Jump to content

Welcome, Guest. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

* * - - - 3 votes

here a photo of trouser length


  • Please log in to reply
143 replies to this topic

#1 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 17 February 2013 - 09:26 AM

great northern open photos of the pros, equipment  shoes etc but did anyone notice how long some of their trousers are, --that would bother me with the long length !


#2 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 17 February 2013 - 09:34 AM

 ronnbee, on 17 February 2013 - 09:26 AM, said:

great northern open photos of the pros, equipment  shoes etc but did anyone notice how long some of their trousers are, --that would bother me with the long length !

Attached Thumbnails

  • 6dee743e255f3962ccad8acf80bbba98.jpg


#3 tommyrobson

tommyrobson

    Junior Golfer

  • Jr. Boomers
  • 451 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 184764
  • Joined: 06/06/2012

Posted 17 February 2013 - 10:05 AM

I really would not consider that long...
I've always subscribed to the belief that the trousers should kiss the top of the shoes.
SeYung Noh has his trousers long by half an inch if anything..

Thats just my $0.02 though, to each his own
View Sig

#4 Llortamaisey

Llortamaisey
  • Advanced Members
  • 3,030 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 11574
  • Joined: 02/09/2006

Posted 17 February 2013 - 10:13 AM

 tommyrobson, on 17 February 2013 - 10:05 AM, said:

I really would not consider that long...
I've always subscribed to the belief that the trousers should kiss the top of the shoes.
SeYung Noh has his trousers long by half an inch if anything..

Thats just my $0.02 though, to each his own

I agree, to each his own, but I also agree with your assessment of his trouser length. If anything they might be perfect length. He has his knees slightly bent and that half inch of extra length we both see might disappear if he were to stand up in his posture.

#5 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 17 February 2013 - 10:28 AM

what about these ?

Attached Thumbnails

  • aaeb6ebd033499ea3a81eff4b3f98243.jpg


#6 Cwing

Cwing
  • Advanced Members
  • 2,975 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 37012
  • Joined: 08/10/2007
  • Location:Go Big Blue!!! 8x Champs. Who Dey !!! Go Bengals,

Posted 17 February 2013 - 10:33 AM

Isn't that more of a cut issue? There is where the slit in the side comes in.
View Sig

#7 sanjaygolf

sanjaygolf
  • Advanced Members
  • 343 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 33562
  • Joined: 07/02/2007

Posted 17 February 2013 - 11:55 PM

Yea, Goose's pants are too long. Not as bad looking as that shirt though. Yikes!
View Sig

#8 mljones99

mljones99
  • Advanced Members
  • 1,203 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 978
  • Joined: 05/26/2005
  • Location:Charlotte, NC
  • Ebay ID:hrcjones

Posted 18 February 2013 - 01:57 PM

Goose's pants a little bit too long but the other guy is dead on perfect
View Sig

#9 allenri2

allenri2
  • Advanced Members
  • 86 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 63423
  • Joined: 08/16/2008

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:04 PM

I'm in my 20s and I like my pants exactly like SeYung Noh's.  I usually buy 32-34" waist pants with 32-34" inseams.  I really only need the inseam to be 29"-30" but the extra length makes hemming them easier.  I think hemming them with a v is trendier look and allows the pants to be a little longer without looking poorly fitted like Goose's.  

Posted Image

#10 Bear Down

Bear Down
  • Members
  • 6 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 228663
  • Joined: 02/12/2013
  • Location:So Cal
  • Ebay ID:cago83

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:25 PM

Those look perfect length to me.


#11 +Church

+Church
  • Advanced Members
  • 853 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 147683
  • Joined: 11/20/2011
  • Location:Central Pennsylvania
  • Ebay ID:church717

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:44 PM

Yeah, all of the pants posted are a length I would/do wear.

