
Will Rory switch putters?
#2
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:04 PM
#3
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:13 PM
MCCA, on 02 January 2013 - 10:04 PM, said:
Kyle Stanley is sticking with his Scotty and if Stanley gets to keep the Scotty and I'm sure Rory will get to keep his. Tiger kept his for how many years???
#4
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:18 PM
#5
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:20 PM

#7
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:23 PM
#8
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
#11
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:45 PM
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
I agree with what you are saying which is sad since the Nike Method had two Major wins before Tiger switched over.
#12
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:51 PM
KJD777, on 02 January 2013 - 09:56 PM, said:
He isn't a top rated putter. He's a good putter, but not like Old Tiger, Stricker, Faxon, Crenshaw, Roberts. I can't see switching putters being devastating to his WGRanking.
Edited by station2station, 02 January 2013 - 10:52 PM.
#13
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:51 PM
#16
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:55 PM
Yepyukon, on 02 January 2013 - 10:45 PM, said:
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
I agree with what you are saying which is sad since the Nike Method had two Major wins before Tiger switched over.
I'm sure Nike would rather tiger use a Cameron and hoist a few majors than use the method and hoist none... Not saying its the putter but you get my point. I'm sure they feel the same way about mcilroy... Winning majors with Nike irons, woods and apparel but a Scotty flat stick is better than all Nike and no majors.
#17
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:58 PM
Side note to what breaker999 said. I have noticed after Tiger switched from Scotty, it seems more and more are using the putters of the brands they are signed with now. I can tell some of the Scotty luster is wearing off.
#18
Posted 02 January 2013 - 11:10 PM
Edited by Kylekoz17, 02 January 2013 - 11:11 PM.
#19
Posted 03 January 2013 - 05:30 AM
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
Those Cameron putters sucked on tour last year. They only lead the tour win 17 wins (42.5% of the 40 events) compared to Nike's 4 wins (10% of the events)
http://www.golfwrx.c...wins-by-putter/
#21
Posted 03 January 2013 - 06:30 AM
#22
Posted 03 January 2013 - 06:44 AM
Woodridge, on 03 January 2013 - 05:47 AM, said:
pgagreg1, on 03 January 2013 - 05:30 AM, said:
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
Those Cameron putters sucked on tour last year. They only lead the tour win 17 wins (42.5% of the 40 events) compared to Nike's 4 wins (10% of the events)
http://www.golfwrx.c...wins-by-putter/
Where in his post did he say that Cameron putters sucked or even that any brand had surpassed them? The rest of your post actually had useful information...Too bad it was overshadowed by the snarkyness in the first line.
I interpreted the statement "broke the invincibility of Cameron" as meaning they have lost their position on number 1 on tour. That they have lost their position of the number 1 selling OTR milled putter. But that could be just me and my opinion. And isn't the internet great in that we all get to express our opinions
snarkyness, I like that you get my sarcasm so early in the morning
#23
Posted 03 January 2013 - 07:32 AM
pgagreg1, on 03 January 2013 - 06:44 AM, said:
Woodridge, on 03 January 2013 - 05:47 AM, said:
pgagreg1, on 03 January 2013 - 05:30 AM, said:
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
Those Cameron putters sucked on tour last year. They only lead the tour win 17 wins (42.5% of the 40 events) compared to Nike's 4 wins (10% of the events)
http://www.golfwrx.c...wins-by-putter/
Where in his post did he say that Cameron putters sucked or even that any brand had surpassed them? The rest of your post actually had useful information...Too bad it was overshadowed by the snarkyness in the first line.
I interpreted the statement "broke the invincibility of Cameron" as meaning they have lost their position on number 1 on tour. That they have lost their position of the number 1 selling OTR milled putter. But that could be just me and my opinion. And isn't the internet great in that we all get to express our opinions
snarkyness, I like that you get my sarcasm so early in the morning
Your definition of invincible is different than mine...or Webster's for that matter. And I like that your dogma never wavers and that you're always willing to take up a battle...even if there isn't one to begin with.
#24
Posted 03 January 2013 - 07:53 AM
#25
Posted 03 January 2013 - 08:48 AM

#26
Posted 03 January 2013 - 09:59 AM
Because Tiger used one putter and one putter only for so long and with such success, I think we tend to give a bit too much credit to the putter and less to the man using it. In Tiger's case and all pro's cases. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure his Cameron and all tour Camerons are made with the highest quality. But pros switch putters allllll the time. Heck, even Rory has used a few Camerons the last couple years. I'm guessing he doesn't have the attachment to his GSS we're assuming. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he switch to a Super Rat for a while AFTER his big US Open win?
Edited by Scotty1140, 03 January 2013 - 10:01 AM.
#27
Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:14 AM
#28
Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:48 AM
#29
Posted 03 January 2013 - 11:29 AM
Breaker999, on 02 January 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:
When Tiger switched to the Method, it kind of broke the invincibility of Cameron. Cameron's success is obviously tied to the rise and dominance of Tiger.
Tiger switching putters was a big deal, for Nike. It gave the Method credibility.
Putters are the most personal equipment. It takes time to adjust to a different putter whatever brand it is.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but since Tiger has been using the Method putter(s) his putting is FAR from his best.
Just sayin'...
Edited by jirizarry, 03 January 2013 - 11:30 AM.
#30
Posted 03 January 2013 - 11:54 AM












