
Slicefixer and Dan Whittaker
#1
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:33 PM

#3
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:06 PM
#4
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:12 PM
#5
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:36 PM

#6
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:06 PM
#7
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:06 PM
#8
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:14 PM
ts511, on 27 February 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:
Gary woodland
Stuart appleby
Lee Westwood
Nick price
Trevor Immelmann
Zach Johnson
Lee Trevino
George Knudsen
Ken Venturi
Sam Snead
Ben hogan
Sergio Garcia
Jonathan Byrd
Jeff maggert
Anthony Kim
David duval
Martin kaymer
I would expect new tiger
Bill glasson
Jim furyk
Carl petterson
John Peterson
David toms
Sorry for the edit but I thought of a few more that are pretty commonly used
Point is there are a bunch of guys that can fit in with what we all teach(not equating myself with them but we do teach the same things so it feels weird to say they
Edited by Fort Worth Pro, 27 February 2013 - 05:01 PM.
#9
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:36 PM
Fort Worth Pro, on 27 February 2013 - 04:14 PM, said:
ts511, on 27 February 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:
Gary woodland
Stuart appleby
Lee Westwood
Nick price
Trevor Immelmann
Zach Johnson
Lee Trevino
George Knudsen
Ken Venturi
Sam Snead
Ben hogan
Sergio Garcia
Jonathan Byrd
Jeff maggert
Anthony Kim
David duval
Martin kaymer
I would expect new tiger
Bill glasson
Point is there are a bunch of guys that can fit in with what we all teach(not equating myself with them but we do teach the same things so it feels weird to say they
Good list. I guess Hogan should go top of the list really! Kim is someone else I like to look at, in fact I had him up on V1 about 10 mins ago!
#11
Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:20 PM
TheBigGun, on 27 February 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
Fort Worth Pro, on 27 February 2013 - 04:14 PM, said:
ts511, on 27 February 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:
Gary woodland
Stuart appleby
Lee Westwood
Nick price
Trevor Immelmann
Zach Johnson
Lee Trevino
George Knudsen
Ken Venturi
Sam Snead
Ben hogan
Sergio Garcia
Jonathan Byrd
Jeff maggert
Anthony Kim
David duval
Martin kaymer
I would expect new tiger
Bill glasson
Point is there are a bunch of guys that can fit in with what we all teach(not equating myself with them but we do teach the same things so it feels weird to say they
Good list. I guess Hogan should go top of the list really! Kim is someone else I like to look at, in fact I had him up on V1 about 10 mins ago!
Not Jason Dufner?
#12
Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:31 PM
rocker40, on 27 February 2013 - 06:20 PM, said:
TheBigGun, on 27 February 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
Fort Worth Pro, on 27 February 2013 - 04:14 PM, said:
ts511, on 27 February 2013 - 01:12 PM, said:
Gary woodland
Stuart appleby
Lee Westwood
Nick price
Trevor Immelmann
Zach Johnson
Lee Trevino
George Knudsen
Ken Venturi
Sam Snead
Ben hogan
Sergio Garcia
Jonathan Byrd
Jeff maggert
Anthony Kim
David duval
Martin kaymer
I would expect new tiger
Bill glasson
Point is there are a bunch of guys that can fit in with what we all teach(not equating myself with them but we do teach the same things so it feels weird to say they
Good list. I guess Hogan should go top of the list really! Kim is someone else I like to look at, in fact I had him up on V1 about 10 mins ago!
Not Jason Dufner?
Absolutely. He just slipped my mind. Don't know why. Great swing
#14
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:01 PM
iteachgolf, on 27 February 2013 - 06:55 PM, said:
There are many common elements.
I said Foley isn't slicefixer .. he MORE stack and tilt.
Not Foley == Stack and Tilt.
Edited by SunkTheBirdie, 27 February 2013 - 07:03 PM.
#16
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:08 PM
SunkTheBirdie, on 27 February 2013 - 07:01 PM, said:
#17
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:13 PM
I have the original article somewhere.
http://www.golfdiges...ean-foley#intro
#19
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:24 PM
SunkTheBirdie, on 27 February 2013 - 07:13 PM, said:
I have the original article somewhere.
http://www.golfdiges...ean-foley#intro
#21
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:43 PM
SunkTheBirdie, on 27 February 2013 - 07:17 PM, said:
#22
Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:05 PM
Can anyone describe these subtle differences?
#23
Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:52 PM
all4, on 27 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:
Can anyone describe these subtle differences?
I "think" that Dan may promote a little more lateral motion in the transition but would not want to answer for him, that's just my observation and understanding of what he has showed me during lessons. There is always a danger that he is showing me these things as I was to spinny at the time though, but again I'd say Dans model students have a bit more lateral than Geoffs.
#24
Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:56 PM
all4, on 27 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:
Can anyone describe these subtle differences?
they have a difference in style and substance(the following is all generalities) in style geoff looks at video longer and wants to make sure that you understand the concept and theory where dan is going to look at video tell you what he sees and go get to work on getting the feel he wants.
in substance,(remember, all of this is very general) the setup is SLIGHTLY different. geoff wants slightly more weight left and Dan teaches a slightly bigger reverse k with more tilt and more weight right. therefore Dan emphasizes the lateral component of the transition more than Geoff. very similar but there are some subtle differences. there would probably be a couple more if I really sat and thought about some details but that is the biggest for sure.
#26
Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:14 AM
#27
Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:18 AM
ts511, on 28 February 2013 - 08:14 AM, said:
I haven't had an internet lesson but there are some on Youtube that he has done for others and they are a great assessment of your swing, where you're at and what to work on. It's obviously relying on you getting good footage for him to work with though.
#28
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:15 AM
ryanandrew_golf, on 28 February 2013 - 09:08 AM, said:
all4, on 27 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:
Can anyone describe these subtle differences?
I've worked with both of them (Geoff in highschool and Dan now).
The difference is that Geoff teaches a method and Dan does not. It's more than a subtle difference in my opinion.
My experience is that Dan very much teaches a method, and from the look of his long term students it's very similar to Geoff's.
#29
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:30 AM
ryanandrew_golf, on 28 February 2013 - 09:08 AM, said:
all4, on 27 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:
Can anyone describe these subtle differences?
I've worked with both of them (Geoff in highschool and Dan now).
The difference is that Geoff teaches a method and Dan does not. It's more than a subtle difference in my opinion.
I have probably spent more time with both of them than anyone and I very respectfully disagree. They both have the theory of removing excess motion. Get rid of compensating moves as much as possible so the body can be it's most efficient in producing the best possible impact conditions. They very much go about that goal in a very similar manner.
#30
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:33 AM





This topic is locked







