Jump to content

Welcome, Guest. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with existing members and access to certain forums. Join our community today and enter into a chance to win a free regular giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

Enforcement of the No Anchoring Rule


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#61 mwkbmw

mwkbmw
  • Advanced Members
  • 952 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 184910
  • Joined: 06/07/2012
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:56 AM

View PostBenSnead, on 05 December 2012 - 11:27 AM, said:

View Postmwkbmw, on 05 December 2012 - 09:39 AM, said:

For all of you guys panicking over the enforcement of "intent", or what you perceive will be widespread attempts at cheating, "The handle touched his shirt", etc., etc.  Do you remember the all of the "doom and gloom" predictions concerning Y2K?  Relax.  :good:


Really bad analogy. I spent the 90's in big corporate IT and if the attitude had been "relax" there would have been MAJOR problems.

What good would it have done for the general public to panic?


#62 BenSnead

BenSnead
  • Advanced Members
  • 87 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 213797
  • Joined: 11/30/2012

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:29 PM

View Postmwkbmw, on 05 December 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:

View PostBenSnead, on 05 December 2012 - 11:27 AM, said:

View Postmwkbmw, on 05 December 2012 - 09:39 AM, said:

For all of you guys panicking over the enforcement of "intent", or what you perceive will be widespread attempts at cheating, "The handle touched his shirt", etc., etc.  Do you remember the all of the "doom and gloom" predictions concerning Y2K?  Relax.  :good:


Really bad analogy. I spent the 90's in big corporate IT and if the attitude had been "relax" there would have been MAJOR problems.

What good would it have done for the general public to panic?

That's a rigged question. Panic is never good. Without raising some "very serious concern" in public the CEO's would not have been pressured to do what needed to be done(spend big money w/o anything new to show for it).

#63 farmer

farmer
  • Advanced Members
  • 2,287 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 70095
  • Joined: 12/02/2008

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:10 PM

By 2016, long putters will be museum oddities, belly putters will be gone or modified into a Kuchar type.  If Carl Petterson figures out how to putt with his long putter and conform, good for him, but they will be gone.  My biggest concern is that all the amateur rules gurus in every club will be making profound statements about the issue, which will make them even more annoying.

#64 pingman1

pingman1
  • Advanced Members
  • 1,959 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 6229
  • Joined: 09/25/2005
  • Location:Southeast

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:15 PM

View Postfarmer, on 05 December 2012 - 01:10 PM, said:

By 2016, long putters will be museum oddities, belly putters will be gone or modified into a Kuchar type.  If Carl Petterson figures out how to putt with his long putter and conform, good for him, but they will be gone.  My biggest concern is that all the amateur rules gurus in every club will be making profound statements about the issue, which will make them even more annoying.

Exactly....Even though the USGA/R&A stated the ruling was not about equipment, they have in fact banned the belly/long putter.  Already the golf stores cant sell them and they are dirt cheap on ebay.
View Sig

#65 Vindog

Vindog

    Came out to watch you play; Why are you running away?

  • Advanced Members
  • 8,686 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 131959
  • Joined: 06/29/2011
  • Location:Maine...the final frontier

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:18 PM

There will be some that will use them out of necessity (physical condition), or even spite.

Edited by Vindog, 05 December 2012 - 01:19 PM.

View Sig




GolfWRX Sponsors