#12 mchamden1

mchamden1
  • Advanced Members
  • 118 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 161375
  • Joined: 02/08/2012
  • Ebay ID:mchamden1

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:52 PM

I wear mine a little on the longer side as well (I'm in my late 20's), but definitely not long enough so they drag on the ground and get dirty.
View Sig

#13 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM

this is downright sloppy

#14 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM

this is downright sloppy

Attached Thumbnails

  • 95ad456933ae357547b8ae6d68d9f589.jpg


#15 +Church

+Church
  • Advanced Members
  • 853 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 147683
  • Joined: 11/20/2011
  • Location:Central Pennsylvania
  • Ebay ID:church717

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:57 PM

 ronnbee, on 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM, said:

this is downright sloppy

Sloppy as in too long?  I think it's weird/inappropriate to have your socks show, so I wear my pants that low.


#16 CCUgolfer23

CCUgolfer23

    MrGolfGuru

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,224 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 185402
  • Joined: 06/10/2012
  • Location:Myrtle Beach

Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:02 PM

 ronnbee, on 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM, said:

this is downright sloppy

Wow. So do you wear capris or high waters?!

#17 JASVA

JASVA
  • Advanced Members
  • 89 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 24585
  • Joined: 01/26/2007

Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:15 PM

 +Church, on 18 February 2013 - 06:57 PM, said:

 ronnbee, on 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM, said:

this is downright sloppy

Sloppy as in too long?  I think it's weird/inappropriate to have your socks show, so I wear my pants that low.

Only thing I see is It looks like the bottom of the leg is just twisted some.  I think the length is probably right.

#18 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 18 February 2013 - 07:33 PM

now tell me this is the proper length !!!!

Attached Thumbnails

  • ef2d02e3cb32e19d6cd20db75bda8376.jpg


#19 GolfFiend1

GolfFiend1
  • Members
  • 32 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 92750
  • Joined: 08/24/2009

Posted 18 February 2013 - 09:21 PM

1/2 inch too long, maybe? Looks good to reasonable to me.  Maybe you could expect more from PGA professionals with tailors, but for guys like me who don't want to pay for tailoring, I think this look is fine.

#20 allenri2

allenri2
  • Advanced Members
  • 86 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 63423
  • Joined: 08/16/2008

Posted 18 February 2013 - 09:36 PM

 ronnbee, on 18 February 2013 - 06:18 PM, said:

this is downright sloppy

I still think it is cool, modern look.  When I started getting my pants tailored that way my friends all commented on how cool they looked.  I think a lot of younger people like it because they are used to wearing jeans which are typically longer and not tailored pants and suits.  For someone who rarely wears a suit, tailored pants can almost feel like floods.

Last I checked, companies like Nike, Under Armour and Adidas have started selling pants with the same slit cut.  However, it might be because the slit allows for off the rack pants to be a tad long and still look good.


#21 Mikey Town

Mikey Town
  • Advanced Members
  • 402 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 187388
  • Joined: 06/19/2012
  • Location:Corona, CA

Posted 18 February 2013 - 09:58 PM

Personally, I think that pants (slacks, anyway) should be at a length that touches the top of the sole of the shoe, at the heel.  Then you have them hemmed correctly so they break nicely over the shoes you are wearing them with.  For golf shoes, which are usually a bit taller and thicker than dress shoes, this usually calls for a notch or a "V" to be hemmed into the bottom of the seam.

Noh's pants look perfect.

Goosen's pants are the proper length... they just aren't hemmed to break over the shoe properly.

GMAC's pants are always perfect (no surprise there).

The one you say is "downright sloppy" are actually really good.  If you look closely, you will see that the seam is twisted from the side of the leg over towards the front, so the notch isn't in the correct place.  They are golfers... they are active and moving around a lot, so this can happen.  If he takes a couple steps, this will self correct and the notch will go back to the proper place for a nice fit.

The last photo is hard to tell.  Pants are tailored when you are standing up straight... not in an athletic position.  Since he is mid golf shot, his knees will be slightly bent.  Though the pants look too long, they may be the proper length once he stands up straight.

#22 CCUgolfer23

CCUgolfer23

    MrGolfGuru

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,224 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 185402
  • Joined: 06/10/2012
  • Location:Myrtle Beach

Posted 18 February 2013 - 10:10 PM

 Mikey Town, on 18 February 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:

Personally, I think that pants (slacks, anyway) should be at a length that touches the top of the sole of the shoe, at the heel.  Then you have them hemmed correctly so they break nicely over the shoes you are wearing them with.  For golf shoes, which are usually a bit taller and thicker than dress shoes, this usually calls for a notch or a "V" to be hemmed into the bottom of the seam.

