Gary McCord on Tiger Woods Impossible!
#1
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:49 AM
Tiger Woods. Best ever?
No, not yet, Jack's 18 [majors] are the standard. But I will say this: I really understood what Jack was doing. I watched and I said, "Yeah, OK, I get that. I understand that shot. Every once in a while I can hit that shot." I don't have a clue with this kid. I knew it early. I'd go, "You've gotta be kidding me -- out of that lie he did that?! First time in broadcasting I didn't understand. That scared me.
He's in a different galaxy.
Different. I remember one time -- damnedest shot I've ever seen: 18th hole, Firestone. He hit this shot out of the left rough, which was up to your fetlocks, deep in the trees. He had 192 to the flag. Feherty, after the round, comes over, gets me, he's got a wedge and a ball, says, "Come on, get in the cart." We go over there. He bet me $100 I couldn't get the ball from the divot right next to where Tiger's was, couldn't get it to the fairway, which was 30 yards away. I didn't take the bet. I couldn't do it. He hit this ball out of this lie -- he hooked it 70 yards and he hit it 196 to the back fringe with a wedge. Dear God! I don't care -- you can go out there and you can trip on acid, you can do anything you want and come up with something but you couldn't come up with that. That's frightening. It's a bad time to be a pretty good player.
(The whole inteview is worth reading.)
Happy golfing
#3
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:30 PM
I also don't expect some to agree with this opinion,and more than a few seem to "dislike" him for whatever reason,,but take note,,you are witnessing the most superior athlete in any particular sport that has ever lived.He does things that are beyond our true understanding of how good he really is.
#6
Posted 22 March 2007 - 01:30 PM
#7
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:46 PM
Lionstar, on Mar 22 2007, 02:30 PM, said:
Only Time will tell but the way this kid plays majors time could be short lived. However Tigar will be a farther soon and Golf will take a back seat to his family but it is also high on his list.
#8
Posted 23 March 2007 - 06:30 AM
i don't mean to sound insensitive, but I can't see Tiger slowing down for a lengthy period of time just because he's starting a family.
he's said before it'll just drive him to want to win more. clearly his best golf is still ahead of it (scary?),
#10 Gallery_moecat_*
Posted 23 March 2007 - 09:06 AM
I think he's got a real healthy attitude in not emotionally missing the opportunity to broadcast the Masters. Still, I think it's a sham that the Masters banned him in the first place. Tradition is important, but for crying out loud already! "Tradition" is also a double edged sword: one could easily throw it back in the faces of Masters loyalists by pointing out the "tradition" of social injustices the organization and event had perpetuated for many years.
#12 Gallery_moecat_*
Posted 23 March 2007 - 10:10 AM
#13
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:35 AM
Lionstar, on Mar 22 2007, 10:30 AM, said:
Ooof...I'm not sure I can agree with that. Remember that Babe Ruth was an accomplished pitcher before becoming a Home Run king. Jordan changed the face of basketball in the same manner Tiger has changed golf. Federer hasn't been around long enough for me to assess but what he's done in a short period of time is just sick.
There have been a few athletes who have changed their sport due to their dominance. Not to take anything away from Tiger, he absolutely is the best golf out today and could very well be the best ever, however it's hard to compare Tiger to Hogan or Jones or even Nicklaus based on two totally different eras and massive equipment differences. We always try to make comparisons like Ali vs Marciano, Ruth vs Bonds, Shaq vs Chamberlain but we can never really know because they never played against each other. It's easy to win when you are playing against inferior opponents but when you play an equal, you never know what could happen and who's going to shine. Nicklaus was one of the toughest mental golfers of his era in the same way Tiger is now. Nicklaus used to bomb his driver the same way Tiger does now (excpet Jack used a wooden club). It would have been great to see a grouping of Hogan, Nicklaus, Jones and Woods all in their prime to see who'd win but unfortunately that will never happen.
I just enjoy watching Tiger for what he is...the most dominent golfer I've ever been able to witness first hand (I've seen Jack play but never went to a tournament in his 70's prime - I was just a wee lad back then).
#14 Gallery_moecat_*
Posted 23 March 2007 - 11:39 AM
#15
Posted 23 March 2007 - 07:59 PM
samm980, on Mar 23 2007, 06:00 AM, said:
Got that right, buddy. You're in for a big heapin' helping of cut 'n' pasting!
(I'll only share the good stuff, however. Just like I know you would for me. Speaking of hilarious, has anybody seen the BSG "workout" thread? Don't dare go there if laughing will cause you to break your stitches. Picture: Bloated Stinking Golfer in a bat-suit. I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP. Oh... and plenty of smackdowns to the newbies who dare question his workout. BSG: where the fun never sets.)
Happy golfing.
#16
Posted 23 March 2007 - 08:38 PM
Second - the whole greatest athlete at his sport thing....better than his peers more so than Tiger:
Babe - Yes, short discussion
Jordan - No but he did carry his sport so that counts for something
Great One - See Babe and the only reason we have hockey in Tenn, Fla and in the freakin desert, now that's impressive
The Greatest - not really but changed America's conscienceness and that counts for something
Federer - okay, maybe I'll give you that one
Lance Armstrong - Yes. period.
Bo Jackson - yes, but sadly for a short time - people forget how above and beyond every other person on the planet he was.
#19
Posted 27 March 2007 - 09:16 AM
In addition to Tiger (and Miller), I think McCord is another guy who has done a lot to make golf what it is today (in terms of its relevance and popularity). He deflated a lot of the stuffiness without losing sight of the fact that it's a great game, and the stuff these pros do on a regular basis is really amazing.
#21
Posted 27 March 2007 - 01:47 PM
BenSeattle, on Mar 23 2007, 07:59 PM, said:
samm980, on Mar 23 2007, 06:00 AM, said:
Got that right, buddy. You're in for a big heapin' helping of cut 'n' pasting!
(I'll only share the good stuff, however. Just like I know you would for me. Speaking of hilarious, has anybody seen the BSG "workout" thread? Don't dare go there if laughing will cause you to break your stitches. Picture: Bloated Stinking Golfer in a bat-suit. I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP. Oh... and plenty of smackdowns to the newbies who dare question his workout. BSG: where the fun never sets.)
Happy golfing.
don't even get me started on that thread, lol!
i just had to register and go look at the thread. it's a huge crock of crap -- i honestly think the guy might be a pathological liar.
#23
Posted 28 March 2007 - 10:45 PM
leetch, on Mar 23 2007, 12:35 PM, said:
Never say never, once I get my hands on that Time Machine I sent away for from that mail order cataloge I'll start picking the boys up, and bringing them to Augusta for a showdown in the swamp.
#24
Posted 29 March 2007 - 02:37 AM
I agree about Tiger having brought the sport to a much higher level than it had been before him. Be it 18 majors or not, that accounts for dominance, and he's dominating for 10 years now. No arguing, IMO. Lance Armstrong - yes, Federer - not long enough yet. But in tennis, I think it's difficult to maintain a 10 years dominance. There were the likes of Boris Becker (Heidelberg!
OB





Sign In
Register
Help
Quote












