Jump to content

Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

- - - - -

MP59 to MP64. What can I expect?


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 chillr710

chillr710

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 799 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 149843
  • Joined: 12/04/2011
GolfWRX Likes : 48

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:20 AM

Currently playing MP59s.
Loving the looks of the 64. Havent seen one in the flesh yet.

What are the main differences in these irons. is the 64 a smaller head? Thinner topline, less offset? less forgiveness?

Nike Vapor Pro Fly 9.5 - Diamana BB Limited S+ 6X
910F 15* - Diamana Kai'li 7X
Titleist 716 AP2 4-9 - Project X 6.5
SM6 46.08 F Grind - S300
SM6 50.08 F Grind - S300
SM6 54.08 M Grind - S300
Edel 60* DGR grind - KBS Hi Rev 2.0

Nike Method 006 Proto
ProV1x 16' / Nike Tour Platinum 16'

Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

1

#2 kgeorge78

kgeorge78

    Hall of Fame

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,995 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 71845
  • Joined: 01/03/2009
GolfWRX Likes : 266

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:49 AM

less forgivness especially in the long irons, slightly lower flight and slightly better feel.

2

#3 lettucebcereal

lettucebcereal

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 586 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 135933
  • Joined: 08/10/2011
  • Location:Northern VA
GolfWRX Likes : 34

Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:41 AM

Pretty much exactly what driverwedge3putt said. I used to have MP58s and when I hit the MP64s, the 64s definitely felt better and softer to me personally.
Titleist 915D3 9.5* Aldila Rogue Black 70
Ping K15 16* Diamana S+ Blue 72
Titleist 913Hd 20* Project X HE6 5.5
Titleist 913Hd 23* Project X Black 5.5
Titleist AP2 5-PW Project X 5.5
Titleist Vokey SM5 Raw Black 52*, 56* DG Wedge
Titleist Vokey SM4 60* Oil Can DG Wedge
Scotty Cameron Kombi S 33"

3

#4 Tarkata

Tarkata

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 762 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 181780
  • Joined: 05/18/2012
GolfWRX Likes : 80

Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:25 AM

I would think the differences are minor, and the similarities vast. That's been my experience with the MP line. Subtle differences in bounce and top line, but essentially, they all seem to feel the same. Ball flight and such is more about the shaft and the swing of the user, all things being equal..:)
yeah

4

#5 hmx3

hmx3

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,331 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 22522
  • Joined: 12/06/2006
  • Location:Austria/Europe
GolfWRX Likes : 31

Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:19 AM

The MP 64 feel more meaty, have a much better feel and most important a better sole grind.

The ball flight is´nt lower in the long irons.


5

#6 dunn

dunn

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,384 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 124833
  • Joined: 03/19/2011
  • Location:so cal
  • Handicap:5
GolfWRX Likes : 853

Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:07 PM

Less forgiving, lower ballflight, different feel and different headshape.....

I would either take 59 or 69

64 isn't really more forgiving than 69 and I like the 69 better in turf interaction, looks, feel,

The 64 is fugly and I disagree with turf interaction between 59 and 64......I prefer 59

Yes I know Luke Donald disagrees.... Lol, but I am not him nor do I play pristine fairways as he does

Edited by dunn, 02 November 2012 - 10:11 PM.


6

#7 Lobber

Lobber

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,740 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 54700
  • Joined: 04/29/2008
GolfWRX Likes : 217

Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:52 PM

View Postdunn, on 02 November 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:

Less forgiving, lower ballflight, different feel and different headshape.....

I would either take 59 or 69

64 isn't really more forgiving than 69 and I like the 69 better in turf interaction, looks, feel,

The 64 is fugly and I disagree with turf interaction between 59 and 64......I prefer 59

Yes I know Luke Donald disagrees.... Lol, but I am not him nor do I play pristine fairways as he does

64S are outstanding in every respect.

