spin, as well as a lowered launch. Theoretically, the S2 Tour is designed for golfers with higher swing speeds... Offering them all the benefits of the extra forgiveness of Stage 2, yet keeping the ball flight flatter and more penetrating with the replaced CG.
Ping G LS Tec Driver 8.4º (digital) ~ Tour AD DI-6
TaylorMade M2 Fairway 16.5º ~ Tour AD GT-7
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 20º ~ Tour AD GT-75 UT
Callaway XR Pro Hybrid 23º ~ Tour AD HY-85
Epon by Endo AF-503 Irons 5–PW ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 51.13 F (Heal & Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 57.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Hand Ground by Bob Vokey Raw SM6 63.09 M (Tour Grind) ~ Project X 5.5
Titleist Scotty Cameron Circle T Del Mar Buttonback Select Tour Prototype (A026140) ~ 34"
Titleist Pro V1x ~ #25

19

#20 ZBigStick

ZBigStick

    Practice Perfect Form

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,306 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 13111
  • Joined: 03/06/2006
  • Location:MCO
GolfWRX Likes : 515

Posted 24 April 2013 - 10:28 AM

View PostG-Bone, on 22 April 2013 - 06:09 AM, said:

View PostZBigStick, on 22 April 2013 - 02:34 AM, said:

View PostG-Bone, on 21 April 2013 - 07:27 AM, said:

View Postborgore23, on 20 April 2013 - 11:02 PM, said:

So the lower launch and spin characteristics of the Stage 2 tour and R1 wouldn't help you at all. Makes sense. I'm guessing you slice the ball as well so the draw bias stage 2 (non tour) would help as well. Glad you found the driver that works best for you!

Actually I play a strong draw. Also, from what I've been told by TM, the Stage 2 is more neutral than draw bias.

So what are the differences between the Stg2 and Stg2 Tour heads?  They look so dang similar.

You are correct there, my friend... Their exterior specs are identical (excluding graphics of course).

The differences between the two heads lie within. The S2 Tours CG is slightly more forward and and lower, when compared to standard S2. Thereby allowing S2 Tour to have marginally less spin, as well as a lowered launch. Theoretically, the S2 Tour is designed for golfers with higher swing speeds... Offering them all the benefits of the extra forgiveness of Stage 2, yet keeping the ball flight flatter and more penetrating with the replaced CG.

Excellent explanation, and what I would have assumed.  I believe TaylorMade has bungled this line up as the RBZ was much easier to differentiate, even their website is not clear.  Also the TP being available in both heads is a bit misleading.  Previously I had even seen video where TMaG had stated that there was not going to be a Tour version of the S2 driver.

Even the weight port on the bottom of the two is in the same place.  For a marketing company, just painting "Tour" on the crown doesn't help enough to differentiate at retail.

TaylorMade R15 10.5 Diamana B-60
Callaway X2 Hot Pro 15 Kuro Kage 70
Callaway Apex 20h Kuro Kage 80
Srixon Z 745 4-PW Steelfiber 110i cw
Callaway MD2 50S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 54S Dynamic Gold
Callaway MD2 58T Dynamic Gold
Odyssey #7 White Hot Pro
Rife Iconic Phantom Vault 001
TaylorMade Tour Preferred

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

20



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors