[brentm76]

I wanted to find out if there is any difference in the FT-5 TOUR ISSUED headcovers and the FT-5 retail headcovers. I know that it's only a headcover but didn't know if one was distinguished with different markings.

Brent

[dannykos]

don't know about the FT-5, but i seriously hope the FT-i tour headcover is different from the pathetic weak magnetic effort of the FT-i standard

[papichulosteve]

don't think so and honestly i'm very dissappointed in the FT-5 headcovers. very weak effort considering how cool the FT-3 covers were IMO.

[clangolf]

The best headcovers Callaway ever included were for the original Steelhead covers. They were made by AME Headcovers and were identical to driver/fairway currently sold in many private clubs with the club logo. Very durable and nice looking - since then they seem cheaper and cheaper. I know AME makes covers that fit 460 size drivers. Ping isn't much better with their last 2-3 driver covers.

[littlepingman]

clangolf, on Mar 19 2007, 03:20 PM, said:

The best headcovers Callaway ever included were for the original Steelhead covers. They were made by AME Headcovers and were identical to driver/fairway currently sold in many private clubs with the club logo. Very durable and nice looking - since then they seem cheaper and cheaper. I know AME makes covers that fit 460 size drivers. Ping isn't much better with their last 2-3 driver covers.

I totally agree with the statement about the Ping headcovers. The Rapture headcover looks like something off Star Trek. When I first bought a Rapture I immediately changed headcovers.

[Uno]

whats wrong with the FT5 headcover? The FTi one is lousy but thats because i hate magnets/zippers/velcro on any of my headcovers.

check out the Big Bertha 460 headcover. THAT is my favorite one.