
Post-Anchoring Ban: What would you want next, as rules to be imposed on golf?
#1
Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:32 PM

#2
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:39 PM
Tango-Golf, on 29 November 2012 - 12:32 PM, said:
1) No lines or lettering on balls that act as aiming aids
2) Shot clock for drives/irons/putting
3) Amateurs and pros to carry their own bags, with an xx weight minimum
4) Allow rangefinders
#6
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:54 PM
#7
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:55 PM
#8
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:01 PM
spoonhead, on 29 November 2012 - 01:54 PM, said:
I am not convinced reining in the ball is the answer, nor is longer courses. The average amateur needs the extra distance that contemporary balls provide. Callaway's Hex Black Tour is partly why I still play long courses, at my age.
Making the same tour courses more difficult through tournament layout is the least penal answer. The problem with that, we viewers will watch tour stats go in the wrong direction, including average scores.
#9
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:06 PM
Divots in your own fairway to be played as ground under repair
OB would not be stroke and distance penalty
#11
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:28 PM
ragweed10, on 29 November 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:
Divots in your own fairway to be played as ground under repair
OB would not be stroke and distance penalty
2 great suggestions I think. Player A hits a bomb down the middle and hits a serviceable but slightly chunky wedge onto the green...ok. Next guy comes along and porks the drive the same and ends up in his divot. Now he doesn't have the same opportunity as the first player. That's not right.
#12
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:30 PM
Tango-Golf, on 29 November 2012 - 12:32 PM, said:
3) Amateurs and pros to carry their own bags, with an xx weight minimum
This is hilarious. Could you imagine what bags would look like if pro's had to carry them? And on the minimum weight thing, I see a conversation going like this;
What are you carrying in that pocket?............. Lead, I can't meet the minimun weight.
#13
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:37 PM
Pepperturbo, on 29 November 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:
spoonhead, on 29 November 2012 - 01:54 PM, said:
I am not convinced reining in the ball is the answer, nor is longer courses. The average amateur needs the extra distance that contemporary balls provide. Callaway's Hex Black Tour is partly why I still play long courses, at my age.
Making the same tour courses more difficult through tournament layout is the least penal answer. The problem with that, we viewers will watch tour stats go in the wrong direction, including average scores.
#14
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:37 PM
Tango-Golf, on 29 November 2012 - 12:32 PM, said:
3) Amateurs and pros to carry their own bags, with an xx weight minimum
Thanks. After my L5 discectomy, you've just kicked me out of the game.
I can carry occasionally depending on how easy the course is, but requiring someone to carry all the time-- no matter the course-- would lose a lot of players. Especially seniors or guys with back problems/back surgeries like me.
#15
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:39 PM

#16
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:43 PM
#17
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:50 PM
spoonhead, on 29 November 2012 - 02:37 PM, said:
Pepperturbo, on 29 November 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:
spoonhead, on 29 November 2012 - 01:54 PM, said:
I am not convinced reining in the ball is the answer, nor is longer courses. The average amateur needs the extra distance that contemporary balls provide. Callaway's Hex Black Tour is partly why I still play long courses, at my age.
Making the same tour courses more difficult through tournament layout is the least penal answer. The problem with that, we viewers will watch tour stats go in the wrong direction, including average scores.
My last club (7100yd) was a US Open and PGA qualifying track. Long about 3 months prior to each event, the rough was left to grow, fairways, and big hitter landing zones were tightened up and greens were moved from 11/11.5 to 12/13. It works... At the last event, first day, only "1" guy broke par, and he was a club member. I won't go into scoring over the next few days by some touring pros, except to say, it wasn't pretty and most were not happy. Its the later that fears the PGA mgt and OEM sponsors most.
#18
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:51 PM
jwrogers, on 29 November 2012 - 02:39 PM, said:
Pepperturbo, on 29 November 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:
That ruins the course for the members. The tour is only there for one week per year.
No it doesn't... we have to step up our games or temporarily play elsewhere; which is what many of our club members did, and nobody complained.
Edited by Pepperturbo, 29 November 2012 - 02:52 PM.
#20
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:56 PM