7

#8 Whids

Whids

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 122296
  • Joined: 02/15/2011
  • Location:Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Handicap:4
GolfWRX Likes : 12

Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:56 PM

64 is better feeling for sure. More solid at impact.
TM M1 460 8.5 w/Motore Speeder Evolution 661 TS
TM Rocketballs Tour 14.5
Srixon Z745 4-PW w/Nippon Modus 120 X (SS1x)
Vokey 50,  TVD M- Black Ion 54,58 w/DGTI Onyx S400
Scotty Cameron Newport 2

8

#9 driverwedge

driverwedge

    If you swing hard and miss, it hurts a bit.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,342 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 69034
  • Joined: 11/10/2008
  • Location:New Hampshire
GolfWRX Likes : 893

Posted 03 November 2012 - 08:05 PM

View PostWhids, on 03 November 2012 - 06:56 PM, said:

64 is better feeling for sure. More solid at impact.

Yep. Other differences are subtle.
TI TM M1 360cc Z Series 7.5* http://www.golfwrx.c...360cc-z-series/
Mizuno MP 650 9.5*/ Cinnamon 75-X
Mizuno MP 650 8.5*/ Cinnamon 65-X
Mizuno JPX 850 7.5*(true loft) Hot Melted/ DG X100 Steel tipped 1"/ Cinnamon 65-X/ PX 7A3
TI Adams 9064 8*/ AxivRed 69x
Adams Super LS Black 18*/ Redboard 83x/ Blueboard 83xION
Adams Super LSP Black 23*/ AxivRed 104x
MP H5 3i/ DG X7 tipped 3/8" + .25" (Mjölnir)
MP64 4-7/ MP4 8-PW (6-PW 1*weak)/ DG X7
MP T5 Black Ion 50,56,60/ Black Chrome S400
Yes Abbie Forged Pro Series
Srixon Z-Star XV (Pre-Spin-Skin)
Tour Issue Drizzle Stick (In case it rains).
WITB Link

9

#10 BCULAW

BCULAW

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,434 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 2307
  • Joined: 07/08/2005
  • Location:Midlothian, VA
  • Ebay ID:bculaw
GolfWRX Likes : 749

Posted 05 November 2012 - 08:44 PM

Can anyone else chime in?


Remove This Advertisement Viewing As Guest

    GolfWRX Forums

    Advertisement


Wanna get rid of this ugly yellow box? And remove other annoying "stuff" in between posts? Create a FREE GolfWRX account here.

10

#11 Volgolfer

Volgolfer

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 355 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 10249
  • Joined: 01/21/2006
  • Location:Charlotte
  • Handicap:5.5
GolfWRX Likes : 10

Posted 07 November 2012 - 02:32 PM

View PostBCULAW, on 05 November 2012 - 08:44 PM, said:

Can anyone else chime in?
I've been hitting the 59's for three months now - prior to which I was hitting 32's.  I tried the 63's (very similar to the 64's) but found them to have a smaller sweet spot.  The 59's feel more beefy to me in comparison as well.  Plus didn't like the look/size compared to the 59's.  I suspect there isn't much difference in the 63 vs 64, and that you're better off keeping the 59's.....

11

#12 Ereim

Ereim

    In Hoc Signo Vinces

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 452 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 59317
  • Joined: 07/01/2008
  • Handicap:4.6
GolfWRX Likes : 22

Posted 07 November 2012 - 02:39 PM

First thing you will notice is the feel. 64's go back to that traditional Mizuno buttery soft feel (think mp 62's). A well struck shot feels like you went straight through the ball, much better feeling than the 59's imho. I went from 59's to 63's to 64's. Feel was about the same with the 63's and 59's but the 64's feel much better.

