murph9095, on 23 January 2013 - 07:03 PM, said:
The cameron underneath the white dot was supposed to be white be he was unable to do that. It still looks great tho
That makes sense.
It will look the best if all the paint fill is coordinated and works together.
Meaning the three dots, the CAMERON name, and the alignment line all done in white would look great......OR, you can go with everything black EXCEPT for the white alignment line.
I don't think it will look as good if you are not consistent one way or the other with the paintfill.
I would vote for the all shiny-black painfill in the dots and CAMERON, with the white alignment line, as I think it will be easier for LaMont to make that look perfect.
The white paintfill in the dots and CAMERON are tough to get perfect, and even the slightest variation or unevenness with the bright white paintfill will stick out like a sore thumb........Whereas putting the shiny, black paintfill (like the paint in the outside alignment lines) in the dots and CAMERON will not stand out as much against the dark black background, and will likely look 100% perfect.
You can probably tell (and I'm sure LaMont will agree) that I'm a bit anal and a perfectionist about how a putter looks!

And if you didn't know better (with all my over-the-top input on finishes), you would think this putter was for ME!!

Wow, I do love great-looking putters!
Head at address looks GREAT.
If you use your headcover religiously (like I have with the black polymer finish LaMont put on my Red X2), that finish will stay dark and great-looking for a long time.
Great putter choice Murph, and outstanding work again LaMont!
TD