
How far is the retail driver off from the real loft ?
#1
Posted 13 November 2012 - 06:30 PM

#3
Posted 13 November 2012 - 07:03 PM
sblack5, on 13 November 2012 - 06:42 PM, said:
That's the theory, but for years, the practical application of that tolerance has been -0/+3. If not more. OEMs have been selling drivers this way for years, because the average golf public won't buy what they really need.
Which kind of sucks for those of us who will buy what we need.
I'm not sure how prevalent this practice still is, but common sense tells me it's still going on to some degree....
#5
Posted 14 November 2012 - 02:52 AM

#7
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:18 AM
sunnyus, on 14 November 2012 - 02:53 AM, said:
You are right....The very best foundries can make it within +/- 1* but that does NOT represent the hole business.
If you really want it right, go custom brand like Wishon, and have them to hand pick a head with the loft, face and lie angle thats right for you, otherwise you would never know what you get.
I also deal with Krank & Swing Science, but only hand picked heads, and its not unusual to see more than 1* off on Krank.
The "worse" was a 10.5 * head with only 8.75 true loft, but as long as i know, its not an issue in my shop, but off the rack or standard OEM order is a shot in the dark or pure lotto if you will.
Its NOT usual for a shop to have a loft gauge for woods, so the option to have it measured is not common after the head left the distributor.
#8
Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:46 AM
#9
Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:07 AM
#11
#12
Posted 14 November 2012 - 02:01 PM
#13
Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:34 PM
Razr fit 8.5 in square position. 9.2 loft 1 degree open.
Anser 9.5 in square position. 13.5 loft .5 degree closed.
Titleist 913d2 12 degree in square position. 12 loft .5 open.
First off I was more surprised that the 913 was right on spec than I was that the Anser was that far off. I know results will vary not only within manufacturers from head to head, but from vendor to vendor as well, so if you can get the head you are buying measured that would probably be the best option you have.
On a side note I have not measured a Ping head ever in the 15 years of building clubs that has been within 1 degree of what was printed on the head.
#14
Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:48 PM
Taylormade from what I've seen is all over the map
Adams tend to be a little higher than stated
Callaway tend to be slightly higher than stated but not much
Titleist 910 seem to be very close to spec with a little edge to higher from what I've seen
Hard to say who is the best in the industry, if you remember the old Ping Tec driver had the effective trajectory loft on the driver they tended to be 1.5* higher than the stated.
This is one reason people find a club works during a fitting but its not the same when they get their ordered one. The other is the shaft.....wait that's the whole club. Go figure.
Going to go measure my 913 will report back
#16
Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:12 AM
It might be worth it to get the TM SD head measured and try to get a similar measured loft in the Fit. Any other way will just be a crapshoot.
#18
Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:32 AM
My Super Tri 9.5 is hi but i like it. Just paid for a 910 D3 9.5, Regular Kai'Li
so will see how it goes after spine align etc.
Golf WRX has taught me so much since last xmas;s Callaway Diablo Octane tour,
a 10.5 that was 11.7 and the PX 5.0 was a bit soft and hi.
Cheers.
#19
Posted 15 November 2012 - 09:35 AM
My current 910D3 9.5 is 9.4 (measured)
#20
Posted 15 November 2012 - 09:42 AM

#22
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:15 AM
Facetious, on 14 November 2012 - 08:34 PM, said:
Razr fit 8.5 in square position. 9.2 loft 1 degree open.
Quite ironic. Callaway were the pioneers in "loft inflation."
#23
Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:28 AM
#24
#25
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:43 PM

#26
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:10 PM
TomWishon, on 16 November 2012 - 03:43 PM, said:
sunnyus, on 13 November 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:
I don't know its real loft, but should be 10.x or 11.x since it's the tour issue.
I'm planing to buy a Cally RAZR FIT TA.
Since it's an retail product, real loft will be 1-2 degree higher than marked. right ?
How far is the retail driver off from the real loft ?
If it is way far, I'd like to pick 9.5. If it's close, 10.5 will be fine.
Any opinion ?
Thanks
Sorry to tell you this, but this is one area in golf club sales that is really, I mean REALLY getting to be messed up. As Pepperturbo said, there are some companies who are INTENTIONALLY making the loft of some of their models to be higher than what is printed on the head. There is no way to know what companies do this, and on which of their head models they do this, unless you get someone who is competent at woodhead loft measurement using a proper clubhead specs measurement gauge to measure the loft.
In addition, every company's heads are subject to a normal +/-1 deg tolerance for loft in the production of their heads.
And even with a head specs measurement gauge, it is darn hard to get accurate loft measurements on driver heads these days and takes someone who has been properly trained on how to fixture the head in the specs gauge to do it right. Most of today's driver heads are designed so the sole has a little bit of radius from face to back. Old days all woodheads only had radius from toe to heel while face to back was dead flat. Those heads were easy to fixture in a gauge for accurate loft reading.
But now with all these drivers having some amount of face to back radius, it is darn difficult to know precisely how to set up the head in the specs gauge to get a correct loft reading. This is also one of several reasons why I stick with the same head production factories to manufacture my woodhead designs - so they are totally in synch with me on how I define the fixturing of a woodhead in the specs gauge to get the right loft reading. Were I to have to switch head making factories for my production, job one is always to teach them how I measure woodhead loft on woodheads with a face to back sole radius so we are all on the same page.
This is yet another good reason to be working with an experienced clubmaker to get your sticks rather than to buy in a golf store off the rack.
TOM
I liked the way you explained that Tom... +1
#28
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:26 PM
Unless you buy the exact club that you demo it sounds like you are kind of screwed. This is pushing me towards buying/selling random used drivers instead of spending time/money on a fitting. But i'm just a weekend joker!
#29
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:32 PM
wetdogsmell, on 16 November 2012 - 06:26 PM, said:
Unless you buy the exact club that you demo it sounds like you are kind of screwed. This is pushing me towards buying/selling random used drivers instead of spending time/money on a fitting. But i'm just a weekend joker!
I disagree. Its always a crap shoot, especially so online. Assuming it shouldn't be suggests a standard that doesn't exist... and probably shouldn't exist, least IMO.
There was a time when I thought equipment standards should exist. But then I realized I wanted that out of selfishness and time constraints. I didn't want to have to conduct due diligence before purchasing and didn't want to gamble. Turns out, capitalism / supply & demand is in my blood.
Edited by Pepperturbo, 16 November 2012 - 06:36 PM.











