
Dynamic gold xp s300 vs project pxi 5.5.
#1
Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:28 AM

#2
Posted 26 February 2013 - 05:21 AM
#3
Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:49 AM
TEE CB5 16.5* w/Blueboard 83s
TM RBZ Tour 21.5* w/Kuro Kage 80s
Bridgestone J40 CB 4-PW w/KBS Tour Stiff
Vokey SM4 50/55/60
Odyssey Black Tour Designs #5
#4
Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:01 AM
TahoeDust, on 26 February 2013 - 05:21 AM, said:
Not sure that is true. From what I've read from TT/Project X - Pxi is to be the same FCM as the regular Project X (just lighter), therefore Pxi 5.5 would = 6.0 FCM. Whereas S300 = 5.8 FCM. I can't confirm that from personal experience though.
#5
Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:08 AM

#6
Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:22 AM
#7
Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:58 AM
http://www.mizunousa...lf/shafts-grips
Not sure if it is loaded into the optimizer software yet though.
Edited by WVP, 26 February 2013 - 09:59 AM.
#8
Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:39 AM
#9
Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:48 AM
#10
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:14 PM

Edited by bleda2002, 26 February 2013 - 12:15 PM.
#11
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:21 PM
I would be interested in more feeback on this shaft because some say the flight is high, others say it's mid. Some say tip is too soft, some say it's not at all. For me it's been mid-high, maybe due to the higher launch H4 head combo. No ballooning so far.
Interestingly, Titleist testing shows it to be lower launch / spin than PXi.
Edited by cheeks, 26 February 2013 - 12:32 PM.
#12
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:42 PM
Archiebunker, on 26 February 2013 - 11:39 AM, said:
Edited by sneakyshort2, 26 February 2013 - 01:13 PM.
#13
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:45 AM
#14
Posted 04 March 2013 - 01:06 AM
Edited by Archiebunker, 04 March 2013 - 01:06 AM.
#15
Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:21 AM

Edited by Ajlepisto, 04 March 2013 - 10:21 AM.
#16
Posted 05 March 2013 - 12:05 AM
#17
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:32 AM
#18
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:33 AM
TMAG FIREMEDIC, on 26 February 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:
Edited by pullfade, 05 March 2013 - 07:34 AM.
#19
Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:27 PM
TahoeDust, on 26 February 2013 - 05:21 AM, said:
Maybe in terms of feel, but as far as I know, an S300 as a FCM of 5.8 and the PXi 5.5 has an FCM of 6.0.
#20
Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:29 PM

#21
Posted 18 May 2013 - 01:28 AM
westpenncyclist, on 24 March 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:
Archiebunker, on 26 February 2013 - 03:28 AM, said:
Nope, Titleist has them as well. My buddy is a fitter for Titleist and has factory installed DG XPs (not dynalite) in his AP2s.
#22
Posted 18 May 2013 - 07:05 AM
PXi is quite soft. Much softer than regular PX shafts.
#23
Posted 18 May 2013 - 09:56 AM
#24
Posted 18 May 2013 - 11:09 AM
westpenncyclist, on 24 March 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:
TahoeDust, on 26 February 2013 - 05:21 AM, said:
Maybe in terms of feel, but as far as I know, an S300 as a FCM of 5.8 and the PXi 5.5 has an FCM of 6.0.
It doesn't look that way looking at the DFSI numbers from Hireko. These have been pretty accurate for me when comparing known shafts. The PXi 5.5 is closer to the R300 of both dynamic gold and dynalite gold xp. The dynalite gold xp plays to about the same flex as the dynamic gold with higher launch. It's a pretty stable shaft.
#25
Posted 18 May 2013 - 06:37 PM