Noh's pants look perfect.

Goosen's pants are the proper length... they just aren't hemmed to break over the shoe properly.

GMAC's pants are always perfect (no surprise there).

The one you say is "downright sloppy" are actually really good.  If you look closely, you will see that the seam is twisted from the side of the leg over towards the front, so the notch isn't in the correct place.  They are golfers... they are active and moving around a lot, so this can happen.  If he takes a couple steps, this will self correct and the notch will go back to the proper place for a nice fit.

The last photo is hard to tell.  Pants are tailored when you are standing up straight... not in an athletic position.  Since he is mid golf shot, his knees will be slightly bent.  Though the pants look too long, they may be the proper length once he stands up straight.

Perfect explanation!!

#23 allenri2

allenri2
  • Advanced Members
  • 86 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 63423
  • Joined: 08/16/2008

Posted 18 February 2013 - 11:12 PM

 Mikey Town, on 18 February 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:


The last photo is hard to tell.  Pants are tailored when you are standing up straight... not in an athletic position.  Since he is mid golf shot, his knees will be slightly bent.  Though the pants look too long, they may be the proper length once he stands up straight.

They do look at tad long, but I agree he is hunched over a little.  If you zoom in on the picture, you can see that they have the V hemmed and they come to roughly the same spot on his shoes as Graeme's do in the picture I posted.

#24 Redman

Redman
  • Advanced Members
  • 2,525 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 122710
  • Joined: 02/21/2011

Posted 18 February 2013 - 11:25 PM

Given your comments on length of pants shown in this thread I'd like to see an example of what you think is correct.  Sounds like you prefer high waters to me.

#25 Bingo1976

Bingo1976
  • Advanced Members
  • 366 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 194780
  • Joined: 07/26/2012
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 18 February 2013 - 11:37 PM

The back of the trouser should touch the top of the sole of the shoe, and the front should hang with one crease above the laces. There is no other correct answer.


#26 allenri2

allenri2
  • Advanced Members
  • 86 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 63423
  • Joined: 08/16/2008

Posted 19 February 2013 - 12:08 AM

 Bingo1976, on 18 February 2013 - 11:37 PM, said:

The back of the trouser should touch the top of the sole of the shoe, and the front should hang with one crease above the laces. There is no other correct answer.

I just think they shouldn't be bunched up on top of the shoes.  To me, the picture with black pants and black Nike shoes (kinda looks like something Kyle Stanley would wear) is perfect.  I just think too many of the better dressed golfers on tour wear this style of pants to call it "sloppy".

Posted Image

#27 Ruleschamp

Ruleschamp
  • Advanced Members
  • 485 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 68618
  • Joined: 11/03/2008

Posted 19 February 2013 - 02:12 AM

Horrific cases of elephant ankles in most of the examples shown.  Any reputable tailor would be completely and utterly appalled.  But, then again, it could just be the angle of the photo or the position in which each player was standing.

#28 ronnbee

ronnbee
  • Advanced Members
  • 285 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 138003
  • Joined: 08/29/2011

Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:34 AM

I think this length would bother me !

Attached Thumbnails

  • 95c2c6ae69eed7b64a71872dd762f1be.jpg


#29 QEight

QEight
  • Advanced Members
  • 646 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 129410
  • Joined: 05/24/2011
  • Location:Finland

Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:51 AM

 ronnbee, on 19 February 2013 - 05:34 AM, said:

I think this length would bother me !

How many strokes worth it would bother you?

#30 goobers80

goobers80

    gooberSammy - I have Autism

  • Advanced Members
  • 698 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 168463
  • Joined: 03/09/2012
  • Location:East Coast
  • Ebay ID:goobies2007

Posted 19 February 2013 - 05:53 AM

Why nots just post length you like ? Unless you likes wearing those women's skinny pants that are not quite downs to the top of shoes. I like longer pants , so men's or some women's , but any that fit alrights works for me.

View Sig




GolfWRX Sponsors