#22
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:18 PM
Why dumb the game down because you didn't hit it straight?
Edited by KILLEDBYASHANKEDWEDGE, 29 November 2012 - 03:18 PM.
#23
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:20 PM
brian575, on 29 November 2012 - 02:57 PM, said:
I would love for the rules to provide relief from divots in your own fairway, but a serious problem is how to define a divot and how to regulate their identification during play. One (drastic) solution is to allow clean and replace in your own fairway under all conditions.
#24
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:37 PM
topekareal, on 29 November 2012 - 02:56 PM, said:
Pepperturbo, on 29 November 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:
jwrogers, on 29 November 2012 - 02:39 PM, said:
Pepperturbo, on 29 November 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:
That ruins the course for the members. The tour is only there for one week per year.
No it doesn't... we have to step up our games or temporarily play elsewhere; which is what many of our club members did, and nobody complained.
Right, but where should the players who aren't as good as you go?? Shouldn't they be able to enjoy the course the other 51 weeks per year??
For me, the two rules I'd change immediately are:
OB - No longer Stroke and Distance...just treat it like a hazard and
Divots in the FW - how on earth this isn't ground under repair is beyond me...it is the prime example of ground which is in the process of being repaired....
As good as me??? Did you overlook the later part of my post. The bigger premise is typically well before contracts and course prep for qualifying events, membership is queried (majority rules) as to whether or not they want such an event and are informed as to the inconveniences. Like I said those that have issues with course becoming more difficult opt to play elsewhere till the event is finished.
#26
Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:03 PM
[quote name='topekareal' timestamp='1354219012' post='5996163']
[quote name='Pepperturbo' timestamp='1354218718' post='5996129']
[quote name='jwrogers' timestamp='1354217950' post='5996063']
[quote name='Pepperturbo' timestamp='1354215709' post='5995837']
Making the same tour courses more difficult through tournament layout is the least penal answer. The problem with that, we viewers will watch tour stats go in the wrong direction, including average scores.
[/quote]
That ruins the course for the members. The tour is only there for one week per year.
[/quote]
No it doesn't... we have to step up our games or temporarily play elsewhere; which is what many of our club members did, and nobody complained.
[/quote]
Right, but where should the players who aren't as good as you go?? Shouldn't they be able to enjoy the course the other 51 weeks per year??
For me, the two rules I'd change immediately are:
OB - No longer Stroke and Distance...just treat it like a hazard and
Divots in the FW - how on earth this isn't ground under repair is beyond me...it is the prime example of ground which is in the process of being repaired....
[/quote]
As good as me??? Did you overlook the later part of my post. The bigger premise is typically well before contracts and course prep for qualifying events, membership is queried (majority rules) as to whether or not they want such an event and are informed as to the inconveniences. Like I said those that have issues with course becoming more difficult opt to play elsewhere till the event is finished.
[/quote]
Strike the comment...I didn't see the "temporarily" part of your post...you're correct that if the membership votes to host an event they generally have reciprocity to play somewhere else during this time..
#27
Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:04 PM
KILLEDBYASHANKEDWEDGE, on 29 November 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:
Why dumb the game down because you didn't hit it straight?
To speed it up...you still get a penalty...so rather than hitting 3 off the tee, you're hitting 3 from your drop...I don't see scores vastly improving because of this...but I could see the game moving along quicker...and it would be one less rule to know....
#28
Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:08 PM
topekareal, on 29 November 2012 - 05:04 PM, said:
KILLEDBYASHANKEDWEDGE, on 29 November 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:
Why dumb the game down because you didn't hit it straight?
To speed it up...you still get a penalty...so rather than hitting 3 off the tee, you're hitting 3 from your drop...I don't see scores vastly improving because of this...but I could see the game moving along quicker...and it would be one less rule to know....
#29
Posted 29 November 2012 - 05:26 PM
I read someone's post this morning quotingthe Golf Channel that 2 million people left golf last year. PGA, Tour, USGA and all of us better pay attention to that.
#30
Posted 29 November 2012 - 06:29 PM












