
nbg352, on 23 February 2013 - 09:48 AM, said:
storm319, on 22 February 2013 - 07:07 PM, said:
nbg352, on 22 February 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:
FYI, the KK shaft in the covert tour is NOT a made for. It is th real deal.
I didn't say that the KK was made for, but if you look at the specs (4+ degrees or torque) and notice the fact that they are produced in China (high end MR shafts are produced in Japan, cheaper lines and made for shafts have been produced in China) they are more comparable to past "made for" shafts than any of the high end Diamana shafts.
Basically they created the equivalent of a "made for" shaft without the "made for" label (I guarantee that Nike is paying no more per shaft for the KK than they did for last year's made for Nike Fubuki or Ahina). Also keep in mind that "made for" does not equal "bad shaft", although it does seem to have that stigma around here.
Yes the KK in the Nike Covert is the same as the aftermarket KK. I am not arguing that. What I am saying is that MR created 2 cheaper lines (KK and Diamana+) that are cost effective enough for OEMs to use as stock options without the negative stigma that "made for" shafts have or the added cost of custom graphics for each OEM (You will notice that MR has not produced any "made for" shafts for OEMs this year). A good example to see what you are actually getting is to look at the Diamana S+ and the made for Titleist Kaili. You will notice that the specs are almost identical (very well could be the same shaft relabeled), yet MR is trying to market these as a combination of the best aspects of the 1st and 2nd gen Diamanas.
Ultimately, a pig in lipstick is still a pig.