Forgiveness vs the 59's shouldn't be all that different. Both play like blades and are best suited to better ball strikers.
In Hoc Signo Vinces
Titleist 913 10.5 GD Tour AD-DI 6x
RBZ tour stage 2 14.5 Fubuki Alpha 60x
Adams a12 19* 24*
Mizuno MP 64 5-PW Project X Pxi 6.0
Vokey wedges & SC Squareback putter

12

#13 Ripken08

Ripken08

    Major Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,742 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 101611
  • Joined: 01/08/2010
GolfWRX Likes : 474

Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:48 PM

Bump.  Considering both of these sets.
Callaway FT-iQ Tour 9.5*, Mistsubishi Fubuki 63 stiff
Callaway X2Hot 3W, Aldila Tour Blue stiff
Callaway X2Hot 5W, Aldila Tour Blue stiff
Callaway Apex CF16, 4-SW, Nippon 990
Ping Karsten 1959 CRAZ-E

13

#14 GMR2iron

GMR2iron

    Tour Winner

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 846 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 217083
  • Joined: 12/21/2012
  • Location:Florida
GolfWRX Likes : 84

Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:08 PM

Big difference is feel. 59's feel good, 64's feel fantastic. 64's SLIGHTLY lower ballflight. Forgiveness? These are two very blade-like irons; Hit the 64 off the toe, it loses 14 yards, hit the 59 off the toe, it loses 10 yards. Does it matter? Both excellent irons. I've posted before, I own the 69's, and have hit the 53,59, and 64 extensively.  Forgiveness differences in any of the short irons are minute at best, and in the longer irons it becomes a little more noticeable. Ball flight increases ever so slightly from 69 to 64 to 59 to 53, and even then, that can be altered via shaft change. I feel if you can hit one of these irons consistently, you can hit them all! It comes down to what you want to look at, and what you are comfortable with.  I play an h4 4 iron, and 69's 5-pw.  When I was being fitted, I was considering something like 4 iron in the 53, 5-7 in the 59, and 8-pw in the 69.  But after hitting 69 6 iron and 53 6 iron side by side, I thought "Why?" The difference was that small! Just make 'em all 69's for consistent set! But grabbed the h4 4 iron when it came out, really launches better than the blade 4 iron.
Titleist 915d3 9.75 GD AD-DJ
Titleist 915F 15.75
Titleist 915H 18 or MP-H4 2 iron
Mizuno MP-53 3 iron, MP-69 4 thru PW
Titleist Vokey SM5 52-08 and 58-04
Yes! Tracy

14

#15 ShortButCrooked

ShortButCrooked

    Advanced

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  •  
  • Member #: 82395
  • Joined: 05/08/2009
  • Location:San Jose, CA
GolfWRX Likes : 14

Posted 23 February 2013 - 01:46 AM

View PostGMR2iron, on 22 February 2013 - 08:08 PM, said:

Big difference is feel. 59's feel good, 64's feel fantastic. 64's SLIGHTLY lower ballflight. Forgiveness? These are two very blade-like irons; Hit the 64 off the toe, it loses 14 yards, hit the 59 off the toe, it loses 10 yards. Does it matter? Both excellent irons. I've posted before, I own the 69's, and have hit the 53,59, and 64 extensively.  Forgiveness differences in any of the short irons are minute at best, and in the longer irons it becomes a little more noticeable. Ball flight increases ever so slightly from 69 to 64 to 59 to 53, and even then, that can be altered via shaft change. I feel if you can hit one of these irons consistently, you can hit them all! It comes down to what you want to look at, and what you are comfortable with.  I play an h4 4 iron, and 69's 5-pw.  When I was being fitted, I was considering something like 4 iron in the 53, 5-7 in the 59, and 8-pw in the 69.  But after hitting 69 6 iron and 53 6 iron side by side, I thought "Why?" The difference was that small! Just make 'em all 69's for consistent set! But grabbed the h4 4 iron when it came out, really launches better than the blade 4 iron.

Thanks for this input. I guess it depends on how often you hit it on the toe (or heel). But to me this is a significant difference. Even as a 4 handicap, I hit enough shots not on the sweet spot. The difference might mean the fringe or in a bunker. We individually have to decide whether forgiveness or workability is more important.

Titleist 915D2 9.5*
Tour Edge Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3 Wood
Adams Super LS 19* Hybrid
Ping s55 4-PW
Ping Glide Wedges 50* SS, 54* SS, 60* TS
Rife IMO Putter

15



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

GolfWRX Sponsors