
How much performance is lost on a ball with a cartpath scuffmark on it?
#1
Posted 19 November 2012 - 08:26 PM

#2
Posted 19 November 2012 - 08:33 PM
The more precise of a striker you are and I have to assume that your tolerance for slight misses is less, the more it will affect you. If you hit it all over the lot, it's not going to make a difference. A really big scuff on one side might give you funny ball flights.
#3
Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:06 AM
#4
#6
#7
Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:38 PM
Colby327, on 21 November 2012 - 12:12 AM, said:
Pulled right out of my arse!!!!!!!!
There is not an anser scuffs are different, balls are different. Most likely cost you about the same distance loss as playing a dirty ball.
Edited by TJCDAS, 21 November 2012 - 08:46 PM.
#8
Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:30 PM
#9
Posted 21 November 2012 - 02:50 PM
#10
Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:50 AM

#11
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:52 AM
cristphoto, on 22 November 2012 - 09:50 AM, said:
#14
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:35 AM
You also want to avoid scuffing against the grain. Those will exaggerate the effects.
#16
Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:40 AM
monkeynaut, on 25 November 2012 - 01:35 AM, said:
You also want to avoid scuffing against the grain. Those will exaggerate the effects.
Just my .02 but I don't think your entirely correct. I would guess that a scuff, much like a ball that has mud on it will tend to travel away from the where the mud is on the ball. i.e. mud on the right the ball will tend to go left and vice versa. I don't think this concept works when talking about mud on the top or the bottom as you suggest due to the rotation of the ball after being struck.
#17
Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:51 AM
#18
Posted 25 November 2012 - 04:55 PM
#20
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:57 AM

#21
Posted 04 December 2012 - 07:53 PM
#22
Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:31 PM
hangubber, on 04 December 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
Best answer ever, haha. Once had a drive carry only 250 yrds. (pre-cart path scuff) and it rolled out pin high on a 380 yrd par 4 after being scuffed. True story
#23
Posted 14 February 2013 - 09:01 AM
Kevmonton, on 19 November 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:
of balls in perfect condition excluding the dreaded scuff!
I couldn't find GD's original test but found a copy of it in this reference and a comment from TM
probablegolfinstruction
Golf Digest did an interesting study which it announced in its May issue < either 2005 or 2008 >. They had Golf Laboratories test several balls with their launch monitor and computer-controlled robot using a
10-degree Callaway driver and Titleist NXT golf balls. The balls varied in condition, though.
In the table below are the results for the different conditioned balls. All distances are in yards. Dispersion is the yardage off-line, left or right of the target.
Table doesn't copy well but compares effects of mud and grass on ball, range ball & after one round of golf - for scuffed vs new ball yardage the results were
NEW carry 225 - total 250 - dispersion 4.6
USED carry 219 - total 244 - dispersion 2.7
so a 6 yard difference, which matches what TM said in the following article
Golf Digest, may 2009
Ball cores are commonly designed to withstand at least 100 strikes at 125 miles per hour before cracking. That's seven rounds of Tiger-like drives.
Of course, the cover will often go first, especially if you have a steep angle of attack or fresh grooves or tend to rely on cartpaths for extra distance. But these minor scuffs won't affect performance. "As long as the cover is relatively smooth, maybe a little paint missing, you're fine to play it," says TaylorMade's Dean Snell. Still, our testing showed that a serious scuff could cost you six yards on a tee shot.
A urethane cover's durability comes from being soft with an elastic memory. Ionomer covers are more durable because they're firm.
TIP: To minimize scuffing, dry your irons and wedges with a towel. A wet clubface increases the shear force, causing the ball's cover to slide over the grooves and tear, instead of gripping and rolling like it would on a dry face
Edited by 8thehardway, 14 February 2013 - 09:02 AM.
#24
Posted 14 February 2013 - 09:09 AM
#26
Posted 14 February 2013 - 09:25 AM












